Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print
Dog Whistle Journalism (Read 5981 times)
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Dog Whistle Journalism
Reply #75 - May 17th, 2012 at 12:40pm
 
Do you notice a pattern emerging on this forum spot?

Perhaps that people call you names, and don't answer your "questions"? 

It's becasue you are an idiot, and your "questions" reflect that.  How do you expect anyone to provide "words they should have used instead" when there is no context? 

Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26458
Australia
Re: Dog Whistle Journalism
Reply #76 - May 17th, 2012 at 12:58pm
 
... wrote on May 17th, 2012 at 12:40pm:
Do you notice a pattern emerging on this forum spot?

Perhaps that people call you names, and don't answer your "questions"? 

It's becasue you are an idiot, and your "questions" reflect that.  How do you expect anyone to provide "words they should have used instead" when there is no context? 



Its only you. And you dont answer because either you are wrong or you dont understand what dog whistling is or both.

Provide a context. You claim its dog whistling. If its dog whistling then there are alternate words that should be used that would not be dog whistling. Have a good read of the op and see if you can understand the concept.

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Dog Whistle Journalism
Reply #77 - May 17th, 2012 at 1:02pm
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 17th, 2012 at 12:58pm:
... wrote on May 17th, 2012 at 12:40pm:
Do you notice a pattern emerging on this forum spot?

Perhaps that people call you names, and don't answer your "questions"? 

It's becasue you are an idiot, and your "questions" reflect that.  How do you expect anyone to provide "words they should have used instead" when there is no context? 



Its only you. And you dont answer because either you are wrong or you dont understand what dog whistling is or both.

Provide a context. You claim its dog whistling. If its dog whistling then there are alternate words that should be used that would not be dog whistling. Have a good read of the op and see if you can understand the concept.

SOB



Lets get 1 thing straight borg.  There is nothing - NOTHING - that you understand but I don't. 

I'm not the first to comment on your complete lack of comprehension, and I won't be the last.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26458
Australia
Re: Dog Whistle Journalism
Reply #78 - May 17th, 2012 at 1:05pm
 
... wrote on May 17th, 2012 at 1:02pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 17th, 2012 at 12:58pm:
... wrote on May 17th, 2012 at 12:40pm:
Do you notice a pattern emerging on this forum spot?

Perhaps that people call you names, and don't answer your "questions"? 

It's becasue you are an idiot, and your "questions" reflect that.  How do you expect anyone to provide "words they should have used instead" when there is no context? 



Its only you. And you dont answer because either you are wrong or you dont understand what dog whistling is or both.

Provide a context. You claim its dog whistling. If its dog whistling then there are alternate words that should be used that would not be dog whistling. Have a good read of the op and see if you can understand the concept.

SOB



Lets get 1 thing straight borg.  There is nothing - NOTHING - that you understand but I don't. 

I'm not the first to comment on your complete lack of comprehension, and I won't be the last. 


Then why cant you answer the question?

You dont even understand th4e concept of dog whistling.

SOB
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 17th, 2012 at 2:12pm by Sir Spot of Borg »  

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: Dog Whistle Journalism
Reply #79 - May 17th, 2012 at 1:08pm
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 17th, 2012 at 1:05pm:
... wrote on May 17th, 2012 at 1:02pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 17th, 2012 at 12:58pm:
... wrote on May 17th, 2012 at 12:40pm:
Do you notice a pattern emerging on this forum spot?

Perhaps that people call you names, and don't answer your "questions"? 

It's becasue you are an idiot, and your "questions" reflect that.  How do you expect anyone to provide "words they should have used instead" when there is no context? 



Its only you. And you dont answer because either you are wrong or you dont understand what dog whistling is or both.

Provide a context. You claim its dog whistling. If its dog whistling then there are alternate words that should be used that would not be dog whistling. Have a good read of the op and see if you can understand the concept.

SOB



Lets get 1 thing straight borg.  There is nothing - NOTHING - that you understand but I don't. 

I'm not the first to comment on your complete lack of comprehension, and I won't be the last. 


Then why cant you answer the question?

SOB



You do realise by the way, that your signature in itself is anti-semitic in nature.
Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17387
Gender: male
Re: Dog Whistle Journalism
Reply #80 - May 21st, 2012 at 4:11pm
 
Peter Freedman wrote on May 16th, 2012 at 5:33pm:
The rest is just a sweeping generalisation and an assumption that the poor are to blame for their poverty.


So whose fault is it when poor people live in poverty, who are you going to blame?

You are on the dole and you bet on horse racing so whose fault is that for your poverty?



Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Kat
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Socialism IS the answer.

Posts: 17709
Everywhere and no-where
Gender: female
Re: Dog Whistle Journalism
Reply #81 - May 21st, 2012 at 4:24pm
 
... wrote on May 17th, 2012 at 12:20pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 17th, 2012 at 12:15pm:
... wrote on May 17th, 2012 at 12:13pm:
I see.  So the rules that bind every other human being on this earth don't apply to you.

Good O.  Glad we cleared that up then.  Roll Eyes


What rules? Hahahhaha why cant you answer the question?

SOB


Do you think your opinions were just formed without any outside influence?  Just claiming that you're immune because you claim not to support any party doesn't change the fact that you have opinions on issues, which are then linked in various ways to these parties, thus influencing your opinion of them.   Rule number 1 - there is NO such thing as a neutral text.  EVERYTHING you see/hear/read has been imparted with some sort of bias by the author. 



Which is why you should get your info from as many and varied sources as possible.

You can then formulate what's known as an 'informed opinion'.

Something that, sadly, is often lacking here.

And, strangely, much more-so from the right.

To some of them, the whole concept is foreign.
Back to top
 

...
 
IP Logged
 
Peter Freedman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5275
Wellington
Gender: male
Re: Dog Whistle Journalism
Reply #82 - May 22nd, 2012 at 9:57am
 
Baronvonrort wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 4:11pm:
Peter Freedman wrote on May 16th, 2012 at 5:33pm:
The rest is just a sweeping generalisation and an assumption that the poor are to blame for their poverty.


So whose fault is it when poor people live in poverty, who are you going to blame?

You are on the dole and you bet on horse racing so whose fault is that for your poverty?


Like most reactionaries you can't resist sticking your nose into other people's business. And getting it wrong.

You win the prize for being the most objectionable character on this forum, It was a tight finish but you made it by a nose. Well done!
Back to top
 

God grant me the patience to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can and, above all, the wisdom to tell the difference.
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17387
Gender: male
Re: Dog Whistle Journalism
Reply #83 - May 25th, 2012 at 1:48pm
 
Peter Freedman wrote on May 22nd, 2012 at 9:57am:
Baronvonrort wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 4:11pm:
Peter Freedman wrote on May 16th, 2012 at 5:33pm:
The rest is just a sweeping generalisation and an assumption that the poor are to blame for their poverty.


So whose fault is it when poor people live in poverty, who are you going to blame?

You are on the dole and you bet on horse racing so whose fault is that for your poverty?


Like most reactionaries you can't resist sticking your nose into other people's business. And getting it wrong.

You win the prize for being the most objectionable character on this forum, It was a tight finish but you made it by a nose. Well done!


Are you going to answer the questions or resort to dog whistling?



Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Peter Freedman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5275
Wellington
Gender: male
Re: Dog Whistle Journalism
Reply #84 - May 26th, 2012 at 10:24am
 
I don't answer stupid questions. Mind your own business.

Why do reactionaries constantly think they have the right to pry into other people's lives?
Back to top
 

God grant me the patience to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can and, above all, the wisdom to tell the difference.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print