cods wrote on Apr 13^th, 2017 at 3:07pm:


I really have no words for this... It's just too much...

I THINK I KNOW WHY THEY ARE CHEM-TRAILING WITH BARIUM - EXPLAINED IN THE FIRST 7 MINUTES + MY PROOF

Published on Apr 26, 2017
I genuinely hope that this is a solid, well-rounded, rational explanation of what might be going on. Something possible that our community can build upon and progress with. A start toward understanding what is beyond our control. My focus is on Barium, but that is only the beginning.

-The cloud layer is highly reflective and refractive, creating the perfect barrier to keep out prying eyes, and to prevent certain communications.
-We don’t know what is going on with the sun, and this cloud layer is perfect to cloak this.
-To create ion traps by generating a cloud layer laced with Barium (possibly to deplete any unwanted gasses), send a Radio Frequency Wave through it, and harvest anti-protons for CERN’s quantum computer.

How we can know that Barium is being used:
-As chem-trails disperse, Barium filters down and people have been collecting the substance in their own backyards.
-It is not naturally occurring and must be manufactured, due to its highly reactive state.
-Barium is known to create the apple-green color in fireworks, and may well be the causation of green-colored fireballs.

-It attacks the nervous system, and is toxic. It does not bio-accumulate and can be relieved as it disperses and goes away, taking with it any strange symptoms. There are many other health problems (lungs, etc.).

-It is known to bleach, and could be the possible cause of faded signs and other structures.
-It facilitates the release of electrons from particles, which could be a cause of higher levels of radiation in our atmosphere.

All of these are a by-product of something else- the same way a pharmaceutical will have side-effects as it “fixes” the main problem. My guess is, we only know of the “side-effects” until now.

Chemtrails Analysis: New Discoveries 1/2

aluminum, barium, strontium and titanium in the chemtrails. But have you ever heard about piezoelectric crystals and of the so called "Smart Dust" - of Morgellons? Are these technologies of human origin? What are they and how they relate to each other? Learn more and lets start with the very basics, that is not commonly known at all.

NASA document - Future Strategic Issues:

SadKangaroo wrote on May 15^th, 2017 at 9:59am:


facts and truths you refuse to contemplate or digest ..

yes look the other way ,

meanwhile this has happened

SadKangaroo wrote on May 15^th, 2017 at 3:44pm:

If you believe otherwise prove it or bugger off.

But I suspect you'll do neither and just post more memes or spam.

Will you just ignore this post and retort with an image you think is clever too?

I know you're just trolling and I shouldn't be feeding you, but you really are pathetic. I hope you have something else of meaning in your life other than the lulz you so desperately seem to crave here.

I eagerly await your total ignoring of this post as you do all others you cannot deal with.

Namaste.

it_is_the_light wrote on May 16^th, 2017 at 8:24am:


If you think otherwise post proof.

Questioning the official line does not immediately make your chosen crackpot conspiracy theory correct, you need proof.

proof

/pruːf/
noun
1. evidence or argument establishing a fact or the truth of a statement.

Quote:


I'm not running away from anything.  If you can find some sort of evidence to link your claims of chemtrail side effect were the cause of those fatalities and breathing issues during the "pollen storm" rather than just questioning it therefore you must be right, then we'll talk.

If you cannot provide a shred of evidence then there is nothing to run from.  Just empty claims by a proven conspiracy nut who on so many other occasion won't even have the decency to clarify their claims, let alone justify them with facts or evidence.

But go ahead, repost the same thing again, with the same video you're holding up as proof which is so laughably inaccurate and lite on anything even accidentally resembling proof it doesn't even warrant a fully researched reply.  Which even if I took the time, you'd only ignore it anyway and burry it with reposts or memes anyway.

Proof or bugger off.  It's as simple as that.  You have no high horse here.  The burden of proof is on you and thus far you have spectacularly failed.

it_is_the_light wrote on May 16^th, 2017 at 9:26am:

Ok, if you honestly believe that then we have vastly different ideas of what constitutes evidence.

Firstly this "truth seeker" is effectively scientifically illiterate.  She has done her best to google things but the conclusions she's reached are wildly misinformed and even if they weren't, she's only talking about the "proof" she's found that show that airliners are in fact laying chemtrails everywhere.  It has nothing to do with Pollen Storms.

What she has done is find "evidence" such as sun damage and oxidation of road signs etc to show that Barium is in the air thanks to chemtrails and it's highly "reactable" (or more correctly, 'reactive') nature is the cause.  It doesn't matter that there is zero evidence to reach that conclusion. 

There were no tests done to check for the presence of Barium in those signs or the environment around them and nothing but her desire for a link to be there and your willingness to believe it to link the two.

Zero Proof.

Then as you have said the video claims, again by a scientifically and in this case medically illiterate person that Barium creates the symptoms we saw in Melbourne when it ignores the delay in exposure, the levels required and it's persistence in the body for up to 4 weeks later and is easily discovered with conventional testing.  Yet still no evidence.

Quote:

No, there isn't.  I'm not just dismissing it, I've just explained that it is not proof.

Quote:

You have found "evidence" from someone who open admitted to first believing that chemtrails are a thing and then worked backwards from there to find proof.  To someone with a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

Now she says that because of the barium in the air, that explains the green glow around fireballs as they enter the atmosphere because the Government must have recently 'chemtrailed'.  Case closed?  Proof of Barium chemtrails? 

Again, no proof offered whatsoever.

You'd have to first ignore the accepted explanation for the green glow being that they're meteors whose shockwaves lead to electrically charged oxygen similar to that seen in auroras, aka glowing green.  It's not burning barium. Then of course there is again the glaring lack of any testing or evidence of barium levels.

Then she goes on to propose that all of this is happening in order to create the conditions to harvest antiprotons from the atmosphere in combination with radio wave boxes, cosmic rays and the chemtrailed barium, but there is a layered conspiracy theory even there, that these antiprotons can be used to fight cancer so that will be told to the public but the true reason for their harvesting is quantum computers.

This reflective layer of barium in the atmosphere, seeded by chemtrails of course, is used to intercept phone calls and wifi signals and even block satellite imagery but most importantly they're creating these ion traps to collect and harvest these antiprotons for quantum computing.

/facepalm

All these claims, yes, claims not proof, may seem perfectly normal if you WANT to believe that. But the most obvious and glaring omission from all of this is the complete and total lack of any testing, experiments or investigations other than the failed logic of a scientifically illiterate conspiracy nut armed with Google.

Nothing has been proven what so ever in this video, not a single thing.

At best, AT BEST, if you ignore all of the actually researched and peer reviewed conclusions that explains much of what she questions, if you ignore all of that and you desperately want chemtrails to be real and part of some global conspiracy then some, SOME of what she is proposing would warrant further investigation.

BUT upon doing said investigation you would discover all the answers to those questions and they have nothing to do with chemtrails.

I've watched the whole video, not just the first 7 minutes and I'm left with many things.

First, if you believe this proves anything you really have no understand what so ever about what constitutes proof, none.  Ignoring all the explanations you don't like that don't fit with your predetermined notions and then using warped logic to draw wildly inaccurate conclusions from the already untrustworthy data that does fit in with your predetermined notions,

Secondly, I honestly believe that she thinks she's onto something, she has discovered through Google a hidden truth. In reality she is a weak minded scientifically illiterate fool spreading misinformation in order to reinforce a conspiracy theory she is far too invested in to let go now.

Thirdly, this has nothing to do with Pollen Storms at all. You've presented this as proof of those who suffered during the pollen storms were in fact victims of chemtrailing. Not Proof.

Even if you misinterpreted the health impacts of exposure to barium, you would have to dismiss all the evidence and explanations as to what actually occurred and has done so in other places around the world, you have not provided any proof at all of the use of barium.