Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 6
Send Topic Print
Geniuses or Liars, fact or theory (Read 6459 times)
mellie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8142
Sydney
Gender: female
Geniuses or Liars, fact or theory
Oct 18th, 2010 at 10:06am
 
So as to stop intruding on the Mary MacKillop thread..(out of respect for others who wish to discuss her very memory).....

I wish to denote this thread to discussing controversial feats of mankind, scientific or otherwise.



A theory of Einstein the irrational plagiarist
Christopher Jon Bjerknes – The Canberra Times September 19, 2006

The name "Einstein" evokes images of a good-humoured genius, who revolutionised our concepts of space, time, energy, mass and motion. Time named Albert Einstein "person of the century". The language itself has incorporated "Einstein" into our common vocabulary as a synonym for extraordinary brilliance. Many consider Einstein to have been the finest mind in recorded human history.

That is the popular image, fostered by textbooks, the media, and hero worshiping physicists and historians. However, when one reads the scientific literature written by Einstein's contemporaries, a quite different picture emerges: one of an irrational plagiarist, who manipulated credit for their work.

Einstein is perhaps most famous for the special theory of relativity, published in 1905 in the German physics journal, Annalen der Physik. The paper was devoid of references, a fact that Einstein's friend and Nobel prize winner for physics, Max Born, found troubling.

continues...

http://web.archive.org/web/20061116211832/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/print.asp?ID=...
Back to top
 

All together now Labor voters.......&&&&lap-tops, pink-bats refugees and Clunker-cars&&&&insurance.AES256
 
IP Logged
 
darkhall67
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1935
Re: Geniuses or Liars, fact or theory
Reply #1 - Oct 18th, 2010 at 10:41am
 

     
Re: Mary MacKillop will be a Saint.
Reply #87 - Today at 10:23am
   
mellie wrote on Today at 9:34am:
Just one of many things which bring him into disrepute are as follows...

(And yes, there are many)

Schrödinger gas model

Einstein suggested to Erwin Schrödinger that he might be able to reproduce the statistics of a Bose–Einstein gas by considering a box. Then to each possible quantum motion of a particle in a box associate an independent harmonic oscillator. Quantizing these oscillators, each level will have an integer occupation number, which will be the number of particles in it.

This formulation is a form of second quantization, but it pre-dates modern quantum mechanics. Erwin Schrödinger applied this to derive the thermodynamic properties of a semiclassical ideal gas. Schrödinger urged Einstein to add his name as co-author, although Einstein declined the invitation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein
______________________________________

In other-words, he was a conceited self-promoting untrustworthy Shmuk, given he took all the credit for other scientists contributions...so what's to say anything with a modicum of genius was in fact his, when he point-blank refused to give others credit where it was Jew.

-Smirk
 And why?

Because he knew it was BS himself. In fact, Einstein knew much of his theory would remain just that, theory.....

http://www.aulis.com/albert_einstein.htm



-----------------------------------------------



So einstein declined schrodingers invitation to be acknowledged as "co-author" so schrodinger gets all the credit and that makes einstein "conceited self promoting and untrustworthy"?


How do you figure that?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mellie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8142
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Geniuses or Liars, fact or theory
Reply #2 - Oct 18th, 2010 at 1:03pm
 
No, he declined duel authorship because he probably didn't want to be cited for having lead other scientists astray with his own inherent BS.... plus it would have rendered him obliged to re-substantiate his own formula , claim, at a time when other scientists were becoming increasingly suspicious of his controversial theories, feats.

Perhaps given the original source had deceased, this and doing so would have been difficult had someone expected him to explain his own theory?

Theory's he himself admitted would unlikely be proven fact for many years after his death, ....and this is being guarded by our sprawling Zionist-socialists movement still calling the shots in US today, ....who more or less portray him as being an individual of exceptional , almost immortal IQ potential, and to such an extent that one of them even stole and pickled his brain most mortem, without having asked for familial consent.

Their reasoning for why our scientists of today cannot make sense of some of his especially ridiculous and myth-busted theories is that modern scientists still haven't caught up with his genius yet.

It's politically incorrect to question his intellect, status, and who ever does, is immediately branded a racist/lunatic /jealous/trouble-maker...so most just keep it to themselves or publish it quietly.



He has been like so many cranks before him immortalised throughout the scientific pages of our history...  and will be forever more.
it was a matter of good timing for an otherwise unremarkable Jewish school-boy who like Al Gore was very good at deceiving the masses and had family in the right placed to help him along in his pilgrimage to the US.

Now, after having named a university after him, this and awarding him a Nobel prize...it's unlikely they will retract, or scrutinise him now, (as doing so would reflect poorly on them) ...even if the general 'unspoken' consensus among modern academics and leading scientific lights are themselves inherently aware of his vast short-comings and plagiarised works.

He was a crack-pot with the right formula of the day.

e=mc2?

More like

e=rp2

He had no business bringing either politics or religion into the field of science, however this said, had he not done so, he would have remained working at the Swiss Patent Office...  after having been repeatedly declined a position in the scientific course of his choice.

When someone has a great idea, makes a discovery, or invents something be it intellectual property or otherwise......where's the first place they go to secure it?

Many ideas have been stolen by patents officers over the years,(particularly the deceased).. think of patent theft as a business strategy.

The currency of innovation and it's applied industry even?

Cool
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 18th, 2010 at 1:12pm by mellie »  

All together now Labor voters.......&&&&lap-tops, pink-bats refugees and Clunker-cars&&&&insurance.AES256
 
IP Logged
 
mellie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8142
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Geniuses or Liars, fact or theory
Reply #3 - Oct 18th, 2010 at 1:27pm
 
And again, this is just my own theory, though does this mean it's any less relevant than he who's own theories are still yet to be scientifically confirmed fact?

Ask yourself, what did Einstein receive a Nobel Prize for?

Precisely name it.


Cool
Back to top
 

All together now Labor voters.......&&&&lap-tops, pink-bats refugees and Clunker-cars&&&&insurance.AES256
 
IP Logged
 
darkhall67
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1935
Re: Geniuses or Liars, fact or theory
Reply #4 - Oct 18th, 2010 at 2:24pm
 
mellie wrote on Oct 18th, 2010 at 1:27pm:
And again, this is just my own theory, though does this mean it's any less relevant than he who's own theories are still yet to be scientifically confirmed fact?

Ask yourself, what did Einstein receive a Nobel Prize for?

Precisely name it.


Cool





Seriously?


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41429
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: Geniuses or Liars, fact or theory
Reply #5 - Oct 18th, 2010 at 2:31pm
 
einstein = freemason

search max plank

1.6 x 10 to the negative 35th meter

all points of matter lose locality that is

they become omnipresent.

eistein recanted and said max plank is correct ipso facto

E does not equal mc squared

try the veal you have all been hoodwinked.

namaste
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Geniuses or Liars, fact or theory
Reply #6 - Oct 18th, 2010 at 2:44pm
 
mellie wrote on Oct 18th, 2010 at 1:27pm:
And again, this is just my own theory, though does this mean it's any less relevant than he who's own theories are still yet to be scientifically confirmed fact?

Ask yourself, what did Einstein receive a Nobel Prize for?

Precisely name it.


Cool


Mellie's theory of irrelevativity? The Photoelectric effect?

Have you considered that you might actually be out of your depth here?


Quote:
E does not equal mc squared


- and Nagasaki and Hiroshima were never destroyed.  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Geniuses or Liars, fact or theory
Reply #7 - Oct 18th, 2010 at 2:45pm
 
darkhall67 wrote on Oct 18th, 2010 at 10:41am:
     
Re: Mary MacKillop will be a Saint.
Reply #87 - Today at 10:23am
   
mellie wrote on Today at 9:34am:
Just one of many things which bring him into disrepute are as follows...

(And yes, there are many)

Schrödinger gas model

Einstein suggested to Erwin Schrödinger that he might be able to reproduce the statistics of a Bose–Einstein gas by considering a box. Then to each possible quantum motion of a particle in a box associate an independent harmonic oscillator. Quantizing these oscillators, each level will have an integer occupation number, which will be the number of particles in it.

This formulation is a form of second quantization, but it pre-dates modern quantum mechanics. Erwin Schrödinger applied this to derive the thermodynamic properties of a semiclassical ideal gas. Schrödinger urged Einstein to add his name as co-author, although Einstein declined the invitation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein
______________________________________

In other-words, he was a conceited self-promoting untrustworthy Shmuk, given he took all the credit for other scientists contributions...so what's to say anything with a modicum of genius was in fact his, when he point-blank refused to give others credit where it was Jew.

-Smirk
 And why?

Because he knew it was BS himself. In fact, Einstein knew much of his theory would remain just that, theory.....

http://www.aulis.com/albert_einstein.htm



-----------------------------------------------



So einstein declined schrodingers invitation to be acknowledged as "co-author" so schrodinger gets all the credit and that makes einstein "conceited self promoting and untrustworthy"?


How do you figure that?



It's easy darkhall....Schrodinger's work was based on one of Einstien's papers....Einstien declined co-authorship because he wanted his personal friend (Schrodinger) to get all the credit and kudos...

But Einstien 'must' be bad....because he was Jewish.....and that's enough for mellie
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Geniuses or Liars, fact or theory
Reply #8 - Oct 18th, 2010 at 2:52pm
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Oct 18th, 2010 at 2:45pm:
But Einstien 'must' be bad....because he was Jewish.....and that's enough for mellie


Unbelievable. I wonder what other internet conspiracies they believe in? Maybe the moon-landing 'hoax' ?

Do you think Mellie and It_is the_light could be the same person?

They seem to have a lot in common.

Mellie, you should be very wary of your sources. That Truthseeker website was a hotbed of Lefties: (oh noes!)

http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20041206051222/http://www.truthseeker.co.uk/Art...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 18th, 2010 at 3:01pm by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Geniuses or Liars, fact or theory
Reply #9 - Oct 18th, 2010 at 2:59pm
 
muso wrote on Oct 18th, 2010 at 2:52pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Oct 18th, 2010 at 2:45pm:
But Einstien 'must' be bad....because he was Jewish.....and that's enough for mellie


Unbelievable. I wonder what other internet conspiracies they believe in? Maybe the moon-landing 'hoax' ?

Do you think Mellie and It_is the_light could be the same person?

They seem to have a lot in common.


Could be....
Next time I'm at the back of the garden I'll get Snugglepot and Cuddlepie to check with the Unicorn...HE'LL know..
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41429
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: Geniuses or Liars, fact or theory
Reply #10 - Oct 18th, 2010 at 3:00pm
 
in this mother earths history earth had 2 moons in syncronicity

the moon you now observe is hollow and a draconian product yes

you only ever see one side of the moon do you not?

magnetic artificial body which will soon be removed when just like

a cell in the microcosm the earth will divide

and so it is

namaste

-:)
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41429
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: Geniuses or Liars, fact or theory
Reply #11 - Oct 18th, 2010 at 3:02pm
 
unicorns are real yes they are of my kind

these are acturian

arch angels

namaste

-:)
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Geniuses or Liars, fact or theory
Reply #12 - Oct 18th, 2010 at 3:04pm
 
[quote author=it_is_the_light link=1287360366/0#10 date=1287378039]in this mother earths history earth had 2 moons in syncronicity

the moon you now observe is hollow and a [highlight]draconian[/highlight] product yes

you only ever see one side of the moon do you not?

magnetic artificial body which will soon be removed when just like

a cell in the microcosm the earth will divide

and so it is

namaste

-:)[/quote]


[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/6b/Draconian.jpg/200px-Draconian.jpg[/img]
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Geniuses or Liars, fact or theory
Reply #13 - Oct 18th, 2010 at 3:05pm
 
[quote author=it_is_the_light link=1287360366/0#10 date=1287378039]you only ever see one side of the moon do you not?


-:)[/quote]

Actually it's more like 2/3rd or 3/4.....
There's only a narrow slice of the darkside we never see..
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Geniuses or Liars, fact or theory
Reply #14 - Oct 18th, 2010 at 3:06pm
 
[quote author=it_is_the_light link=1287360366/0#11 date=1287378125]unicorns are real yes they are of my kind

these are acturian

arch angels

namaste

-:)[/quote]

They are Arcturian. Get it right.  ;D
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 6
Send Topic Print