Grendel wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2008 at 12:41pm:



"No skinheads allowed in the party"
Well that dosn't sound too democratic to me,boof.
All the rest of your post is your usual bullshit rant.

Anyone associated with racist groups etc, etc, was warned and not allowed to become members.  One more time for the non-believing dummy...

Since its inception One Nation has born the brunt of more hypocrisy and dishonesty that any other party in recent times.

RACISTS - the big lie...

Before One Nation was even formed Pauline Hanson was labelled a racist. Cries rang out in Parliament House before she had even finished her maiden speech. The racist LIE was born.

But this political ploy had been used for years by the “left” to silence debate on issues such as immigration and multiculturalism.

A racist is someone who holds the belief that one race is superior to another.

There is NO One Nation policy, so based.

Let’s make that point one more time,
to make it perfectly clear...

There is NO One Nation policy, so based.

The politically correct have lied and corrupted the English language in their attempt to control and stifle debate in Australia.

One Nation - extreme right wing...

Really? A quick look at One Nation policies since it’s inception would quickly put an end to that lie.

But who really knows what One Nation’s policies are? It’s so much easier to just believe what others say.

One Nation has NO answers...

How often have we heard that one? Yet we have governments both federal and state adopting One Nation policies.

How many times have things One Nation warned about come to pass?

Backward looking...

One Nation wants to drag Australia back to the past. Really? At a time when the major parties thought infrastructure development was too difficult and the Democrats didn’t even know what it was. One Nation was asking why not? It was One Nation who wanted to rebuild our manufacturing base here in Australia for our children’s future.

The DEMOCRATS and the anti-Hanson parties...

Just more lies and hypocrisy. When Meg Lees went to the 2001 election on a platform of little more than anti-Hanson sentiment she conveniently forgot that both parties shared many more policy commonalities than differences.

The real reason for targeting One Nation was because they were a political threat to the Democrats, nothing more, nothing less.

The other parties such as Unity, etc. were parties founded on a lie. One Nation was not racist.

Political scare-mongering was used to create more competition and siphon off preferences to the majors.

The BIG Hypocrisy...

In a final bid to kill off One Nation the major parties preferenced each other. This had absolutely nothing to do with any moral imperative. It was pure and simple... a ploy to entrench the status quo.

Both the major parties didn’t care who won government as long as it wasn’t someone other than them.
     

Troops in Iraq-Majority against
ONE NATION AGAINST.

Sale of Telstra-Majority against
ONE NATION AGAINST.

IR reforms-Majority against
ONE NATION AGAINST.

Sooo they are RW are they? Do any of these stands spell RW to you?

Bla bla bla bla bla, give up boofy, Australians decided what they thought of One Nation and the dickheads who supported it, if they were SOOOOOOOOOOO good, why dont they have any members in federal parliment.
As for the Democrates, since when were they left wing?
Last time I checked they were founded by a  Liberal minister.

Democrats? What Democrats?

Weren't the founded to 'keep the bastards honest'?

Until they became a bunch of socialist alcoholic misfits.

Where are they now?

easel wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2008 at 1:05pm:


The same place as One Nation.
A better question should be -who cares where they are now?

One Nation had some truly retarded policies, like their tax policies for example. Obviously if you have enough policies the major parties will adopt a few eventually and reject the rest. This does not make One Nation leadership material.

What drugs were you on at the time squippy...  no skinheads allowed in the party.

That's odd Grendel. Why would they ban people who shave their heads? If racists flock to your party, how can you effectively ban them and stop them from influencing party policy? It's like a politician saying their party has a policy against corruption, therefor there is no corruption in their party