Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: End mandatory detention

Too bloody right,yes    
  8 (66.7%)
I'm xenophobic, no    
  3 (25.0%)
Who cares, not me    
  1 (8.3%)
whats in it for me    
  0 (0.0%)




Total votes: 12
« Created by: skippy. on: Dec 14th, 2010 at 1:26pm »

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
End Mandatory Detention (Read 4678 times)
jame-e
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 426
Darwin (currently)
Gender: male
Re: End Mandatory Detention
Reply #15 - Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:07pm
 
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:02pm:
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:46pm:
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:38pm:
codswal wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:27pm:
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:07pm:
Plus please explain what xenophobia has to do with processing and detention? We are serving their human rights by processing them, detention is a fairly standard part of processing across the world is it not? What about a governments responsibility towards its current citizens... oh i forgot, we're all terrible xenophobes.



how about asking all Greenies to take responsibility for them.. I have often thought its up to the bleeding hearts to open their homes and their wallets however they never seem to put that idea into a policy motion..

surely bobbys got room for a family or two.



I'm happy to put money into ending mandatory sentencing, if you pay for the open ended war in Afghanistan, that probably caused some of these refugees in the first place.

And it is curious to note, compassion to fellow humans is now bleeding hearts to the heartless. So why do you support the afghan war again?


How and replaced by what?



By shifting my share of tax money that goes to the open ended Afghanistan war to refugees.


And... do what? What would your policy actually do? What would change and how would it be an improvement?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
JC Denton
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 5197
Gender: female
Re: End Mandatory Detention
Reply #16 - Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:09pm
 
I like jame-e because he always asks sensible questions.

Don't ever expect Greens to be able to give you a substantial reply.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: End Mandatory Detention
Reply #17 - Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:14pm
 
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:07pm:
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:02pm:
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:46pm:
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:38pm:
codswal wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:27pm:
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:07pm:
Plus please explain what xenophobia has to do with processing and detention? We are serving their human rights by processing them, detention is a fairly standard part of processing across the world is it not? What about a governments responsibility towards its current citizens... oh i forgot, we're all terrible xenophobes.



how about asking all Greenies to take responsibility for them.. I have often thought its up to the bleeding hearts to open their homes and their wallets however they never seem to put that idea into a policy motion..

surely bobbys got room for a family or two.



I'm happy to put money into ending mandatory sentencing, if you pay for the open ended war in Afghanistan, that probably caused some of these refugees in the first place.

And it is curious to note, compassion to fellow humans is now bleeding hearts to the heartless. So why do you support the afghan war again?


How and replaced by what?



By shifting my share of tax money that goes to the open ended Afghanistan war to refugees.


And... do what? What would your policy actually do? What would change and how would it be an improvement?


It is not a policy, it was a reply to your statement. Keep your hair on.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
adelcrow
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male
Re: End Mandatory Detention
Reply #18 - Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:26pm
 
Cods, you will find many people who support the fair treatment of Refugees such as my wife and myself contribute quite a bit to helping refugees settle into the country.
As I have stated before, I am proud to call many refugees both old and new ....friends.
I cant speak for others here but I do know from personal experience that many Aussies put their time and money where their mouths are when it comes to the fair treatment and intergration of refugees  Smiley
I also know from personal experience that if migrants and refugees,   have a positive experience when they first go into the community they will in turn give back to this country in spades.
Fear and hate are wasted emotions and only attract fear and hate in return.
Back to top
 

Go the Bunnies
 
IP Logged
 
viewpoint
Gold Member
*****
Offline


A joke is a very serious
thing. [Winston]

Posts: 2209
Gender: male
Re: End Mandatory Detention
Reply #19 - Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:26pm
 
Quick.......very quick turnaround........send them back from whence they came.........asap!
Back to top
 

Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
- Sir Winston Churchill
 
IP Logged
 
jame-e
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 426
Darwin (currently)
Gender: male
Re: End Mandatory Detention
Reply #20 - Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:27pm
 
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:14pm:
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:07pm:
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:02pm:
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:46pm:
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:38pm:
codswal wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:27pm:
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:07pm:
Plus please explain what xenophobia has to do with processing and detention? We are serving their human rights by processing them, detention is a fairly standard part of processing across the world is it not? What about a governments responsibility towards its current citizens... oh i forgot, we're all terrible xenophobes.



how about asking all Greenies to take responsibility for them.. I have often thought its up to the bleeding hearts to open their homes and their wallets however they never seem to put that idea into a policy motion..

surely bobbys got room for a family or two.



I'm happy to put money into ending mandatory sentencing, if you pay for the open ended war in Afghanistan, that probably caused some of these refugees in the first place.

And it is curious to note, compassion to fellow humans is now bleeding hearts to the heartless. So why do you support the afghan war again?


How and replaced by what?



By shifting my share of tax money that goes to the open ended Afghanistan war to refugees.


And... do what? What would your policy actually do? What would change and how would it be an improvement?


It is not a policy, it was a reply to your statement. Keep your hair on.


Right... So you don't support any kind of policy change?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
jame-e
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 426
Darwin (currently)
Gender: male
Re: End Mandatory Detention
Reply #21 - Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:41pm
 
adelcrow wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:26pm:
Cods, you will find many people who support the fair treatment of Refugees such as my wife and myself contribute quite a bit to helping refugees settle into the country.
As I have stated before, I am proud to call many refugees both old and new ....friends.
I cant speak for others here but I do know from personal experience that many Aussies put their time and money where their mouths are when it comes to the fair treatment and intergration of refugees  Smiley
I also know from personal experience that if migrants and refugees,   have a positive experience when they first go into the community they will in turn give back to this country in spades.
Fear and hate are wasted emotions and only attract fear and hate in return.


Agree, but asociating fear and hate with detention is wrong. Both sides of the debate exploit this issue and its disgusting.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: End Mandatory Detention
Reply #22 - Dec 14th, 2010 at 6:15pm
 
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:27pm:
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:14pm:
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:07pm:
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:02pm:
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:46pm:
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:38pm:
codswal wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:27pm:
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:07pm:
Plus please explain what xenophobia has to do with processing and detention? We are serving their human rights by processing them, detention is a fairly standard part of processing across the world is it not? What about a governments responsibility towards its current citizens... oh i forgot, we're all terrible xenophobes.



how about asking all Greenies to take responsibility for them.. I have often thought its up to the bleeding hearts to open their homes and their wallets however they never seem to put that idea into a policy motion..

surely bobbys got room for a family or two.



I'm happy to put money into ending mandatory sentencing, if you pay for the open ended war in Afghanistan, that probably caused some of these refugees in the first place.

And it is curious to note, compassion to fellow humans is now bleeding hearts to the heartless. So why do you support the afghan war again?


How and replaced by what?



By shifting my share of tax money that goes to the open ended Afghanistan war to refugees.


And... do what? What would your policy actually do? What would change and how would it be an improvement?


It is not a policy, it was a reply to your statement. Keep your hair on.


Right... So you don't support any kind of policy change?




I support faster processing, and then integration while their refugee claims are processed.

Where do you stand?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Verge
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6329
Gender: male
Re: End Mandatory Detention
Reply #23 - Dec 14th, 2010 at 7:04pm
 
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 6:15pm:
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:27pm:
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:14pm:
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:07pm:
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:02pm:
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:46pm:
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:38pm:
codswal wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:27pm:
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:07pm:
Plus please explain what xenophobia has to do with processing and detention? We are serving their human rights by processing them, detention is a fairly standard part of processing across the world is it not? What about a governments responsibility towards its current citizens... oh i forgot, we're all terrible xenophobes.



how about asking all Greenies to take responsibility for them.. I have often thought its up to the bleeding hearts to open their homes and their wallets however they never seem to put that idea into a policy motion..

surely bobbys got room for a family or two.



I'm happy to put money into ending mandatory sentencing, if you pay for the open ended war in Afghanistan, that probably caused some of these refugees in the first place.

And it is curious to note, compassion to fellow humans is now bleeding hearts to the heartless. So why do you support the afghan war again?


How and replaced by what?



By shifting my share of tax money that goes to the open ended Afghanistan war to refugees.


And... do what? What would your policy actually do? What would change and how would it be an improvement?


It is not a policy, it was a reply to your statement. Keep your hair on.


Right... So you don't support any kind of policy change?




I support faster processing, and then integration while their refugee claims are processed.

Where do you stand?


Why integrate while processing when the outcome of that is unknown.

It is giving false hope, and most importantly they are unknown.  Talk about an open door policy.
Back to top
 

And why not, if you will permit me; why shouldn’t I, if you will permit me; spend my first week as prime minister, should that happen, on this, on your, country - Abbott with the Garma People Aug 13
 
IP Logged
 
jame-e
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 426
Darwin (currently)
Gender: male
Re: End Mandatory Detention
Reply #24 - Dec 15th, 2010 at 12:29am
 
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 6:15pm:
I support faster processing, and then integration while their refugee claims are processed.

Where do you stand?


Ok, but that suggests that there isn't a problem with how we integrate people.

Where do i stand? I don’t believe that detention is humane. It could be made more humane by doing something for the detained. If they were capable of making the journey to Australia than they are capable of contributing to the community they wish to join. The Australian people have decided that we have a responsibility to these people, thus i feel creating a responsibility on the asylum seekers part. If picking lychees and digging holes was good enough for me than its good enough for anyone. They should be made to contribute in any way that they can while they are in transition. We have severe labour shortages in some industries and i propose that we should invest in something that is productive. Productive for them and productive for the community. If the residents of the Asti hotel were assisted in contributing to the mango harvest it would do a world of good. Along with some education it would help to give them the ability to function independently within the community and create more value in that goal. In turn the community’s views would change dramatically.

We require 457 visa holders to live where we require their contributions to be made. Why do we not expect the same from all who seek residence in this country. Obligation is empowering, not detrimental. Remember that these people were not rescued from a refugee camp, they are able, determined and were financially capable of making the journey that they made. 2 to 5 years service in an area of need in order to gain residence is a gift, a gift that thousands accept and millions would crave.

Everything i have i’ve worked for, and i suggest that they be given the opportunity to work for what they want.  Detention is a necessity, but that shouldn’t mean we leave people to rot.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: End Mandatory Detention
Reply #25 - Dec 15th, 2010 at 5:29am
 
Verge wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 7:04pm:
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 6:15pm:
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:27pm:
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:14pm:
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:07pm:
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 5:02pm:
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:46pm:
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:38pm:
codswal wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:27pm:
jame-e wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 4:07pm:
Plus please explain what xenophobia has to do with processing and detention? We are serving their human rights by processing them, detention is a fairly standard part of processing across the world is it not? What about a governments responsibility towards its current citizens... oh i forgot, we're all terrible xenophobes.



how about asking all Greenies to take responsibility for them.. I have often thought its up to the bleeding hearts to open their homes and their wallets however they never seem to put that idea into a policy motion..

surely bobbys got room for a family or two.



I'm happy to put money into ending mandatory sentencing, if you pay for the open ended war in Afghanistan, that probably caused some of these refugees in the first place.

And it is curious to note, compassion to fellow humans is now bleeding hearts to the heartless. So why do you support the afghan war again?


How and replaced by what?



By shifting my share of tax money that goes to the open ended Afghanistan war to refugees.


And... do what? What would your policy actually do? What would change and how would it be an improvement?


It is not a policy, it was a reply to your statement. Keep your hair on.


Right... So you don't support any kind of policy change?




I support faster processing, and then integration while their refugee claims are processed.

Where do you stand?


Why integrate while processing when the outcome of that is unknown.

It is giving false hope, and most importantly they are unknown.  Talk about an open door policy.



So what is the percentage of successful applications ... 98 plus percent?

So the sooner they are integrated, the less chance of damage we will be inflicting.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: End Mandatory Detention
Reply #26 - Dec 15th, 2010 at 5:33am
 
jame-e wrote on Dec 15th, 2010 at 12:29am:
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 6:15pm:
I support faster processing, and then integration while their refugee claims are processed.

Where do you stand?


Ok, but that suggests that there isn't a problem with how we integrate people.

Where do i stand? I don’t believe that detention is humane. It could be made more humane by doing something for the detained. If they were capable of making the journey to Australia than they are capable of contributing to the community they wish to join. The Australian people have decided that we have a responsibility to these people, thus i feel creating a responsibility on the asylum seekers part. If picking lychees and digging holes was good enough for me than its good enough for anyone. They should be made to contribute in any way that they can while they are in transition. We have severe labour shortages in some industries and i propose that we should invest in something that is productive. Productive for them and productive for the community. If the residents of the Asti hotel were assisted in contributing to the mango harvest it would do a world of good. Along with some education it would help to give them the ability to function independently within the community and create more value in that goal. In turn the community’s views would change dramatically.

We require 457 visa holders to live where we require their contributions to be made. Why do we not expect the same from all who seek residence in this country. Obligation is empowering, not detrimental. Remember that these people were not rescued from a refugee camp, they are able, determined and were financially capable of making the journey that they made. 2 to 5 years service in an area of need in order to gain residence is a gift, a gift that thousands accept and millions would crave.

Everything i have i’ve worked for, and i suggest that they be given the opportunity to work for what they want.  Detention is a necessity, but that shouldn’t mean we leave people to rot.




Our views are not that far apart ... a slight difference is I don't think these people have risked their own and their families lives to slack off and suck off society.
Give them opportunities and I believe they will grab then with both hands.

Like all the other migrants have before them.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aussiefree2ride
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3538
Re: End Mandadory Detention
Reply #27 - Dec 15th, 2010 at 8:49am
 
skippy. wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 1:48pm:
aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 1:42pm:
What a piss weak poll woody.


I set the poll,as requested, are you the one who voted no but was afraid to say so?



So you are Woody, Skippy. Your poll is about on par for shallow thinking as the rest of your mad posts.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
jame-e
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 426
Darwin (currently)
Gender: male
Re: End Mandatory Detention
Reply #28 - Dec 15th, 2010 at 1:02pm
 
____ wrote on Dec 15th, 2010 at 5:33am:
jame-e wrote on Dec 15th, 2010 at 12:29am:
____ wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 6:15pm:
I support faster processing, and then integration while their refugee claims are processed.

Where do you stand?


Ok, but that suggests that there isn't a problem with how we integrate people.

Where do i stand? I don’t believe that detention is humane. It could be made more humane by doing something for the detained. If they were capable of making the journey to Australia than they are capable of contributing to the community they wish to join. The Australian people have decided that we have a responsibility to these people, thus i feel creating a responsibility on the asylum seekers part. If picking lychees and digging holes was good enough for me than its good enough for anyone. They should be made to contribute in any way that they can while they are in transition. We have severe labour shortages in some industries and i propose that we should invest in something that is productive. Productive for them and productive for the community. If the residents of the Asti hotel were assisted in contributing to the mango harvest it would do a world of good. Along with some education it would help to give them the ability to function independently within the community and create more value in that goal. In turn the community’s views would change dramatically.

We require 457 visa holders to live where we require their contributions to be made. Why do we not expect the same from all who seek residence in this country. Obligation is empowering, not detrimental. Remember that these people were not rescued from a refugee camp, they are able, determined and were financially capable of making the journey that they made. 2 to 5 years service in an area of need in order to gain residence is a gift, a gift that thousands accept and millions would crave.

Everything i have i’ve worked for, and i suggest that they be given the opportunity to work for what they want.  Detention is a necessity, but that shouldn’t mean we leave people to rot.




Our views are not that far apart ... a slight difference is I don't think these people have risked their own and their families lives to slack off and suck off society.
Give them opportunities and I believe they will grab then with both hands.

Like all the other migrants have before them.


Agreed. But i think they are very different to the migrants that have come before them. My experience with migrants is almost 100% positive. My experience with refugees is much less positive than that. Yes these people are human beings but that does not automatically qualify them for success in Australian society, we need to do more.
Slamming mandatory detention and in any way fuelling detainees undesirable behaviour is highly destructive. Both for the detained and for the community. By all means fight for a better deal, but calling for an immediate end to mandatory detention i think is total stupidity given the current environment surrounding this issue.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
skippy.
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 20882
Gender: male
Re: End Mandadory Detention
Reply #29 - Dec 15th, 2010 at 1:46pm
 
aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 15th, 2010 at 8:49am:
skippy. wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 1:48pm:
aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 14th, 2010 at 1:42pm:
What a piss weak poll woody.


I set the poll,as requested, are you the one who voted no but was afraid to say so?



So you are Woody, Skippy. Your poll is about on par for shallow thinking as the rest of your mad posts.


When you read the first post of this thread for the first time you will see Greens asked for someone else to set up a poll as they could not work it out.Are you really that stupid or do you need to work on being such a stupid old fart?
Back to top
 

  freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print