Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> General Board >> selective censorship not in Oz surely?
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1507839556

Message started by cods on Oct 13th, 2017 at 6:19am

Title: selective censorship not in Oz surely?
Post by cods on Oct 13th, 2017 at 6:19am
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/ray-hadley-its-radio-silence-in-orange-so-what-can-i-say/news-story/a6a6c4443261954bf19cb1e0ec52796c

This week, I’ve been speaking about a case in Orange, about a fatal accident where a 72-year-old lost his life. A man has been charged with dangerous driving causing death, and negligent driving causing death. He applied to have his ­licence reinstated and the magistrate agreed. His employer, a local business, provided a statement to the court that if he did not get his licence back, he’d be unemployed. Every time I’ve mentioned the story, the Southern Cross Network has stopped my transmission not only to Orange but stations across NSW, Queensland and South Australia. The local business is a substantial ­advertiser with MMM in Orange. Southern Cross says it’s a legal issue. If that were the case, this newspaper and my radio program would not be able to report any matters after someone was charged until the process concludes.

Title: Re: selective censorship not in Oz surely?
Post by John Smith on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:09am
FD is a fan of selective censorship ::)

Title: Re: selective censorship not in Oz surely?
Post by Karnal on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:21am

John Smith wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:09am:
FD is a fan of selective censorship ::)


That's true, JS. FD censors himself all the time.

Title: Re: selective censorship not in Oz surely?
Post by John Smith on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:23am

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:21am:

John Smith wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:09am:
FD is a fan of selective censorship ::)


That's true, JS. FD censors himself all the time.


Not just himself. Didn't he recently ban a whole swath of members who weren't Islamaphobes? He failed to provide an alternate reason

Title: Re: selective censorship not in Oz surely?
Post by Karnal on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:27am

John Smith wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:23am:

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:21am:

John Smith wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:09am:
FD is a fan of selective censorship ::)


That's true, JS. FD censors himself all the time.


Not just himself. Didn't he recently ban a whole swath of members who weren't Islamaphobes? He failed to provide an alternate reason


Yes, that's true too. FD doesn't like it when you don't want to ban the tinted races. Sustainability, innit.

Title: Re: selective censorship not in Oz surely?
Post by Ye Grappler on Oct 13th, 2017 at 10:49am

John Smith wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:23am:

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:21am:

John Smith wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:09am:
FD is a fan of selective censorship ::)


That's true, JS. FD censors himself all the time.


Not just himself. Didn't he recently ban a whole swath of members who weren't Islamaphobes? He failed to provide an alternate reason


Islamophilia is a fatal online disease and quarantine was called for.... Islamophilia can cause outbreaks of rioting and street offences, fatal bleeding and loss of head..... and is also a prime factor in the shrinking of secular organs  :-X

Title: Re: selective censorship not in Oz surely?
Post by John Smith on Oct 13th, 2017 at 10:50am
;D ;D

Title: Re: selective censorship not in Oz surely?
Post by Ye Grappler on Oct 13th, 2017 at 10:52am

John Smith wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 10:50am:
;D ;D


read again..... more laughs than a barrel full of monkeys...

Title: Re: selective censorship not in Oz surely?
Post by The_Barnacle on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:52am

Quote:
Every time I’ve mentioned the story, the Southern Cross Network has stopped my transmission not only to Orange but stations across NSW, Queensland and South Australia. The local business is a substantial ­advertiser with MMM in Orange.


For once cods is making an important point.
The commercial stations are well known for censoring news that is negative towards it's major sponsors and major advertisers.

There was the John Laws and Alan Jones cash for comment scandal

More recently there was the censorship of the Getup commercial


Quote:
Such an irony: the commercial television channels, which ran a landmark free-speech case in the High Court to protect their advertising revenue during election campaigns, have now censored an advertisement criticising the coverage of the election by Rupert Murdoch’s newspapers.
https://theconversation.com/commercial-tv-murdoch-and-censorship-17823



This sort of corporate bias and censorship is the very reason that a well funded ABC is so important

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.