Lol.

It's funny that you mentioned anti-Semitism considering your post on the Morner interview about disputed evidence on global warming was from a publication with known links to anti-Semitism.

I've seen that argument elsewhere. You are welcome to start a new thread on it. I don't see a sound argument in being able to list a few prominent Jews.

Well have a look around here. I think we manage to discuss some very controversial issues without things getting out of hand. The global board would probably be most suitable. There are no taboos here.

imperial wrote on Aug 17^th, 2008 at 3:53pm:


I think if you look closely you will find that I did not accuse you of anti-semitism. If fact, you were the one who said that there is an air of anti-semitism in here. I merely noticed the irony of your comment and your EIR article.


I cannot comment on Hollywood, or the banking institution beyond hearsay. I've heard others say the same as your comment before but I've not seen any data on it proving the case either way. There is a difference between truth, speculation and conjecture. However, the motive of the publishers of your article can be substantiated. Laroache is a known anti-Semite and a political lobbyist and generally known as a little um... eccentric.

By anti-Semite, I'm using the general and common usage of the term that being anti-Jewish. I know that Arabs form 90% of Semites (Abu has already pointed this out). That being said, the common usage of the vernacular still stands. Everyone knows what is meant when the word is uttered. There is no confusion.

freediver wrote on Aug 17^th, 2008 at 4:29pm:


Except maybe on avatars.

simply google...also jewish owned...not that theres anything wrong with that.....eh jerry......doh!!

explin how one would need to go beyond compiling a list of influencial jews...to compile a list of influencial jews.....hehehe