2 recent stories from round the world have revealed the depth to which the media will plumb in order to sensationalise their stories, regardless of the truth, and any damge their incitement may cause.
Firstly, the french neo nazi shooter who turned out to be muslim.
Quote:“Neo-Nazi serial killer” is actually a Muslim Jihadist. Media lied again.
A series of spree killings in France became the single biggest news story in the entire world when the media declared that the perpetrator would turn out to be “a Neo-Nazi.” Once again the media was desperately trying to a make a story fit the political narrative they wanted it to.
Big Surprise. The suspect is an Algerian Muslim Jihadist/Terrorist. He was originally apprehended by the US Army in Afghanistan and turned over to France. The US Army believed him to be connected to Al Quaida. The liberal French authorities set him free in France.
BACKFIRE!!!
Left-wing French newsoutlets were already reporting that the “Neo-Nazi serial spree killer” would hurt the president campaign of Marine Le Pen. Now that it has been revealed that the killer is an Algerian Jihadist who was coddled by the French authorities, the UK Guardian is calling the events “a gift to the far-right.”
secondly, the "white" man who shot an "innocent" black yoof:
Quote:Besides the fact that almost all media outlets have lied about what race George Zimmerman is (he is a Latino/Mestizo), they are also censoring major important details of the case. Some have even published wild opinions about the 911 calls as if the opinions were factual statements.
Would you be surprised to know that the statements of the eyewitness are being censored in almost every media story about the shooting?
1. When police officers arrived, George Zimmerman had a bloody nose and was bleeding from a wound on the back on his head.
2. The eyewitness who called 911 said Zimmerman who screamed for help.
3. The eyewitness also reports that Zimmerman was on the ground and Martin was on top of him beating on him.
This information was made public by a local Orlando television station on February 27th. We now have 22 days of rampant media reports that omit these facts. Once you see what information the police had, it is obvious why they did not arrest him. They were simply abiding by Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law. Police are now required to have evidence that a shooter was not acting in self-defense.
How many times have you heard the phrase “Trayvon Martin was a cheerful person,” but you had never heard the words of the eye-witness to the shooting?
Each time you see a “mainstream” news outlet rant about the Zimmerman/Martin case, ask yourself why these three facts mentioned above are missing from the story. Ask yourself why the media is called Zimmerman a white man instead of a Latino. Ask yourself if you think the story is really news or is it agitation/propaganda designed to advance a political agenda.
This past weekend in Chicago alone, black and Latino gangbabgers shot 10 people and wounded 40. The youngest fatality is only six years old. This received no national coverage. Why does this one shooting warrant weeks of coverage?
Even if you think Zimmerman was completely unjustified in firing his gun; ask yourself why 99% of the now thousands of articles are solely from the point of view of the grieving family without trying give a balanced account of the events.
Note the common theme: Painting whitey as "racist" is gold to the media. Just what are they trying to achieve by doing this?
Forum
Pages: 1 
