This has been going round in circles on the boycott halal thread for a while.
Quote:The throat is cut with a human hand.
Wouldn't it be better to use a knife? I'm sure they had those in Muhammed's day.
Quote:How about you concentrate on backing up your claim that halal slaughterhouses necessarily require discrimination in the workforce.
You are the one saying it Gandalf. You just don't understand it.
Quote:Not when its a job that otherwise wouldn't be required.
It is still discrimination Gandalf. It would not be discrimination if anyone was allowed to cut the animal's throat in the approved manner. If the job can only be performed by a Muslim, that is discrimination.
Is the throat-slitter forbidden from doing any other useful tasks that would still be required in a non-halal slaughterhouse?
Quote:Its only discrimination if you take an existing role that is non-discriminatory and replace that worker with a muslim only.
So if a company came up with a policy that all newly-created positions must be filled by non-Muslims so they could put anti-terrorism stickers on their food, you would not complain about it being discrimination? Quote:You need to demonstrate how a halal-slaughterhouse would say to an ordinary non-muslim worker - "we don't need you because your role is taken by a muslim only".
No I don't. This is obviously religious discrimination in the workplace.
freediver wrote on Sep 10
th, 2013 at 1:08pm:
This is obviously religious discrimination in the workplace.
No non-muslim abbattoir worker is being told that their role, or the role they wish to fill can only be filled by a muslim.
It is not discrimination.