chicken_lipsforme
Gold Member
Offline
Australian Politics
Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender:
|
Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 31 st, 2011 at 2:18pm: chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 31 st, 2011 at 2:05pm: Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 31 st, 2011 at 10:01am: chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 31 st, 2011 at 9:54am: Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 31 st, 2011 at 9:13am: chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 31 st, 2011 at 7:22am: mozzaok wrote on Mar 24 th, 2011 at 11:33am: I liked how the talkback radio interviewers asked members of the crowd at the Carbon Tax Rally, if they were extremists?
Amazingly, none of them considered themselves extremists, lmao, they were all the epitome of fair minded, and balanced Australians, in their own eyes.
Seriously, how many nutters think of themselves in that way, and how many think that they are amonga small handful of sane ones, and the other 99.99% of people are the wacky, delusional ones?
The crowd should have been polled to ask how many of them believed that AGW was really a giant conspiracy, organised by either, scientists wanting grant money, or by left wing extremists seeking to destroy western society, or a Zionist plot, for secret zionisty reasons, lol(my favourite of the lot).
I would also liked to have had the crowd polled to ask how many of them believed that Abbott had really accepted that AGW was real, or that he just has to say that now, because that is what the public expects a political leader to say, but deep down they know he still believes it is "ABSOLUTE CRAP", just like they do.
My guess would be that the majority of those who were there yesterday, would have been of the more extreme AGW denial mindset, and a very significant number would ascribe to one of the conspiracy theories, and would also believe that Abbott actually still agreed with them on those key points.
Extremists??
You decide. Well they must be extremists and nutters. Who wouldn't want another tax burden placed upon struggling working families. Let them eat cake. Well if Abbott had supported the mining tax we could have used that revenue to combat CC. No burden on any struggling working families, but no the billionaires & the multi national companies bottom line came before Australians for Tony & his supporters, how about you chook were you in favour or one of the ones predicting complete economic collaspe as the miners & shareholders took their bat & ball home because instead of a 10 billion 1/2 year profit it may have been 8, no sense working for that piddly profit eh.(that's PROFIT not turnover) There was no air tax when Abbott wasn't supporting the mining tax. And that was right up until the election. That does not answer my question, did you support Australia's struggling families who you are now using to support your argument or did you blindly follow Tony and support multi billionaires continuing to profit handsomely? It was because of the mining multi billionaires, that Howard was able to leave so much of a surplus behind ($20B) when he left which did support struggling families. And further support them in the three income tax cuts working families received. You know about the surplus, the one Rudd & Swan & Gillard wasted like a couple of fat kids in a lolly shop with a pocket full of change. So we would like our multi billionaires to keep profiting handsomely whilst paying their taxes. And we want their companies to grow and expand accordingly to support Australias struggling working families. Because this country will need them once again to pay off Labors financial mismanagement. Whats that saying from a past election some years ago. Q. How does Labor start a small business. A. Give them a large business first and just watch them. That's as funny now as it was then. And unfortunately so bloody true. And there we go again. Conviently forgetting the worlds biggest economic meltdown since the depression. We also will ignore that those tax cuts given by Howard also fueled inflation which in turn caused interest rates to rise causing more money to go out of those struggling budgets than was returned by the cuts in the 1st place. The rest is just bullsh!t Business prospers under whatever government of the day. Oh & your also forgetting that Swan is fixated on returning the budget to surplus by 2013 which also happens to be an election year, so you liberal mangers of debt will not be required. P.S I'm not supporting Swan in his quest I'm one of the silly people who think our country could quite easily service a modest debt & even be better for it, but if he doesn't get that surplus I'm sure you'll be here to whine Like a rat up a drainpipe smithy. And whining louder than ever. And Swan may well be committed to a surplus by 2013, but like everything else with this mob, it will turn to custard. Personally, I wouldn't trust Swan to balance the office petty cash tin let alone this countries budget. The man has the ring of a dunderclumper around him.
|