Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Which country is the biggest threat to Oz?

Indonesia    
  11 (42.3%)
Malaysia    
  1 (3.8%)
China    
  4 (15.4%)
Other    
  10 (38.5%)




Total votes: 26
« Created by: ex-member DonaldTrump on: Feb 23rd, 2007 at 4:08am »

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print
Which country is the biggest threat to Oz? (Read 37657 times)
Aussie Nationalist
Ex Member
*****



Gender: male
Re: Which country is the biggest threat to Oz?
Reply #45 - Mar 19th, 2007 at 11:12pm
 
Quote:
hunter gatherer communities such as Australian aboriginies and North American indians are very close to this concept in the way that they operate. As our intelligence grew and we became more successful at survival we grew in numbers, eventually having to compete for space, and fight for space. Competition. There is a theory that almost all of modern social order has grown up out of the human drive to fight each other. Warrior classes evolved and took positions of power because they saw that they could. Much technological advancement has evolved as a direct result of war and fighting. As such, much good has come from fierce competition as well as cooperation.


I agree 100%.  Man has excelled through war.
exept that abo's did not have true societies while Native Americans did.

Quote:
Back to my point. Trade (AKA capitalism) is also a fundamental part of this type of society, as it is a fundamental part of all societies. It can be argued that outside of defense,


And thats fine, as long as we dont enter into American capitalism.
Our Defense force needs buiding up.


Quote:
I believe in free market capitalism, and as such I believe in communism...


Why? free markets destroy our local businesses and communism annihilates it.

Quote:
I know its the demon word, but just try for a minute instead of thinking about everyones desire to compete, try to think how much we actually cooperate every single day. We work to trade services for trade units (money). This is cooperation between you and your employer: communism of a sort. You want to eat, you offer trade units in exchange for food, same for housing, clothing etc, this is all cooperation. The sum of all cooperation in a society is community: communism.


Communism is ownership of ALL. what you are talking about here is how general society works.
It aint communist.


Quote:
Personally I believe the best thing society is to find a balance between cooperation and competition.


Agreed.

Quote:
So in a sense I am communist yes, through my belief in the free market.


I believe in tarrifs.

Quote:
But I also have a healthy repsect for competition. My belief in communism stems from a desire to give the word back its true meaning, there has been a disastrous smear campaign against the word communism, which literally means community-ism. Much ignorance has come about through attacks on our language. This is one of the strongest underlying themes in Orwells 1984 if you have read it.


The idea of Communism  was invented for countries of large class divisions to ensure the equality of all peoples. In reality, corruption reigns supreme as the rich (intelligencia) reigns supreme over the system thus, only by the book can the stupid can rule. But it is never the case. imagine a country ruled by idiots! FAMINE.
Yes i have Read George Orwells 1984 and it horrifies me- so many things today exist which are akin;    IE   ; cameras every where. Although i have not yet met the black haired girl to have a root with in the fields lately unfortunately!

BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING! (U.S.A)



Quote:
Above all I believe in intelligence and knowledge, and carefully considered, well thought out beliefs that don't rely on historical doctrine...


History is a GREAT tool. dont ignore it.


Quote:
Sorry for yet another rant, I sit down to write a few sentences and all this poo just spews out...  Tongue


No worries, i spew poo all the time Grin
Back to top
 

hitler9.JPG (23 KB | 93 )
hitler9.JPG
Total anti-marxist and anti-left wing. The Right is Right.&&&&&&
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 50566
At my desk.
Re: Which country is the biggest threat to Oz?
Reply #46 - Mar 20th, 2007 at 10:50am
 
AN do have have a definition of a 'true society.'
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Aussie Nationalist
Ex Member
*****



Gender: male
Re: Which country is the biggest threat to Oz?
Reply #47 - Mar 20th, 2007 at 10:58pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 20th, 2007 at 10:50am:
AN do have have a definition of a 'true society.'


Western society.
Back to top
 
Total anti-marxist and anti-left wing. The Right is Right.&&&&&&
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 50566
At my desk.
Re: Which country is the biggest threat to Oz?
Reply #48 - Mar 21st, 2007 at 9:38am
 
So all you are saying is they weren't European?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
zoso
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 512
Re: Which country is the biggest threat to Oz?
Reply #49 - Mar 21st, 2007 at 1:50pm
 
My god man! Denial of an aboriginal culture prior to white settlement is about as ignorant and pig headed as it gets!

The law of this country has declared 'terra nullius' to be untruthful and unlawful - a direct legal acknowledgement of aboriginal culture.

They even had permenant dwellings in places! They constructed some of the earliest engineering feats known to man through redirection of water courses and building of fish traps etc. Aborigines had a strict breeding program (for want of a better term) whereby they made sure bloodlines did not mix outside of their own plans. This was a direct understanding of the dangers of inbreeding, they knew about this because they kept their communities to the bare minimum for the required genetic diversity that prevents inbreeding. They had an unquestionable mastery of the complexity of their environment and sought to live as close to harmoniously with the environment as they could. There is much to be learned from Australian Aboriginal culture that will help us with future challenges in terms of the environment. Thousands of languages stretching across every square inch of this continent and vastly differing cultures with unsurpassed understanding of their surroundings at any particular time in history, some of the oldest use of tools and trade the planet has known and you say they had no society???

And now this utterly ridiculous comment about 'society' meaning 'western european'... jesus just crawl back into whatever hole you came out of... this is not 1807! this is 2007  Cry
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
auzgurl
Ex Member


Re: Which country is the biggest threat to Oz?
Reply #50 - Mar 21st, 2007 at 2:25pm
 
Abos agree 100%.  Man has excelled through war.
exept that abo's did not have true societies while Native Americans did. "
==============================

Aussie Nat ..this is rediculous..
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
auzgurl
Ex Member


Re: Which country is the biggest threat to Oz?
Reply #51 - Mar 21st, 2007 at 2:37pm
 
Zoso..and aus nat..they also farmed theyre land, as well  fish traps you mentioned and yes they did have dwellings..They also manipulated breeding 'programs' and  practiced infanticide..due to the survuival of the tribe being the priority overall.. the sick and elderly were left behind to die for thsoe who were nomadic and this for the same reason.

They had a wide knowledge of bush medicine all derived from the bush and served them well as treatments for most things that ailed them It was invasion that bought the real threats of foreign illness..as well as tobacco, alcohol and unhealthy westernised diet..sugar and processes flours etc.

The Abl pple when looking to compare the survival of the fittest and most harmoniously in tune with theyre environment, survived over 50 thousand yrs this way....not like the white counterparts , whos mangaed to poison his air water and environment in 200 hundred short yearsAnd well on the way to killing the environmental health of the whole world.



Westrn man can learn so much from Indigenous cultures the world over. They Rea the SUPERIOR species!!!  No contest. They are not stupid enough to allow 'progress ' to contamniate his world so it becomes uninhabitable..now thats stupid!!!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 50566
At my desk.
Re: Which country is the biggest threat to Oz?
Reply #52 - Mar 21st, 2007 at 2:39pm
 
What did they grow?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
auzgurl
Ex Member


Re: Which country is the biggest threat to Oz?
Reply #53 - Mar 21st, 2007 at 2:48pm
 
The mode of life and material cultures varied greatly from region to region. While Torres Strait Island populations were agriculturalists who supplemented their diet through the acquisition of wild foods the remainder of Indigenous Australians were hunter-gatherers. Indigenous Australians along the coast and rivers were also expert fishermen. Some Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders relied on the dingo as a companion animal, using it to assist with hunting and for warmth on cold nights.

"Indigenous Australians did practise agriculture. Torres Strait Islanders were skilled farmers and herdsmen, cultivating a variety of crops including sugar cane, taro and sweet potato as well as husbanding pigs and cassowaries. In contrast Australian Aborigines did not cultivate any crops and lacked any domestic food animals. Some writers have described some mainland Indigenous food and landscape management practices as "incipient agriculture"[13]. In present-day Victoria, for example, there were two separate communities with an economy based on eel-farming in complex and extensive irrigated pond systems; one on the Murray River in the state's north, the other in the south-west near Hamilton, which traded with other groups from as far away as the Melbourne area (see Gunditjmara).

On mainland Australia no animal other than the dingo was domesticated, however domestic pigs were utilised by Torres Strait Islanders. The typical Indigenous diet included a wide variety of foods, such kangaroo, emu, wombats, goanna, snakes, birds, many insects such as honey ants and witchetty grubs. Many varieties of plant foods such as taro, nuts, fruits and berries were also eaten. (see Bush Tucker)."

------------------------------------------------------

I can paste a link..this on Wikipedia and has a comprehensive article on agricuture for Indigenous pple.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
auzgurl
Ex Member


Re: Which country is the biggest threat to Oz?
Reply #54 - Mar 21st, 2007 at 2:52pm
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australians

there are plenty of sites that cover farming!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
zoso
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 512
Re: Which country is the biggest threat to Oz?
Reply #55 - Mar 21st, 2007 at 3:08pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 21st, 2007 at 2:39pm:
What did they grow?

It is also argued by some that their bushfire practices can be regarded as agricultural in nature. Firestick farming they call it - another thing that good ole whitey has messed up. Although I will point out that many also argue the aborigines promoted the dry species through their practices and as such have left to the land dependent on back burning in order to keep the real bushfires controlled - this is what we have failed to keep up.

Ausgirl I won't give the Aborigines complete perfect harmony with nature, although I agree they were light-years ahead of whitey. It is now known that many species were hunted to extinction in the early days of Aboriginal settlement, it is also argued by some like Flannery that this is partly the cause of our bushfire problems and back-burning dependence. The argument is complex, but more or less Flannery suggests that many large herbivorous marsupials that were wiped out were responsible for cleaning the forest floors, which is what back-burning does, without these species the fires that resulted wiped out anything but fire loving plants, leaving us where we are. You can however give them the fact that extinctions occurred in the very early days of Aboriginal settlement in Australia, and they very much did learn to be harmonious with their surroundings as time progressed.

I'd be very suprised if we were able to keep up our 'great' and 'mighty' western civilisation the way it is today for 50+ thousand years (some now think Aboriginal settlement goes back some 80,000 years!). We will be lucky to make it to 300 years without absolutely massive cultural changes!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
auzgurl
Ex Member


Re: Which country is the biggest threat to Oz?
Reply #56 - Mar 21st, 2007 at 3:44pm
 
'Aborigines complete perfect harmony with ' I never used these exact words Zoso..I said most in tune ..and they were..They worked with nature rather then against nature.Firetsick farming is a good example of that >They had to be 'in tune' in this vast and hostile land to be and live so successfully for so long.

Without the aid of modern agricultural farming tools, doctors, health services and environmental planning of any description apart from what theyAborigines  taught themselves, they survived successfully for over 50 thousand yrs..I call that harmonious.


modern scientists should be looking to the practices of traditonal pple to solve climate change issues of the future..back to the future?

Freediver I hope I answered your question adequately  and no,  thats fine I was glad to oblige.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 50566
At my desk.
Re: Which country is the biggest threat to Oz?
Reply #57 - Mar 21st, 2007 at 3:59pm
 
I don't get the whole fire issue. Wouldn't fires have burnt anyway, even without the aboriginies? Plenty are still cause by lightning, and there's nothing to stop them burning all the way up and down the coast.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
zoso
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 512
Re: Which country is the biggest threat to Oz?
Reply #58 - Mar 21st, 2007 at 4:39pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 21st, 2007 at 3:59pm:
I don't get the whole fire issue. Wouldn't fires have burnt anyway, even without the aboriginies? Plenty are still cause by lightning, and there's nothing to stop them burning all the way up and down the coast.

Thats the point exactly. First the large herbivores cleaned the forest floor, then fire breaks out, less fuel, so lower intensity overall, higher chance of not getting very far. It is generally accepted that Australia was once covered by more rainforest or water loving fire intolerant species, now things are different. The idea is that Aboriginies hunted the large herbivores to extinction and so litter accumulated, bigger fires, killing off the intolerant species (there is a range of thresholds for fire tolerance). Aboriginies worked out they could control the intensity of bushfire by burning off constantly to keep the fuel levels down - Flannerys theory is that it was the diprotodon or whatever that did this before Aboroginies hunted them to extinction. Now the accepted theory is that through constant back burning for millenia, the Aborigines caused changes in the ecosystem by driving the fire intolerant species back to goegraphically sheltered areas, the current lack of back burning now means that too much fuel gathers and when fire inevitably breaks out - it is more intense because of it, een hot enough to kill off fire tolerant species. The diprotodon bit is a less conclusive, but I'm just repeating what I read in a Flannery book thats all. 

Oh Ausgirl, sorry I wasn't starting something there, some people just carry on about how perfect tribal societies were and all that, when they cause ecological damage too, you seem to know what you are on about, probably more than I do! Smiley
Really I think the point is that every species leaves its mark... and when that gets off balance, mother nature takes her vengance.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 50566
At my desk.
Re: Which country is the biggest threat to Oz?
Reply #59 - Mar 21st, 2007 at 4:47pm
 
How would a diprotodon cut down on fuel accumulation? Do they eat wood and fallen branches?

What book was that in? Have you read nay of Jared Diamond's books?

The greens had a policy (for a while anyway) of introducing more 'lush' vegetation, I think targetted at Northern NSW. The theory was that they could change the type of forest cover and thus prevent fires. It sounds crazy to me.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print