Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Will/would you support recycled water?

Yes (SEQ resident)    
  6 (31.6%)
No (SEQ resident)    
  1 (5.3%)
Yes (I live elsewhere)    
  9 (47.4%)
No (I live elsewhere)    
  3 (15.8%)




Total votes: 19
« Created by: freediver on: Jan 18th, 2007 at 9:01am »

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
SEQ to get referendum on recycled water (Read 15447 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47366
At my desk.
SEQ to get referendum on recycled water
Dec 6th, 2006 at 5:33pm
 
Bruce Flegg has set up a non-biased website to 'encourage discussion' at wateroptions.net, though a forum is noticably lacking. You can sign a petition for or against recycled water being used in our water supply. You can read what other politicians think. Residents of Toowoomba are going to be forced to vote again on this issue. I have emailed in the ideas in the gardening section, though I'm sure others have made similar suggestions.

The referendum will be held in March.
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Stu(Guest)
Guest


Re: SEQ to get referendum on recycled water
Reply #1 - Dec 6th, 2006 at 6:18pm
 
hey fd

i find that this is really stupid.

whats the problem they dont like the idea.

Isnt it good enough for the astronaughts.

the science is good and really just needs good controls.

I suppose when they have to buy bath water and so on it might change their minds as the human body is 99% water if that is right, i think so.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47366
At my desk.
Re: SEQ to get referendum on recycled water
Reply #2 - Dec 6th, 2006 at 6:52pm
 
People are saying that it is inevitable anway so the referendum is a waste fo money and just a way for the government to shift blame if something goes wrong.

I see two other good options: harvesting stormwater runoff for certain uses and charging more for water. Apparently far more water lands on a city in the form of rain than is used. As for charging for water, the price charged should obviously reflect the cost of getting more water, and then some, so that the value of natural flows in our rivers is also taken into account (for fisheries productivity, recreation, conservation etc). I know I don't consider the cost in how I use water, though I am probably paying for my ignorance.
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: SEQ to get referendum on recycled water
Reply #3 - Dec 9th, 2006 at 8:23pm
 
The area I live in has stage 4 water restrictions and has had those restrictions on and off for years.  If we harvested water as freedriver suggested this would make all the difference and it should be made compulsory for us all to have rainwater tanks - with a reasonable govt. subsidy.  A couple of decades ago we all had to get rid of our tanks as part of council regulations and also I suppose to boost the profits of Sydney Water.

We have bore water here - but even that will run short eventually and it's not too healthy for the environment to drain the underground water tables.  But it's happening not far from where I live with Coca Cola Amatil operating a huge spring water factory where they are now taking  66 million litres p.a. working 24 hours a day.  They pay a minimal amount for the lease and have a net profit of $660 million.

Meanwhile the residents put up with bad water quality,  harsh restrictions and high water rates while Coca Cola - which isn't even an Australian company - depletes the water tables and the livelihood of many of the locals.

Foreign multinationals always come first.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47366
At my desk.
Re: SEQ to get referendum on recycled water
Reply #4 - Dec 10th, 2006 at 3:18pm
 
Have you seen my grey water article in the gardening section? For about $20 worth of equipment (depending on your situation of course) you can divert your shower water onto the garden.

Still not sure what happens with the soap though, whether we will get salt or phosphate building up.
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
macsporan
New Member
*
Offline


Choses not to cope

Posts: 14
Gold Coast Australia
Gender: male
Re: SEQ to get referendum on recycled water
Reply #5 - Dec 20th, 2006 at 12:18am
 
I'm in favour of recycled water but only for industrial and commercial use.

Back to top
 

Socialism is the unceasing erosion of the preventable causes of human suffering
 
IP Logged
 
NoComment(Guest)
Guest


Re: SEQ to get referendum on recycled water
Reply #6 - Dec 20th, 2006 at 12:13pm
 
Why not domestic?  The water that comes out of the treatment plants is cleaner than what comes out of the tap at home (depending on the treatment level obviously).  Why the hell wouldnt you utilise that?  The rivers and dams are full of fish crap and various bacteria, algae and any number of protozoans.  Despite that we thow enough chlorine and ammonia into the supply to kill those nasties.  At the same time, these levels are high enough to kill any fish that are kept in mains water?  You know what, i would prefer the treated sewage!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47366
At my desk.
treated sewage
Reply #7 - Dec 20th, 2006 at 12:37pm
 
There are some factories in Brisbane that use treated sewage. They pay more for it than for tap water.

Why?

Because it is of higher quality. They need it to keep whatever processes they run clean.

Interestingly, one of the groups holding this sort of thing up is firemen. They want assurance that when they put out a factory blaze they won't be breathing in poo.
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47366
At my desk.
Re: SEQ to get referendum on recycled water
Reply #8 - Jan 17th, 2007 at 8:48pm
 
http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Water-costs-to-double-in-SE-Qld/2007/01/17/1168709824268.html

South-east Queensland residents have been warned that water costs are expected to double, but over a period a several years.


On Wednesday, Opposition Leader Jeff Seeney said the government had bungled the delivery of the infrastructure and the delays would only push up the cost of water to unprepared consumers.

"It's just not believable they (the government) haven't done the calculations as to how much the water is going to cost to pump and how much it's going to cost to purify and desalinate."


"The panel is here because the government has already said that in an emergency situation, we will use recycled water irrespective of the plebiscite so we have to work on the assumption there may be occasions when recycled water is used, whether or not there is a `yes' vote."
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: SEQ to get referendum on recycled water
Reply #9 - Jan 18th, 2007 at 8:50am
 
The Central Coast is going to have to go on Stage 5 water restrictions in March, because the dams are empty.  These idiots who call themselves politicians and councillors have not thought about water until it's too late.

Meanwhile Coca Cola pumps millions of litres of water from our underground springs and pays next to nothing.

They're talking about a usage of 130 litres a day - I hope per person.  This will be extremely difficult to manage - so it means 1 minute showers - no flushing of toilets and using the same grey water all day.

Until it actually hits you, many people forget how precious it is.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
enviro
Senior Member
****
Offline


Taking Out The Trash

Posts: 323
Weethalle NSW
Gender: male
Re: SEQ to get referendum on recycled water
Reply #10 - Jan 18th, 2007 at 9:11pm
 
Recycled water has it's place. (In the toilet)

Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47366
At my desk.
referendum canned, QLD to get recycled water
Reply #11 - Jan 29th, 2007 at 10:04am
 
http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Recycling-will-prevent-Qld-running-dry/2007/01/29/1169919243036.html

Queensland Premier Peter Beattie says his government's controversial decision to introduce recycled drinking water will help prevent the state running dry by 2009.

Internal documents from the Queensland Water Commission, obtained by the Courier Mail, indicate the drought-stricken state may start running out of water in two years.

The Queensland government scrapped a plan to host a $10 million referendum, involving 18 councils, to gauge whether residents would accept drinking recycled water.

But drastically low water levels in the Wivenhoe-Somerset Dam system, now standing at just 23 per cent, were reason enough to mandate recycled drinking water, the premier said.

However, the Water Commission documents reveal there still will not be enough water to meet projected demand as early as 2009, even with recycled water, the Courier Mail reports.

The premier on Sunday scrapped plans for a $10 million referendum on the issue, saying record-low inflows to dams had left him with no choice but to introduce treated sewage in the drinking supply.

Mr Beattie said he respected the views of state governments such as NSW and Victoria which are opposed to recycling, but he predicted all governments eventually would have to introduce it.

"I think in the end, because of the drought, all of Australia is going to end up drinking recycled purified water," Mr Beattie told ABC Radio.

Incoming federal Environment and Water Resources Minister Malcolm Turnbull, who will be sworn in on Monday, said the states had to be open minded about recycling as a viable option.

"We support recycling. Obviously it has to be weighed up against other alternatives, but I think in Brisbane it is a very viable alternative and their water crisis is very extreme," he told the Nine Network.



http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Water-plan-may-force-farmers-off-land/2007/01/28/1169919206442.html

Farmers could be forced off their land in areas with old and leaky irrigation systems under the federal government's $10 billion water security plan.

Incoming federal Environment Minister Malcolm Turnbull confirmed that farms could be compulsorily acquired under the project to modernise irrigation channels and stop water wastage.

About 30 per cent of irrigation water is lost to evaporation, leakage and seepage before it reaches farmlands, leading the federal government to promise $3 billion to line and pipe major channels.

Mr Turnbull also called on other states to follow Queensland's lead in going ahead with recycled drinking water, saying the plan should not be ruled out just because it sounded distasteful.

Other states are reluctant to follow, with NSW and South Australia ruling out a similar move.

But Mr Turnbull said anyone living downstream of a town was probably already drinking recycled water.

"Don't rule out desalination because it's expensive or recycling because it sounds a bit yucky or building a dam because environmentalists are concerned - don't rule anything out, put everything on the table," he told reporters in drought-ravaged Griffith, in south-western NSW.

"Assess the economic, environmental, financial costs, and then make a decision. But the critical thing is to make a decision."



http://www.smh.com.au/news/breaking-news/no-recycled-drinking-water-in-nsw-govt/2007/01/28/1169919202928.html

The NSW government has ruled out the need to follow Queensland's lead and introduce recycled drinking water for Sydney households.



Cloud-seeding may boost SE Qld rainfall

http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Cloudseeding-may-boost-SE-Qld-rainfall/2007/07/12/1183833673089.html

The Queensland government will begin cloud seeding in the state's drought-stricken south-east by the end of the year, hoping to boost rainfall by up to 30 per cent.

Water Minister Craig Wallace said the first aircraft would drop seeding material over the south-east's dams, including Somerset and Wivenhoe, from November.

The move is part of a $7.6 million four-year research project which will also investigate local weather systems and cloud microphysics.

"Some people may doubt that cloud-seeding works, but it's science fact, not science fiction," Mr Wallace told reporters.

"However, it will only work in certain circumstances and we have to see if those circumstances are right for south-east Queensland.



Greens want cloud seeding stalled

http://www.smh.com.au/news/breaking-news/greens-want-cloud-seeding-stalled/2007/09/03/1188783152783.html

The Tasmanian Greens want Hydro Tasmania to defer extending its cloud-seeding program until a socio-economic impact study is released.

The company announced it would expand cloud-seeding outside its catchment areas in an bid to boost rain stocks around the state.

But Greens water spokesman Tim Morris said it should be delayed until the study is released by SGC Economics and Planning.

Mr Morris argued that the decision should not be taken by Hydro Tasmania alone because "there may be winners who get more water and losers who miss out".
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 4th, 2007 at 2:58pm by freediver »  

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47366
At my desk.
Monday: SEQ water seminar
Reply #12 - Oct 8th, 2007 at 6:58pm
 
http://www.uq.edu.au/events/event_view.php?event_id=3668

BrisScience: Professor Paul Greenfield - Water in South East Queensland: Where does it come from? Where does it go? What can I do with it?View event details below. On this page you can view a printable version of the event, export event in iCalendar and Outlook formats and send the event to your friend.


Primary Information 
Date: Monday, 15 October 2007 
Time: 6:30pm - 7:30pm 
Room: Ithaca Auditorium
Location: Brisbane City Hall
Event Information 
Description: South east Queensland is currently suffering from its worst drought in the last century. In addition, its population has increased dramatically over the last 20 years and this trend looks like continuing. Part of the reason for the increased growth lies in the quality of the SEQ lifestyle, which in turn reflects the quality of SEQ’s environment, in particular the aquatic environment.

The talk will argue that, in going forward, we need to look at alternative water supplies, we need to remember that rivers need water flowing in them if they are to remain healthy and that we must manage our demands for water. The talk will aim to convey an understanding of our river and bay environments, where we might find our water supplies of the future and what this means for water treatment and on the links between water demand and the quality of our aquatic environments.

Title: Water in South East Queensland: Where does it come from? Where does it go? What can I do with it?
Speaker: Professor Paul Greenfield AO, FTSE
Date: 15 October 2007
Time: 6:30pm to 7:30pm (Doors open at 6pm)
Venue: Ithaca Auditorium, Brisbane City Hall
Refreshments: There will be complimentary drinks and nibblies following the talk, and Professor Greenfield will be available to answer any questions.
Questions? Contact Joel (0411 267 044 or joel@BrisScience.org) or Nelle (nelle@BrisScience.org).
URL: http://www.BrisScience.org
Event Category: Featured Events / Public lectures /   
Contact Information 
Name: Nelle Ross
Phone: 69935
Email: n.ross@sps.uq.edu.au
Org. Unit: Physical Sciences
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47366
At my desk.
Wednesday: Brisbane water forum
Reply #13 - Oct 22nd, 2007 at 4:41pm
 
http://www.uq.edu.au/events/event_view.php?event_id=3726

The release of level 6 water restrictions means that University staff will need to be aware of how the restrictions affect them to ensure compliance. Strict penalties will apply for non-compliance.

To address these issues and to inform University staff about water in SEQ and what UQ is doing to improve efficiency, Property and Facilities Division is holding a water forum.

Professor Paul Greenfield- Senior Deputy Vice Chancellor will introduce the forum and give an overview of water in SEQ and a Brisbane City Council representative will speak about level 6 water restrictions and current projects to reduce consumption in SEQ. Geoff Dennis, and Leigh Burgess, Property and Facilities Division, UQ, will speak about water efficiency projects and water consumption at The St Lucia campus.

Representatives from Brisbane City Council, Property and Facilities Division as well as the University Chemical Manager will be available during an open forum and discussion to answer any questions.

If you would like to attend the forum, please R.S.V.P to Leigh Burgess, Environmental Services Section, Property and Facilities Division by Monday 22nd October. Afternoon tea will be provided. l.burgess@pf.uq.edu.au or phone 57580



Cloud seeding trial begins in SE Qld

http://news.smh.com.au/cloud-seeding-trial-begins-in-se-qld/20080124-1nxs.html

A cloud-seeding trial has begun in Queensland's drought-stricken south-east following months of delays.

Climate Change Minister Andrew McNamara said two aircraft had started flying around the region, one collecting data and the other testing the technology.

"Successful cloud-seeding won't solve south-east Queensland's water crisis on its own, but would be part of an overall package of initiatives including recycling, more efficient water use, desalination and new storage facilities," Mr McNamara said.

The project is focusing on the Wivenhoe and Somerset dams.

Cloud-seeding is a technique that adds particles such as salt and silver iodide particles to clouds to enhance condensation and droplet and ice crystal formation.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 24th, 2008 at 8:09pm by freediver »  

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47366
At my desk.
Sniff of Queensland election damns recycling
Reply #14 - Nov 26th, 2008 at 2:41pm
 
Does anyone know what the dam levels are now?

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24708206-2702,00.html

THE Queensland Government was yesterday forced into an election-driven backdown on two fronts: recycling sewage in the state's southeast and the flooding of a valley to create a dam in the Sunshine Coast hinterland.

Premier Anna Bligh yesterday renewed speculation of a New Year election campaign by ordering a review of the $2.5 billion recycled sewage plan and announcing the controversial Traveston Crossing Dam would be shelved for up to four years.

Ms Bligh, who yesterday claimed she would go full term before calling an election late next year, conceded the reversal from her previous hardline stance to pump recycled water into the drinking supply - when the southeast corner's combined levels hit 40 per cent - had been made after Labor polling last week showed falling support on the issue.

The polling, obtained by The Australian, asked: "Do you support or oppose recycled water being added to your water system for general use, including drinking?" The results showed 56 per cent in support and 38 per cent opposed.

Ms Bligh denied the review was a political decision, saying that while there was a small majority in support of recycled water, most people only wanted it as an insurance policy if Queensland was hit with another drought. "Clearly this, I think, is something that needs people to have a broad consensus about," she told reporters.

"You would have to be living under a rock not to know that people would prefer that we think about this a bit harder."

The shift by Ms Bligh follows a series of reports by The Australian in recent months, which has highlighted concerns by experts about whether viruses and other contaminants would be blocked by the planned seven-stage screening process.

Ms Bligh said that public opinion had changed in the face of rising dam levels after they fell to 22 per cent when the recycled water plan was announced in January last year.

"As circumstances change, people's attitudes change and they expect the Government to change when necessary," she said.

The decision defies Ms Bligh's statement on November 11 when she said that the only thing that would stop recycled water was if the dams were overflowing.

Earlier yesterday, Ms Bligh told state parliament she had written to the Queensland Water Commission seeking urgent advice on whether the 40 per cent trigger for recycled water should be retained. The commission will meet today to discuss a new trigger for the combined water levels of the Wivenhoe, Somerset and North Pine dams.

But Ms Bligh said the 40 per cent trigger might remain, depending on the advice from the water commission. "I do want it to be based on a very good analysis of possible changes to the water balance and I do want it to be scientifically solid before we lock into that," she said.
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print