bogarde73 wrote on May 28
th, 2011 at 10:13am:
Contrarianism is a familiar expression in sharemarket circles. Put simply, one is a contrarian if he or she regularly goes against market trends. Not that someone would throw good money after bad; if a company is truly on the skids, to buy more shares in it is to be an idiot not a contrarian.
But generally it comes down to not following the herd mentality. And there is plenty of that in the sharemarket.
A similar situation exists in the market for ideas, philosophies and politics.
I am a contrarian in both senses. I don't know what the motivation is.
There is probably a boundary between being a contrarian and being an eccentric. I don't think I've crossed it yet, or if I have on occasions, I've managed I think to find my way back.
But usually, not always, when something is in dispute, say some political issue, I will find myself on the opposite side to the majority.
I'm not talking about issues which are clear-cut. . .but just at the moment I can't think of any.
My god, you see . . .there's the problem. There are not many things that are clear-cut. For me, free trade is not clear-cut, climate change is not clear-cut, foreign aid is not clear-cut etc etc.
So that means when someone puts a point of view I quite frequently rush to debate it from the other side.
It's not easy being a contrarian . .I wonder is it easy being green.
Yadda
is a contrarian.
Or, is Yadda perhaps just an eccentric ???

It's not easy being a contrarian, nor being Yadda.
...but that is my 'burden'.