Amadd wrote on Oct 16
th, 2010 at 5:09am:
Houston we have a problem.
That definition would get you a gold plated membership card into the atheist club no worries.
I know you as a person of science, and the definition that you've provided agrees totally with what I'd expect of you.
When we're speaking of God(s) in religious terms, I'm quite sure that we're speaking of supernatural beings and supreme creators capable of divine intervention.
I don't see where an atheist would not agree with your definition there. In fact, they'd probably say ..bravo!
Yes the laws of the universe state that no man on earth can walk on water or rise into the sky. Snakes can't talk and virgins don't give birth.
Men don't get divine spoken instruction for all of humanity..etc.
What you've described there is a science, not a faith in supernatural beings or supreme creators.
It's a club that I don't want to join. Of course a true atheist, strictly defined as a person who doesn't believe in gods, might have less of an issue with non-interventionist gods such as I have described. He would certainly take issue with Pantheists.
Re Walking on water and talking to snakes, virgin births etc - These are things associated with Theism rather than Deism. Theism is only a subset of the possible interpretations of gods.
A Deist God for example comes without the baggage. Deists generally believe that human beings can only know 'God' (call it the laws of the universe if you will) via reason and the observation of nature - not by revelation or supernatural manifestations such as miracles or prophesies. These are things that deists generally regard with total skepticism. Their position is that of rationalism with a prime cause. Of course we can't say anything about that prime cause.
I sometimes feel more affinity with Deists than with the label of Atheist, but I enjoy various religions for their cultural value. However, neither belief in god(s) nor disbelief in gods are important aspects of my life. A non interventionist 'god' can hardly be a driving force in my life, yet I choose a non-extremist moral path which most people would find boring. I choose not to drink or take anything that will affect my rationality. I prefer to keep fit and healthy so that I can enjoy the natural world.
Deists have a long history of stigmatisation by Christians in particular, often being denounced as atheists or witches.
Deists are also very diverse in views. Some even choose to adopt Christian morality without the revelatory message (and without the smug self-righteousness of the new Evangelicals).
Unfortunately I see the same brand of smug self-assuredness in the new Atheists, and for me, that's an even more compelling reason to disassociate myself from the term Atheist.
You might have a problem, Houston, but I'm quite happy

By the way, Western secularism probably comes to you from Deism, via the US, through such people as Thomas Jefferson, George Washington and Benjamin Franklin, who were all Deists. Then of course there were Thomas Paine (author of the Age of Reason) and Ethan Allen.
Did you know that a person selling "The Age of Reason" in England was arrested back in the early 19th century for blasphemy?