PJ subjugates all principles, including common sense itself, to his opposition to marine parks.
Quote:You cannot give a direct answer without implying that NTZ's are a done deal
So you refuse to answer the question on the grounds that it may involve acknowleding reality?
Answering the question implies nothing about your support for marine parks in general or the liklihood of their use. This is all just your overactive imagination. Either that or a really lame excuse you had to come up with when you realised you have spent a few pages arguing indirectly against a principle that you cannot bring yourself to oppose directly becuase you would then look even sillier than you do now.
Quote:and the only legitimate debate is about where they should be placed
Can you explain how answering a question implies that no other questions are worth asking?
Quote:Asking for a yes/ no answer is another giveaway for a loaded question.
I did not ask for a yes/no answer. Any kind of answer would be better than your BS excuses.
PJ, if you had the opportunity to exclude your favourite fishing spot from a NTZ, would you refuse the opportunity on the grounds that it is a loaded question?
If you had a choice between vanilla and chocolate ice cream, would you refuse to choose unless they included your favourite flavour?