Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 15^th, 2011 at 5:23pm:



yeah that's the line....but unfortunately, that's all it is.

If they thought 'critically' about such mantras as 'diversity is strength' they'd soon find that it hasn't a shred of evidence to back it up.  But it doesn't need to - people WANT to believe it.

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 15^th, 2011 at 6:19pm:



Good, because it is a patently false platitude...one that is oft repeated but rarely questioned.

Would you go so far as to say that diversity breeds conflict?

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 15^th, 2011 at 6:41pm:



So what you're saying is that if we keep pushing on with a failing policy, it'll eventually come good?

Well OK, why heres how i got read it;

Quote:


If all goes to plan and we all get along in peace and harmony, then in the long term, we all become one, and there is no diversity anymore.

Quote:


it doesn't have to if?  if compliance with this unnatural edict is enforced and any dissenting (dare I say diverse?) opinions are weeded out and crushed?  Hmmm...sounds like previous incarnations of the left all over again...

but that's obviously not what you meant.  What did you mean?

Quote:


Well since it is so globalized, you've got to ask yourself why we all need to cram together in white countries (and only white countries) If you fancy some Thai culture- go to Thailand.  If you fancy a dash of Indian - go to India.  And if you want some european culture, go to errr....well not europe, since that's no longer for europeans.....erm...well I guess theres no room on this big green planet for whites to call their own.

Quote:



Yes, we do need an other. We always have, and theres no reason to suggest that this part of our nature is going to wane.  Theres more chance of the complete opposite - every non-white can openly identify with and give favour along racial lines.  This group solidarity gives them an advantage over a non-unified group such as...................whites.  When you get a clear advantage from doing things one way, changing to the opposite isn't going to happen.

Quote:



The only way that cultural prefernces won't matter is if there are no cultural differnces at all.  A defining trait of one culture may be abhorrent to another.  Look at the muslim/western contrast for example. Or islam/judaism. or shiite/sunni muslims.

Quote:


This is irreconcilable with your previous staments.  On the one hand, race or culture is irrelevant, but on the other, an absence of different race/cultures provides nothing but 'bland homogeneity'. We're often told that 'there is more variation within a race than between them' - you can't have it both ways.  

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16^th, 2011 at 1:11pm:


As long as cultural practices abide by the law of the country in which its members reside, too bad. Why do you care so much about what other people do when it has absolutely no effect on you?

I don't really care what others do, I more or less keep to myself.  But as part of the majority, I am a part of the only group that has restrictions placed on it.  Example:  I saw a show on ABC the other night - Miss south sudan australia.  Now ask yourself why it's OK for them to hold such a narrowly defined, exclusive event - not just miss africa, or miss sudan, no, this is miss SOUTH sudan.  I wouldn't begrudge them celebrating their group identity, if it was uniform across the board.  Can you imagine the outcry (ironically, the only people who would make a fuss would be white) if I ran a miss white australia contest?  The 'rules' either apply to all, or to none.  Persoanlyl, I'd rather none at all.

Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 16^th, 2011 at 4:15pm:



LOL.  umm it's kinda implied.  There's not that many honkies in south sudan.  Maybe they're all in North Sudan, which is why they were excluded.

Anyhoo, here are the contestants.  Guess how many honkies there are?

http://misssouthsudan.com.au/contestants