Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 5^th, 2012 at 11:17am:


You don't get it. These fvckers were granted 'genuine' refugee status, numpty.

Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 5^th, 2012 at 11:21am:


We know all Aussie tourists are drug smugglers because of the Bali 5 and Corby 
We know all Aussies are terrorists because of David Hicks 

Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 5^th, 2012 at 11:21am:




Well, we have evidence that being granted refugee status is no guarantee of being 'genuine refugees' - in other words, the process of granting refugee status to undocumented foreigners is EVIDENTLY flawed.


How flawed? Let's find out! Apparently DIAC has known for years that it has been a flawed processes. What happened? Nothing. People like you kept parroting that if the are given refugee status then they are genuine refugees.

This is but one example of how an unthinking approach will eventually come back and bite you. What percentage of them are crooks doesn't matter. What matters is that the process is not trusted. And you can't have an orderly immigration or refugee process if the way it is done is not trusted.

But I guess this remains incomprehensible to you, Che and the usual unthinking parrots.  SO carry on, altogether now 'oh. it's only one guy, but the rest are all genuine refugees', while the rest of us, the sensible demographic, laugh at you.

Maqqa wrote on Jun 5^th, 2012 at 11:47am:


Showing up here without documents and claiming asylum is not illegal.
Just as losing your documents when you are overseas does make you illegal.
Falsifying documents with the intention of obtaining a visa does make you illegal

Soren wrote on Jun 5^th, 2012 at 11:47am:



Lift your game old man.  I never said it's only one guy.

In fact, I said: "There's probably more than one, sure."

I then asked you how many you think it may be (but you failed to answer).

If you can't answer the question, just say so (we all knew that anyway).

Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 5^th, 2012 at 12:16pm:


Common sense tells us that not all people claiming asylum are genuine but we do know the vast majority of them are.
There will always be shonks in all walks of life but we dont abandon all mankind due to the actions of a few.

As always the right wing media waxes hysterically and those who believe everything they read in the rightwing media bark on command.

The Sydney Daily Telegraph, in a beat up on the Four Corner's programme, uses the term "alleged" or "allegedly" NINE times in its article.

Translated, the term means: "Look, we have no idea whether this is true or not, but we're going to publish it anyway because it suits our prejudices."

Ironically the DT article appears alongside a report that the Australian Press Council has caned the newspaper for "an especially serious breach of its principles" in previous coverage of asylum seekers. The APC found the DT's coverage was "gravely inaccurate, unfair and offensive".