Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10
Send Topic Print
Will Rudd Destroy Labor? (Read 4324 times)
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35696
Gender: male
Re: Will Rudd Destroy Labor?
Reply #75 - Feb 22nd, 2012 at 8:44am
 
Sir Bobby wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 8:14am:
skippy. wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 8:06am:
Its been forum policy for the five years or so that I've posted here for posters to put up a link if they reproduce an article. Anything else is pure plagiarism, longlie has form on this, and has been told before to do it, but being the sad little man he is he ignores the rules. Lets face it most of what he does write is proven lies, I think he steals others articles to give himself some cred, dog knows he needs it.



Thanks - the moderators have been informed as no apology or retraction was made.


you are such a child... and once again, everyone is laughing at you.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33877
Re: Will Rudd Destroy Labor?
Reply #76 - Feb 22nd, 2012 at 9:46am
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 8:31am:
Sir Bobby wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 8:14am:
Thanks - the moderators have been informed as no apology or retraction was made.


While you're at it bobby, you'd better report Imcrookonit for these three...
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1328557260
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1327811944
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1327698728

No author credit on any of them either




now you have spoilt their little pick on a lib rants.. LOL>.

if you think they are about to pick on one of their own.. think again.  I havent seen it yet.and dont expect too..

its more than childish anyway...I am almost sure no one is going to take anyone to court for plagiarism on a pathetic forum like this.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Bobby
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 24228
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Will Rudd Destroy Labor?
Reply #77 - Feb 22nd, 2012 at 10:08am
 
The rules:


http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/pages/Website_Terms_of_Use_Agreement?...
Quote:

Quote:
Intellectual Property


Reproduction of part or all of the contents in any form of the Website is prohibited other than for individual use only, and the contents of this Website may not be copied or otherwise shared with any third parties.


Without limitation, You agree that You will not print, distribute, display, sell, publish, broadcast, circulate, disseminate or commercially exploit, in any form or by any method whatsoever, part or all of the contents of the Website, or incorporate the website material, or any part of it, in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic, or any other form.


Unless otherwise noted, all materials on this site are protected as the copyright, trade dress, trademarks and/or other intellectual properties owned by Business Spectator or by other parties that have licensed their material to Business Spectator.
Back to top
 

Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep thoughts can be winnowed from deep nonsense. Carl Sagan
 
IP Logged
 
blackadder
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1977
Re: Will Rudd Destroy Labor?
Reply #78 - Feb 22nd, 2012 at 10:15am
 
Sir Bobby wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 10:08am:
The rules:


http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/pages/Website_Terms_of_Use_Agreement?...
Quote:

Quote:
Intellectual Property


Reproduction of part or all of the contents in any form of the Website is prohibited other than for individual use only, and the contents of this Website may not be copied or otherwise shared with any third parties.


Without limitation, You agree that You will not print, distribute, display, sell, publish, broadcast, circulate, disseminate or commercially exploit, in any form or by any method whatsoever, part or all of the contents of the Website, or incorporate the website material, or any part of it, in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic, or any other form.


Unless otherwise noted, all materials on this site are protected as the copyright, trade dress, trademarks and/or other intellectual properties owned by Business Spectator or by other parties that have licensed their material to Business Spectator.



Jesus batpoo grow up and stop being such a belligerent little prat.

You married batpoo? Ever been married? Ever had a girlfriend? Ever had sex? Er with  a woman.
Back to top
 

The trouble with quotes on the internet is that it's difficult to determine whether or not they are genuine - Abraham Lincoln
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Bobby
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 24228
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Will Rudd Destroy Labor?
Reply #79 - Feb 22nd, 2012 at 10:21am
 
In general - it is acceptable to take a small excerpt from another
website as long as you put a link to it.

In the case of Longweekend - he copied an entire article
& pretended that it was his.

That is not only illegal it is dishonest.
Back to top
 

Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep thoughts can be winnowed from deep nonsense. Carl Sagan
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35696
Gender: male
Re: Will Rudd Destroy Labor?
Reply #80 - Feb 22nd, 2012 at 10:46am
 
Sir Bobby wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 10:21am:
In general - it is acceptable to take a small excerpt from another
website as long as you put a link to it.

In the case of Longweekend - he copied an entire article
& pretended that it was his.

That is not only illegal it is dishonest.


its not even illegal, twitface.

one day you may get a girlfriend and discover how much fun life can be with a FEMALE love interest instead of toenail.

you act like a baby.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
FRED.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3310
Re: Will Rudd Destroy Labor?
Reply #81 - Feb 22nd, 2012 at 10:51am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 10:46am:
Sir Bobby wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 10:21am:
In general - it is acceptable to take a small excerpt from another
website as long as you put a link to it.

In the case of Longweekend - he copied an entire article
& pretended that it was his.

That is not only illegal it is dishonest.


its not even illegal, twitface.

one day you may get a girlfriend and discover how much fun life can be with a FEMALE love interest instead of toenail.

you act like a baby.


LONGEY Dont pick on the kid    Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
FRED.bell58@yahoo.com.au FRED.bell58@yahoo.com.au  
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35696
Gender: male
Re: Will Rudd Destroy Labor?
Reply #82 - Feb 22nd, 2012 at 11:08am
 
FRED. wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 10:51am:
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 10:46am:
Sir Bobby wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 10:21am:
In general - it is acceptable to take a small excerpt from another
website as long as you put a link to it.

In the case of Longweekend - he copied an entire article
& pretended that it was his.

That is not only illegal it is dishonest.


its not even illegal, twitface.

one day you may get a girlfriend and discover how much fun life can be with a FEMALE love interest instead of toenail.

you act like a baby.


LONGEY Dont pick on the kid    Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin


its a bit like child abuse, or beating up on a mentally retarded person.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
adelcrow
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19756
everywhere
Gender: male
Re: Will Rudd Destroy Labor?
Reply #83 - Feb 22nd, 2012 at 11:17am
 
The same old political cycle..Libs get in..Labor gets in...Libs get in... Labor gets in...blah blah blah.
Back to top
 

Go the Bunnies
 
IP Logged
 
FriYAY
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7395
Re: Will Rudd Destroy Labor?
Reply #84 - Feb 22nd, 2012 at 11:31am
 
Sir Bobby wrote on Feb 21st, 2012 at 7:21pm:
Longweekend,
Quote:
you are stupider than snot booby. of COURSE it came from there!


Longweekend,
Apologise for not including a link to the source or
I will report you to the moderators for plagiarism.

No wonder you were banned as a moderator.
You don't even understand simple rules.


LOLZ

Dobber dobber dobber!!

Bobby the Dobber. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: Will Rudd Destroy Labor?
Reply #85 - Feb 22nd, 2012 at 11:38am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 8:44am:
Sir Bobby wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 8:14am:
skippy. wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 8:06am:
Its been forum policy for the five years or so that I've posted here for posters to put up a link if they reproduce an article. Anything else is pure plagiarism, longlie has form on this, and has been told before to do it, but being the sad little man he is he ignores the rules. Lets face it most of what he does write is proven lies, I think he steals others articles to give himself some cred, dog knows he needs it.



Thanks - the moderators have been informed as no apology or retraction was made.


you are such a child... and once again, everyone is laughing at you.


Of course, the correct thing to do would have been to admit the minor mistake in not including a link and then go update the post. But no, just go ahead and dig a hole for yourself.
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9789
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: Will Rudd Destroy Labor?
Reply #86 - Feb 22nd, 2012 at 11:39am
 
What is Plagiarism?

Many people think of plagiarism as copying another's work, or borrowing someone else's original ideas. But terms like "copying" and "borrowing" can disguise the seriousness of the offense:

According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, to "plagiarize" means
    to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own
    to use (another's production) without crediting the source
    to commit literary theft
    to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source.

In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else's work and lying about it afterward.

But can words and ideas really be stolen?
According to U.S. law, the answer is yes. The expression of original ideas is considered intellectual property, and is protected by copyright laws, just like original inventions. Almost all forms of expression fall under copyright protection as long as they are recorded in some way (such as a book or a computer file).
All of the following are considered plagiarism:

    turning in someone else's work as your own
    copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit
    failing to put a quotation in quotation marks
    giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation
    changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit
    copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not (see our section on "fair use" rules)

Most cases of plagiarism can be avoided, however, by citing sources. Simply acknowledging that certain material has been borrowed, and providing your audience with the information necessary to find that source, is usually enough to prevent plagiarism.

Link -
http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_what_is_plagiarism.html
=================================
I recommend that all members, if using someone else's material, credit the source of that material.

A failure to do so, could place those members not doing so, in greater danger of facing legal action.   

Whilst the result of any such legal action, would be for the courts to decide, the risk of incurring what can be massive legal costs alone, should be a sufficient deterrent for most people, not to risk whether something is or is not plagiarism!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: Will Rudd Destroy Labor?
Reply #87 - Feb 22nd, 2012 at 11:39am
 
FriYAY wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 11:31am:
Sir Bobby wrote on Feb 21st, 2012 at 7:21pm:
Longweekend,
Quote:
you are stupider than snot booby. of COURSE it came from there!


Longweekend,
Apologise for not including a link to the source or
I will report you to the moderators for plagiarism.

No wonder you were banned as a moderator.
You don't even understand simple rules.


LOLZ

Dobber dobber dobber!!

Bobby the Dobber. Roll Eyes


You must be Fred's older twin by all of about 10 minutes I reckon. How do you enjoy preschool? Do you like drawing with crayons too?
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35696
Gender: male
Re: Will Rudd Destroy Labor?
Reply #88 - Feb 22nd, 2012 at 11:45am
 
Gist wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 11:38am:
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 8:44am:
Sir Bobby wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 8:14am:
skippy. wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 8:06am:
Its been forum policy for the five years or so that I've posted here for posters to put up a link if they reproduce an article. Anything else is pure plagiarism, longlie has form on this, and has been told before to do it, but being the sad little man he is he ignores the rules. Lets face it most of what he does write is proven lies, I think he steals others articles to give himself some cred, dog knows he needs it.



Thanks - the moderators have been informed as no apology or retraction was made.


you are such a child... and once again, everyone is laughing at you.


Of course, the correct thing to do would have been to admit the minor mistake in not including a link and then go update the post. But no, just go ahead and dig a hole for yourself.


if everyone was called to account for minor mistakes, then what would happen here? it was obvious to anyone with a brain that it was copied as it is not even close to my style of writing. its only a problem to a nice person like booby.

as if we dont have any ther things to discuss.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Bobby
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 24228
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Will Rudd Destroy Labor?
Reply #89 - Feb 22nd, 2012 at 11:50am
 
perceptions_now wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 11:39am:
What is Plagiarism?

Many people think of plagiarism as copying another's work, or borrowing someone else's original ideas. But terms like "copying" and "borrowing" can disguise the seriousness of the offense:

According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, to "plagiarize" means
    to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own
    to use (another's production) without crediting the source
    to commit literary theft
    to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source.

In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else's work and lying about it afterward.

But can words and ideas really be stolen?
According to U.S. law, the answer is yes. The expression of original ideas is considered intellectual property, and is protected by copyright laws, just like original inventions. Almost all forms of expression fall under copyright protection as long as they are recorded in some way (such as a book or a computer file).
All of the following are considered plagiarism:

    turning in someone else's work as your own
    copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit
    failing to put a quotation in quotation marks
    giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation
    changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit
    copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not (see our section on "fair use" rules)

Most cases of plagiarism can be avoided, however, by citing sources. Simply acknowledging that certain material has been borrowed, and providing your audience with the information necessary to find that source, is usually enough to prevent plagiarism.

Link -
http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_what_is_plagiarism.html
=================================
I recommend that all members, if using someone else's material, credit the source of that material.

A failure to do so, could place those members not doing so, in greater danger of facing legal action.   

Whilst the result of any such legal action, would be for the courts to decide, the risk of incurring what can be massive legal costs alone, should be a sufficient deterrent for most people, not to risk whether something is or is not plagiarism!



Thanks Perceptions -
that's good advice for all of us.
Back to top
 

Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep thoughts can be winnowed from deep nonsense. Carl Sagan
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10
Send Topic Print