qikvtec wrote on Jul 5
th, 2010 at 7:51pm:
One needn't look too far on many political boards to find shining examples of the need for late 3rd Trimester abortion.
That reminds me of a question in Parliament back in the early 1970,s, when Whitlam was PM, and Malcolm Fraser got up and demanded that Whitlam give a clear indication of whether he was in favour of legalised abortion or not.
Whitlam replied; "I am, and in your case I would make it retrospective."
I miss the days when listening to question time was entertaining as well as informative, Whitlam had some real no-hopers as some of his Ministers, like weird Al Grassby, and Jim, hide your wallets, Cairns, as his woeful Treasurer, but there were also some great speakers in the Parliament then, which we sadly do not seem to have anymore.
As to the matter of abortion, Victoria seems to have the most recent, and clearest rulings on what the community standards are, as legislated in a new law in 2008.
Annie was right in thinking that a time period is mentioned, and that is 24 weeks, before that a doctor can determine the case on his own, but after 24 weeks at least 2 doctors must consult, and agree that the stated criteria are met.
As for FD's assertion that a law not being enforced is the same as being legal, then he should perhaps inform the judges who convicted a NSW doctor for doing an illegal abortion in 2006.
The fact that Doctors were operating under a quasi-legal ideal on how abortions should be conducted, rather than having a specific law stating clearly what those criteria were, was why Victoria acted a couple of years ago, as the threat of prosecution hung like the proverbial sword of damacles over the heads of any Doctor if someone chose to question his interpretation of the "expected" standards that they had been working under.
Most states now look to Victoria's legislation as the blueprint for a modern legal approach to the abortion issue.