Still Centrist Libertarian.

eg:

Code:

[img]http://www.politicalcompass.org/facebook/pcgraphpng.php?ec=-2.75&soc=5.03[/img] 

gives:

http://www.politicalcompass.org/facebook/pcgraphpng.phpec=-2.75&soc=5.03

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.46


Same as Gandhi 

would  have liked to be more closer to  the Dalai Lama tho   

I am closest to the centre (fair and balanced), so far. Wisdom, eh??? No surprise there....

Hmmm

My political compass seems to be ...

Economic Left/Right: -2.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.72

http://www.politicalcompass.org/printablegraph?ec=-2.88&soc=2.72

Red rules (just not too far to the left of red).

My test result is here:

Still trying to work out attaching graph.

AAAARRRRRGGGGHHHH

Team Froggie wrote on Jun 19^th, 2010 at 1:10pm:



Save it as a file & attach it in your reply.

Bobby. wrote on Jun 19^th, 2010 at 1:16pm:

-------------------------
Ahhh, so!

Thanks bobby.

Wow! perce....you're such a leftard!....joking

my political compass

Econ Left/Right    -7.25
Soc Lib/Auth       -2.31

Aww poo....The pic didn't show...

I have a feeling that that's partially a problem with the test itself. Many of the questions that indicate an authoritarian/economically right orientation are of the kind that VERY FEW people in society would agree to. Others are directly lifted from the F-test and the Authoritarian Personality (like the odd questions about Abstract art and the 'fusion of information and entertainment'). Other questions, like these, few would agree with;

'If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations.'

Most people would immediately disagree, even though I don't think those that would would see the matter as that simple.

'Our race has many superior qualities, compared with other races.'

This one I would assume puts you up the authoritarian scale a lot. Nobody would agree with it (I put strongly agree, even though I don't think the matter is as simple as the question is worded)

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jun 19^th, 2010 at 8:47pm:

aikmann4 wrote on Jun 19^th, 2010 at 8:46pm:

Why would most disagree with that statement?

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 19^th, 2010 at 8:50pm:


Maybe you're right, but I don't know. Corporations have very few apologists from my experiences.

Yeah, that's a load of sh*t and a complete misunderstanding of the concept of heterosis.

Oh sorry. I actually misread the question (I kind of speed read a lot of the time, so my comprehension isn't always 100% when I do). So we'd both agree.

Quote:


Why? Perhaps you should start a new thread on this one.

"'If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations.'

Most people would immediately disagree, even though I don't think those that would would see the matter as that simple.

'Our race has many superior qualities, compared with other races.'"

Well I can't see how any one would disagree with the first statement...

Globalisation SHOULD serve humanity, rather than corporations...

And as for the second...Why should one race have 'superior' qualities, compared to any other????

Lactose tolerance is one. 

perceptions_now wrote on Jun 19^th, 2010 at 9:32pm:

The statement asks you to entertain the idea that economic globalisation is inevitable. Of course you may not agree with the premise, but that wasn't the point of the statement. Its like "IF the greening of the sky and the bluing of the grass is inevitable, then artistic realism should reflect that reality".

Granted that the questions offer options that many of us would never actually choose, as Helian said, all I can say is, me and Nelson Mandela were going down the pub when we met ghandi, and like three little peas in a pod, we decided instead to stick up for the underdog, and give the authorities the big raspberry.

aikmann4 wrote on Jun 19^th, 2010 at 9:00pm:


Yes the person who wrote the question was relying on the reader
not understanding genetics.

perceptions_now wrote on Jun 19^th, 2010 at 10:02pm:


Freediver,
I have just posted some additional info on the Future thread.

You may find the Richard Heinberg video's, in particular, relate to some of what I referred to above. 

remember_when64 wrote on Jun 20^th, 2010 at 12:52pm:


Economic Left/Right: 0.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.10

Bobby. wrote on Jun 20^th, 2010 at 12:55pm:


I know what heterosis is. Human races are not sufficiently inbred enough to benefit much, if at all, from hybrid vigour.

Barack Obama's mixed genes did not make him 'brilliant' (if he is even brilliant; that statement is not substantiated by anything conclusive). His father is an extreme outlier of his cohort and his mother is a white (wacko) with a PhD.

I don't know how you can state that hetereosis has made mixed race people brilliant. That statement is disproven just by looking around the world today.

Bobby. wrote on Jun 20^th, 2010 at 1:22pm:


Who are you associating with?

Would you call most Aboriginals 'very intelligent'?

Why are Latin American nations such pestholes?

Quote:


rofl

You realize they're probably very intelligent for a very obvious reason other than that they're mixed race, right?

Quote:


How many Aboriginals without admixture have you met in your life? I'm sure I could count them on one hand.

So from this, why are there achievement gaps that we're constantly being reminded of?

Quote:


What?

Latin America is the most miscegnated region on the planet. Three major human races have come together there to create many populations that are so differentially admixed that they are very difficult to categorize. The most successful and intelligent people from Latin America are unmixed Europeans and unmixed Japanese Brazilians.

Oh.

You are a loony.

Why?

Quote:


Seriously? That's enough to make someone a 'Hitlerite'?

Quote:


But I do.

Quote:


Hitler believed in one master race; the German race. His views had nothing whatsoever to do with heterosis.

No real surprises there.

Your political compass

Economic Left/Right: 1.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.13

People who haven't posted yet:

Athos
Freediver
sprintcyclist
Abu (I doubt we'll ever get him to)
Calanen
Karnal
tallowood
Locusticus
mantra
auzgirl

Would be nice if you guys and gals took the test so we can get a nice complete composite picture.

Oooh interesting. I might have a go at that one also now. Thanks