Quote:And who cares if they aren't recognised as a legal couple? Only they do.
If they care and you don't, why not let them have what they want? Denying something to another person when it would cost you nothing is not a good sign.
I'll accept the union under a few conditions...
1) It's in name only.
2) The taxpayer doesn't have to pay anything extra as a result of this union.
3) They don't get a marriage.
4) They don't show it in public. No kissing... no holding hands. Etc etc.
5) They don't make the union 'religious' in any way. Just a signing of a paper... etc.
6) They don't get any special priveleges.
If they just want acknowledgement... whatever... give them a certificate. But it shouldn't affect the rest of us. Sorry if I'm benig fascist... but I'm just being honest.
Poofters alone don't bother me... it's two poofters together that bother me.
Quote:That is a very negative view of it. Is being heterosexual equally sick? I must admit the promiscuousness and casual sexness of some people living the gay lifestyle I find sickening, but it would be sickening to see heterosexuals having multiple casual sex contacts in public toilets also - just degrading of their and our humanity.
The promiscuous gay lifestyle is generally confined to a segment of the male gay population anyway (I am unsure of the size of the segment) and is atypical in female gay people.
But it is a sickness of the mind connie... sorry... but it is.... for both men and women.
We're built with penises and vaginas primarily for pro-creation. If you prefer sticking it up a guys bum and HATE women.... then quite frankly... you're sick-minded. Sorry. I can't see that any other way.
As far as their choice of lifestyle goes... I don't care so long as it doesn't directly affect me. In the privacy of their own homes... away from us normal people.