Australian Politics Forum - Moon Landing Anniversary Today

it_is_the_light

Gold Member

Offline

Christ Light

Posts: 41432
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male

Re: Moon Landing Anniversary Today
Reply #30 - Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 2:31pm

sherri wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 7:21am:

I remember it. I was at school and we were all taken into the canteen where there were several TVs around, to watch it. I am glad of that, because I do believe it was real, it happened.

Why? Because the most straight forward answers are usually the right ones, in my experience.

So I believe the moon landing took place, I believe Harold Holt drowned and was NOT whisked away in Japanese sub, Diana died because she was dumb enough to get into a car without doing up her seatbelt. There are no reptilian aliens, only us. And so on.
Makes life much simpler. Grin

Besides, the American space program had its share of disasters and we shared those too.
I wish they would hurry up with the next phase, a Mars mission.

yes its called being mass mind controlled

you were indoctrinated

yet many see through the lies now

namaste

- : ) =

Back to top

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: Moon Landing Anniversary Today Reply #31 - Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 4:16pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 12:14pm: Doctor Jolly wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 12:02pm: The same loops who deny the moon landing, deny climate change. Climate change on the moon? nah, but um ya bulldust nuclear fusion moon rock is up there aint it fella!!
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Moon Landing Anniversary Today
Reply #32 - Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 4:21pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 2:31pm:

sherri wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 7:21am:

I remember it. I was at school and we were all taken into the canteen where there were several TVs around, to watch it. I am glad of that, because I do believe it was real, it happened.

Why? Because the most straight forward answers are usually the right ones, in my experience.

So I believe the moon landing took place, I believe Harold Holt drowned and was NOT whisked away in Japanese sub, Diana died because she was dumb enough to get into a car without doing up her seatbelt. There are no reptilian aliens, only us. And so on.
Makes life much simpler. Grin

Besides, the American space program had its share of disasters and we shared those too.
I wish they would hurry up with the next phase, a Mars mission.

yes its called being mass mind controlled

you were indoctrinated

yet many see through the lies now

namaste

- : ) =

I like this one............................................................ Cool

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: Moon Landing Anniversary Today
Reply #33 - Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 4:58pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 10:27am:

We all remember those blurry images from the moon ... and still nobody has explained to me why 45 years later CCTV images of thieves robbing stores are just as blurry as that footage that came from 384,000 kilometers away.

It's down to pixel numbers and the amount of light needed.
Most stores don't pay the same for their security cameras as NASA paid for the cameras sent to the Moon. Check out a 1970s super8 film sometime.

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

Lord Herbert

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 34441
Gender: male

Re: Moon Landing Anniversary Today
Reply #34 - Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 5:52pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 4:58pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 10:27am:

We all remember those blurry images from the moon ... and still nobody has explained to me why 45 years later CCTV images of thieves robbing stores are just as blurry as that footage that came from 384,000 kilometers away.

It's down to pixel numbers and the amount of light needed.
Most stores don't pay the same for their security cameras as NASA paid for the cameras sent to the Moon. Check out a 1970s super8 film sometime.

I don't agree.

I have a tiny little Canon PowerShot A400 digital camera that I bought years ago in Porn Shop that can film footage many times clearer than what I see on TV when they show us footage of thieving etc.

Back to top

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: Moon Landing Anniversary Today
Reply #35 - Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 5:59pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 5:52pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 4:58pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 10:27am:

We all remember those blurry images from the moon ... and still nobody has explained to me why 45 years later CCTV images of thieves robbing stores are just as blurry as that footage that came from 384,000 kilometers away.

It's down to pixel numbers and the amount of light needed.
Most stores don't pay the same for their security cameras as NASA paid for the cameras sent to the Moon. Check out a 1970s super8 film sometime.

I don't agree.

I have a tiny little Canon PowerShot A400 digital camera that I bought years ago in Porn Shop that can film footage many times clearer than what I see on TV when they show us footage of thieving etc.

Hmmm and how many mega pixels is that??

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

Lord Herbert Gold Member Offline Posts: 34441 Gender:	Re: Moon Landing Anniversary Today Reply #36 - Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 6:10pm gizmo_2655 wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 5:59pm: Hmmm and how many mega pixels is that?? Just a lousy 3.3 mega pixels.
Back to top	IP Logged

gizmo_2655 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 16010 South West NSW Gender:	Re: Moon Landing Anniversary Today Reply #37 - Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 6:20pm Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 6:10pm: gizmo_2655 wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 5:59pm: Hmmm and how many mega pixels is that?? Just a lousy 3.3 mega pixels. That's still a lot better than most of the security cameras though.
Back to top	"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition. It's similar to a strawman fallacy" Bobbythebat IP Logged

Life_goes_on

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 4772
400kms south of Yobsville, Qld
Gender: male

Re: Moon Landing Anniversary Today
Reply #38 - Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 6:31pm

The moon landing vids were at about the same resolution as your average CCTV camera.

Why they look very similar is because the moon landing vid was filmed at a much lower frame rate than normal broadcast video and the raw footage was processed on earth to remove the jerkiness. The processing degraded quality. The individual frames from the raw footage were of higher quality that the processed ones.

Your average CCTV camera footage is compressed - unlike that on a digital camera taking video. It's compressed so 24hrs or more can fit on either a standard tape or digital drive. With compression you also loose quality.

Typical CCTV is just 330k pixels.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 6:41pm by Life_goes_on »

"You're just one lucky motherf-cker" - Someone, 5th February 2013

Num num num num.

IP Logged

Lord Herbert

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 34441
Gender: male

Re: Moon Landing Anniversary Today
Reply #39 - Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 9:08pm

Life_goes_on wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 6:31pm:

The moon landing vids were at about the same resolution as your average CCTV camera.

Why they look very similar is because the moon landing vid was filmed at a much lower frame rate than normal broadcast video and the raw footage was processed on earth to remove the jerkiness. The processing degraded quality. The individual frames from the raw footage were of higher quality that the processed ones.

Your average CCTV camera footage is compressed - unlike that on a digital camera taking video. It's compressed so 24hrs or more can fit on either a standard tape or digital drive. With compression you also loose quality.

Typical CCTV is just 330k pixels.

Thanks Gizmo and life.

It still doesn't answer the question why CCTV footage in the year 2014 is of such poor quality. The images should be crystal clear.

Back to top

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: Moon Landing Anniversary Today
Reply #40 - Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 9:19pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 9:08pm:

Life_goes_on wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 6:31pm:

The moon landing vids were at about the same resolution as your average CCTV camera.

Why they look very similar is because the moon landing vid was filmed at a much lower frame rate than normal broadcast video and the raw footage was processed on earth to remove the jerkiness. The processing degraded quality. The individual frames from the raw footage were of higher quality that the processed ones.

Your average CCTV camera footage is compressed - unlike that on a digital camera taking video. It's compressed so 24hrs or more can fit on either a standard tape or digital drive. With compression you also loose quality.

Typical CCTV is just 330k pixels.

Thanks Gizmo and life.

It still doesn't answer the question why CCTV footage in the year 2014 is of such poor quality. The images should be crystal clear.

More 'could be' than should be. It really depends on how much you're willing to pay for the camera systems. (Also, a lot of times, what the media shows is blurred deliberately so the suspect doesn't realise that they are recognisable).

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 95453 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Moon Landing Anniversary Today Reply #41 - Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 9:46pm Published on Jan 1, 2014 The Truth Behind the Moon Landings Documentary debunking the conspiracy theories surrounding the first moon landing.
Back to top	IP Logged

sherri

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 746
Melbourne, Australia
Gender: female

Re: Moon Landing Anniversary Today
Reply #42 - Jul 23^rd, 2014 at 5:16pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 2:31pm:

sherri wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 7:21am:

I remember it. I was at school and we were all taken into the canteen where there were several TVs around, to watch it. I am glad of that, because I do believe it was real, it happened.

Why? Because the most straight forward answers are usually the right ones, in my experience.

So I believe the moon landing took place, I believe Harold Holt drowned and was NOT whisked away in Japanese sub, Diana died because she was dumb enough to get into a car without doing up her seatbelt. There are no reptilian aliens, only us. And so on.
Makes life much simpler. Grin

Besides, the American space program had its share of disasters and we shared those too.
I wish they would hurry up with the next phase, a Mars mission.

yes its called being mass mind controlled

you were indoctrinated

yet many see through the lies now

namaste

- : ) =

So..you really reckon the Japanese swooped in and grabbed Harold Holt?
What on earth did they want him for? Sushi?

Back to top

IP Logged

Doctor Jolly Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 3808	Re: Moon Landing Anniversary Today Reply #43 - Jul 23^rd, 2014 at 5:30pm gizmo_2655 wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 12:17pm: Doctor Jolly wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2014 at 12:02pm: The same loops who deny the moon landing, deny climate change. No we don't. yes you do. Its the same mindset.
Back to top	IP Logged

Lord Herbert

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 34441
Gender: male

Re: Moon Landing Anniversary Today
Reply #44 - Jul 23^rd, 2014 at 5:57pm

sherri wrote on Jul 23^rd, 2014 at 5:16pm:

So..you really reckon the Japanese swooped in and grabbed Harold Holt?
What on earth did they want him for? Sushi?

Harold Holt was a notorious homosexual ... (which seems to be an unfortunate condition suffered by more Australian males than any other nationality on Planet Earth) ... and it was rumoured at the time that a Chinese sub had picked him up and taken him to the Land of the Middle Kingdom where his 'closet' would be a little more secure from the gaze of the Australian media.

Back to top

IP Logged