Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Simple question for rights/conservatives on here. (Read 721 times)
TheGreenLight
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 633
Gender: male
Simple question for rights/conservatives on here.
May 5th, 2012 at 5:05pm
 
This question has never really been answered by the Coalition or their supporters, so I would really appreciate a straightforward, no beating around the bush answer. If the Coalition knew about Slipper's behaviour, then why was he pre-selected 9 times? I have heard that they knew that he was dodgy since about 2003, so then, why was he pre-selected in 2004, 2007 and 2010? Why was he not disendorsed until 2011?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 19629
Re: Simple question for rights/conservatives on here.
Reply #1 - May 5th, 2012 at 5:09pm
 

I don't know.
It's pretty poor, isn't it ?
Back to top
 

Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
corporate_whitey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8896
Archivist
Re: Simple question for rights/conservatives on here.
Reply #2 - May 5th, 2012 at 5:12pm
 
TheGreenLight wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:05pm:
This question has never really been answered by the Coalition or their supporters, so I would really appreciate a straightforward, no beating around the bush answer. If the Coalition knew about Slipper's behaviour, then why was he pre-selected 9 times? I have heard that they knew that he was dodgy since about 2003, so then, why was he pre-selected in 2004, 2007 and 2010? Why was he not disendorsed until 2011?

These are all problems relating to globalists, (Neo cons and neo libs) not conservatives nor the traditional left. Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley
Back to top
 

World Wide Working Class Struggle
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 36444
Gender: male
Re: Simple question for rights/conservatives on here.
Reply #3 - May 5th, 2012 at 5:34pm
 
TheGreenLight wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:05pm:
This question has never really been answered by the Coalition or their supporters, so I would really appreciate a straightforward, no beating around the bush answer. If the Coalition knew about Slipper's behaviour, then why was he pre-selected 9 times? I have heard that they knew that he was dodgy since about 2003, so then, why was he pre-selected in 2004, 2007 and 2010? Why was he not disendorsed until 2011?


I think when you can explain how Thomson was preselected multiple times while being known as a whoring, embezzling scumbag who took secret commissions then you might get someone to bother answering you.

in the meantime, you just look like a hypocrite.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8439
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Simple question for rights/conservatives on here.
Reply #4 - May 5th, 2012 at 5:57pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:34pm:
TheGreenLight wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:05pm:
This question has never really been answered by the Coalition or their supporters, so I would really appreciate a straightforward, no beating around the bush answer. If the Coalition knew about Slipper's behaviour, then why was he pre-selected 9 times? I have heard that they knew that he was dodgy since about 2003, so then, why was he pre-selected in 2004, 2007 and 2010? Why was he not disendorsed until 2011?


I think when you can explain how Thomson was preselected multiple times while being known as a whoring, embezzling scumbag who took secret commissions then you might get someone to bother answering you.

in the meantime, you just look like a hypocrite.


So in your pathetic opinion you can justify any action by finding allegations against your opponent and dismissing any concerns as hypocrisy.....Take a look at yourself in the mirror mate!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
TheGreenLight
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 633
Gender: male
Re: Simple question for rights/conservatives on here.
Reply #5 - May 5th, 2012 at 6:32pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:34pm:
TheGreenLight wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:05pm:
This question has never really been answered by the Coalition or their supporters, so I would really appreciate a straightforward, no beating around the bush answer. If the Coalition knew about Slipper's behaviour, then why was he pre-selected 9 times? I have heard that they knew that he was dodgy since about 2003, so then, why was he pre-selected in 2004, 2007 and 2010? Why was he not disendorsed until 2011?


I think when you can explain how Thomson was preselected multiple times while being known as a whoring, embezzling scumbag who took secret commissions then you might get someone to bother answering you.

in the meantime, you just look like a hypocrite.


He was only actually preselected twice, and I have said the same of him as I have of Slipper. The only one being hypocritical is you. No answer? Can't justify why the Coalition preselected him?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 36444
Gender: male
Re: Simple question for rights/conservatives on here.
Reply #6 - May 5th, 2012 at 6:39pm
 
philperth2010 wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:57pm:
longweekend58 wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:34pm:
TheGreenLight wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:05pm:
This question has never really been answered by the Coalition or their supporters, so I would really appreciate a straightforward, no beating around the bush answer. If the Coalition knew about Slipper's behaviour, then why was he pre-selected 9 times? I have heard that they knew that he was dodgy since about 2003, so then, why was he pre-selected in 2004, 2007 and 2010? Why was he not disendorsed until 2011?


I think when you can explain how Thomson was preselected multiple times while being known as a whoring, embezzling scumbag who took secret commissions then you might get someone to bother answering you.

in the meantime, you just look like a hypocrite.


So in your pathetic opinion you can justify any action by finding allegations against your opponent and dismissing any concerns as hypocrisy.....Take a look at yourself in the mirror mate!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


well you dont seem to care about Thomson's crimes so I might as well. Now if he was a Lib you'd be screaming for his jailing.

Yes. Hypocrite fits you quite well.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
adelcrow
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20091
everywhere
Gender: male
Re: Simple question for rights/conservatives on here.
Reply #7 - May 5th, 2012 at 6:41pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 6:39pm:
philperth2010 wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:57pm:
longweekend58 wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:34pm:
TheGreenLight wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:05pm:
This question has never really been answered by the Coalition or their supporters, so I would really appreciate a straightforward, no beating around the bush answer. If the Coalition knew about Slipper's behaviour, then why was he pre-selected 9 times? I have heard that they knew that he was dodgy since about 2003, so then, why was he pre-selected in 2004, 2007 and 2010? Why was he not disendorsed until 2011?


I think when you can explain how Thomson was preselected multiple times while being known as a whoring, embezzling scumbag who took secret commissions then you might get someone to bother answering you.


in the meantime, you just look like a hypocrite.


So in your pathetic opinion you can justify any action by finding allegations against your opponent and dismissing any concerns as hypocrisy.....Take a look at yourself in the mirror mate!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


well you dont seem to care about Thomson's crimes so I might as well. Now if he was a Lib you'd be screaming for his jailing.

Yes. Hypocrite fits you quite well.


When was Thomson convicted of any crimes?
Back to top
 

Go the Bunnies
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 19446
Brisbane
Re: Simple question for rights/conservatives on here.
Reply #8 - May 5th, 2012 at 6:41pm
 
There are no true scotsmen

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
nice person!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
adelcrow
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20091
everywhere
Gender: male
Re: Simple question for rights/conservatives on here.
Reply #9 - May 5th, 2012 at 6:46pm
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 6:41pm:
There are no true scotsmen

SOB



Sean Connery?
Back to top
 

Go the Bunnies
 
IP Logged
 
TheGreenLight
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 633
Gender: male
Re: Simple question for rights/conservatives on here.
Reply #10 - May 5th, 2012 at 6:46pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 6:39pm:
philperth2010 wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:57pm:
longweekend58 wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:34pm:
TheGreenLight wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:05pm:
This question has never really been answered by the Coalition or their supporters, so I would really appreciate a straightforward, no beating around the bush answer. If the Coalition knew about Slipper's behaviour, then why was he pre-selected 9 times? I have heard that they knew that he was dodgy since about 2003, so then, why was he pre-selected in 2004, 2007 and 2010? Why was he not disendorsed until 2011?


I think when you can explain how Thomson was preselected multiple times while being known as a whoring, embezzling scumbag who took secret commissions then you might get someone to bother answering you.

in the meantime, you just look like a hypocrite.


So in your pathetic opinion you can justify any action by finding allegations against your opponent and dismissing any concerns as hypocrisy.....Take a look at yourself in the mirror mate!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


well you dont seem to care about Thomson's crimes so I might as well. Now if he was a Lib you'd be screaming for his jailing.

Yes. Hypocrite fits you quite well.


Two wrongs don't make a right. You don't seem to understand, no one is defending Thomson. We're just asking why the Coalition preselected Slipper so many times, if they knew that he was dodgy from circa 2003? Yes, the same case can, and by myself, has been, said. Again, two wrongs don't make a right, and no one has defended Thomson.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 36444
Gender: male
Re: Simple question for rights/conservatives on here.
Reply #11 - May 5th, 2012 at 6:53pm
 
adelcrow wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 6:41pm:
longweekend58 wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 6:39pm:
philperth2010 wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:57pm:
longweekend58 wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:34pm:
TheGreenLight wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:05pm:
This question has never really been answered by the Coalition or their supporters, so I would really appreciate a straightforward, no beating around the bush answer. If the Coalition knew about Slipper's behaviour, then why was he pre-selected 9 times? I have heard that they knew that he was dodgy since about 2003, so then, why was he pre-selected in 2004, 2007 and 2010? Why was he not disendorsed until 2011?


I think when you can explain how Thomson was preselected multiple times while being known as a whoring, embezzling scumbag who took secret commissions then you might get someone to bother answering you.


in the meantime, you just look like a hypocrite.


So in your pathetic opinion you can justify any action by finding allegations against your opponent and dismissing any concerns as hypocrisy.....Take a look at yourself in the mirror mate!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


well you dont seem to care about Thomson's crimes so I might as well. Now if he was a Lib you'd be screaming for his jailing.

Yes. Hypocrite fits you quite well.


When was Thomson convicted of any crimes?


look to the future (your words).
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
adelcrow
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20091
everywhere
Gender: male
Re: Simple question for rights/conservatives on here.
Reply #12 - May 5th, 2012 at 6:54pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 6:53pm:
adelcrow wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 6:41pm:
longweekend58 wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 6:39pm:
philperth2010 wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:57pm:
longweekend58 wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:34pm:
TheGreenLight wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 5:05pm:
This question has never really been answered by the Coalition or their supporters, so I would really appreciate a straightforward, no beating around the bush answer. If the Coalition knew about Slipper's behaviour, then why was he pre-selected 9 times? I have heard that they knew that he was dodgy since about 2003, so then, why was he pre-selected in 2004, 2007 and 2010? Why was he not disendorsed until 2011?


I think when you can explain how Thomson was preselected multiple times while being known as a whoring, embezzling scumbag who took secret commissions then you might get someone to bother answering you.


in the meantime, you just look like a hypocrite.


So in your pathetic opinion you can justify any action by finding allegations against your opponent and dismissing any concerns as hypocrisy.....Take a look at yourself in the mirror mate!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


well you dont seem to care about Thomson's crimes so I might as well. Now if he was a Lib you'd be screaming for his jailing.

Yes. Hypocrite fits you quite well.


When was Thomson convicted of any crimes?


look to the future (your words).


and wise words they are
Back to top
 

Go the Bunnies
 
IP Logged
 
Frances
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3530
In a Castle in the Hills
Gender: female
Re: Simple question for rights/conservatives on here.
Reply #13 - May 5th, 2012 at 6:57pm
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 5th, 2012 at 6:41pm:
There are no true scotsmen


My father was....
Back to top
 

Sure God created man before woman. But then you always make a rough draft before the final masterpiece.
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6399
Re: Simple question for rights/conservatives on here.
Reply #14 - May 5th, 2012 at 7:11pm
 
The answer to your question is rather simple. Slipper was a  "protected species" within the Liberal party due to his symbiotic relationship with the Queensland Liberal party factional boss Santo Santoro.

Quote:
Former Howard government advisers and senior Liberal Party figures have told The Sun-Herald Mr Santoro's factional support for Mr Slipper protected him from being disendorsed.

''There was definitely a concern [about Mr Slipper] but he was entrenched,'' a former senior adviser in Mr Howard's prime ministerial office said. ''If you'd been able to move him on, you would [have], but you weren't able to. He had the numbers.''

A senior figure within the Queensland party concurred: ''He was very much a protected species [Mr Santoro's faction] would use their influence to look after him. They did that for their own self-interest. It was a symbiotic relationship with Santo.''

Sources said Mr Slipper would marshal members of his electorate to back candidates favoured by Mr Santoro for party positions and preselections. John Howard attempted to rein in Mr Slipper's behaviour by appointing him his personal parliamentary secretary in March 2002. ''Howard wanted to keep a close eye on him,'' another former senior adviser to the Howard government said.


Slipper remained in parliament because it would have been politically inconvenient to disendorse him.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print