Raiders investigate animal sex picture



A Canberra Raiders star is at the centre of a club investigation after allegedly being involved in a sex act with a dog.
The player was allegedly photographed in the act by fellow players during the Raiders' Mad Monday celebrations.

The photo has been widely circulated in the past 24 hours.

Raiders CEO Don Furner confirmed an investigation was under way.

"If he did it, it is something he will live with for the rest of his life," Furner said at a press conference in Canberra.

"We don't know whether it's authentic."

The Raiders were knocked out of the NRL playoffs after losing 26-24 to the Tigers at Canberra Stadium.


Update ... player has admitted the pic is real

Guess I shouldn't name the player, or show the pic here.

CAUTION....LOOK AT YOUR PERIL

http://twitpic.com/33eepz

He should be reported to the RSPCA. These people make Ivan Milat look civilised. Animals raping animals! What next? a corpse.

Will he get rewarded for this? a tv show, a new contract, a sponsorship from a beer company perhaps?

Honestly when I first saw it, I thought it was bahamian caught on film.

Is that sarah palin without lipstick?

____ wrote on Nov 4^th, 2010 at 6:18pm:


...

Lame.

As a joke, it doesn't even work. Sarah Palin is definitely an attractive woman.

<<Lame.

As a joke, it doesn't even work. Sarah Palin is definitely an attractive woman. >>
..............................................................................

She said 'what's the difference between a bulldog and a hockey mom"?........lipstick.

According to Bill Clinton it wouldn't even be classed as a sex act.

So he had had a dog lick his nuts. Who cares?

<<So he had had a dog lick his nuts. Who cares? >>
......................................................................

Anyone with a little incy wincy bit of human decency.

Yeah well if the lad had licked the dog`s nuts.........

qikvtec wrote on Nov 4^th, 2010 at 8:52pm:


People who think images like this aren't funny.

Definitely attractive =/= oil painting (though most women depicted in oil paintings are ugly so I wouldn't say the parallel there completely works, though I obviously know what you meant)

You have to correct for the age factor here. Compared to most women of her age cohort, she is stunning. Obviously she isn't knockout babealicious but let's be reasonable here. I can barely stand to look at most women over the age of thirty five.

JC Denton wrote on Nov 4^th, 2010 at 9:06pm:


Mate, your missing out. i have to agree with the notion that women don't reach their prime (sexually) till ~30+ (yes i have a penis and i don't apologise).


Sarah Palin is ugly. Her basic and corrupt entrails excrete from every orifice, her (...their) ideas are cancer... they infect and cripple my member.

jame-e wrote on Nov 5^th, 2010 at 11:07pm:



Of course, this is natural, dick jokes are the funniest, followed by loud wet farts and embarrassing incontinence.  This is our culture and heritage. Gay stuff is funny too, though pedo isn`t funny at all.

p.s. If one could combine a gay mother in law joke with some dick, wet farts, and embarrassing incontinence, they`d be on a real winner.

aussiefree2ride wrote on Nov 6^th, 2010 at 5:49am:



Maybe we can make those jokes once a month!

Quote:


Actually, when people are paid as  Professionals then their 'Private Life' is a part of that 'professionalism'.
...unlike the Players of Old, who had to work in supporting jobs.

Sums up Rugby League = GRUBS.
I don't even bother with a Code that can't even get its own rules right.

Mind you, its the League's Club venues like Panthers that gets the crowds in ...not the Players, so I don't even know why they think they are 'Celebrities', Gods gift to women and ...even animals.

I'm pretty sure this isn't the only incident...

It_is_the_Darkness wrote on Nov 6^th, 2010 at 10:16am:


Absolute crap. They are professional RUGBY players. What they do in there own time is there own business. Their private life is their own business.
To claim that we have a right to pry into and judge their private lives is just an attempt to justify nosiness and peoples love of being morally outraged

The_Barnacle wrote on Nov 6^th, 2010 at 10:42am:




Partially right there buddy
When they are out in public in their own time then they are still open to scrutiny.
WHilst what they do in private parties/functions or their own home or friends home or motel etc then the public doesnt have a right.

The 'paying' public has every right.
If he was playing football for free or by his own finances - then the Public should 

But he's not.
Whats next ....in his 'own time' ?
Child molestation?

If they players get away with it, don't get busted - good on em then.
But if they get caught - then "shame shame shame".

It_is_the_Darkness wrote on Nov 6^th, 2010 at 10:58am:




Are you saying that their sport, rugby, is not their main source of income?

It_is_the_Darkness wrote on Nov 6^th, 2010 at 10:58am:


With all due respect I think it is you that has the bent view upon what makes a professional. When I was growing up it was source of ridicule that US sportsmen had "morality" clauses in their contracts. "only in America" we used to say. Now unfortunately it has started over here.
Sportsmen are paid to play sport. I don't give a toss what they do in their free time. If they have done something illegal, let the police deal with it. I have nothing but contempt for those people who are obsessed with sportsmen's private lives.

Well then "Oh Yeah" - you go right out and support your "professional"  team of molesters, beastialities, junkies, acoholics, murderers, dole-bludgers, rapists, dealers, thieves and liars.

I support a professional team of men who try their best to 'better' the game they play in ...in their own time.

It_is_the_Darkness wrote on Nov 6^th, 2010 at 11:13am:




As he said, if it is illegal (off field)- let the police deal with it.
If it effects their performance on the field then the selectors will deal with that aspect.

Quote:

i bet he hopes the Police get to him first,
because I'm sure he doesn't want attention from the Animal Rights Activists.

Nahhhhh
I didn't say 'either'
I'm saying 'both' (and even more if possible) should give his dirty paws a wrap.


...anyway, I'm over this Topic - before it starts to have a negative side effect on me like watch another National Redneck League game.

This is what can happen to some men when women close up shop!


bwaaaahaaaa

tickfen wrote on Nov 6^th, 2010 at 12:04pm:



This is why they close up shop, who'd want to catch ticks and parvovirus.

Quote:

Most blokes have had canine sex, just that at the time the beer goggles are working!

aussiefree2ride wrote on Nov 6^th, 2010 at 12:50pm:


LOOK!    NO HANDS!

I'm betting that your right Because dumb people are wrong.