Grey wrote on May 28
th, 2011 at 2:16pm:
Forgive me Bob the bat, but if my solution is a dream yours is bat poo crazy. Do you really imagine (a) That Australians would give away the bite. (B) Jews would exchange Tel Aviv for it?
What I am suggesting is to go back to the historical default. Jews and Arabs both living side by side in the ME. Nothing fanciful there.
Grey,
Jews and Arabs both living side by side in the ME ?
That is not impossible........EXCEPT.
As per usual, you [and people like yourself] have yet again, completely ignored the reality,....of the influence of ISLAM upon the relationship, between Jews and Arabs.
ISLAM will only allow such a circumstance [of Jews and Arabs living side by side],
....in circumstances where moslems are 1 class citizens,
....and where non-moslems [in this instance, the Jewish people] must be
3rd class people.
THAT, IS THE REALITY, Grey.
Your
CONSTANT denial of that reality**, will not change the truth of that circumstance.
**
i.e.
The influence of ISLAM upon the relationship, between moslems, and non-moslem communities.
Google;
islam, muslims to have a superior positionGoogle;
islam, establishes legal apartheid, muslim superior+++
+++
Worldwide, we non-moslems believe that, if not perfect, our [Western] laws are equitable [just].
Why?
Because everyone,
moslems and non-moslems, are
equal before our laws.
But that is not the opinion of many, many, 'moslems' [living within Australia].
Moslems [e.g. within Australia] living within their moslem communities, inculcate, and teach each other,
exactly what ISLAM teaches them,
...
that the non-moslem community is 'oppressing' local moslems, by subjecting moslems to 'unjust' non-moslem laws.
And that is precisely what this woman [next], the sister of the convicted Jihadist, is expressing!
e.g.
"Five Australian jihadists convicted - Sister, 'its not fair' "http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/02/15/2819965.htmhttp://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/02/australia-5-jihadists-motivated-by-intolerant-..."..The sister for one of the convicted men said...that the sentence is not fair to her community or religion."It was reported, that her brother
liked to watch videos of moslems beheading non-moslems, and now he can't,
...for a very long time.
And it's just not fair!!Australians laws are so unfair.
COMMENT;
This woman clearly identifies herself as a *moslem*.
And has clearly declared that *she believes*;
"...that the sentence is not fair to her community or religion."
As a moslem, this woman [along with all moslems] is
effectively declaring;
'ISLAM gives us moslems the right to use violence to impose our value system upon you non-moslems.
Your non-moslem laws are illegal, and unjust.
And it is evil, and unjust, for you to use your laws to resist our Jihad, against you.'
And i assure you, imo, that that, is the mindset of all good moslems share.
+++
And all non-moslems, and all Australians should understand, that moslems do not believe in, they do not endorse, or promote, 'one law for all'.
Moslems want Sharia, because Sharia is an inequitable system of laws which unashamedly favours moslems.
Sharia establishes, and is, a legal apartheid, which favours moslems.
And the Jihad [violence against non-moslems], is the path towards a Sharia system,
which is justified and endorsed by all good moslems.
+++
That is the problem, of ISLAM.
That, is the exact same problem which the Israelis [Jews, being non-moslems] face.
And again Grey,
Your
UNRELENTING, AND CONSTANT denial of that reality, of the influence of ISLAM upon the relationship, between moslems, and non-moslems, will not change the truth of that 'circumstance'.
i.e.
The truth that moslems and non-moslems can never live in peace together,
as equals,
...because ISLAM will never,
and cannot, ever allow that circumstance.
+++
CONFIRMING EVIDENCE, FROM THE MOUTHS OF GOOD MOSLEMS....
Attack on London 'inevitable'
April 19, 2004
"We don't make a distinction between civilians and non-civilians, innocents and non-innocents. Only between Muslims and unbelievers. And the life of an unbeliever has no value. It has no sanctity."
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/04/19/1082326119414.html?from=storyrhs&on...The ummah [the worldwide moslem community] are a closed community [in law, i.e. in moslem law].
To ISLAM [to good moslems!], those outside the ummah have the status of cattle.i.e.
Those outside the ummah can live, while they are 'useful' to moslems, but they are not 'protected'.