greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 30
th, 2014 at 3:22pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Jun 30
th, 2014 at 3:19pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 30
th, 2014 at 2:56pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Jun 30
th, 2014 at 2:40pm:
____ wrote on Jun 28
th, 2014 at 7:16pm:
Grand Duke Imam Mahdi wrote on Jun 28
th, 2014 at 7:12pm:
No wonder the greens get no votes these days.
Come on, you had your chance in the other thread and you ran.
Don't post the same endless drivel in this thread and ignore the opening question.
Why do humans have to procreate ... simple enough question surely. For the same reason everything else in Nature does.
And what is that reason?
Continuation of the species is the simplest way to put it.
For what reason though?
Sometimes there doesn't have to be a reason.
It's sort of like chocolate, having a child can give people a deep sense of pleasure.
I had a friend who told us how she viewed it. For years she had listened to other women tell their birthing tales, their tales of toddlers, tales of parenthood, and then she eventually had a child.
"I have my own story now," she said.
Deep satisfaction.
If you don't want children, don't have any, it isn't obligatory.
But for a lot of people, having at least one child is something they yearn for.
And why shouldn't people exist? We have as much right to be here as any butterfly or elephant or any other form of life.
I think the world would be better off if we could lower population numbers, lower the birth rate, but trying to stop people from reproducing at all would just not work.
It is what it is, you just have to accept some things.
I'm not questioning why individuals have kids.
I'm asking why the "continuation of the species" is important.