The latest Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show 62.5 per cent of survey forms have now been sent back.
This is enough to give legitimacy to the survey.
So will you accept the result if it is not what you were hoping for?

To whom are you enquiring?

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 8:44pm:

To whom are you enquiring?

You'll do.

I don't think anyone cares anymore, Barnacle. It's done.

It'll be fun to watch Mr Abbott vote yes in the parliament though, no?

Say what you'll do and do what you say. Thank heavens the grown-ups are back in charge.

The feminists win again!

;)

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:02pm:

I don't think anyone cares anymore, Barnacle. It's done. It'll be fun to watch Mr Abbott vote no in the parliament though, no?

i think it's only just getting ineresting

If the yes vote wins, and all polls show that is the most likely result, turnbull is screwed

he still won't be able to change the legislation or the conservatives  in his party will most likely overthrow him

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:02pm:

I don't think anyone cares anymore, Barnacle. It's done. It'll be fun to watch Mr Abbott vote no in the parliament though, no?

Indeed!  It'll be fun watching that day.

I went down to Canberra (Parliament House) when "Abbott" was being voted on....I'd love to be there the day this is voted on.....but I reckon the place is already booked out!

Aussie wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 8:59pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:44pm: To whom are you enquiring? You'll do.

If the 'yes' vote gets up I'll be instructing all 150 representatives to  comply with the will of the people.
:o :o  :o

Aussie wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:08pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:02pm: I don't think anyone cares anymore, Barnacle. It's done. It'll be fun to watch Mr Abbott vote no in the parliament though, no? Indeed!  It'll be fun watching that day. I went down to Canberra (Parliament House) when "Abbott" was being voted on....I'd love to be there the day this is voted on.....but I reckon the place is already booked out!

Sorry, Aussie, I had to edit my post. I remembered Mr Abbott's promise to the Australian people.

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 8:44pm:

To whom are you enquiring?

Everyone

Personally, if the "No" result wins it won't bother me at all. It's not something that will have any effect on my life so I will accept the judgement.

I am interested to hear what the reaction will be from those who are saying that it will be the end of civilization if ssm is allowed. If the "yes" result were to win will these people accept the result? Or will they fight to save our civilization?

LOL...  some people are surely clueless.

Turnbull? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D  Oh yeah karnal.

Will I accept the result?
Well like most people what choice do I have?
Like most Conservatives I'd accept it, be unhappy about it, think it is the wrong decision then wait to see what happens in Parliament then move on with life.

According to Shorten and the radical activists behind it all, they won't accept anything but change and he says he will bring it in even against a majority NO vote.
So much for democracy eh.

Will it bring Equality?
NO...

Like in other SSM societies it will create and us and them when it comes to marriages...  there will be real marriage and gay marriage and it will ever be thus.

It will bring in all sorts of ludicrous changes and further attempts to change society and bring about the mythological equality.

My indifference to the whole issue is legion.... and I await with bated breath the next.. and the next... and the next..... and the next... part of the Alphabet program...

Like the feminists, once the foot is in the door it's all ahead full throttle..... about time this nation started saying no to silly demands without a moment's hesitation... appeasement of loud minorities hasn't worked so far, why would anyone assume it will work in the future?

Grendel wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:17pm:

It will bring in all sorts of ludicrous changes and further attempts to change society and bring about the mythological equality.

Indeed.

I've already got a dress picked out for my wheelbarrow, for the day when we're finally allowed to marry.

Grendel wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:17pm:

LOL...  some people are surely clueless. Turnbull? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D  Oh yeah karnal. Will I accept the result? Well like most people what choice do I have? Like most Conservatives I'd accept it, be unhappy about it, think it is the wrong decision then wait to see what happens in Parliament then move on with life. According to Shorten and the radical activists behind it all, they won't accept anything but change and he says he will bring it in even against a majority NO vote. So much for democracy eh. Will it bring Equality? NO... Like in other SSM societies it will create and us and them when it comes to marriages...  there will be real marriage and gay marriage and it will ever be thus. It will bring in all sorts of ludicrous changes and further attempts to change society and bring about the mythological equality.

Grendel learns quick. Beastiality's next, dear.

Miow miow.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:19pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:17pm: It will bring in all sorts of ludicrous changes and further attempts to change society and bring about the mythological equality. Indeed. I've already got a dress picked out for my wheelbarrow, for the day when we're finally allowed to marry.

I've got the rope.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:19pm:

..... about time this nation started saying no to silly demands without a moment's hesitation...

We do.

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:09pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:08pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:02pm: I don't think anyone cares anymore, Barnacle. It's done. It'll be fun to watch Mr Abbott vote no in the parliament though, no? Indeed!  It'll be fun watching that day. I went down to Canberra (Parliament House) when "Abbott" was being voted on....I'd love to be there the day this is voted on.....but I reckon the place is already booked out! Sorry, Aussie, I had to edit my post. I remembered Mr Abbott's promise to the Australian people.

You do remember that Mr Abbott didn't keep his promises to the people ?

The_Barnacle wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:11pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:44pm: To whom are you enquiring? Everyone Personally, if the "No" result wins it won't bother me at all. It's not something that will have any effect on my life so I will accept the judgement. I am interested to hear what the reaction will be from those who are saying that it will be the end of civilization if ssm is allowed. If the "yes" result were to win will these people accept the result? Or will they fight to save our civilization?

I can't save the world on my own: hence I boycott this dogs dinner altogether!

To not care about keeping the status quo is easy.

Women just slut it up no matter what happens so you may aswell just call yourself a dumb c#}{  :o

Dnarever wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:21pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:09pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:08pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:02pm: I don't think anyone cares anymore, Barnacle. It's done. It'll be fun to watch Mr Abbott vote no in the parliament though, no? Indeed!  It'll be fun watching that day. I went down to Canberra (Parliament House) when "Abbott" was being voted on....I'd love to be there the day this is voted on.....but I reckon the place is already booked out! Sorry, Aussie, I had to edit my post. I remembered Mr Abbott's promise to the Australian people. You do remember that Mr Abbott didn't keep his promises to the people ?

Under-promise and over-deliver, that's Mr Abbott's motto. Say what you'll do and do what you say.

Thank heavens the grown-ups are back in charge.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:19pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:17pm: It will bring in all sorts of ludicrous changes and further attempts to change society and bring about the mythological equality. Indeed. I've already got a dress picked out for my wheelbarrow, for the day when we're finally allowed to marry.

Those cute red wheelbarrows look great in white and a garland of flowers around the wheel is a must.

Rope eh karnal...  Then use it TROLL and stop crapping in every topic you can.

Quote:

and I await with bated breath the next.. and the next... and the next..... and the next...

What....next...and the next...and the next...and the next.

No-one has ever said.

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:24pm:

Dnarever wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:21pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:09pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:08pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:02pm: I don't think anyone cares anymore, Barnacle. It's done. It'll be fun to watch Mr Abbott vote no in the parliament though, no? Indeed!  It'll be fun watching that day. I went down to Canberra (Parliament House) when "Abbott" was being voted on....I'd love to be there the day this is voted on.....but I reckon the place is already booked out! Sorry, Aussie, I had to edit my post. I remembered Mr Abbott's promise to the Australian people. You do remember that Mr Abbott didn't keep his promises to the people ? Under-promise and over-deliver, that's Mr Abbott's motto. Say what you'll do and do what you say. Thank heavens the grown-ups are back in charge.

I miss Mr Abbott - it was the funniest time in Australian politics ever. Shame he was such a predictable failure.

If you measured political success by how much you laughed he could have been our most successful PM ever.

He really was the suppository of all wisdom you know ?

And he knew exactly what woman should be thinking about while doing the ironing.

Grendel wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:25pm:

Then use it TROLL and stop crapping in every topic you can.

I can't use my wheelbarrow until we are wed.

I've made that promise to her.

It's only a matter of time, though.

Once consenting homosexual adults, who are in love with each other, are allowed to marry it's only a matter of time until  humans are able to marry non-consenting animals and inanimate objects.

Would you like to be my best man?  My Weber BBQ is busy that day.

Grendel wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:17pm:

Will I accept the result? Well like most people what choice do I have? Like most Conservatives I'd accept it, be unhappy about it, think it is the wrong decision then wait to see what happens in Parliament then move on with life.

But it will result in the collapse of civilisation! I've been assured of this by many reliable conservative posters on this forum. Surely you will do more than meekly accept the result.

Dnarever wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:27pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:24pm: Dnarever wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:21pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:09pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:08pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:02pm: I don't think anyone cares anymore, Barnacle. It's done. It'll be fun to watch Mr Abbott vote no in the parliament though, no? Indeed!  It'll be fun watching that day. I went down to Canberra (Parliament House) when "Abbott" was being voted on....I'd love to be there the day this is voted on.....but I reckon the place is already booked out! Sorry, Aussie, I had to edit my post. I remembered Mr Abbott's promise to the Australian people. You do remember that Mr Abbott didn't keep his promises to the people ? Under-promise and over-deliver, that's Mr Abbott's motto. Say what you'll do and do what you say. Thank heavens the grown-ups are back in charge. I miss Mr Abbott - it was the funniest time in Australian politics ever. Shame he was such a predictable failure. If you measured political success by how much you laughed he could have been out most successful PM ever.

Oh, I know. Even funnier, he's more influential now than he ever was as our Roads and Infrastructure Prime Minister.

Malcolm Turnbull ends up doing whatever he says.

The_Barnacle wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 8:43pm:

The latest Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show 62.5 per cent of survey forms have now been sent back. This is enough to give legitimacy to the survey. So will you accept the result if it is not what you were hoping for?

Will the SSM people accept the result if they lose or will they be like the brexit losers who whinged and complained about the result?

The_Barnacle wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:29pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:17pm: Will I accept the result? Well like most people what choice do I have? Like most Conservatives I'd accept it, be unhappy about it, think it is the wrong decision then wait to see what happens in Parliament then move on with life. But it will result in the collapse of civilisation! I've been assured of this by many reliable conservative posters on this forum. Surely you will do more than meekly accept the result.

That is the real kicker after all the damage that has been done it is a non binding result that the Liberals will never pass legislation on.

The reality is that a loss would have ended SSM for a long time but a win means nothing.

The_Barnacle wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:29pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:17pm: Will I accept the result? Well like most people what choice do I have? Like most Conservatives I'd accept it, be unhappy about it, think it is the wrong decision then wait to see what happens in Parliament then move on with life. But it will result in the collapse of civilisation! I've been assured of this by many reliable conservative posters on this forum. Surely you will do more than meekly accept the result.

It will result in a society in which girls have short hair and boys wear dresses; we are in the yoke of Marxist overlords and it will all lead, ultimately, to the infiltration of tinted folk.

It's taken a couple of months but we finally got to the bottom of it.

Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:34pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:43pm: The latest Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show 62.5 per cent of survey forms have now been sent back. This is enough to give legitimacy to the survey. So will you accept the result if it is not what you were hoping for? Will the SSM people accept the result if they lose or will they be like the brexit losers who whinged and complained about the result?

Getting out of Brexit could cost the UK $50 Billion. What a good plan.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:29pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:25pm: Then use it TROLL and stop crapping in every topic you can. I can't use my wheelbarrow until we are wed. I've made that promise to her. It's only a matter of time, though. Once consenting homosexual adults, who are in love with each other, are allowed to marry it's only a matter of time until  humans are able to marry non-consenting animals and inanimate objects. Would you like to be my best man?  My Weber BBQ is busy that day.

Oh look the other TROLL....  don't waste my time answering replies I make to other people gweggy.

Can't you take another holiday...  a longer one this time.
The site makes much more sense without you. :D

mothra wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:36pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29pm: Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:17pm: Will I accept the result? Well like most people what choice do I have? Like most Conservatives I'd accept it, be unhappy about it, think it is the wrong decision then wait to see what happens in Parliament then move on with life. But it will result in the collapse of civilisation! I've been assured of this by many reliable conservative posters on this forum. Surely you will do more than meekly accept the result. It will result in a society in which girls have short hair and boys wear dresses; we are in the yoke of Marxist overlords and it will all lead, infiltration of tinted folk. It's taken a couple of months but we finally got to the bottom of it.

Except in Scotland where the girls will have to start wearing a kilt.

Grendel wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:39pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29pm: Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:25pm: Then use it TROLL and stop crapping in every topic you can. I can't use my wheelbarrow until we are wed. I've made that promise to her. It's only a matter of time, though. Once consenting homosexual adults, who are in love with each other, are allowed to marry it's only a matter of time until  humans are able to marry non-consenting animals and inanimate objects. Would you like to be my best man?  My Weber BBQ is busy that day. Oh look the other TROLL....  don't waste my time answering replies I make to other people gweggy. Can't you take another holiday...  a longer one this time. The site makes much more sense without you. :D

A barraphobic ?

The_Barnacle wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:29pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:17pm: Will I accept the result? Well like most people what choice do I have? Like most Conservatives I'd accept it, be unhappy about it, think it is the wrong decision then wait to see what happens in Parliament then move on with life. But it will result in the collapse of civilisation! I've been assured of this by many reliable conservative posters on this forum. Surely you will do more than meekly accept the result.

You don't need to prove to me you are an idiot and shallow thinker... 

Dnarever wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:39pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:36pm: The_Barnacle wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29pm: Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:17pm: Will I accept the result? Well like most people what choice do I have? Like most Conservatives I'd accept it, be unhappy about it, think it is the wrong decision then wait to see what happens in Parliament then move on with life. But it will result in the collapse of civilisation! I've been assured of this by many reliable conservative posters on this forum. Surely you will do more than meekly accept the result. It will result in a society in which girls have short hair and boys wear dresses; we are in the yoke of Marxist overlords and it will all lead, infiltration of tinted folk. It's taken a couple of months but we finally got to the bottom of it. Except in Scotland where the girls will have to start wearing a kilt.

Girls already wear them and not just in Scotland. :D :D :D
A Kilt and a dress are not the same thing BTW.

Grendel wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:42pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29pm: Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:17pm: Will I accept the result? Well like most people what choice do I have? Like most Conservatives I'd accept it, be unhappy about it, think it is the wrong decision then wait to see what happens in Parliament then move on with life. But it will result in the collapse of civilisation! I've been assured of this by many reliable conservative posters on this forum. Surely you will do more than meekly accept the result. You don't need to prove to me you are an idiot and shallow thinker...

This is where Grendel starts to pretend he was for gay marriage all along.

Watch.

YAWN
And here's where karnal keeps crapping in yet another topic eh karnal innit? :D :D :D

Grendel wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:43pm:

Dnarever wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:39pm: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:36pm: The_Barnacle wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29pm: Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:17pm: Will I accept the result? Well like most people what choice do I have? Like most Conservatives I'd accept it, be unhappy about it, think it is the wrong decision then wait to see what happens in Parliament then move on with life. But it will result in the collapse of civilisation! I've been assured of this by many reliable conservative posters on this forum. Surely you will do more than meekly accept the result. It will result in a society in which girls have short hair and boys wear dresses; we are in the yoke of Marxist overlords and it will all lead, infiltration of tinted folk. It's taken a couple of months but we finally got to the bottom of it. Except in Scotland where the girls will have to start wearing a kilt. Girls already wear them and not just in Scotland. :D :D :D A Kilt and a dress are not the same thing BTW.

My daughter had one, not sure if she still has it.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:19pm:

My indifference to the whole issue is legion.... and I await with bated breath the next.. and the next... and the next..... and the next... part of the Alphabet program... Like the feminists, once the foot is in the door it's all ahead full throttle..... about time this nation started saying no to silly demands without a moment's hesitation... appeasement of loud minorities hasn't worked so far, why would anyone assume it will work in the future?

The art of war says: When the door is open be like a maiden and rush in!

Feminism is just an excuse to be a s#%}!

I beg your pardon, DNA.

Marxists and feminists.

Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 9:34pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:43pm: The latest Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show 62.5 per cent of survey forms have now been sent back. This is enough to give legitimacy to the survey. So will you accept the result if it is not what you were hoping for? Will the SSM people accept the result if they lose or will they be like the brexit losers who whinged and complained about the result?

I boycotted the whole dogs dinner of a process so I don't care about the result!

I simply believe sodomy is violence and if anyone tries to teach my kid about it I will be taking action!

You're a feminist again. Just fot today?

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 10:01pm:

You're a feminist again. Just fot today?

I'm always a feminist, Hammer.

I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is.

A survey is a snap moment in time count of people's opinion.
We have political surveys regularly because positions change.

Whatever the result, we should have a new $122 million survey every three months, until the end of the current government's term.


Then in the next government's term, the marriage act bastardisation by John Howard is reversed.

Gay people can then use the court to test the validity of marriage equality.

This way it would be less divisive. Unless via the courts, Gay people are able to remove religious freedom to discriminate against gay people.

mothra wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 10:03pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is.

Ah... but there be feminists and feminists... like Muslims they come in many colours and stamps..... generalising and theorising and putting on the mantle of the 'good' feminist is meaningless.. we need to SEE your 'outcomes'(shudders at use of buzz word) for ourselves in order to judge....

It is only by your results that we can fairly judge.......  8-)

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 10:17pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Ah... but there be feminists and feminists... like Muslims they come in many colours and stamps..... generalising and theorising and putting on the mantle of the 'good' feminist is meaningless.. we need to SEE your 'outcomes'(shudders at use of buzz word) for ourselves in order to judge.... It is only by your results that we can fairly judge.......  8-)

Well you've got some catching up to do. First you need to work out what i've actually said versus what you have shoved in my mouth ... then approach analysis without prejudice (a seemingly impossible task for you) ... and then you "all" can start "judging" me on my actual merits.

Meanwhile, i've got you worked all the way out.

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 10:01pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:34pm: The_Barnacle wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:43pm: The latest Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show 62.5 per cent of survey forms have now been sent back. This is enough to give legitimacy to the survey. So will you accept the result if it is not what you were hoping for? Will the SSM people accept the result if they lose or will they be like the brexit losers who whinged and complained about the result? I boycotted the whole dogs dinner of a process so I don't care about the result! I simply believe sodomy is violence and if anyone tries to teach my kid about it I will be taking action!

Charity begins at home, Death.

____ wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 10:15pm:

A survey is a snap moment in time count of people's opinion. We have political surveys regularly because positions change. Whatever the result, we should have a new $122 million survey every three months, until the end of the current government's term. Then in the next government's term, the marriage act bastardisation by John Howard is reversed. Gay people can then use the court to test the validity of marriage equality. This way it would be less divisive. Unless via the courts, Gay people are able to remove religious freedom to discriminate against gay people.

The marriage act was never bastardised.
It wasn't bastardised by Howard.
Ask Labor they supported the wording changes and they also stated that the meaning of the act was never changed merely confirmed and clarified.
So lie to yourself all you like but stop wasting my time by continually posting that rubbish. :D :D :D :D :D

i still don't get why you think it wasn't changed just because labor ended up agreeing to it?


you're a fool goose.

John Smith wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 10:26pm:

i still don't get why you think it wasn't changed just because labor ended up agreeing to it? you're a fool goose.

Well I'm not but you sure do a good impersonation of a retarded goose...  Troll.

get an adult to explain it to you, I've given up trying. :D :D :D :D :D

Grendel wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 10:25pm:

____ wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:15pm: A survey is a snap moment in time count of people's opinion. We have political surveys regularly because positions change. Whatever the result, we should have a new $122 million survey every three months, until the end of the current government's term. Then in the next government's term, the marriage act bastardisation by John Howard is reversed. Gay people can then use the court to test the validity of marriage equality. This way it would be less divisive. Unless via the courts, Gay people are able to remove religious freedom to discriminate against gay people. The marriage act we never bastardised. It wasn't bastardised by Howard. Ask Labor they supported the wording changes and they also stated that the meaning of the act was never changed merely confirmed and clarified. So lie to yourself all you like but stop wasting my time by continually posting that rubbish. :D :D :D :D :D

So you admit the marriage act was bastardised by Howard ... words changes so to deny the opportunity of recognising marriages that occurred overseas.

Howard removed the rights of a section of the population and this is why this is a human rights issue.

Also a plank in the argument of why Australia requires a Bill of Rights.

As Howard stripped a right from same sex couples, a future politician could strip rights from other Australians.

Christians, for example. A right to wear the crucifix in public, or something along that line..

That 'section of the population' didn't have that 'right' in Australia... do we permit a person with a tribal permission to carry an AK-47 to carry it here?

Thought not....

Do try to get a grip on the issues, would you?

'gay marriage' is not a right - it is a preference and if granted will be a gift from the representatives of the society in which we live since it has no foundation in reality, since marriage is currently defined as between a man and a woman .... and as such the privilege of 'gay marriage' can be withdrawn at any time.....

Grendel wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 10:32pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:26pm: i still don't get why you think it wasn't changed just because labor ended up agreeing to it? you're a fool goose. Well I'm not but you sure do a good impersonation of a retarded goose...  Troll. get an adult to explain it to you, I've given up trying. :D :D :D :D :D

yet you keep citing labor agreeing to it as your proof that it wasn't changed. It doesn't matter what any politician says, the fact remains it was changed. DO you even know what 'change' means?

Grendel wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 10:25pm:

they supported the wording changes

opps, you shot yourself in the foot

you idiot ;D ;D

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 10:01pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:34pm: The_Barnacle wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:43pm: The latest Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show 62.5 per cent of survey forms have now been sent back. This is enough to give legitimacy to the survey. So will you accept the result if it is not what you were hoping for? Will the SSM people accept the result if they lose or will they be like the brexit losers who whinged and complained about the result? I boycotted the whole dogs dinner of a process so I don't care about the result! I simply believe sodomy is violence and if anyone tries to teach my kid about it I will be taking action!

We have to look at the future, by looking at other countries, and there we have a clue..... does this current Aussie ad show us the measure of what is to come for our children's future?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcTruqNNBaU

Will parents really lose their rights in Australian schools and what is taught, as done in Canada for instance?

What action can a parent take? Doing home schooling? Going to live far away from the madding crowds? Limiting internet and TV?

PM targets gays in marriage law


Gay couples will be banned from marrying or adopting children from overseas but will be allowed to inherit their partner's superannuation under proposed changes to marriage laws announced today.
Less than an hour after Prime Minister John Howard announced the changes to the Marriage Act, the government rushed legislation enabling the changes into parliament.

Mr Howard said the Marriage Act would be changed to include a definition of marriage as the `voluntarily entered-into union of a man and a woman to exclusion of all others'.

The laws currently do not define marriage.

``We've decided to insert this into the Marriage Act to make it very plain that that is our view of a marriage and to also make it very plain that the definition of a marriage is something that should rest in the hands ultimately of the parliament of the nation,'' Mr Howard told reporters.

''(It should) not over time be subject to redefinition or change by courts, it is something that ought to be expressed through the elected representatives of the country.''

The change would mean that couples could not marry overseas in a country where gay marriage was legal and then hope to have the union recognised on their return to Australia.

Mr Howard also said the Family Law Act would be changed to prevent, where possible, gay couples adopting children from overseas.

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/05/27/1085461876842.html


Howard's Bastardisation of the Marriage Act
and
Removal of Rights from a section of the Population.
i.e Banning Gay Couples From Marrying. Removing their Right that already existed.
This is a human rights issue.

Will you accept the result?

Of course, we live in a democracy. A part of that is we must accept things that do not go our way.

Although Raven wishes the aftermath was fair.

A NO vote appears to be binding. A YES vote is not.

We spent over a hundred million dollars on this exercise. The outcome should be binding, no matter what it is.

The_Barnacle wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 8:43pm:

The latest Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show 62.5 per cent of survey forms have now been sent back. This is enough to give legitimacy to the survey. So will you accept the result if it is not what you were hoping for?

If you were asking the republican movement or the proponents of Day Light Savings and the vote was no, then most definitely the will of the people would be rejected, as many very expensive referenda have shown.

So why should this be any different?

mothra wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 10:03pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is.

Neither do you.

Grendel wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 10:25pm:

____ wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:15pm: A survey is a snap moment in time count of people's opinion. We have political surveys regularly because positions change. Whatever the result, we should have a new $122 million survey every three months, until the end of the current government's term. Then in the next government's term, the marriage act bastardisation by John Howard is reversed. Gay people can then use the court to test the validity of marriage equality. This way it would be less divisive. Unless via the courts, Gay people are able to remove religious freedom to discriminate against gay people. The marriage act was never bastardised. It wasn't bastardised by Howard. Ask Labor they supported the wording changes and they also stated that the meaning of the act was never changed merely confirmed and clarified. So lie to yourself all you like but stop wasting my time by continually posting that rubbish. :D :D :D :D :D

Howard changed the Marriage Act, and you had no say in it.

Why do you a demand a say in it now?

mothra wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 10:21pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:17pm: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Ah... but there be feminists and feminists... like Muslims they come in many colours and stamps..... generalising and theorising and putting on the mantle of the 'good' feminist is meaningless.. we need to SEE your 'outcomes'(shudders at use of buzz word) for ourselves in order to judge.... It is only by your results that we can fairly judge.......  8-) Well you've got some catching up to do. First you need to work out what i've actually said versus what you have shoved in my mouth ... then approach analysis without prejudice (a seemingly impossible task for you) ... and then you "all" can start "judging" me on my actual merits. Meanwhile, i've got you worked all the way out.

I'd suggest you need a good dose of "practice what you preach".

A grandiloquent hypocrite. 

____ wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 10:35pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:25pm: ____ wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:15pm: A survey is a snap moment in time count of people's opinion. We have political surveys regularly because positions change. Whatever the result, we should have a new $122 million survey every three months, until the end of the current government's term. Then in the next government's term, the marriage act bastardisation by John Howard is reversed. Gay people can then use the court to test the validity of marriage equality. This way it would be less divisive. Unless via the courts, Gay people are able to remove religious freedom to discriminate against gay people. The marriage act we never bastardised. It wasn't bastardised by Howard. Ask Labor they supported the wording changes and they also stated that the meaning of the act was never changed merely confirmed and clarified. So lie to yourself all you like but stop wasting my time by continually posting that rubbish. :D :D :D :D :D So you admit the marriage act was bastardised by Howard ... words changes so to deny the opportunity of recognising marriages that occurred overseas. Howard removed the rights of a section of the population and this is why this is a human rights issue. Also a plank in the argument of why Australia requires a Bill of Rights. As Howard stripped a right from same sex couples, a future politician could strip rights from other Australians. Christians, for example. A right to wear the crucifix in public, or something along that line..

Maybe we should accept all qualifications & documents from overseas ey?

Instead of having them meet Australian standards & requirement under our law & constitution?

What rot.

PLEASE


Just make it all go away

It won't go away ....that's the trouble.

This has been made more important than our national security.

Australia is always the follower ...... about the last in doing what's been done in the US, UK, Canada etc for years ..... good or bad.

It's done without any regard to any fall out from or ongoing side affects.............

we never learn from the outcomes/mistakes of others.

It's much more than the "warm & fuzzy" notion that it's solely about 2 men or 2 women that are in love wanting to marry.

Gnads wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 8:49am:

It won't go away ....that's the trouble. This has been made more important than our national security. Australia is always the follower ...... about the last in doing what's been done in the US, UK, Canada etc for years ..... good or bad. It's done without any regard to any fall out from or ongoing side affects............. we never learn from the outcomes/mistakes of others. It's much more than the "warm & fuzzy" notion that it's solely about 2 men or 2 women that are in love wanting to marry.

Indeed.

It's about people being allowed to marry their wheelbarrows, dogs, and letterboxes.

By 2020, it'll be compulsory to marry at least one sibling and one inanimate object.

You're certainly on the ball, Gonads.

I'll accept it. if the vote goes against the "Yes" voters, they won't.

They will continue to push their wheelbarrow until they get their "wants".

lee wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 11:30am:

I'll accept it. if the vote goes against the "Yes" voters, they won't. They will continue to push their wheelbarrow until they get their "wants".

I'll continue to push my wheelbarrow until I can marry it.

I think you should spend more time with your wheelbarrow in the garden or on a building site and less time with your computer. :D :D :D :D :D

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 9:26am:

Gnads wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 8:49am: It won't go away ....that's the trouble. This has been made more important than our national security. Australia is always the follower ...... about the last in doing what's been done in the US, UK, Canada etc for years ..... good or bad. It's done without any regard to any fall out from or ongoing side affects............. we never learn from the outcomes/mistakes of others. It's much more than the "warm & fuzzy" notion that it's solely about 2 men or 2 women that are in love wanting to marry. Indeed. It's about people being allowed to marry their wheelbarrows, dogs, and letterboxes. By 2020, it'll be compulsory to marry at least one sibling and one inanimate object. You're certainly on the ball, Gonads.

You should change your name to strawman!

Grendel wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 12:27pm:

I think you should spend more time with your wheelbarrow in the garden or on a building site and less time with your computer.

https://static5.depositphotos.com/1040226/463/i/950/depositphotos_4632297-stock-photo-wheelbarrow-with-man-inside.jpg

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 12:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:26am: Gnads wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 8:49am: It won't go away ....that's the trouble. This has been made more important than our national security. Australia is always the follower ...... about the last in doing what's been done in the US, UK, Canada etc for years ..... good or bad. It's done without any regard to any fall out from or ongoing side affects............. we never learn from the outcomes/mistakes of others. It's much more than the "warm & fuzzy" notion that it's solely about 2 men or 2 women that are in love wanting to marry. Indeed. It's about people being allowed to marry their wheelbarrows, dogs, and letterboxes. By 2020, it'll be compulsory to marry at least one sibling and one inanimate object. You're certainly on the ball, Gonads. You should change your name to strawman!

You should change your name to slippery slope!

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 10:25pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:34pm: The_Barnacle wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:43pm: The latest Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show 62.5 per cent of survey forms have now been sent back. This is enough to give legitimacy to the survey. So will you accept the result if it is not what you were hoping for? Will the SSM people accept the result if they lose or will they be like the brexit losers who whinged and complained about the result? I boycotted the whole dogs dinner of a process so I don't care about the result! I simply believe sodomy is violence and if anyone tries to teach my kid about it I will be taking action! Charity begins at home, Death.

Is that supposed to mean anything?

mothra wrote on Oct 11^th, 2017 at 10:03pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is.

Feminists are just sl*** with an excuse.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 12:36pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:27pm: I think you should spend more time with your wheelbarrow in the garden or on a building site and less time with your computer. https://static5.depositphotos.com/1040226/463/i/950/depositphotos_4632297-stock-photo-wheelbarrow-with-man-inside.jpg

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ytx16F1X1yM/maxresdefault.jpg

Gnads wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 8:21am:

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Neither do you.

Are you going to mansplain it to me?

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 12:39pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Feminists are just sl*** with an excuse.

Oi. You're sailing close to reporting.
Tone it down.

____ wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 1:09pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:39pm: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Feminists are just sl*** with an excuse. Oi. You're sailing close to reporting. Tone it down.

Tone your sodomy education to kids down first!

mothra wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 1:05pm:

Gnads wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 8:21am: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Neither do you. Are you going to mansplain it to me?

lol, everything is a mans fault: dumb s&^%$ take no responsiblity for their own safety and end up crying forever and demanding men come around and listen to their stupid rage.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 12:37pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:33pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:26am: Gnads wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 8:49am: It won't go away ....that's the trouble. This has been made more important than our national security. Australia is always the follower ...... about the last in doing what's been done in the US, UK, Canada etc for years ..... good or bad. It's done without any regard to any fall out from or ongoing side affects............. we never learn from the outcomes/mistakes of others. It's much more than the "warm & fuzzy" notion that it's solely about 2 men or 2 women that are in love wanting to marry. Indeed. It's about people being allowed to marry their wheelbarrows, dogs, and letterboxes. By 2020, it'll be compulsory to marry at least one sibling and one inanimate object. You're certainly on the ball, Gonads. You should change your name to strawman! You should change your name to slippery slope!

Slippery slope fallacy only applies to relatively small initial steps!

If you try to argue that the changing of marriage from one of heterosexuality to one of institutionalising sodomy is a relatively small initial step then you're simply a lunatic demonstrating why all gay people are avoided like the plague.

I've said this many times but of course you don't listen cos you're demented like all gay people trying to sell the story of how sodomy is not violence.

Admittedly, I'm not sure what difference it makes what the result is. Its non-binding.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 2:51pm:

Admittedly, I'm not sure what difference it makes what the result is. Its non-binding.

Well yes, but Mr Abbott always said he'd support the will of the Australian people.

Say what you'll do and do what you say. Mr Abbott will vote with the government for sure.

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 1:23pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:37pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:33pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:26am: Gnads wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 8:49am: It won't go away ....that's the trouble. This has been made more important than our national security. Australia is always the follower ...... about the last in doing what's been done in the US, UK, Canada etc for years ..... good or bad. It's done without any regard to any fall out from or ongoing side affects............. we never learn from the outcomes/mistakes of others. It's much more than the "warm & fuzzy" notion that it's solely about 2 men or 2 women that are in love wanting to marry. Indeed. It's about people being allowed to marry their wheelbarrows, dogs, and letterboxes. By 2020, it'll be compulsory to marry at least one sibling and one inanimate object. You're certainly on the ball, Gonads. You should change your name to strawman! You should change your name to slippery slope! Slippery slope fallacy only applies to relatively small initial steps! If you try to argue that the changing of marriage from one of heterosexuality to one of institutionalising sodomy is a relatively small initial step ...

That's not what's being done.

Sodomy has nothing to do with it.

Either do children.

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 1:17pm:

____ wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:09pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:39pm: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Feminists are just sl*** with an excuse. Oi. You're sailing close to reporting. Tone it down. Tone your sodomy education to kids down first!

Impossible to tone a zero quantity down.

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 1:17pm:

____ wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:09pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:39pm: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Feminists are just sl*** with an excuse. Oi. You're sailing close to reporting. Tone it down. Tone your sodomy education to kids down first!

The only person discussing sodomy and kids is you.

You need to stop.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 3:37pm:

That's not what's being done. Sodomy has nothing to do with it. Either do children.

Don't tell me what's being done you dodgy freak!

____ wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 3:38pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:17pm: ____ wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:09pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:39pm: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Feminists are just sl*** with an excuse. Oi. You're sailing close to reporting. Tone it down. Tone your sodomy education to kids down first! Impossible to tone a zero quantity down.

You think you're quite tricky don't you!

That's why gay people are avoided like the plague,... so they get the picture!

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 3:38pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:17pm: ____ wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:09pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:39pm: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Feminists are just sl*** with an excuse. Oi. You're sailing close to reporting. Tone it down. Tone your sodomy education to kids down first! The only person discussing sodomy and kids is you. You need to stop.

I need to what?
You need to stop teaching my kids violent sexual acts!

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 3:41pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:38pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:17pm: ____ wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:09pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:39pm: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Feminists are just sl*** with an excuse. Oi. You're sailing close to reporting. Tone it down. Tone your sodomy education to kids down first! The only person discussing sodomy and kids is you. You need to stop. I need to what? You need to stop teaching my kids violent sexual acts!

I said you need to stop.

You've accused people of this too many times now.

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 3:40pm:

____ wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:38pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:17pm: ____ wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:09pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:39pm: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Feminists are just sl*** with an excuse. Oi. You're sailing close to reporting. Tone it down. Tone your sodomy education to kids down first! Impossible to tone a zero quantity down. You think you're quite tricky don't you! That's why gay people are avoided like the plague,... so they get the picture!

Not tricky, factual.

You make false claims ... I bat them away.
Insanity ... doing the same thing over and expecting a different result.

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 3:41pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:38pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:17pm: ____ wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:09pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:39pm: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Feminists are just sl*** with an excuse. Oi. You're sailing close to reporting. Tone it down. Tone your sodomy education to kids down first! The only person discussing sodomy and kids is you. You need to stop. I need to what? You need to stop teaching my kids violent sexual acts!

They'll need to learn eventually, Death. Why can't they be taught how to do it safely?

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 3:39pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:37pm: That's not what's being done. Sodomy has nothing to do with it. Neither do children. Don't tell me what's being done you dodgy freak!

That's not what's being done.

Sodomy has nothing to do with it.

Neither do children.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 3:46pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:39pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:37pm: That's not what's being done. Sodomy has nothing to do with it. Neither do children. Don't tell me what's being done you dodgy freak! That's not what's being done. Sodomy has nothing to do with it. Neither do children.

Well what's to stop gay children getting married? Tell me that.

The promotion of sodomy to our children is the sign of a sick society.

That's why gay people are avoided like the plague.

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 3:47pm:

The promotion of sodomy to our children is the sign of a sick society.

Yes, but what if they're married first?

Gay people are not promoting sodomy to children.

The question :
‘Should the law be changed to allow same-sex couples to marry?’

____ wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 3:50pm:

Gay people are not promoting sodomy to children. The question : ‘Should the law be changed to allow same-sex couples to marry?’

That's a completely different question, ____. We're talking about legalizing sodomy for married children.

http://img43.laughinggif.com/pic/HTTP21lZGlhLmdpcGh5LmNvbS9tZWRpYS9sME85eVZZUlNxZlMwaDcxSy9naXBoeS5naWYlog.gif

____ wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 3:50pm:

Gay people are not promoting sodomy to children. The question : ‘Should the law be changed to allow same-sex couples to marry?’

It's a slippery slope. The slippery slope fallacy only applies to relatively small initial steps but you can't argue that changing an institution of heterosexual marriage to one of debauchery and violent sexual acts is a relatively small initial step.

In other words, there's consequences to actions and our flesh and blood died for the right to discuss such consequences.

You tell us we are not allowed to discuss consequences and that is what makes you all a bunch of fascists.

Aussie wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 3:56pm:

http://img43.laughinggif.com/pic/HTTP21lZGlhLmdpcGh5LmNvbS9tZWRpYS9sME85eVZZUlNxZlMwaDcxSy9naXBoeS5naWYlog.gif

What is so funny?

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 3:59pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:56pm: http://img43.laughinggif.com/pic/HTTP21lZGlhLmdpcGh5LmNvbS9tZWRpYS9sME85eVZZUlNxZlMwaDcxSy9naXBoeS5naWYlog.gif What is so funny?

Quote:

That's a completely different question, ____. We're talking about legalizing sodomy for married children.

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 3:58pm:

... you can't argue that changing an institution of heterosexual marriage to one of debauchery and violent sexual acts ...

You can't keep saying that, because that's not what's happening.

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 3:41pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:38pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:17pm: ____ wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:09pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:39pm: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Feminists are just sl*** with an excuse. Oi. You're sailing close to reporting. Tone it down. Tone your sodomy education to kids down first! The only person discussing sodomy and kids is you. You need to stop. I need to what? You need to stop teaching my kids violent sexual acts!

Can someone ban this dipshit.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 4:00pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:58pm: ... you can't argue that changing an institution of heterosexual marriage to one of debauchery and violent sexual acts ... You can't keep saying that, because that's not what's happening.

Yeah - at least wait until all the evidence is in....... then we can go pick up the pieces and help those emotionally scarred for life..... no problem there.... if saying NO can save just one future child in a homosexual or lesbian or whatever family from suicide, then it will have been worth it.....

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 4:21pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:00pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:58pm: ... you can't argue that changing an institution of heterosexual marriage to one of debauchery and violent sexual acts ... You can't keep saying that, because that's not what's happening. Yeah - at least wait until all the evidence is in....... then we can go pick up the pieces and help those emotionally scarred for life..... no problem there.... if saying NO can save just one future child in a homosexual or lesbian or whatever family from suicide, then it will have been worth it.....

Just out of interest how many children commit suicide because they are in a homosexual or lesbian family.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 4:20pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:41pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:38pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:17pm: ____ wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:09pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:39pm: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Feminists are just sl*** with an excuse. Oi. You're sailing close to reporting. Tone it down. Tone your sodomy education to kids down first! The only person discussing sodomy and kids is you. You need to stop. I need to what? You need to stop teaching my kids violent sexual acts! Can someone ban this dipshit.

I've reported him to FD and Vic.

I suggest others do the same.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 4:20pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:41pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:38pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:17pm: ____ wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:09pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:39pm: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Feminists are just sl*** with an excuse. Oi. You're sailing close to reporting. Tone it down. Tone your sodomy education to kids down first! The only person discussing sodomy and kids is you. You need to stop. I need to what? You need to stop teaching my kids violent sexual acts! Can someone ban this dipshit.

Umpire Umpire Umpire  :o :o

You should start eating some real food and try feeding your body nutrients for once.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 4:27pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:20pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:41pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:38pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:17pm: ____ wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:09pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:39pm: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Feminists are just sl*** with an excuse. Oi. You're sailing close to reporting. Tone it down. Tone your sodomy education to kids down first! The only person discussing sodomy and kids is you. You need to stop. I need to what? You need to stop teaching my kids violent sexual acts! Can someone ban this dipshit. I've reported him to FD and Vic. I suggest others do the same.

Typical man-hating feminist: run to the authorities and claim purity!

::) ::) ::)

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 4:20pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:41pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:38pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:17pm: ____ wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:09pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:39pm: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Feminists are just sl*** with an excuse. Oi. You're sailing close to reporting. Tone it down. Tone your sodomy education to kids down first! The only person discussing sodomy and kids is you. You need to stop. I need to what? You need to stop teaching my kids violent sexual acts! Can someone ban this dipshit.

No. We want Death here, we need him.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 4:27pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:20pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:41pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:38pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:17pm: ____ wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:09pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:39pm: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Feminists are just sl*** with an excuse. Oi. You're sailing close to reporting. Tone it down. Tone your sodomy education to kids down first! The only person discussing sodomy and kids is you. You need to stop. I need to what? You need to stop teaching my kids violent sexual acts! Can someone ban this dipshit. I've reported him to FD and Vic. I suggest others do the same.

Meh, FD did precisely 1/10th of bugger all when it came to Dr Mengele.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 4:29pm:

Meh, FD did precisely 1/10th of bugger all when it came to Dr Mengele.

Why should he? FD wants the Doctor here. He needs him.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 4:00pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:58pm: ... you can't argue that changing an institution of heterosexual marriage to one of debauchery and violent sexual acts ... You can't keep saying that, because that's not what's happening.

Ignorance is the only card you ever played.

;)

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 4:29pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:20pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:41pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:38pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:17pm: ____ wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:09pm: TheFunPolice wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:39pm: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:01pm: You're a feminist again. Just fot today? I'm always a feminist, Hammer. I just don't happen to think that very many people on here know what a feminist actually is. Feminists are just sl*** with an excuse. Oi. You're sailing close to reporting. Tone it down. Tone your sodomy education to kids down first! The only person discussing sodomy and kids is you. You need to stop. I need to what? You need to stop teaching my kids violent sexual acts! Can someone ban this dipshit. No. We want Death here, we need him.

Who else are you going to attack with a pair of scissors if the house is empty again?

May aswell pick up the phone and pretend you're some mans best friend and plan the dodgy conversation while he bothers to come around.

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 12^th, 2017 at 4:30pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:29pm: Meh, FD did precisely 1/10th of bugger all when it came to Dr Mengele. Why should he? FD wants the Doctor here. He needs him.

A bit like the over-simplified left needs the over-simplified right!

He's just a meme.