Just another day in the Middle East where Islam has ruled supreme for 14 hundred years.

Proud legacy.

Proud cultural inheritance.

Nothing to see here, folks!

These are just your ordinary, average Muslims doing what comes naturally when they're not raping 19 women in Tahrir Square within the space of a fortnight.

Can anyone explain why the West is importing these monstrous people as migrants and asylum-seekers?

I don't care.

I didn't see rise up Australia or one nation do well in the elections.

Did they even get a seat in the senate with there anti muslim rant?

Lord Herbert wrote on Sep 14^th, 2013 at 5:48pm:



whats the point of you putting a poll with a option of "I don't care"?

Then you expect members to give you a answer why they chose "I don't care".

Again tell me, how many seats to these anti muslim parties get?

Where are all the aussies rising up about no muslim immigration?

Lord Herbert wrote on Sep 14^th, 2013 at 5:15pm:


Perhaps you are talking about England where until fairly recently they publicly executed poor hungry people for stealing food?

Yes English executions are far more civilised right?






Lord Herbert wrote on Sep 14^th, 2013 at 5:15pm:


Its a bit rich for you to blame that on Muslims when it widely acknowledged that the perpetrators were working for secularist military.


Anyway, it is safer for women in Tahrir Square than it is for women in the US military:

Three rapes happen every hour in US military

freediver wrote on Sep 14^th, 2013 at 9:39pm:


Which country do you live in? Here in Australia we have an ANZAC Day, war memorials, and pilgrimages to Kokda and Gallipoli.

We even have Monash University and the Monash Freeway in Melbourne.


freediver wrote on Sep 14^th, 2013 at 9:39pm:


Just about everybody alive today would have pedophile ancestors if we follow the current Australian government definition.


The Catholic Church teaches that Joseph married Mary when she was 14 years-old! PEDOPHILE!


US president (and vice-president during the civil war) Andrew Johnson married a 16 year-old! PEDOPHILE!


Pedophile kings of UK:

Richard II: married Isabella of Valois when she was 6 years old.


William III married  Mary II when she was 15

David II: married Joan of England when she was 7

True Colours wrote on Sep 14^th, 2013 at 9:37pm:


"until fairly recently ... " ?

Don't embarrass yourself with such nonsense. You are as aware as the rest of us that Muslims of the Middle East have been forgotten by Time, and the mentality is still firmly rooted in the barbarities of the Middle Ages.

True Colours wrote on Sep 14^th, 2013 at 9:37pm:


Again, don't embarrass yourself with such childish excuses for these people. They are repeatedly shouting "Allahu Akbar!" at every moment of these barbarous occasions.

Every time we see you trying to defend these people you are making yourself complicit in their barbarous behaviour.

True Colours wrote on Sep 14^th, 2013 at 9:37pm:


You really are determined to white-wash and propagandise these Muslims as a duty you believe you owe them here in Australia.

How about a word of disapproval from you about how these Muslims conducted themselves in Tahrir Square with their penchant for wholesale rape?

How about letting your fragile Muslim sensitivities at least acknowledge that some of the Muslims in Tahrir Square exploited the situation for getting their rocks off? 

I want to work with you on this, TC, but it's impossible if you're not mature enough to make a few concessions for the sake of honesty and candour.

The poll is running ... 5 to 2 against further Muslim immigration.

True Colours ~ I think at least 50% of the reason for those voting against, is not so much because of the Muslim violence we see overseas, but because every last one of you immigrant Muslims is ALWAYS being heard to defend, and excuse, and rationalise, and in any way you can ~ white-wash your fellow-Muslims from any blame.

On Talkback radio, or Current Affairs discussions, or TV interviews and panel shows, you 'Australian' Muslims are always heard to adopt the role of Defence Counsel and advocate for what we witness happening abroad.

You are a 5th column in this country who have your own loyalties and your own agendas ~ and none of it is 'Australian'.

Lord Herbert wrote on Sep 14^th, 2013 at 5:15pm:





Lord Herbert wrote on Sep 15^th, 2013 at 8:21am:


Get to know your history.

It was not so long ago that is was all open slather for hanging, beheadings and quarterings for man, woman and child in the UK.

The UK was still publicly executing pickpockets in 1808.

Public executions were still carried out for other crimes in the UK until 1868.

Beheadings and quarterings were not stopped in the UK until 1870.

The UK was still executing children in 1889, and only removed the execution of juveniles as option in 1933.

The UK executed 657 people in the 20th century - including 11 women, and 26 German prisoners of war.


A Jewish mp introduced a bill to abolish the death penalty in non-Irish parts of the UK in 1965. It was passed by the parliament - and it is thought that abolition movement was helped a number of botched murder investigations/prosecutions/trials which were perceived to have possibly seen innocent men executed.


The death penalty was only abolished altogether in the UK in 1973 - I am sure there are a few of us on the forum who can still remember 1973 .


Since then, parliament has voted 20 times on bills to reintroduce executions. Each bill has failed to pass, but there has been a lot of support for it. Half of those bills were supported by 200 or more mps. In 1983 263 mps voted to reintroduce executions - but that was not quite a majority.

A new bill to allow executions was introduced to the UK parliament just a few months ago.