Quote:And I fear that certain other projects we're the guinea pigs for now are likewise leading to disaster, where they have not already, of course.
Yeah it's become an experiment that's now too big to be allowed to fail, we must keep believing in the unbelievable until reality strikes.
Quote:It's a club that I don't want to join.
There may be those who treat it as a club nowadays, but there was never any specific intent, doctrine or belief that one had to follow in order to join an atheist club.
You are generally
told that you are in this club because of your choosing to not pay membership fees to any other club.
If you believe in Deism and that there is a divine creator who doesn't interfere with human activity, then I'd assume that to mean that you don't want to follow any religious doctrine in it's entirety, but you'll go some way to appease religions as opposed to any specific belief that you have (via thought and reason) in a non-interventionist God.
Bill Mayer is seen as an athiest of the highest order, yet his opinion is that he follows the religion of "I don't know". He also believes that other people as human as himself don't possess any special powers that he does not, so it follows that they probably don't know either.
Richard Dawkins also leaves the possibility open for an interventionist God.
But first you need to define what people are supposed to be believing in.
I have no clue as to any real definition of God, an atheist, or how strictly one must believe in and follow any religious doctrine.
The answer of "I don't know", seems the correct one for me when talking about the yadda yadda. I'd like to know, but I don't need to know.
But a lot of people
need to know don't they?
For maybe obvious reasons, or maybe not, they
need to know that they have all of the answers, even if those answers are ridiculous.i