NorthOfNorth wrote on May 7
th, 2011 at 2:21pm:
I wouldn't classify your opinion ('god' as a mass psycho-social phenomenon) as a religion... Certainly such an opinion does not require faith in the theistic sense (not, at least, in the traditional sense of the words).
That a subject is demonstrating a believing-in-god (in a psycho-social sense) is easily observable and does not require of the observer any leap of faith.
Are you saying that nobody has faith in human nature?
Besides, who brought up faith? That all sounds very Abrahamic.
Quote:Religion is a cultural system that creates powerful and long-lasting meaning by establishing symbols that relate humanity to beliefs and values.[1] Many religions have narratives, symbols, traditions and sacred histories that are intended to give meaning to life or to explain the origin of life or the universe. They tend to derive morality, ethics, religious laws or a preferred lifestyle from their ideas about the cosmos and human nature.
Some dictionaries don't even attempt to define religion. So I'm free to define god any way that I like, and I'm free to define religion and theism any way I like too.
So lets talk about your atheist viewpoint. You say that you reject my psycho-social god. (because it's a god)
Can you see where I'm going with this?