locutius wrote on Aug 21
st, 2008 at 9:33am:
Now
that's
funny
What...that you have a habit of coming to the defense of religous bigots? No...thats true.
locutius wrote on Aug 21
st, 2008 at 9:33am:
I would suggest that you seem to be one of those religious bigots that is continuously hijacking every conversation here.
Would you now? And why is that. I defend my faith and my religon. If this is your definition of a bigot...then fine, I am a bigot.
however, take note, I have never attacked anyone based on there religous beliefs...nor have I judged anyone due to there race or religon. I don't feel 'concern' when someone converts to Judism, Christianity, or any religon.
locutius wrote on Aug 21
st, 2008 at 9:33am:
I don't support bigotry.
Yes you do. Bliss made a quite clear bigotted statement...'concern' that a man has converted to Islam. You glossed over this statement, and chose to go on about petty issues like 'interest' and 'concern' not being 'mutually exclusive'.
You can make statements like 'I don't support bigotry'..but your actions in continuously defending bigotted statements indicate that you do.
locutius wrote on Aug 21
st, 2008 at 9:33am:
I don't support bigotry. I support facts as I best know them, or support pursuing facts deeper. And if I throw my weight behind an argument that is defeated by a better argument I will alter my position gladly.
Mate....the facts are that an Australian man that happens to be a pilot converts to Islam.....and a poster here expresses 'concern' for no other reason then the fact that he converted to Islam. I attack this statement...and you defend it. these are the facts.
Imagine I posted that I was 'concerned' that a navy captain had converted to Judism? Would you come to my aid if someone mocked my statement. I doubt it.
locutius wrote on Aug 21
st, 2008 at 9:33am:
My criticism of that pettiness above still stands. I thought you might have been at least grownup enough not to defend it.
Mate...you've attacked me for finding 'concerned' and 'interested' funny. Your hardly one to talking about pettiness.
locutius wrote on Aug 21
st, 2008 at 9:33am:
As for my opinion, I don't have a problem with the pilot converting to Islam. As for him joining the Army of Islam and without further information I assume
this Army of Islam ....
wikipedia "Notorious for their kidnapping of BBC reporter Alan Johnston and capture of Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, Army of Islam, which appears to draw inspiration from, or is linked to al-Qaeda, have also conducted at least one bombing of a Palestinian civilian target (an empty school) and a number of other kidnappings. The group has been previously closely related to Hamas, but has been since shunned by both Hamas and Fatah. The group has also been known as the organisation of al-Qaeda in Palestine."
it's not like I can tell him he can't do it. If he deserted than there are legal consequenses there especially if legally he is still considered a part of the Australian Military Forces and passes on sensitive information. Will he attack Australian or western interests or citizens??? I assume he will, as he has joined a
millitant movement proven in these actions.
THAT is what will make him an enemy of this country,
NOT the fact that he was or has converted to Islam.
Mate..I suggest you go back and read the opening post. The 'army of Islam' quote came from the poster, who felt that by using such emotive language he/she might make a greater impact.
There is no mention of the 'army of Islam' whatsoever, from a site, that mind you has already been shown to be a hoax.
Besides, how could anyone possibly know that he has joined the 'army of islam'...a group that I have never heard of mind you.
Why do you assume he will attack Australian interests? Why have you even concluded that he has joined 'an army of Islam'?
beleive it or not...thousands of Australians convert to Islam, and though this might really surprise you, but they don't all join 'terrorist' groups. Heck...there are even two on this board.