olde.sault
|
progressiveslol wrote on Apr 23 rd, 2012 at 3:30pm: skippy. wrote on Apr 23 rd, 2012 at 3:25pm: progressiveslol wrote on Apr 23 rd, 2012 at 3:16pm: skippy. wrote on Apr 23 rd, 2012 at 3:14pm: Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 23 rd, 2012 at 3:03pm: skippy. wrote on Apr 23 rd, 2012 at 3:01pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Apr 23 rd, 2012 at 2:49pm: Personally I would prefer no carbon tax at all. Why?
Without a carbon tax -
1) There is no need to hand out compensation for people to pay it 2) There is no need to adjust the tax brackets 3) There is no additional excuse for people to face greater bills.
I'm sorry but you take away the tax, you take away the need to go through this merry-go-round of making sure people are ok. I happen to think lifting the income threshold is good, it will particularly help low income earners, some will no longer have to pay tax at all. As I said, I cant wait to see Abbott explain to the punters why he is going to tax them more. I can see it now, joe blogs walks into the voting booth,"daa who do I vote for, the person that just gave me a 12 and a half thousand dollar tax break, or phony Tony that is going to take that 12 and a half thousand dollar tax break off me?" I can see a landslide for sure, Labors way, if they point out these facts to the punters. Your drunk or stoned already @ 3.00PM in the arvo???? Well it is 3pm. I really do think things will turn around once the punters get some cash in their pockets and get to like that extra cash. As I said, I want to see phony tony sell taking it back off them, that will be priceless. How much cash is that skip. How many dollars are they going to get excited about. 350 bucks a week, you no longer pay tax on.ATM its 115, so 235 bucks a week more than you do now that you dont pay tax on. didn't you go to school? Does a person on new start pay taxes. I would have assumed they would be $1 - $3 better off. Arent they the poor. What you are talking about are the real consumers that are going to be paying alot more for consumption, so the money you suggest is going to be eaten up. How many more will have to be employed "unproductively" to charge this tax and then distribute compensation to the low income people? Such employees would draw on the tax paid by the "real earners" for this country, the exporters of goods. Have any of you leftards costed this as well as these Green schemes that have to be subsidised heavily by the tax payers? No wonder the country is sinking in billion dollars of debt.
|