I knew it, onya Australia.

Correct ... No to homophobia.

Johnnie wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 3:54pm:

I knew it, onya Australia.

jeez,

I find this difficult to believe,        .....but i hope that it is true.

____ wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 4:02pm:

Correct ... No to homophobia.

If that is the case the MAJORITY has spoken.

Live and let live.

It would be a sad day indeed if 2, 3 or 4% of the population told the other 96% how to live.

Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex.

If not, what are you on about ?

____ wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 4:25pm:

Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ?

Gays are a minority group at about 3 or 4%, why should most people bend the knee to a lifestyle they don't agree with.

It's the tail wagging the dog, don't you think....????

Yadda wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 4:14pm:

Johnnie wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 3:54pm: I knew it, onya Australia. jeez, I find this difficult to believe,        .....but i hope that it is true.

Given all the propaganda so do I find it hard to believe!

A leak from the bureau,


of course there is  :D :D :D

Johnnie wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 3:54pm:

I knew it, onya Australia.

I don't know where you got this from so I don't believe it!

John Smith wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 4:41pm:

A leak from the bureau, of course there is  :D :D :D

Go Internet!

The Coalition's $122 million non binding postal vote was to gauge support for same sex people to marry. It's wasn't a poll on opinions of same sex people.

____ wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 4:42pm:

The Coalition's $122 million non binding postal vote was to gauge support for same sex people to marry. It's wasn't a poll on opinions of same sex people.

But it was the opinion of same sex people that forced the government to spend $122 million on a postal vote.

Ajax wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 4:45pm:

____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:42pm: The Coalition's $122 million non binding postal vote was to gauge support for same sex people to marry. It's wasn't a poll on opinions of same sex people. But it was the opinion of same sex people that forced the government to spend $122 million on a postal vote.

No. It was the conservatives that force the squandering of $122 million.

A conscious vote in parliament months ago would sorted marriage equality.

John Smith wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 4:41pm:

A leak from the bureau, of course there is  :D :D :D

like the previous leak that said it was 69%"Yes". :)

Ajax wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 4:29pm:

____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:25pm: Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ? Gays are a minority group at about 3 or 4%, why should most people bend the knee to a lifestyle they don't agree with.

Most people don't have to bend the knee.

Most people won't have to do anything.

This may come as a surprise to you, but when SSM is legalised in this country, you won't have to do a thing.

Crisis over.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 5:12pm:

Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:29pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:25pm: Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ? Gays are a minority group at about 3 or 4%, why should most people bend the knee to a lifestyle they don't agree with. Most people don't have to bend the knee. Most people won't have to do anything. This may come as a surprise to you, but when SSM is legalised in this country, you won't have to do a thing. Crisis over.

We will have to protect our kids from the re-education this decision forces upon them?

;) ;) ;)

There are always consequences.....

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 5:12pm:

Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:29pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:25pm: Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ? Gays are a minority group at about 3 or 4%, why should most people bend the knee to a lifestyle they don't agree with. Most people don't have to bend the knee. Most people won't have to do anything. This may come as a surprise to you, but when SSM is legalised in this country, you won't have to do a thing. Crisis over.

Source!, any long term predictions.

TheFunPolice wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 5:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:12pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:29pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:25pm: Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ? Gays are a minority group at about 3 or 4%, why should most people bend the knee to a lifestyle they don't agree with. Most people don't have to bend the knee. Most people won't have to do anything. This may come as a surprise to you, but when SSM is legalised in this country, you won't have to do a thing. Crisis over. We will have to protect our kids from the re-education this decision forces upon them? ;) ;) ;) There are always consequences.....

First we have to protect children from religious mental illness.

TheFunPolice wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 5:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:12pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:29pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:25pm: Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ? Gays are a minority group at about 3 or 4%, why should most people bend the knee to a lifestyle they don't agree with. Most people don't have to bend the knee. Most people won't have to do anything. This may come as a surprise to you, but when SSM is legalised in this country, you won't have to do a thing. Crisis over. We will have to protect our kids from the re-education this decision forces upon them? ;) ;) ;) There are always consequences.....

Your vote isn't even in the mix, how do you feel now.

Johnnie wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 5:24pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:15pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:12pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:29pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:25pm: Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ? Gays are a minority group at about 3 or 4%, why should most people bend the knee to a lifestyle they don't agree with. Most people don't have to bend the knee. Most people won't have to do anything. This may come as a surprise to you, but when SSM is legalised in this country, you won't have to do a thing. Crisis over. We will have to protect our kids from the re-education this decision forces upon them? ;) ;) ;) There are always consequences..... Your vote isn't even in the mix, how do you feel now.

Not participating was a valid choice: so you can eat me broseph!

____ wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 5:23pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:15pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:12pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:29pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:25pm: Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ? Gays are a minority group at about 3 or 4%, why should most people bend the knee to a lifestyle they don't agree with. Most people don't have to bend the knee. Most people won't have to do anything. This may come as a surprise to you, but when SSM is legalised in this country, you won't have to do a thing. Crisis over. We will have to protect our kids from the re-education this decision forces upon them? ;) ;) ;) There are always consequences..... First we have to protect children from religious mental illness.

Are you telling me what's what?

Get away from my kids you sicko with your perverted reeducation agenda or you will pay!

Johnnie wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 5:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:12pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:29pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:25pm: Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ? Gays are a minority group at about 3 or 4%, why should most people bend the knee to a lifestyle they don't agree with. Most people don't have to bend the knee. Most people won't have to do anything. This may come as a surprise to you, but when SSM is legalised in this country, you won't have to do a thing. Crisis over. Source!, any long term predictions.

The onus is on you.

Still waiting ...

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 5:30pm:

Johnnie wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:12pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:29pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:25pm: Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ? Gays are a minority group at about 3 or 4%, why should most people bend the knee to a lifestyle they don't agree with. Most people don't have to bend the knee. Most people won't have to do anything. This may come as a surprise to you, but when SSM is legalised in this country, you won't have to do a thing. Crisis over. Source!, any long term predictions. The onus is on you. Still waiting ...

Feminists think the onus is on everyone else until they remember their sins!

Until then it's just drinking metho......

TheFunPolice wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 5:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:30pm: Johnnie wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:12pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:29pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:25pm: Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ? Gays are a minority group at about 3 or 4%, why should most people bend the knee to a lifestyle they don't agree with. Most people don't have to bend the knee. Most people won't have to do anything. This may come as a surprise to you, but when SSM is legalised in this country, you won't have to do a thing. Crisis over. Source!, any long term predictions. The onus is on you. Still waiting ... Feminists think the onus is on everyone else until they remember their sins! Until then it's just drinking metho......

How do you draw that conclusion, lucky dip!

Poor old gays, as if they didn't already how the broader community felt about them.

____ wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 4:25pm:

Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ?

Marriage never included marrying your own sex - you have no point.

The next step is to get all the gays, lessos and multiple other strange and weird sexes and treat them humanely with a cocktail of drugs to bring them back to normal.

Perhaps the world does have a chance after all...... ;D

Yes campaign increases majority, new poll finds


A new poll released on Tuesday, the final before the announcement of the postal survey, has shown the Yes vote has maintained its lead — in fact, the pro-SSM camp has even strengthened its majority.

The announcement will be made at 10am on Wednesday by the Australian Bureau of Statistics in Canberra.

A Newspoll for The Australian reported 63 per cent of those polled had voted Yes in the survey.

This is a rise from 62 per cent from a fortnight ago and a steady swing towards Yes since the campaign began. Overall 58 per cent of Australians supported a law change but around 20 per cent of these hadn’t actually voted. When only the intentions of those who had voted were taken into account, the Yes figure rose.

The No campaign’s final polling figure was 37 per cent of those who voted.


http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/gay-marriage/yes-campaign-increases-majority-new-poll-finds/news-story/78a4f476f417eeb3874cc028cbdbd4b7

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 5:12pm:

Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:29pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:25pm: Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ? Gays are a minority group at about 3 or 4%, why should most people bend the knee to a lifestyle they don't agree with. Most people don't have to bend the knee. Most people won't have to do anything. This may come as a surprise to you, but when SSM is legalised in this country, you won't have to do a thing. Crisis over.

I'll be too busy ROFLing to do much of anything... great comedy theatre....

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 6:08pm:

____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:25pm: Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ? Marriage never included marrying your own sex -

Why lie?

____ wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 4:25pm:

Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ?

They can't leave well alone what is not theirs - marriage.

It is so obviously a heterosexual institution that only the audacity of SSM is greater than its absurdity.

____ wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 5:23pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:15pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:12pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:29pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:25pm: Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ? Gays are a minority group at about 3 or 4%, why should most people bend the knee to a lifestyle they don't agree with. Most people don't have to bend the knee. Most people won't have to do anything. This may come as a surprise to you, but when SSM is legalised in this country, you won't have to do a thing. Crisis over. We will have to protect our kids from the re-education this decision forces upon them? ;) ;) ;) There are always consequences..... First we have to protect children from religious mental illness.

What has that to do with SSM?  Do keep on track, Bluebottle....

Frank wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 6:11pm:

____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:25pm: Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ? They can't leave alone what is not theirs - marriage. It is so obviously a heterosexual institution that only the audacity of SSM is greater than its absurdity.

Bit like those plurry Kaffir and their demand to 'own' Ayers Rock and any spirituality included.... they ain't got it so they want it - and once they stake out that prime piece of Australian culture for their own, no 'native title' piece of ground will be safe.

That's how these things work.... get a little bit that sounds fair and reasonable and all warm and fuzzy, then move on and cut a few other people into tiny bits... just like the disease of feminism did.

Johnnie wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 5:42pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:32pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:30pm: Johnnie wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:12pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:29pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:25pm: Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ? Gays are a minority group at about 3 or 4%, why should most people bend the knee to a lifestyle they don't agree with. Most people don't have to bend the knee. Most people won't have to do anything. This may come as a surprise to you, but when SSM is legalised in this country, you won't have to do a thing. Crisis over. Source!, any long term predictions. The onus is on you. Still waiting ... Feminists think the onus is on everyone else until they remember their sins! Until then it's just drinking metho...... How do you draw that conclusion, lucky dip!

However I want!

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 6:08pm:

____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:25pm: Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ? Marriage never included marrying your own sex - you have no point.

Yes it did, and yes it does.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 6:12pm:

____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:23pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:15pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:12pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:29pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:25pm: Do you think marriage equality forces heterosexuals to marry members of their own sex. If not, what are you on about ? Gays are a minority group at about 3 or 4%, why should most people bend the knee to a lifestyle they don't agree with. Most people don't have to bend the knee. Most people won't have to do anything. This may come as a surprise to you, but when SSM is legalised in this country, you won't have to do a thing. Crisis over. We will have to protect our kids from the re-education this decision forces upon them? ;) ;) ;) There are always consequences..... First we have to protect children from religious mental illness. What has that to do with SSM?  Do keep on track, Bluebottle....

It betrays the fact that this is all a campaign against the church and so western civilisation itself!

____ wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 5:23pm:

First we have to protect children from religious mental illness.

I would rather have religious instructions in our schools than that safe schools program designed to confuse kids with 64 genders while preparing them for a homosexual existence.

The sickness is on your side of the fence my friend, like I said before climb back into your closet, there you can do whatever you want, just don't bother the majority of people and ESPECIALLY little children.

WACA................. :D

Boring.

thecuriousmail wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:02pm:

Boring.

Yes, that is what our schools are going to be teaching our male children to do to other male children and we can't even complain about it in a democracy our own flesh and blood died for!

Ajax wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 6:27pm:

____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:23pm: First we have to protect children from religious mental illness. I would rather have religious instructions in our schools than that safe schools program designed to confuse kids with 64 genders while preparing them for a homosexual existence. The sickness is on your side of the fence my friend, like I said before climb back into your closet, there you can do whatever you want, just don't bother the majority of people and ESPECIALLY little children. WACA................. :D

Teach children that theres this angry deity that gives you free will. And if you don't do what crazy religionist tell you to do with this free will, this angry deity will burn you forever.

And if the crazy religionists change the rules down the track then you stop burning forever because the crazy religionists are more powerful than this invisible deity.

Crazy Crazy Crazy!!!

Ajax wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 6:27pm:

____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:23pm: First we have to protect children from religious mental illness. I would rather have religious instructions in our schools than that safe schools program designed to confuse kids with 64 genders while preparing them for a homosexual existence. The sickness is on your side of the fence my friend, like I said before climb back into your closet, there you can do whatever you want, just don't bother the majority of people and ESPECIALLY little children. WACA................. :D

What do you mean by that (the part I've highlighted)?

How is ___ bothering little children?

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:16pm:

Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 6:27pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:23pm: First we have to protect children from religious mental illness. I would rather have religious instructions in our schools than that safe schools program designed to confuse kids with 64 genders while preparing them for a homosexual existence. The sickness is on your side of the fence my friend, like I said before climb back into your closet, there you can do whatever you want, just don't bother the majority of people and ESPECIALLY little children. WACA................. :D What do you mean by that (the part I've highlighted)? How is ___ bothering little children?

x2

____ wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:16pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 6:27pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:23pm: First we have to protect children from religious mental illness. I would rather have religious instructions in our schools than that safe schools program designed to confuse kids with 64 genders while preparing them for a homosexual existence. The sickness is on your side of the fence my friend, like I said before climb back into your closet, there you can do whatever you want, just don't bother the majority of people and ESPECIALLY little children. WACA................. :D What do you mean by that (the part I've highlighted)? How is ___ bothering little children? x2

He doesn't want to answer, so I've referred it to the Mods.

____ wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:13pm:

Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 6:27pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:23pm: First we have to protect children from religious mental illness. I would rather have religious instructions in our schools than that safe schools program designed to confuse kids with 64 genders while preparing them for a homosexual existence. The sickness is on your side of the fence my friend, like I said before climb back into your closet, there you can do whatever you want, just don't bother the majority of people and ESPECIALLY little children. WACA................. :D Teach children that theres this angry deity that gives you free will. And if you don't do what crazy religionist tell you to do with this free will, this angry deity will burn you forever. And if the crazy religionists change the rules down the track then you stop burning forever because the crazy religionists are more powerful than this invisible deity. Crazy Crazy Crazy!!!

Almost as crazy as the guns and standing armies that religion built so you could eat in safety and demand luxury your whole life whilst godless countries starved?

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:22pm:

____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:16pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 6:27pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:23pm: First we have to protect children from religious mental illness. I would rather have religious instructions in our schools than that safe schools program designed to confuse kids with 64 genders while preparing them for a homosexual existence. The sickness is on your side of the fence my friend, like I said before climb back into your closet, there you can do whatever you want, just don't bother the majority of people and ESPECIALLY little children. WACA................. :D What do you mean by that (the part I've highlighted)? How is ___ bothering little children? x2 He doesn't want to answer, so I've referred it to the Mods.

He's referring to the group-think - not directly to bottom liner...... get a grip, peccary.... this kind of approach is exactly why people voted NO..... bullying is not part of open discussion...

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:22pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:16pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 6:27pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:23pm: First we have to protect children from religious mental illness. I would rather have religious instructions in our schools than that safe schools program designed to confuse kids with 64 genders while preparing them for a homosexual existence. The sickness is on your side of the fence my friend, like I said before climb back into your closet, there you can do whatever you want, just don't bother the majority of people and ESPECIALLY little children. WACA................. :D What do you mean by that (the part I've highlighted)? How is ___ bothering little children? x2 He doesn't want to answer, so I've referred it to the Mods. He's referring to the group-think - not directly to bottom liner......

He was replying, and referring, directly to ___

I've passed it on to the Mods.

I'm a little disappointed that you're defending Ajax's behaviour, to be honest.

Ajax wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 6:27pm:

____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:23pm: First we have to protect children from religious mental illness. I would rather have religious instructions in our schools than that safe schools program designed to confuse kids with 64 genders while preparing them for a homosexual existence. The sickness is on your side of the fence my friend, like I said before climb back into your closet, there you can do whatever you want, just don't bother the majority of people and ESPECIALLY little children. WACA................. :D

Discussion of '64 genders' (the Heinz Genders) should be left to the 'academic' classes in universities, in the fringe classes, where it belongs.  They can discuss this nonsense to their heart's content there - but it has no application to school aged children and should not be foisted upon them.

They'll work it out for themselves when they get older..... they don't need 'guidance' at a young age in this sort of nonsense.

There are TWO Genders - and 62 oddball variations... even suggesting that each variation is a discrete 'gender' of itself is absurd, since it is a mix of the TWO.

Who exactly is being bullied here, Grap?

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:29pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:22pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:16pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 6:27pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:23pm: First we have to protect children from religious mental illness. I would rather have religious instructions in our schools than that safe schools program designed to confuse kids with 64 genders while preparing them for a homosexual existence. The sickness is on your side of the fence my friend, like I said before climb back into your closet, there you can do whatever you want, just don't bother the majority of people and ESPECIALLY little children. WACA................. :D What do you mean by that (the part I've highlighted)? How is ___ bothering little children? x2 He doesn't want to answer, so I've referred it to the Mods. He's referring to the group-think - not directly to bottom liner...... He was replying, and referring, directly to ___ I've passed it on to the Mods. I'm a little disappointed that you're defending Ajax's behaviour, to be honest.

I think the mods are a bit disappointed at the state of feminism as exhibited by you in this forum over Millenia to be even more perfectly honest!

mothra wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:31pm:

Who exactly is being bullied here, Grap?

Ajax, methinks - with threats of 'mods' and reports by greg.  I certainly didn't view his comment as a personal attack on bottom liner, but a denial of any 'right' on the part of the group bottom liner ascribes to, to pursue teaching young children this nonsense.

If greg considers what Ajax said a 'threat' - he is out of line.... Ajax was telling that kind of 'thinker' to buggar off and leave kids to be kids.

mothra wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:31pm:

Who exactly is being bullied here, Grap?

The mere males: yknow, all the good ones that weren't the perps but still get portrayed everyday as nothing but pure evil because the modern slu# says so but are still expected to kiss the feet of the sinners of the female persuasion in their collective families!

Johnnie wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 3:54pm:

I knew it, onya Australia.

You beauty

All the hot chicks of the world will 'holiday' here now

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:35pm:

mothra wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:31pm: Who exactly is being bullied here, Grap? Ajax, methinks - with threats of 'mods' and reports by greg.  I certainly didn't view his comment as a personal attack on bottom liner, but a denial of any 'right' on the part of the group bottom liner ascribes to, to pursue teaching young children this nonsense. If greg considers what Ajax said a 'threat' - he is out of line.... Ajax was telling that kind of 'thinker' to buggar off and leave kids to be kids.

Oh? And the abuse directed at ____ and the aspersions cast upon him are okay with you, of course, because you agree with them.

One must always remember when dealing with you, that white heterosexual men are the victims .. right?

Way-too-much dumb-ass ignorance in this thread, from various directions.
Keep calm and get a life.

can we deport all the homos too?

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:35pm:

mothra wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:31pm: Who exactly is being bullied here, Grap? Ajax, methinks - with threats of 'mods' and reports by greg.

I'm sorry - a threat?

It's not a threat - I've reported Ajax to all of the Mods.

He has directly implied that ___ cases harm to children.

You might be okay with this "all gays are pedos, and all pedos are gay" crap, but I'm not, and I won't stand by and see good people like ___ be bullied by ignorant homophobes like Ajax.

I'm disappointed that you've chosen his side, and I'll remember it in the future.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:29pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:22pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:16pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 6:27pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:23pm: First we have to protect children from religious mental illness. I would rather have religious instructions in our schools than that safe schools program designed to confuse kids with 64 genders while preparing them for a homosexual existence. The sickness is on your side of the fence my friend, like I said before climb back into your closet, there you can do whatever you want, just don't bother the majority of people and ESPECIALLY little children. WACA................. :D What do you mean by that (the part I've highlighted)? How is ___ bothering little children? x2 He doesn't want to answer, so I've referred it to the Mods. He's referring to the group-think - not directly to bottom liner...... He was replying, and referring, directly to ___ I've passed it on to the Mods. I'm a little disappointed that you're defending Ajax's behaviour, to be honest.

For what reason?  It's a crime now to tell someone not to 'bother' children with this kind of overblown nonsense about countless 'genders' when it is clear there are two, and a few variations.  You've either got the gear of a man (A) or a woman (B) - that makes you one or the other - if you choose sexual experience outside  A>B, that is a personal choice and not a gender.

He said 'your side of the fence' - he didn't say YOU.

I've seen worse thrown around without threats of reports... and let me relay to you a personal experience:-

The parents of a 7 year old boy I know were devastated that another child, who had obviously been abused, was showing him 'how it was done'.. with the 7 yo's pants down and the other kid's penis in his bum cheeks .... they didn't consider the difference between men, women and some mythical 62 other genders of any value.  The other kid's parents left town - we think because they came there to get away from the stigma of their kid being abused.... and the kid had taken it on as 'the proper thing to do'.

Come on, Greg... you know better than that.... and kids deserve better than to be handed all that nonsensical information about nothing of value to most of them.  Most of them will grow up straight men or women, so they don't even need to hear this nonsense.,

mothra wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:41pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:35pm: mothra wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:31pm: Who exactly is being bullied here, Grap? Ajax, methinks - with threats of 'mods' and reports by greg.  I certainly didn't view his comment as a personal attack on bottom liner, but a denial of any 'right' on the part of the group bottom liner ascribes to, to pursue teaching young children this nonsense. If greg considers what Ajax said a 'threat' - he is out of line.... Ajax was telling that kind of 'thinker' to buggar off and leave kids to be kids. Oh? And the abuse directed at ____ and the aspersions cast upon him are okay with you, of course, because you agree with them. One must always remember when dealing with you, that white heterosexual men are the victims .. right?

Flatliner is deliberately controversial: are you going to say he is isn't?

It's a like a dumb chick sleeping with a criminal and then crying to daddy for 20 years!

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:29pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:22pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:16pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 6:27pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:23pm: First we have to protect children from religious mental illness. I would rather have religious instructions in our schools than that safe schools program designed to confuse kids with 64 genders while preparing them for a homosexual existence. The sickness is on your side of the fence my friend, like I said before climb back into your closet, there you can do whatever you want, just don't bother the majority of people and ESPECIALLY little children. WACA................. :D What do you mean by that (the part I've highlighted)? How is ___ bothering little children? x2 He doesn't want to answer, so I've referred it to the Mods. He's referring to the group-think - not directly to bottom liner...... He was replying, and referring, directly to ___ I've passed it on to the Mods. I'm a little disappointed that you're defending Ajax's behaviour, to be honest. For what reason?

There's a strict rule in this forum that members are not to imply that others are paedophiles.

Ajax has been going on for weeks now with his "all gays are pedos, and all pedos are gay" nonsense.

Now, he's levelled that lie directly at ___, stating that he bothers children.

Others have been banned for far less, so I can't see why Ajax shouldn't be banned for this disgusting act of bullying.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:51pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:43pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:29pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:22pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:16pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 6:27pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:23pm: First we have to protect children from religious mental illness. I would rather have religious instructions in our schools than that safe schools program designed to confuse kids with 64 genders while preparing them for a homosexual existence. The sickness is on your side of the fence my friend, like I said before climb back into your closet, there you can do whatever you want, just don't bother the majority of people and ESPECIALLY little children. WACA................. :D What do you mean by that (the part I've highlighted)? How is ___ bothering little children? x2 He doesn't want to answer, so I've referred it to the Mods. He's referring to the group-think - not directly to bottom liner...... He was replying, and referring, directly to ___ I've passed it on to the Mods. I'm a little disappointed that you're defending Ajax's behaviour, to be honest. For what reason?  There's a strict rule in this forum that members are not to imply that others are paedophiles. Ajax has been going on for weeks now with his "all gays are pedos, and all pedos are gay" nonsense. Now, he's levelled that lie directly at ___, stating that he bothers children. Others have been banned for far less, so I can't see why Ajax shouldn't be banned for this disgusting act of bullying.

Basically, it's a femenist forum run by feminists!

:D :D :D :D :D

No democracy allowed: may aswell call it the afl or Australia!

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:51pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:43pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:29pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:22pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:16pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 6:27pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:23pm: First we have to protect children from religious mental illness. I would rather have religious instructions in our schools than that safe schools program designed to confuse kids with 64 genders while preparing them for a homosexual existence. The sickness is on your side of the fence my friend, like I said before climb back into your closet, there you can do whatever you want, just don't bother the majority of people and ESPECIALLY little children. WACA................. :D What do you mean by that (the part I've highlighted)? How is ___ bothering little children? x2 He doesn't want to answer, so I've referred it to the Mods. He's referring to the group-think - not directly to bottom liner...... He was replying, and referring, directly to ___ I've passed it on to the Mods. I'm a little disappointed that you're defending Ajax's behaviour, to be honest. For what reason?  There's a strict rule in this forum that members are not to imply that others are paedophiles. Ajax has been going on for weeks now with his "all gays are pedos, and all pedos are gay" nonsense. Now, he's levelled that lie directly at ___, stating that he bothers children. Others have been banned for far less, so I can't see why Ajax shouldn't be banned for this disgusting act of bullying.

So the use of the term 'bothering' now automatically means 'seeking paedophile activity with' kids?  Such a  term can be interpreted in many ways - my view is that bothering kids with even discussing this nonsense if a problem..... I'm sure the majority of them are mightily confused by discussion of such things at a very young age....

Leave it to the 'academics' in Fairyland University... they can argue it to their heart's content, but it is not mainstream teaching for children.

BTW - Ajax quoted a homosexual who said that scratch a homosexual and you find a paedophile.  May not be entirely correct, and it may be that homosexuals, like other men, are drawn to youth - and I personally don't believe it is true of all homosexuals, and to consider that to be true is perhaps extreme.  This is not a new issue - he's been saying it for ages now, though I hardly notice, and I see no reason to make an issue of it now, and I still think he is referring to the group-think rather than the individual...

I may be wrong..  let him speak.

I prefer to allow all views... I mean - I ignore juliar's nonsense rather than make an issue of it.  People can decide for themselves without censorship.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:29pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:22pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:16pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 6:27pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:23pm: First we have to protect children from religious mental illness. I would rather have religious instructions in our schools than that safe schools program designed to confuse kids with 64 genders while preparing them for a homosexual existence. The sickness is on your side of the fence my friend, like I said before climb back into your closet, there you can do whatever you want, just don't bother the majority of people and ESPECIALLY little children. WACA................. :D What do you mean by that (the part I've highlighted)? How is ___ bothering little children? x2 He doesn't want to answer, so I've referred it to the Mods. He's referring to the group-think - not directly to bottom liner...... He was replying, and referring, directly to ___ I've passed it on to the Mods. I'm a little disappointed that you're defending Ajax's behaviour, to be honest.

WTF is this pecca you stupid c@nt, cant you reada the engrish.

If I was going to call flatliner a pedo I would instead of beating around the bush.

Please re-read what I wrote...thanks............ ::) :P

lee wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 4:56pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:41pm: A leak from the bureau, of course there is  :D :D :D like the previous leak that said it was 69%"Yes".

Yeah, that was miles off.

Anyone been watching Molly Meldrum (used to run a bar in Thailand) on Play School recently?  :-?

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2017 at 4:28pm:

lee wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:56pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:41pm: A leak from the bureau, of course there is  :D :D :D like the previous leak that said it was 69%"Yes". Yeah, that was miles off.

I smell a rat or two and demand a recount, an immediate independent watchdog to be appointed and a full audit into the goings on in this department before the evidence is shredded.
I think they must have pulled a swifty, how could so many Australians vote this way.

Hmm - looks like about half of those went into the shredder.................................

If the LGBTxyz community forms 3 or 4% of the population it does seem illogical that they would get up by 62%.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 9:34pm:

So the use of the term 'bothering' now automatically means 'seeking paedophile activity with' kids?  Such a  term can be interpreted in many ways - my view is that bothering kids with even discussing this nonsense if a problem..... I'm sure the majority of them are mightily confused by discussion of such things at a very young age.... Leave it to the 'academics' in Fairyland University... they can argue it to their heart's content, but it is not mainstream teaching for children. BTW - Ajax quoted a homosexual who said that scratch a homosexual and you find a paedophile.  May not be entirely correct, and it may be that homosexuals, like other men, are drawn to youth - and I personally don't believe it is true of all homosexuals, and to consider that to be true is perhaps extreme.  This is not a new issue - he's been saying it for ages now, though I hardly notice, and I see no reason to make an issue of it now, and I still think he is referring to the group-think rather than the individual... I may be wrong..  let him speak. I prefer to allow all views... I mean - I ignore juliar's nonsense rather than make an issue of it.  People can decide for themselves without censorship.

Hey YG

This homosexual person Kevin Bishop is apparently some sort of scholar on paedophilia and has written a book about it.


Quote:

Kevin Bishop, an admitted pederast (pedophile), is promoting the work of the North American /Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) in South Africa. Bishop, who was molested at the age of six, is also an admitted homosexual who is blunt about the relationship between homosexuality and pedophilia. "Scratch the average homosexual and you will find a pedophile," said Bishop in an interview with the Electronic Mail & Guardian (June 30, 1997).1 (1. Angella Johnson, “The man who loves to love boys,” Electronic Mail & Guardian, June 30, 1997, http://www.mg.co.za/mg.) This pedophile/homosexual activist began studying pedophilia while a student at Rhodes University. He also discovered Karl Marx there, as well as other literature that helped form his worldview. His views are being echoed around the world by homosexual activists who are seeking what they call "sexual freedom" for children. Bishop is on a crusade in South Africa to have "age of sexual consent laws" abolished, and he is looking for help from NAMBLA to accomplish his goal. He says children must be empowered "by teaching them about loving relationships at an early age, and giving them the opportunity to make an informed decision about having [sex]." He also approves of incest, noting, "Two women psychologists in America say the healthiest introduction to sex for a child should be with their [sic] parents, because it is less threatening and the emotional intimacy more comfortable." 2 (2.Ibid) Bishop agrees with NAMBLA that the next social movement in Western politics will be an attack m "sexual ageism," which prohibits sexual contact based on age differences. The movement already is well under way in Europe and Canada.

http://www.emaso.com/links/extra/frightening_gay_statistics/frightening_gay_statistics.htm

https://www.popmatters.com/73113-is-your-child-safe-2496025731.html

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2017 at 4:28pm:

lee wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:56pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:41pm: A leak from the bureau, of course there is  :D :D :D like the previous leak that said it was 69%"Yes". Yeah, that was miles off.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Ajax wrote on Nov 15^th, 2017 at 7:25pm:

If the LGBTxyz community forms 3 or 4% of the population it does seem illogical that they would get up by 62%.

Illogical?
No, the only thing that was illogical was the 38% of people who want to impose their values on other people.
If you don't like same sex marriage then don't marry someone of the same sex. simple.

The_Barnacle wrote on Nov 15^th, 2017 at 8:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15th, 2017 at 4:28pm: lee wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:56pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:41pm: A leak from the bureau, of course there is  :D :D :D like the previous leak that said it was 69%"Yes". Yeah, that was miles off. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Ajax wrote on Nov 15th, 2017 at 7:25pm: If the LGBTxyz community forms 3 or 4% of the population it does seem illogical that they would get up by 62%. Illogical? No, the only thing that was illogical was the 38% of people who want to impose their values on other people. If you don't like same sex marriage then don't marry someone of the same sex. simple.

You so sure it will end here with SSM being accepted....??

I'm willing to say by the experience of Canada, the USA, Holland and Ireland that there si more to come.

Ajax wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 4:29pm:

Gays are a minority group at about 3 or 4%, why should most people bend the knee to a lifestyle they don't agree with. It's the tail wagging the dog, don't you think....????

I'm not sure what you are trying to say. No one is making anyone marry anyone else. No one is proposing that laws be changed to make anything currently legal, illegal.

The proposed legislation has no changes to school programs, or any other discrimination laws other than allowing religious celebrants to refuse marriage, which they can already do.

Homosexuality, Sodom, Gomorrah history repeating and now in Australia.

____ wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:13pm:

Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 6:27pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:23pm: First we have to protect children from religious mental illness. I would rather have religious instructions in our schools than that safe schools program designed to confuse kids with 64 genders while preparing them for a homosexual existence. The sickness is on your side of the fence my friend, like I said before climb back into your closet, there you can do whatever you want, just don't bother the majority of people and ESPECIALLY little children. WACA................. :D Teach children that theres this angry deity that gives you free will. And if you don't do what crazy religionist tell you to do with this free will, this angry deity will burn you forever. And if the crazy religionists change the rules down the track then you stop burning forever because the crazy religionists are more powerful than this invisible deity. Crazy Crazy Crazy!!!

Yet you support crazy crazy Islamics  ::)

capitosinora wrote on Nov 16^th, 2017 at 8:23am:

Homosexuality, Sodom, Gomorrah history repeating and now in Australia.

Don't you live in NY?

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14^th, 2017 at 8:22pm:

____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 8:16pm: Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 6:27pm: ____ wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 5:23pm: First we have to protect children from religious mental illness. I would rather have religious instructions in our schools than that safe schools program designed to confuse kids with 64 genders while preparing them for a homosexual existence. The sickness is on your side of the fence my friend, like I said before climb back into your closet, there you can do whatever you want, just don't bother the majority of people and ESPECIALLY little children. WACA................. :D What do you mean by that (the part I've highlighted)? How is ___ bothering little children? x2 He doesn't want to answer, so I've referred it to the Mods.

Referred what to the Mods?

Did you tell a lie via your personal opinion of what was typed?

You've had a few holidays of late what cred do you have running telling tales?

The_Barnacle wrote on Nov 15^th, 2017 at 8:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15th, 2017 at 4:28pm: lee wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:56pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:41pm: A leak from the bureau, of course there is  :D :D :D like the previous leak that said it was 69%"Yes". Yeah, that was miles off. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Ajax wrote on Nov 15th, 2017 at 7:25pm: If the LGBTxyz community forms 3 or 4% of the population it does seem illogical that they would get up by 62%. Illogical? No, the only thing that was illogical was the 38% of people who want to impose their values on other people. If you don't like same sex marriage then don't marry someone of the same sex. simple.

I think I know who is actually imposing their values on whom.

And its not your version.

So where is the link to the report of this leak? Does anyone else find it tedious when people are unhappy with a political outcome in a reasonable democracy, and can think of no other response than to start talking about their government as if it is a huge conspiracy?

Kytro wrote on Nov 16^th, 2017 at 7:09am:

Ajax wrote on Nov 14th, 2017 at 4:29pm: Gays are a minority group at about 3 or 4%, why should most people bend the knee to a lifestyle they don't agree with. It's the tail wagging the dog, don't you think....???? I'm not sure what you are trying to say. No one is making anyone marry anyone else. No one is proposing that laws be changed to make anything currently legal, illegal. The proposed legislation has no changes to school programs, or any other discrimination laws other than allowing religious celebrants to refuse marriage, which they can already do.

It isn't a matter of legality/illegality - that's just squid's ink - it is a matter of whether or not a group demanding entry when they do not qualify should be given entry by a change in the rules.