http://www.infowars.com/cancer-is-purely-man-made-say-scientists-after-finding-almost-no-trace-of-disease-in-egyptian-mummies/

Cancer ‘is purely man-made’ say scientists after finding almost no trace of disease in Egyptian mummies
                                    
Fiona Macrae
Daily Mail
October 14, 2010
Cancer is a man-made disease fuelled by the excesses of modern life, a study of ancient remains has found.

Tumours were rare until recent times when pollution and poor diet became issues, the review of mummies, fossils and classical literature found.
A greater understanding of its origins could lead to treatments for the disease, which claims more than 150,000 lives a year in the UK.

Despite slivers of tissue from hundreds of Egyptian mummies being rehydrated, just one case of cancer has been confirmed. This is even though tumours should be better preserved by mummification than healthy tissues.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1320507/Cancer-purely-man-say-scientists-finding-trace-disease-Egyptian-mummies.html

Dismissing the argument that the ancient Egyptians didn't live long enough to develop cancer, the researchers pointed out that other age-related disease such as hardening of the arteries and brittle bones died occur.

Fossil evidence of cancer is also sparse, with scientific literature providing a few dozen, mostly disputed, examples in animal fossil, the journal Nature Reviews Cancer reports.

Even the study of thousands of Neanderthal bones has provided only one example of a possible cancer.

Caricaturist James Gillray illustrated the taking of snuff, which appears in first reports in scientific literature of distinctive tumours of nasal cancer in snuff users in 1761
Evidence of cancer in ancient Egyptian texts is also 'tenuous' with cancer-like problems more likely to have been caused by leprosy or even varicose veins.
The ancient Greeks were probably the first to define cancer as a specific disease and to distinguish between benign and malignant tumours.
But Manchester professors said it was unclear if this signalled a real rise in the disease, or just a greater medical knowledge.
The 17th century provides the first descriptions of operations for breast and other cancers.
And the first reports in scientific literature of distinctive tumours only occurred in the past 200 years or so, including scrotal cancer in chimney sweeps in 1775 and nasal cancer in snuff users in 1761.
Professor David, who presented the findings to Professor Mike Richards, the UK's cancer tsar and other oncologists at a conference earlier this year, said: 'In industrialised societies, cancer is second only to cardiovascular disease as a cause of death. But in ancient times, it was extremely rare.
'There is nothing in the natural environment that can cause cancer. So it has to be a man-made disease, down to pollution and changes to our diet and lifestyle.
'The important thing about our study is that it gives a historical perspective to this disease. We can make very clear statements on the cancer rates in societies because we have a full overview. We have looked at millennia, not one hundred years, and have masses of data.
'Yet again extensive ancient Egyptian data, along with other data from across the millennia, has given modern society a clear message – cancer is man-made and something that we can and should address.
Dr Rachel Thompson, of World Cancer Research Fund, said: 'This research makes for very interesting reading.
'About one in three people in the UK will get cancer so it is fairly commonplace in the modern world.
Scientists now say a healthy diet, regular physical activity and maintaining a healthy weight can prevent about a third of the most common cancers so perhaps our ancestors’ lifestyle reduced their risk from cancer.'

Not exactly sound logic there. They are admitting that the egyptians didn't live long enough, but insisting that cancer should happen at a younger age just because those other diseases do.

__________

this point is a semantic lie.

many of these you know as egyptian 'gods' and 'goddesses' lived

for many hundreds of years using the manna and other ancient

esoteric knowledge rituals..do you deny this?

do not believe everything you read for it is the case

that when information is delivered 80% of the truth may be

delivered but again

at critical point of thinking the freemasonic fairygodmothers

twist the thought process and impose a  final distorted veiw.

Up until fairly recently peoples life expectancy was much younger than it is now.
If you go back to Egyptian times people were lucky to see their 30th birthdays. We are more comfortable, have fairer working conditions,  much better health care and have  better diets and variety of foods then we ever have before so people are living much longer.
Smoking and alcohol related cancers are on the rise in less enlightened countries but in Australia those cancers are steadily falling as people smoke and drink less then they used to.
As for cancers in general...as we get older our bodies deteriorate and whereas we used to be long dead before these sorts of cancers had a chance show up, now thanks to modern science and our generally favourable lifestyles we are living to ripe old ages which is long enough for these cancers to catch up with us.
We now die of prostate cancer at 90yrs old instead of dying of smallpox or dysentery at 12 yrs old 

Good post Adelcrow and so true except one point.
Only one Egyptian, Ramses II, lived to a very old age - 130 years.
Which is why that, although a coward in the face of battle, he turned Egypt into a powerful propaganda nation with his 'artistic' endeavours of Monuments, Structures, etc that he lived long enough to see complete - his old age only confirmed his 'godlike' immortality to the common peoples. Typical Ranga! (found adrift  on the Nile as a bubby long before Moses)

What Mr Light suggests in regards to the position of a Pharoah is godswallop giggly-goggly. Most were inbreeds, hence the shape of some of the Crowns (Ramses was a Ranga from somewhere else?). Most Pharoahs lived no longer than the common lifespan. Even the Black Pharoahs from Nubia didn't live much longer than the norm.

Cancers are a product of our 'extended' lifespan and although some bits, like Prostate Glands, can't keep up the pace and thus self-destruct with Cancer ....a fair whack of Cancer is also due to Processed Foods, and Environmental Pollution. A person in the city who goes 'jogging' every morning will have (via surgical autopsy) 'sooty' lungs just as bad as a heavy smokers.
I noticed the difference when I breathed in the good stuff driving along  the road leading to Mt Taranaki-Egmont, where giant hedges upon either side pumped out the freshest of airs I've ever experienced (and I've been around the Himalaya too) - then you return to Sydney at it just smells/tastes like filth! Take into account that I regularly breath in 32% O2 when diving too. There is a difference of quality.

There are many roads that lead to Cancer ...and as you look out from the mountains, you can see the 'Cancer' sprawling across the Sydney Basin, which 'could have been' an area that would have bettered the Nile Delta in regards to Farming to Aqua-Farming output ...now its just another Asian breeding pen.

Nipponese have the highest rate of Bowel or Stomach Cancers in the world ...possibly due to the way their language is structured: they talk Nipponese as if they are 'constipated'.

Did anyone really think that hundreds of years of polluting, combined with the decreasing quality of food, and increasing use of synthetic substances wouldn't affect us sooner or later?

Quote:


is the writer an idiot or something? an understanding of anatomy that could even idenityf tumours is so recent that this kind of comment is irrelvant and statistically invalid. Unless you can refer me to a 850AD report into the incidence of tumours or soemthing of that ilk??

It was only 50 years or so ago many people died of 'natural causes'.

Many older people we declared to have died of old age.  they would just get sick, then pass.

Now days no one dies of that.  Its only through technology and better practices that we are able to determine the causes of, then treatment of such things, thus expanding our life expectancy.

So I guess there is a few reasons for its increasing.  Population increases, diagnosis and I do think the foods/chemicals do play a part.

As for it being man made, highly unlikely.  A good friend had a tumour triggered by a bee sting.

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 18^th, 2010 at 4:53pm:




Don't take it personal longy, but it'd be the height of stupidity to think we can expose ourselves to all manner of unnatural substances and radiations and there not be any downside at all.  Whether you think that overall it's been worth it or not, surely you can't think that there is no downside?  Or can you....?

I'll take the pollution and the radioactivity along with the high standard of living as well as its length anytime thanks!

____________

you will be taking all this junk with you when you leave this planet

bon voyage

-:)

Cancer is simply cellular change, of which deviate from normal cellar growth, this and becomes invasive.

Cancer isn't man-made as such, it's the natural order of things, and plenty of naturally occurring environmental carcinogens can result in changes to a cells DNA.

Plenty of naturally occurring rocks and minerals commonly found deep within our earth's soil, and sometimes not so deep are often radioactive, contain a degree of radiation, this and are known to result in changes to cells in excessive quantities, or due to frequent exposure. I had a rather radioactive rock collection (still do though the offending rocks are now kept in the garage) as a child, which I had no idea at the time was a tad radioactive....until a few weeks after I got them.

Whilst it's true, in modern times we humans are bringing more of these chemical elements into our immediate environments, due to the industrialisation of civilisation and so forth, cells are rather interesting things, this and are adaptable also, forever adapting to ones own environment, ie, it's/suspected that an X-rays might have caused severe radiation poisoning and imminent death on Neanderthal man, this and the exposure to cell-altering chemicals and other substances may have indeed contributed to modern-day man's longevity in some cases.

As you know, not so long ago man used to eat dirt, ground up rocks medicinally, (some people/animals still do), which some believe is their body craving iron or a number of other essential minerals.

Now we know cancers are treated with a number of deemed-lethal chemicals, elements, ie chemo and radiation therapy, with substances such as plant alkaloids, polonium, radium, substances we would normally regard quite toxic when we are otherwise well.

Cancer isn't a disease in it's own right, it's an abnormal, or invasive growth, change in cells, so to suggest man causes his own cancer, when in fact, any number of naturally occurring elements,lifestyle factors, genetics etc could have triggered it,is pretty short sighted.

Also, sometimes cells just spontaneously change of their own accord, then change back again and we still don't know why.


In some cases, yes man does contribute to his own exposure, either knowingly, (smoking, working around harmful chemicals) , but not always... 

Try to relax, and not think too much on it.

Hey, you gotta die of something, and whilst I agree, we need to start taking better care of our environment, I wouldn't go so far as to say we are killing off our species, because if this were the case, our lifespan would be decreasing, not increasing.

nutjob.

GOD/PRIME CREATOR has no responsibility to the freewill

HE has given unto you dear souls

man has created all the problems you see on your world

this dear mother earth is PERFECT

man has been hoodwinked into believing dogma and doctrine

delivered by the freemasonic despots

and so it is

namaste

-:)

http://www.couriermail.com.au/business/cancer-chemical-found-at-gas-site/story-e...

Quote:


What a bunch of geniuses.  Somebody should tell them that BTEX occurs naturally in crude oil and coal, that petrol contains about 3% benzene (much more than a trace), and about 36% BTEX overall. 

I think your comparing apples and oranges.  Obviously during their time there life was shortened do to what was going on during their time and the food during their time.  We live to 80s based on what is going on during our time.  You can't compare.

___________________
Logan

The African Bush Willow, when applied to someone with a Cancer, can knock the Cancer out or stop it in its tracks like a coma for anything up to 3 months. Its highly recommended that your Doctor gets on top of this window of opportunity ASAP.

____________

Laetrile and Information on Vitamin B17

Since Laetrile is not considered an approved treatment for cancer in the United States, websites that sell it as a cure for cancer are being shut down.  These sites include David Arjona's www.worldwithoutcancer.com and Jason Vale's www.apricotsfromgod.com. To read our opinion out why laetrile and other natural substances used in alternative-cancer therapies are not readily available in the U.S., go to our "why these natural therapies haven't been approved by the FDA" page.

Recently we wrote a letter to the editor of the LA Times regarding an article in their newspaper on Laetrile. Click here to read it.

The Cancer Cure Foundation did an internet search and found some websites that sell apricot kernels (a natural source of B17) and laetrile. We do not have additional information about these companies, but if you do an internet search, you can research these companies and find additional information and sources. Be aware, however, that these companies will probably not be able to give you information about using these substances to treat cancer.

Suppliers of kernels include:

Apricot Power 866-GOT-PITS (468-7487) or www.apricotpower.com
Sun Organic 1-888-269-9888 or www.sunorganic.com
American Biologics in Mexico
http://www.credence.freeserve.co.uk in the United Kingdom sells kernels and laetrile outside of the United States only
http://www.vitaminb17.de
http://www.apricot-seeds.com/ - Our Father's Farm in Canada
Suppliers of laetrile include:

Cyto Pharma in Mexico at 888-281-6663  http://www.cytopharma.com/
KEMSA in Mexico at 800-851-9470 or www.kemsa.com, but they do not ship to the U.S. You have to go and pick up the product in Mexico
Bio Research at 800-291-1508
International Antiaging Systems in Great Britain - www.smart-drugs.com (You can go to their ordering information page for information or in the U.S. fax 310-388-1072)
American Biologics in Mexico
http://www.vitaminb17.de
http://www.credence.freeserve.co.uk in the United Kingdom sells kernels and laetrile outside of the United States only
If you hear of others sources, or if you find out these sources no longer make kernels or laetrile available, you can leave a message with us at webmaster@cancure.org.

In addition, there are many foods that contain Vitamin B17. These include: Apple seeds, alfalfa sprouts, apricot kernels, bamboo shoots, barley, beet tops, bitter almond, blackberries, boysenberries, brewer’s yeast, brown rice, buckwheat, cashews, cherry kernels, cranberries, currants, fava beans, flax seeds, garbanzo beans, gooseberries, huckleberries, lentils, lima beans, linseed meat, loganberries, macadamia nuts, millet, millet seed, peach kernels, pecans, plum kernels, quince, raspberries, sorghum cane syrup, spinach, sprouts (alfalfa, lentil, mung bean, buckwheat, garbanzo), strawberries, walnuts, watercress, yams.

Keep in mind that Vitamin B17 helps prevent cancer, but if one already has cancer, a complete protocol is required including diet, enzymes, exercise, and  supplementation, as prescribed by a physician. In addition, some conditions, such as some brain tumors and basal cell carcinomas may not be helped with laetrile protocol. It is best to work with an alternative physician to be sure you are using the best approach to treat your particular condition. Currently, our data shows that the following doctors and clinics are offering laetrile as part of their therapy:

Advanced Medicine & Research Center - may be closed
American Biologics in Mexico - temporarily closed
American Metabolics in Mexico - temporarily closed
Dr. Beals in Maryland -  (301) 490-9911
Dr. Brodie in Nevada www.drbrodie.com 775-829-1009
Dr. Briggs in Montana - 701-838-6011
Dr. Callebout in London England 011 44 207 2 55 2232
Dr. Castillo in Mexico - http://www.translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://www.drcastillo.com/index%20es.html - 800-296-9881
Center for Natural Medicine in Mexico - may be closed
CHIPSA in Mexico - 800-573-9720
Dove Clinic for Integrated Medicine in the UK. http://www.doveclinic.com
Harold Manner in Mexico - temporarily closed
Hans Nieper Clinic (confirming info) 011-49-511-348-08-08
IMS in Atlanta Georgia (770) 474-4029
Joseph Brenna in Israel - 972-3-5467733
Hospital Bajanor in Mexico - www.bajanor.com. 1-888-294-0342
LifeExtension  in Nevada http://www.aacancer.com  775-324-5700

Oasis - Dr. Contreras in Mexico - 888-500-4673
Dr. Rizov in Austin, TX - (512) 451-8149
Dr. Schachter in NY (845) 368-4700 www.mbschachter.com
Stella Maris in Mexico - 800-973-7909
Dr. Swetlikoff, ND in Kelowna Canada - 250-868-2205
We hope to have write ups on all of these clinics soon. If you know of any other clinics that offer laetrile as part of their protocol, be sure to let us know. In addition, an oncologist can prescribe laetrile. Lorraine Rosenthal of The Cancer Control Society tries to keep on top of doctors who use laetrile - 323-663-7801.

If you would like to read information on Laetrile and other metabolic therapies, see our list of books, audios, and videos. We recommend World Without Cancer, written by G. Edward Griffin,  and Alive and Well, written by Philip E. Binzel, Jr., M.D.

http://www.cancure.org/laetrile.htm

The African Bush Willow, when applied to someone with a Cancer, can knock the Cancer out or stop it in its tracks like a coma for anything up to 3 months. Its highly recommended that your Doctor gets on top of this window of opportunity ASAP.

___________

here is another cure for cancer yes YOU can now cure cancer HIV

http://www.sutherlandia.org/cancer.html

Sutherlandia and Cancer

This brief document is intended to answer the frequent questions asked about the use of Sutherlandia tablets/capsules in patients with cancer. There is a well-established present and historical folk-use of Sutherlandia in the treatment of cancers, and indeed the Afrikaans name is Kankerbos, or Cancer Bush in English. This has created expectations from patients, friends and relatives which should be tempered by responsible information.

Quality-of-Life Tonic
There is preliminary clinical evidence that Sutherlandia has a direct anticancer effect in some cancers, and also acts as an immune stimulant, but Sutherlandia should not be recommended as a so-called “universal cancer cure”, but rather as a quality-of-life tonic.

Mood
Sutherlandia decreases anxiety and irritability and it elevates mood.
Appetite and weight
It is an established fact that up to a third of cancer patients succumb to the wasting syndrome, rather than the actual tumor mass. Appropriate doses of select chemotypes and varieties of Sutherlandia dramatically improves appetite, and weight-gain can be expected in wasted patients. The first 5 kg gain is common after six weeks of treatment. In patients who are not wasted, weight-gain is not usual.
Energy levels and exercise tolerance
Sutherlandia typically improves the energy levels and exercise tolerance of patients, and gives an enhanced sense of well-being.
Qualified Healthcare Professionals
It is recommended that all cancer patients get assessed and managed by an appropriately qualified healthcare professional with recognized experience in managing cancer. The patient will need to make an informed decision about the treatment modalities to follow in his / her specific case. A decision should be made on whether or not Sutherlandia and / or other natural approaches to managing cancer should be included, and if so at what stage of the planned treatment regimen.

Nutrition
It is recommended that any cancer management programme should include meticulous attention to optimizing diet in consultation with a professional nutritionist with experience and interest in cancer.

Emotional, Cultural and Spiritual
The participation of a psychologist, traditional healer and / or spiritual person could also be considered as part of the holistic team to provide support for the important but neglected emotional, cultural and spiritual aspects of the illness.

Dose of Sutherlandia
The minimum dose of select Sutherlandia varieties for enhanced quality-of-life is one tablet (300 mg) twice a day, after meals. This can be taken long-term.

Many cancer patients, in an effort to explore possible anticancer activity, choose to self-medicate with two tablets (600 mg) three times a day after meals. This is typically taken long term.

Precautions
It is not recommend that Sutherlandia be taken during pregnancy.

Publications:
A number of recent published scientific studies on Sutherlandia have shown interesting results, including anti-HIV activity, anti-oxidant activity, anti-inflammatory activity, anti-cancer activity, and also potential drug interaction between Sutherlandia and anti-retroviral drugs. Summaries of the published studies are included. People living with HIV should discuss the potential use of Sutherlandia with their doctor or healthcare professional.

Apricot was the 'staple' diet of a few Hunza tribes up in the Karakorams. Apricot was in everything they consumed.
This is the only explaination as to why they 'traditionally' lived to a 'ripe' age of 150+ years. They were first 'recorded' by Alexander on his way to India, of which a few 'characteristics' (blonde hair, blue eyes) are stil prevalent in the tribes today. Since Globalisation, the average life-span of these people has become 80 years the norm, like most of the world
...wether this is due to the introduction of Coca Cola and McDonalds?