Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 13
th, 2012 at 5:45pm:
Quote:Actually you are the one that has been insulting. I haven't called you a dickhead or anything like that.
Didnt call you one either
Yes you did!
Quote:The scenarios are not silly and have everything to do with any future redefinition of marriage.
You are assuming there would be a redefinition of marriage in the future
[/quote]
That's the point we've spent 10 pages trying fruitlessly to explain to you - that by the reasoning you use to justify homosexual marriage, you can't deny anyone the 'right" to marry who/whatever they please!
Quote:But, you refuse to give an answer as to what would happen if two brothers want to marry in the future.
Pretty sure i havent refused to answer it. Maybe i havent answered THIS TIME because im getting sick of the same excuses all the time. Basically it wont come up. Its not on anyone agenda. Its a silly example that wont ever happen.
[/quote]
Yes, much like 30 years ago homosexual marriage was a silly example that wasn't on anyones agenda.
Quote:If you don't have a problem with two brother marrying each other then admit that your fine with it.
I havent given it any thought and dont have an opinion on it except that its silly and wont ever come up.
SOB [/quote]
It will when a precedent is set.