interesting.....

The USA control many of the tyrrants in the Middle East including those in Yemen, Bahrain, Egypt, Morocco etc and YET they are silent on the state and military slaughter of unarmed demonstrators.

But in Libya a No-Fly zone resolution is turned into a mass aerial bombardment of anything that moves at night.

Oh the web of self interest and deceit that we weave in the name of Freedom and democracy.

So tell me - why doesnt the USA begin with interventions and condemnations in the middle eastern countries it controls? Surely it doesnt support the dictators OVER these poor unarmed demostrators who are seeking freedom and basic human rights?

Tell me it isnt true?

Based on the clearly deteriorating mental state of Bill_crany aka Prevailing, I predict another enforeced stay in a mental instituion very soon. Supporting Gaddaffis 'right' to murder his own citizens is certainly a sign of extreme paranoia.

Watch and see if Im right. I was after the Victoran bushfires where he calimed they were deliberately set by the government. he was away for nearly a year then.

Holiday time coming for you again Bedwetter Bill!!!!

so nutjob, do you support gaddafi killing his own people because they want a change in government? just answer the question!

what_next wrote on Mar 24^th, 2011 at 8:59am:


the topic is gadaffi and libya.  stick to the topic. do u think the UN attacks on gadaffi are good or bad?

http://www.ctc.usma.edu/harmony/pdf/CTCForeignFighter.19.Dec07.pdf

here is the document from westpoint academy

US funded al-qaeda

research yes good

namaste

the topic is gadaffi and libya.  stick to the topic. do u think the UN attacks on gadaffi are good or bad?


Do I agree the attacks on Gaddafi are a good thing?

Well first of all, the UN and America have insisted that Gaddafi himself is not a target, you forget this is not a war (according to the US) it is simply enforcing a no fly zone over Libya, which includes bombing the defence forces of Libya. Why the US would then bomb his compound is hard to understand.

However, the British and French have stated that Gaddafi himself is a legitimate target and should be destroyed, it looks as though all sides can't agree on the same issue.

Now do I agree with it, yes and no. I believe in democracy and I believe every country should have it, especially when the people are so passionate about gaining it. However if you are going to attack one nation for not supporting democracy and for murdering its people, then I believe you should have the same stance on every nation.

What we are seeing is the hypocrisy of how the US treats friend versus foe. Bahrain, Egypt and Tunisia all had Governments killing innocent protesters, as we are seeing now in Bahrain with the support of the US. How can the US be pro-democracy in Libya, but anti-democracy in Bahrain? The answer is simple, money. Bahrain, Egypt and Tunisia all have billion dollar arms deals with the US, so when they attack and kill innocent civilians, the US turn a blind eye, something which goes against the very foundations of the democracy they supposedly represent.

I do not support Gaddafi, however, you tend to feel a little sympathy for him due in part to the fact that he is doing nothing different to what the other middle Eastern dictators (or leaders) were doing, yet he is the only one being attacked.

Why is the death of say an Egyptian or a Bahrain national not seen as abhorrent act by the US? Are Egyptian and Bahrain nationals worthless. If the US wants credibility it must support democracy in all nations, even those where it has a vested interest, otherwise they come out looking like hypocritical war mongers.

Confusion reigns. What a circus.

Video shows US senator John McCain calling Gaddafi a terrorist after signing a huge arms deal with him.