allah humma Innee As alooka 'ilman naa fee-ow wa Rizq-ow waa See-ow wa Shee-faa amm min Kooll-lee daa-een.

O allah, I ask you to grant me beneficial knowledge, abundant sustenance and cure from all diseases.

Well at a rough guess, I'd say know allah simply ain't listening.

Most of them are illiterate, living conditions are sub standard, they suffer from massive physical defects, caused by islamic inbreeding.

Maybe the old moon god allah's idea  of knowledge, sustenance and cure, is the antithesis of what the Christian and Jewish God's ideals are.

polite_gandalf wrote on May 18^th, 2013 at 10:58pm:



Too fvckn bad for the people who were ACTUALLY murdered in the name of Islam because they  -  * gulp * - translated the book.

How monstrously intolerant and primitive can they be? And all in the name of and justified by - Islam. Take a bow. 21st century and people are murdered in the name of Islam for what they think.


Not to mention the reflex self-censorship it induced in the cowards who want to 'accommodate' Islam.

As the Byzantine emperor said to the Muslim scholar -show me one positive thing that Islam has introduced into the world.


There isn't any.

What is "radicalisation"?

This is what it is: it is taking Islam, the texts of Islam, fully to heart, and deciding to act upon them. That's what "radicalization" means. There are many Muslims who are, for now, living in the West, and unwilling to risk the good lives they have -- all the benefits they receive, not just the grants and the subsidies and the free education and the free health care so superior to anything offered in Muslim countries, but also the living in stable societies that, at least until the Muslim invasion, were temperate in their political climate, and well and securely run, by comparison with the hell-holes of Islam. So while they are perfectly willing, for now, not to act on the tenets of Islam to engage, directly, in violent Jihad, they are willing to use other instruments of Jihad, including that of propaganda -- or lying about the faith -- to continue to attempt to confuse and deceive unwary Infidels, for as long as possible.

Cameron and Clegg and Teresa May and others should be asked, publicly, to define "radicalization" among Muslims. Is there a different Qur'an that the "radicals" read? Different collections of the most "authentic" (based on the rankings given by the most respected muhaddithin, such as Bukhari and Muslim)? A different biography of Muhammad, the Perfect Man? No, the"radicals' read exactly the same Qur'an, the same Hadith, the same Sira. And the testimony of ever defector from Islam who has ever been able and willing, in the physical security that the West offers, is always the same: Islam is violent, Islam is dangerous, Islam is deceptive, Islam is based on an uncompromising division of the world between Believer and Unbeliever, Muslim and Infidel, and is obsessed with territory, with the further division of Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb, that is between the lands of where Muslims rule and what, for now, are still the lands of the Infidels. Between the two camps, according to the texts and tenets of Islam, there exists a state of permanent war, though not necessarily of open warfare on the battlefield. Islam teaches that the supreme duty of Muslims is to engage in Jihad, that is the "struggle" to remove all obstacles to the spread, and then the dominance, of Islam, so that ultimately, as is only right and just, Islam everywhere dominates, and Muslims rule, everywhere.
http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_display.cfm/blog_id/49254

Thoughts, Gandy and Brain?

Soren wrote on May 27^th, 2013 at 9:40pm:


Soooooo... apparently a radical is a muslims who believes and promotes a message of peace and understanding, mutual coexistence and tolerance of different cultures and beliefs.

If so, then call me a proud radical. 

Soren wrote on May 28^th, 2013 at 10:48pm:


Hmmm I think I can guess the general gist of this video:

Islam sux.

Am right?

Yes its all true Soren! We are all so smacking evil, we just want to eat your children and take your women as sex slaves. Its true that I became a muslim because I'm just an all round arsehole, who is genuinely interested smacking things up for other people. Thats just the kind of guy I am.

Soren wrote on May 28^th, 2013 at 10:48pm:


And guys who say that killing in the name of islam is completely unacceptable, they don't count - even though they're in the majority and speak for mainstream islam. No lets just ignore them. Carry on, keep quoting the extremists.

polite_gandalf wrote on May 28^th, 2013 at 11:01pm:



The murderous bastards back up their claim with reference to the Koran.

You don't.

You just deploy rhetoric and puffery.

Show us how their Koranic claim of justification are wrong. Back up your claims by showing how the Koran they quote is wrong and you are right.

Soren wrote on May 28^th, 2013 at 11:18pm:


Thats your assumption - baseless as always.

Truth is you have no idea how much thinking I have done on islam, and what motivated me to become a muslim. See the problem here Soren is that you have created this rigid, unshakable reality that says muslims terrorising and using the quran to justify it = honest muslims, while muslims preaching peace and tolerance - and claiming a quranic basis = dishonest muslims. Thats the crux of it. The problem I, and I'm sure most other sensible and rational people, have with this is the fact that you take the side of the minority - and using the fact that the majority professes the opposite view of the quran - merely as proof that muslims are inherently dishonest. However to a rational person, it would seem far more sensible to simply say that its more likely that the majority are being honest, and what they say about the quran is more likely to be truer than what the minority extremists are saying.