____ wrote on Dec 14
th, 2010 at 6:15pm:
I support faster processing, and then integration while their refugee claims are processed.
Where do you stand?
Ok, but that suggests that there isn't a problem with how we integrate people.
Where do i stand? I don’t believe that detention is humane. It could be made more humane by doing something for the detained. If they were capable of making the journey to Australia than they are capable of contributing to the community they wish to join. The Australian people have decided that we have a responsibility to these people, thus i feel creating a responsibility on the asylum seekers part. If picking lychees and digging holes was good enough for me than its good enough for anyone. They should be made to contribute in any way that they can while they are in transition. We have severe labour shortages in some industries and i propose that we should invest in something that is productive. Productive for them and productive for the community. If the residents of the Asti hotel were assisted in contributing to the mango harvest it would do a world of good. Along with some education it would help to give them the ability to function independently within the community and create more value in that goal. In turn the community’s views would change dramatically.
We require 457 visa holders to live where we require their contributions to be made. Why do we not expect the same from all who seek residence in this country. Obligation is empowering, not detrimental. Remember that these people were not rescued from a refugee camp, they are able, determined and were financially capable of making the journey that they made. 2 to 5 years service in an area of need in order to gain residence is a gift, a gift that thousands accept and millions would crave.
Everything i have i’ve worked for, and i suggest that they be given the opportunity to work for what they want. Detention is a necessity, but that shouldn’t mean we leave people to rot.