|
john_g
|
skippy. wrote on May 17 th, 2012 at 1:29pm: john_g wrote on May 17 th, 2012 at 1:11pm: skippy. wrote on May 17 th, 2012 at 11:44am: john_g wrote on May 16 th, 2012 at 7:50pm: adelcrow wrote on May 16 th, 2012 at 4:02pm: I'm concerned that all these personalities may come back to haunt Matty when he gets a seat after the next election.
I doubt that it's Matty. It's probably just someone with somewhat similar views. Too many differences, in my opinion. You don't seem to understand john, some people thrive on multi sox/personalities on these forums. It is their intention to make it look like they are different people with similar views in order to further their argument. one or two people are renown over multiple forums for doing this, the poster that uses the matty ID is just one of them. Many of them get banned then turn back up as a knew ID while others, like the matty personality happily carry on with multi IDs to make their argument look like it has support. It isn't hard to pick the characteristics of their posts, that mixed with the facts they often make mistakes like answering a post with one ID that was addressed to a different ID. corporate whitey was banned a couple of weeks ago and turned up as PREVAILING immediately, he was easy to spot, even one of the mods pointed it out. Same thing happened with longweekend a couple of weeks ago he turned up as borntorule after his longweekend ID was suspended. You're probably right that some do it, skippy, but I don't think that it's fair to accuse someone of something, when there is no proof, and they may just be someone with a similar opinion. When I first posted on here, I was accused of being someone else. I can't remember the exact name, but it was frustrating to be accused of something/someone that I wasn't. In direction relation to Matty, I haven't seen him on for ages. Do you know whether or not he was banned? I would have no idea. I do think that he gets far more flack than he actually deserves. In regards to longy, I didn't see that poster, borntorule, but is s/he still on here?Finally, as for Prevailing/corporate whitey, there are definite similarities there, I never thought about that, but don't think that it is fair to accuse them if they profess "innocence", for lack of a better word. Matty is his own worst enemy. when matty first stated here he claimed to be a member of the GREENS he kept that up for months, UNTIL he finally admitted IT WAS A LIE. I haven't seem borntorule post since longweekends suspension was over, I'm not the only one that picked him as longweekend, many did. As for prevailing, I don't think he professed innocence, it was hard to, he answered me as if he were corporate whitey then realised his mistake.  I know, I remember that 30 page or so thread. Still, I don't see why he deserves to be made fun of as others are doing on this thread. He apologised for lying about that. I do think that he is naive, but definitely not dumb, and his views are really out there, but he seems like a nice enough kid, and do remember that he is only 21. I just did a quick search, and born to rule last posted on here on May 4, so almost two weeks ago. A lot of his posts do seem uncannily like longy's, so I see what you mean. Has longy said anything on the matter. As for Prevailing/Corporate Whitey , that is funny. I do wonder why some people do feel the need to make multiple accounts. I mean, why bother?
|
Forum
Pages: 
