abu_rashid wrote on Oct 27
th, 2008 at 6:40am:
Less than 100 years ago in most Western countries 12 was age of consent, and in quite a few countries today (not just Muslim ones) it still is.
I don't see how all of a sudden marrying at age 12 to a FEMALE became chronically gross, yet marrying another man is now all of a sudden normal and not gross in the slightest...
first of all in Indonesia the age of consent is 16- so it was illegal anyway. So his very act of marrying her was haram because he broke the laws of the country.
Secondly, two men marrying each other has a very important element that this does- mutual adult consent.
Children do not have the ability to discern what they
want need and what is good for them. There is so much room for manipulation and abuse when a child marries a man- there is no guarantee as to the man's character and the child is essentially defenceless against him.
Even if the child has a loving family and support system- that means nothing if you know anything about child psychology. It's very easy to intimidate and manipulate children. A 43 year old man is a lot more sophisticated than a 12 year old girl.
Thirdly- note that the article mentioned the parents consenting to the marriage but did not mention anything about the child consenting.
Then again this is a moot point- for it is my opinion that a 12 year old does not have the capacity to consent to marriage and sexual relations.
the fact that this used to be legal in western countries less than 100 years ago means sweet FA. It's not going to make me agree with it, or give this act some kind of authority via historical tradition. There were many things 100 years ago, and even now, that I do not morally agree with and the mere fact that they exist or have existed does little to sway me from that point of view.