In response to freediver...
Quote:Who cares?
I care.
Quote:If white people breed with darker skinned people to 'dilute white genes', no-one looses.
I have a few nagging problems with it.
1) I think they get uglier.
2) I think their intelligence gets lower depending on which 'black' people you're talking about. I guess if the 'white' gene is mixed with the 'Indian' gene it wouldn't be too bad.
3) Irreplaceable genes... like blue/green eyes and blonde/red/brown hair would be lost... (Again... it depends on the race of people... Africans are known to have stronger genes than that of 'whites'... therefore.. their genes would overpower ours... thus losing the genetic traits I love so much... whereas certain Indian groups in northern India have been known to sustain green eyes and blonde hair believe it or not). Call me superficial.
Quote:If they are out bred by other races, no-one loses.
No problem with that. I guess since China's and India's populations are so much greater than that of western countries it makes white peoples population tiny in comparison. But there's no denying that 'whites' are rapidly decreasing in western countries.
Quote:Jews control 'most' of the American media...
You have never provided any reasonable supporting evidence for this.
Freediver... I've tried a lot of times to convince you on this site that most of America's media is controlled by Jews... by naming the major media 'owners' and 'personalities.' It's just a well-known fact. Ask any media teacher.
But anyway... what 'reasonable' evidence do you require that will convince you? Seriously... I don't know what reasonable evidence means to you... Aren't names and backgrounds of media owners good enough for you? I don't know what else to list.
Quote:Well... it's actually illegal now to mention the appearance (Aka... if they're of 'middle-eastern/African'Jewish/African appearance) of criminals in the media.
No it isn't.
Um... actually it is. You said that with such conviciton too... funny how you're wrong.
Quote:I can give a very good definition of what makes our 'western/European' culture superior to that of the Middle-East and Africa.
Please do.
Sigh... I'm not getting into that now. Particularly when I'm repeating myself for the jillionth time.
Quote:You accuse white people of being racist when non-whites (Particularly Muslims) are just as, if not more racist than whites themselves.
That doesn't mean you aren't racist. That like complaing about being called a criminal despite the fact that there are worse criminals around.
Welll... yeah...
It's like arresting a Granny that jaywalked and charging her with a bigger punishment than a gang-rapist.
Spot on Freediver.
Furthermore... I could not give a krap if someone is racist or not. To me, it's not a 'crime,' merely an opinion.
Quote:You really think there are people in Australia who have had so little contact with Aboriginals?
Yes?
Quote:You ignore the fact that Africans fleeing from 'war-torn countries' are driving around in brand new $20,000 cars and some Australians are driving around in $1000 bombs.
Are you jelous or something?
Not 'jealousy.' Just a sense of injustice. As I think Australian tax payer money was used to buy that car. How on Earth can FOTB Africans afford that unless they've had massive assistance? Is it the same thing in Sydney or is it just in Melbourne?
Quote:That is half a fact. Notice how a non white commits a crime their face is blurred out on tv. It dosent happen to whites.
There are reasons for doing, or not doing that. They have nothing to do with race. That's the absurdity of racism. You start using race to explain things that have much simpler and more obvious explanations.
I doubt it Freediver. I KNOW (Yes... I'm sure) it's illegal that they aren't allowed to use 'Middle-Eastern (Or any other ethnic description)' appearance in newspapers now... so why not blocking out their faces too?
I can't be positive on that one... but I'd bet money on it.
Quote:But come on... you can't honestly say that people weren't scared to call someone 'black' until recently.
That's hardly a significant 'temporary overcorrection' when you look at the history of racism in this country.
Nevertheless... anti-racists still use fear as a tactic. So to me that's being hypocritical if you say 'white supremacists use 'fear' as a tactic.