Chard wrote on Jan 30
th, 2013 at 12:08pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jan 29
th, 2013 at 7:16pm:
Refer to the Nuremberg principle
Did you actually read any of that? Reason I'm asking is because not a damn bit of that applies to the Vietnam War. It wasn't a war of aggression on our part. In fact, it wasn't technically a war at all for us. The South Vietnamese asked for our aid, so how the hell you think that qualifies as a "war of aggression" makes me serious question just how fragile your grasp of reality really is.
Do you read it?
Quote:(a) Crimes against peace: (i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances; (ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
(b) War crimes: Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory; murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the Seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.
(c) Crimes against humanity: Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime."
You can hardly say that the Nuremberg principles don't stand when the Yanks
& our Allies hanged Nazis for those principles.
Who are you - a CIA operative?