Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> General Board >> racial hatred in Australia
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1507512415

Message started by John Smith on Oct 9th, 2017 at 11:26am

Title: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 9th, 2017 at 11:26am
A good article.


A suburban hair salon, an anti-Muslim tirade and what it says about hate speech in Australia

Such hair as I have is cut from time to time by Mrs E, who runs a one-chair salon in my neighbourhood.

She has been in business there for 40 years. She knows all about the history of the street and many of her clients have been coming to her for half a lifetime.

The salon is shut on Mondays, when she cuts the hair of the elderly and disabled in various local institutions.

Mrs E is a petite woman with a cloud of brown hair, a bright smile and that empathetic personality that fits so many hairdressers for their parallel occupation of informal counsellor.

Under her hairdresser's smock she wears a dress or a blouse and trousers.

She came to Australia as a child from the Balkans, grew up, married, had two sons.

Australia is home and a place where she says she has always felt welcome, until the other day.

A client whose hair she had been cutting for 20 years came in as usual, and then, without any prompting or preamble, launched into a tirade against Muslims.

Mrs E heard her out. As a rule, like most sensible businesspeople, she resists being drawn into conversations about sex, religion or politics.

But eventually it became too much. "I'm a Muslim," she told the client, "and I very much regret that after 20 years I must tell you I will no longer cut your hair".
The salon contains no outward sign of her faith: nothing in her appearance or in the room itself gives it away. For her, it is something private; nothing to do with her professional life.

It happened that I came in about a week later. Mrs E and I often talk in general terms about what's going on in the world.

She knows I am a journalist and academic and I think she feels safe pushing her conversational boundaries slightly.

She told me this story and as she did so, the hurt was written all over her face.

And after nearly a lifetime in Australia, she said she felt just that little bit less welcome.

Hate speech seeping into Australian society

So this is how it goes.

Hate speech becomes part of the currency of national debate and is exploited for political purposes.

In 1996, Pauline Hanson delivers her notorious maiden speech in which she says Australia is being "swamped by Asians".

John Howard, as prime minister, dog-whistles that this is all about free speech.

In 2001, the so-called Tampa election occurs.

Boat people — overwhelmingly Muslim — become the butt of Howard's assertion of national sovereignty: "We will decide who comes to this country and the circumstances in which they come."

There are votes in this and both sides of politics pile on.

In the midst of the 2013 election, Labor's Kevin Rudd — the same man who claims Dietrich Bonhoeffer as an inspiration — slams the door on asylum seekers by striking deals, with Nauru and Papua New Guinea, that Australia is still living with.

In 2014, the Federal Government tries to weaken the Racial Discrimination Act in what is said to be in the interests of free speech.

Attorney-General George Brandis asserts that "people have a right to be bigots".
In 2015, research conducted for the Melbourne Social Equity Institute finds that the single most important driver of negative attitudes toward asylum seekers is religious prejudice, sometimes expressed as concern about the "Islamisation" of Australia.

In August 2017, Senator Hanson wears a burqa into Senate Question Time.

Senator Brandis discovers where bigotry can lead and assails her for an "appalling stunt" disrespectful of the Muslim faith.

Eventually, the political licensing of racism and religious intolerance seeps into the fabric of society. It might take a generation or it might take longer.

But when it does it stains and rots that fabric, eating away at people's sense of belonging, undermining the Australian multicultural project, and in a small suburban hair salon, a middle-aged woman feels emboldened to vent her prejudice, doing harm and hurt to someone who has been tending her person for 20 years.

Dennis Muller is a senior research fellow at the University of Melbourne's Centre for Advancing Journalism.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-09/anti-muslim-tirade-hairdresser-and-hate-speech-in-australia/9029746






the politics of division is alive and well in this country.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 9th, 2017 at 11:56am
lucky for us... it was only  WORDS.....

you may see or hear it as racist  and may even claim  it isnt ....  but some things DO still go deep..

I am talking about the subject of the Republic...a topic  very much on the minds of the  left leaning side of Australians. and when it rears its head   .some of the things that have been said in the past  have been down right cruel and nasty....... and I am sure many more in the future.will be the same....

and yes they can go deep.. and yes they do have an affect of making some of us from the old country feel unwelcome / unwanted call it what you like...

I have been told .. dont like it here go back where you come from..... who asked you to come here.? and so it went on...yep it happens....


we get told to turn the other cheek...

is it Australian  to speak like that.... ANTI everything   


no I dont think so....

I like to think those people are few and far between   that lady and I am sorry she heard all that   but one women in 20 years   is not all that ugly....some people lash out because they see their lives changing  because of things that happen elsewhere...

this lady may have been hurt by this customers   but I am sure she still thanks the lord she lives in this country.. I know I do!

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 9th, 2017 at 12:15pm

cods wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 11:56am:
I have been told .. dont like it here go back where you come from..... who asked you to come here.? and so it went on...yep it happens....


you think it happens to you? try being from a non english background.


cods wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 11:56am:
 but one women in 20 years

you don't honestly believe that?

Just yesterday I took the kids kayaking. A random woman stopped for a chat cause my kids started patting her dog. the first thing she choose to go on about was how bad the muslims are, all the while going on about how she wasn't racist cause she used to play with her greek/ italian friends from school when she was a teenager. I'd never met her in my life, and within 60 seconds of meeting me that's what she choose to talk about?
Ohh, and I suspect the only reason she did so was cause she picked through my wifes accent that we were european. I doubt we would have had the same conversation if I was a pom

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 9th, 2017 at 12:38pm
I saw this on the Conversation.

Brilliant article.

The Hanson effect: how hate seeps in and damages us all

https://theconversation.com/the-hanson-effect-how-hate-seeps-in-and-damages-us-all-85314

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 9th, 2017 at 12:45pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 12:15pm:

cods wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 11:56am:
I have been told .. dont like it here go back where you come from..... who asked you to come here.? and so it went on...yep it happens....


you think it happens to you? try being from a non english background.

not over the republic thats for sure..



its human nature  I think..


cods wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 11:56am:
 but one women in 20 years

you don't honestly believe that?

Just yesterday I took the kids kayaking. A random woman stopped for a chat cause my kids started patting her dog. the first thing she choose to go on about was how bad the muslims are, all the while going on about how she wasn't racist cause she used to play with her greek/ italian friends from school when she was a teenager. I'd never met her in my life, and within 60 seconds of meeting me that's what she choose to talk about?
Ohh, and I suspect the only reason she did so was cause she picked through my wifes accent that we were european. I doubt we would have had the same conversation if I was a pom



I was talking about what the lady in your post said......she said she had been cutting her hair for 20 years....then out of the blue she started...

people are in fear today...this is the whole problem...

Im not  I feel very safe and secure   but a lot dont........

do you still speak with an accent?   or did your wife come here later?....when I first came here...foreigners were called New Australians...and or Wogs...one girl I worked with had married an Italian  she was a real aussie shelia..said filims instead of films 
just like Kath and Kim really....but some of the blokes gave her a hard time she didnt care...he was a good man  and I am sure now people have changed their minds on how they thought back then...

they were afraid of the influx...a lot of 10 pound poms as they w ere called flooded here as well I wasnt one of them..my husband was here and I didnt want the wait  so had to find my own way over....


but yes   its sad people have this problem  I do hope you set her right and told her not to be afraid...the govt will look out for you.. :) :) :)

I forgot to mention I was called a pommie bastard I am sure you remember that sweet term.... ;D ;D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 9th, 2017 at 12:47pm
Hate is governed by Fear   fear of the unknown...and we have a need to take it out on someone..

like now its Hansons fault as if there was NO Hate in the world Before Pauline.. >:( >:( >:(

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 9th, 2017 at 12:48pm

cods wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 12:45pm:
do you still speak with an accent?   

no

cods wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 12:45pm:
 or did your wife come here later?..

my wife came about 11 yrs ago, she has the accent

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 9th, 2017 at 12:50pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 12:48pm:

cods wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 12:45pm:
do you still speak with an accent?   

no

cods wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 12:45pm:
 or did your wife come here later?..

my wife came about 11 yrs ago, she has the accent



well I still get picked as a POM  I am shocked   I think its a lucky guess its got to be....Im a Londoner not from the north

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lisa Jones on Oct 9th, 2017 at 12:50pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 11:26am:
A good article.


A suburban hair salon, an anti-Muslim tirade and what it says about hate speech in Australia

Such hair as I have is cut from time to time by Mrs E, who runs a one-chair salon in my neighbourhood.

She has been in business there for 40 years. She knows all about the history of the street and many of her clients have been coming to her for half a lifetime.

The salon is shut on Mondays, when she cuts the hair of the elderly and disabled in various local institutions.

Mrs E is a petite woman with a cloud of brown hair, a bright smile and that empathetic personality that fits so many hairdressers for their parallel occupation of informal counsellor.

Under her hairdresser's smock she wears a dress or a blouse and trousers.

She came to Australia as a child from the Balkans, grew up, married, had two sons.

Australia is home and a place where she says she has always felt welcome, until the other day.

A client whose hair she had been cutting for 20 years came in as usual, and then, without any prompting or preamble, launched into a tirade against Muslims.

Mrs E heard her out. As a rule, like most sensible businesspeople, she resists being drawn into conversations about sex, religion or politics.

But eventually it became too much. "I'm a Muslim," she told the client, "and I very much regret that after 20 years I must tell you I will no longer cut your hair".
The salon contains no outward sign of her faith: nothing in her appearance or in the room itself gives it away. For her, it is something private; nothing to do with her professional life.

It happened that I came in about a week later. Mrs E and I often talk in general terms about what's going on in the world.

She knows I am a journalist and academic and I think she feels safe pushing her conversational boundaries slightly.

She told me this story and as she did so, the hurt was written all over her face.

And after nearly a lifetime in Australia, she said she felt just that little bit less welcome.

Hate speech seeping into Australian society

So this is how it goes.

Hate speech becomes part of the currency of national debate and is exploited for political purposes.

In 1996, Pauline Hanson delivers her notorious maiden speech in which she says Australia is being "swamped by Asians".

John Howard, as prime minister, dog-whistles that this is all about free speech.

In 2001, the so-called Tampa election occurs.

Boat people — overwhelmingly Muslim — become the butt of Howard's assertion of national sovereignty: "We will decide who comes to this country and the circumstances in which they come."

There are votes in this and both sides of politics pile on.

In the midst of the 2013 election, Labor's Kevin Rudd — the same man who claims Dietrich Bonhoeffer as an inspiration — slams the door on asylum seekers by striking deals, with Nauru and Papua New Guinea, that Australia is still living with.

In 2014, the Federal Government tries to weaken the Racial Discrimination Act in what is said to be in the interests of free speech.

Attorney-General George Brandis asserts that "people have a right to be bigots".
In 2015, research conducted for the Melbourne Social Equity Institute finds that the single most important driver of negative attitudes toward asylum seekers is religious prejudice, sometimes expressed as concern about the "Islamisation" of Australia.

In August 2017, Senator Hanson wears a burqa into Senate Question Time.

Senator Brandis discovers where bigotry can lead and assails her for an "appalling stunt" disrespectful of the Muslim faith.

Eventually, the political licensing of racism and religious intolerance seeps into the fabric of society. It might take a generation or it might take longer.

But when it does it stains and rots that fabric, eating away at people's sense of belonging, undermining the Australian multicultural project, and in a small suburban hair salon, a middle-aged woman feels emboldened to vent her prejudice, doing harm and hurt to someone who has been tending her person for 20 years.

Dennis Muller is a senior research fellow at the University of Melbourne's Centre for Advancing Journalism.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-09/anti-muslim-tirade-hairdresser-and-hate-speech-in-australia/9029746






the politics of division is alive and well in this country.


All I can see is an article about what happened in a small hair dressing salon that had NOTHING to do with racial hatred at all.  ::)

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lord Herbert on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:22pm
Nonsense.

People should continue to express their opinions regardless of what it is .. so long as it is done discreetly, politely, and on appropriate occasions.

From what I can understand from the story, the woman delivering the anti-Islam rant wasn't aware the hairdresser is a Muslim.

The term 'Hate Speech' is baby-talk terminology. The question that needs asking is How correct is what the 'offender' has said?

We've just been treated to a month of the most violent and vile 'Hate Speech' coming from the 'Yes' ~ screw his arse with a ring-on-your-finger mob with not a solitary mention by any of the media's writers and commentators about 'Hate Speech' against the 'NO' mob.

What did the ranter in the Hairdresser's shop say?

Or would that be too counter-productive to reveal because the contents pass The Pub Test?


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:24pm
Well, bigotry can be discrete but tell me, Herbie? How can it be polite or appropriate?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:25pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:22pm:
People should continue to express their opinions regardless of what it is .. so long as it is done discreetly, politely, and on appropriate occasions.


people should keep to opinions to themselves unless asked. I certainly  don't walk around offering opinions on issues to random strangers.


Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:22pm:
We've just been treated to a month of the most violent and vile 'Hate Speech' coming from the 'Yes' ~ screw his arse with a ring-on-your-finger mob with not a solitary mention by any of the media's writers and commentators about 'Hate Speech' against the 'NO' mob.


really? pointing out the arguments are flawed isn't hate speech you more on

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lord Herbert on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:31pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:25pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:22pm:
People should continue to express their opinions regardless of what it is .. so long as it is done discreetly, politely, and on appropriate occasions.


People should keep their opinions to themselves unless asked. I certainly don't walk around offering opinions on issues to random strangers.


I agree with you 100%. (But as a 20-year long client she was hardly talking to a 'random stranger'. Do try to read your own cut-n-pastes a little more carefully).

You might notice there I popped in "on appropriate occasions".

During a Road rage
At Barbecues
On the Groom's Night Out
In the soccer stands
etc





Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Dr Mengele on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:42pm
Nothing wrong with some good solid hate....gotta keep subhumans in their place.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:44pm

Dr Mengele wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:42pm:
Nothing wrong with some good solid hate....gotta keep subhumans in their place.


Do you hate it when the tabs come unstuck?



Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by AnotherJourneyByTrain on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:48pm

mothra wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:24pm:
Well, bigotry can be discrete but tell me, Herbie? How can it be polite or appropriate?

How can it be appropriate to give your country away to terrorists just because they make developers lots of money?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Dr Mengele on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:50pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:44pm:
Do you hate it when the tabs come unstuck?


Do you hate it when you get banned and the pigs ignore your pleas?  8-)

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lord Herbert on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:54pm

mothra wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:24pm:
Well, bigotry can be discrete but tell me, Herbie? How can it be polite or appropriate?


Hush!

The men are talking.

I can hear the kettle boiling.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:54pm

Dr Mengele wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:50pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:44pm:
Do you hate it when the tabs come unstuck?


Do you hate it when you get banned and the pigs ignore your pleas? 


Maybe the larger sized ones will help you with the problem of the tabs coming unstuck.





Try them for a few nights, and let us know how you go.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:55pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:54pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:24pm:
Well, bigotry can be discrete but tell me, Herbie? How can it be polite or appropriate?


Hush!

The men are talking.

I can hear the kettle boiling.


That's the best you could come up with?

How long did that take?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Karnal on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:05pm

Dr Mengele wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:42pm:
Nothing wrong with some good solid hate....gotta keep subhumans in their place.


That's true, Doctor, but we need to deal with them in a scientific manner.

If the subhumans step out of line, they should be dealt with in a calm, clinical fashion, in the fullnesss of time.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Dr Mengele on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:06pm
Poor pecker, it's been a rough month for you but it's okay man. Let it all out.  ;D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:06pm

mothra wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 12:38pm:
I saw this on the Conversation.

Brilliant article.

The Hanson effect: how hate seeps in and damages us all

https://theconversation.com/the-hanson-effect-how-hate-seeps-in-and-damages-us-all-85314

judging by the title it's bias bullsh so unlike you I wont waste time reading it. :D :D :D :D :D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Karnal on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:06pm

mothra wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:55pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:54pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:24pm:
Well, bigotry can be discrete but tell me, Herbie? How can it be polite or appropriate?


Hush!

The men are talking.

I can hear the kettle boiling.


That's the best you could come up with?

How long did that take?


Black for me, dear. Herbie'll have his usual.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:08pm

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:06pm:
Herbie'll have his usual.



Cup of hot water with a spot of milk? Intravenously?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Karnal on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:13pm

mothra wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:08pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:06pm:
Herbie'll have his usual.



Cup of hot water with a spot of milk? Intravenously?


Just fill up his catheter. Herb'll take it from there.

He may not live to see the day, but Herbie sleeps well in the knowledge that you fifth columnists and collaborators will be rounded up and shot in the back of the neck, in the fullness of time.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:14pm

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:06pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:55pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:54pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:24pm:
Well, bigotry can be discrete but tell me, Herbie? How can it be polite or appropriate?


Hush!

The men are talking.

I can hear the kettle boiling.


That's the best you could come up with?

How long did that take?


Black for me, dear. Herbie'll have his usual.



so relieved you didnt ask fro a sandwich   women of strength are not allowed to make sandwiches for mere males at risk of being kicked  out of club womenhood...so watch your mouth herbie..

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:15pm
Waffle waffle waffle....

how many topics will you lot ruin today eh?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:15pm

mothra wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:08pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:06pm:
Herbie'll have his usual.



Cup of hot water with a spot of milk? Intravenously?




Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Karnal on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:19pm

Grendel wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:15pm:
Waffle waffle waffle....

how many topics will you lots ruin today eh?


Leave Grendel alone, leftards, and don't waste his time.

Agree with him instead.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lisa Jones on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:26pm

Dr Mengele wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:50pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:44pm:
Do you hate it when the tabs come unstuck?


Do you hate it when you get banned and the pigs ignore your pleas?  8-)



Ouch! 😱

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:27pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:26pm:

Dr Mengele wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:50pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:44pm:
Do you hate it when the tabs come unstuck?


Do you hate it when you get banned and the pigs ignore your pleas?  8-)



Ouch! 😱


Did something bite you, dear?


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:31pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:31pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:25pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:22pm:
People should continue to express their opinions regardless of what it is .. so long as it is done discreetly, politely, and on appropriate occasions.


People should keep their opinions to themselves unless asked. I certainly don't walk around offering opinions on issues to random strangers.


I agree with you 100%. (But as a 20-year long client she was hardly talking to a 'random stranger'. Do try to read your own cut-n-pastes a little more carefully).

You might notice there I popped in "on appropriate occasions".

During a Road rage
At Barbecues
On the Groom's Night Out
In the soccer stands
etc


it's certainly not appropriate to express your hatred of muslims when you are getting your hair done.  They're there to cut your hair and as part of that they engage in idle chit chat.

Also, After 20 yrs I would at least know where my hairdresser is from. The customer in this case was an ignorant fool.


edit: I'll also note that if this particular muslim lived up to her customers expectations, those scissors would have been used for something other than cutting hair.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:33pm

Dr Mengele wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:50pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:44pm:
Do you hate it when the tabs come unstuck?


Do you hate it when you get banned and the pigs ignore your pleas?  8-)



I don't think he's particularly fussed if you ignore him, no!

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:43pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 11:26am:
"She has been in business there for 40 years."

Impossible.  Muslims don't work.

Ask The Moronic - he'll tell you.


John Smith wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 11:26am:
"A client whose hair she had been cutting for 20 years ..."

It must be pretty tough hair.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lord Herbert on Oct 9th, 2017 at 4:56pm

Grendel wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:15pm:
Waffle waffle waffle....

how many topics will you lots ruin today eh?


Exactly.

The same monkey cage of Usual Suspects abusing FD's hospitality by closing down thread after thread with their ad hominem playground antics instead of addressing the topics.

Ultimately FD is the main loser for extending his forum board to be a child-minding centre.




Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 9th, 2017 at 4:58pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 4:56pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:15pm:
Waffle waffle waffle....

how many topics will you lots ruin today eh?


Exactly.

The same monkey cage of Usual Suspects abusing FD's hospitality by closing down thread after thread with their ad hominem playground antics instead of addressing the topics.


Like you telling me to make the men a cup of tea?

Face it Herbie, you can dish it out but you can't take it.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 9th, 2017 at 5:10pm

mothra wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 4:58pm:
Face it Herbie, you can dish it out but you can't take it.



herbie an expert at crying every time he gets what he dishes out. He's had lots of practice

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lord Herbert on Oct 9th, 2017 at 5:17pm

mothra wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 4:58pm:
Like you telling me to make the men a cup of tea?

Face it Herbie, you can dish it out but you can't take it.


Context, Mothra.

I still hold out hope for you, but meanwhile you're skating on thin ice. As the Matron of this tedious group you should be showing some leadership in counselling them to FAR MORE discuss, debate, argue, and brawl over the Subject Matter of topics than playing silly monkey-games like naughty boys in a classroom before the teacher has arrived.

I'm appointing you to be the Prefect of this woeful lot, and I shall expect a marked improvement in their behaviour over the next few days and weeks.

Otherwise it's back to the Tea Room with you.

Or should that be the Tuck Shop?



Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 9th, 2017 at 5:21pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 5:17pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 4:58pm:
Like you telling me to make the men a cup of tea?

Face it Herbie, you can dish it out but you can't take it.


Context, Mothra.

I still hold out hope for you, but meanwhile you're skating on thin ice. As the Matron of this tedious group you should be showing some leadership in counselling them to FAR MORE discuss, debate, argue, and brawl over the Subject Matter of topics than playing silly monkey-games like naughty boys in a classroom before the teacher has arrived.

I'm appointing you to be the Prefect of this woeful lot, and I shall expect a marked improvement in their behaviour over the next few days and weeks.

Otherwise it's back to the Tea Room with you.

Or should that be the Tuck Shop?



Would you care for me to underline all of the ad hominems in that, Herbie?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Secret Wars on Oct 9th, 2017 at 5:32pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 4:56pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:15pm:
Waffle waffle waffle....

how many topics will you lots ruin today eh?


Exactly.

The same monkey cage of Usual Suspects abusing FD's hospitality by closing down thread after thread with their ad hominem playground antics instead of addressing the topics.

Ultimately FD is the main loser for extending his forum board to be a child-minding centre.


With John and Gregg working like trolls to restore their embarrassingly high post counts FD benefits from ad revenue.    :) 

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lord Herbert on Oct 9th, 2017 at 5:51pm

Secret Wars wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 5:32pm:
With John and Gregg working like trolls to restore their embarrassingly high post counts FD benefits from ad revenue.    :) 


Aaah ... so THAT's why FD keeps these monkeys here? It figures.

And keeps Mothra here to make the tea ....  ;D





Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 9th, 2017 at 5:52pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 5:51pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 5:32pm:
With John and Gregg working like trolls to restore their embarrassingly high post counts FD benefits from ad revenue.    :) 


Aaah ... so THAT's why FD keeps these monkeys here? It figures.

And keeps Mothra here to make the tea ...


Now we just need to figure out why he keeps you here?

Any ideas, Herr Bert?


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Valkie on Oct 9th, 2017 at 6:12pm
Its a shame the muzzos dont get a mention on how they

Condemn non muzzos

Demand murder for anyone justly criticizing the CULT

The 90% of muzzos who are criminals and who attack Australians everyvday.

But if one person has a rant, ITS A MAJOR CONSPIRACY OF RACIAL HATRED

NEWS FOR YOU LOT OF ILLITERATE S

MUZZOS ARE NOT A RACE,

THEY ARE A HATEFUL, BRUTAL, PRIMITIVE, PEDOPHILE INFESTED BUNCH OF BIGOTS AND MURDERIOUS CRIMINALS

Get it right people

Hating muzzos is not race hate, no matter how much you want it to be.

Its simply common sense to hate something this evil.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lord Herbert on Oct 9th, 2017 at 8:06pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:31pm:
it's certainly not appropriate to express your hatred of muslims when you are getting your hair done.  They're there to cut your hair and as part of that they engage in idle chit chat.

Also, After 20 yrs I would at least know where my hairdresser is from. The customer in this case was an ignorant fool.


edit: I'll also note that if this particular muslim lived up to her customers expectations, those scissors would have been used for something other than cutting hair.




We're in heated agreement.

I would never have embarrassed the lady with a rant like that.

But interestingly, John, do you know what my ethnic workmates used to call  me for hiding my 'true' feelings for not speaking up? "Typical British hypocrisy".

Blurting out what you really think, no matter how offensive or inappropriate the circumstance, was thought to be a case of you 'talking straight' - 'Not being deceitful' - 'Being commendably honest' - and to hell with you keeping a civilised and respectful tongue in your head.





Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lord Herbert on Oct 9th, 2017 at 8:19pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 5:52pm:
Now we just need to figure out why he keeps you here?

Any ideas, Herr Bert?



Do YOU, John Smith, and the Tea Lady know why he keeps me here?  8-)

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 9th, 2017 at 8:47pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 8:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 5:52pm:
Now we just need to figure out why he keeps you here?

Any ideas, Herr Bert?



Do YOU, John Smith, and the Tea Lady know why he keeps me here?  8-)


Yes.

You're an Islamophobe.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lord Herbert on Oct 9th, 2017 at 8:56pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 8:47pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 8:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 5:52pm:
Now we just need to figure out why he keeps you here?

Any ideas, Herr Bert?



Do YOU, John Smith, and the Tea Lady know why he keeps me here?  8-)


Yes.

You're an Islamophobe.


But then why does he keep you thread vandals here?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 9th, 2017 at 9:22pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 8:56pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 8:47pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 8:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 5:52pm:
Now we just need to figure out why he keeps you here?

Any ideas, Herr Bert?



Do YOU, John Smith, and the Tea Lady know why he keeps me here?  8-)


Yes.

You're an Islamophobe.


But then why does he keep you thread vandals here?


No buts.

You're an Islamophobe.

A racist, bigoted, homophobic, Islamophobe.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Valkie on Oct 10th, 2017 at 3:44am

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 8:56pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 8:47pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 8:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 5:52pm:
Now we just need to figure out why he keeps you here?

Any ideas, Herr Bert?



Do YOU, John Smith, and the Tea Lady know why he keeps me here?  8-)


Yes.

You're an Islamophobe.


But then why does he keep you thread vandals here?


Its amazing how the sycophant, sympathiser, apologists throw the words islamaphobe and homophobe around as if its something to be ashamed of.

The simple fact is that being a brutal, primitive retarded muzzo gains you no consideration other than contempt and disgust.

The same for being one of the alphabet mob LGBTIQSP
There is nothing positive about being one of these mentally ill creatures who see the sewer as a playground.

The truth is that these creatures who throw these words homophobe and islamaphobe are in fact
Christophobes and Hetrophobes.

And the stupidity of their alliance becomes clear when one examines the doctrines of the two groups

The LGBTIQSP mob profess to hate homophobes
The feminists hate men who take them for granted or dont consider them equal

And yet the muzzos hate homosexual, with such fervour that they murder them.
The muzzos treat women with contempt and consider them far less than equal.

These two groups are mutually exclusive and yet are championed by the left wing idiooots.

It just shows you how stoooopid they are.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 10th, 2017 at 5:04am

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 10th, 2017 at 5:05am

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 10th, 2017 at 5:07am

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 10th, 2017 at 5:17am

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lord Herbert on Oct 10th, 2017 at 11:15am

Grendel wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 5:05am:


;D ;D ;D



Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 10th, 2017 at 11:24am

Valkie wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 3:44am:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 8:56pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 8:47pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 8:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 5:52pm:
Now we just need to figure out why he keeps you here?

Any ideas, Herr Bert?



Do YOU, John Smith, and the Tea Lady know why he keeps me here?  8-)


Yes.

You're an Islamophobe.


But then why does he keep you thread vandals here?


Its amazing how the sycophant, sympathiser, apologists throw the words islamaphobe and homophobe around as if its something to be ashamed of.

The simple fact is that being a brutal, primitive retarded muzzo gains you no consideration other than contempt and disgust.

The same for being one of the alphabet mob LGBTIQSP
There is nothing positive about being one of these mentally ill creatures who see the sewer as a playground.

The truth is that these creatures who throw these words homophobe and islamaphobe are in fact
Christophobes and Hetrophobes.

And the stupidity of their alliance becomes clear when one examines the doctrines of the two groups

The LGBTIQSP mob profess to hate homophobes
The feminists hate men who take them for granted or dont consider them equal

And yet the muzzos hate homosexual, with such fervour that they murder them.
The muzzos treat women with contempt and consider them far less than equal.

These two groups are mutually exclusive and yet are championed by the left wing idiooots.

It just shows you how stoooopid they are.


It's rare to find such an abundance of ignorance in one place, yet here we have it.   

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 10th, 2017 at 11:45am

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 8:06pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 3:31pm:
it's certainly not appropriate to express your hatred of muslims when you are getting your hair done.  They're there to cut your hair and as part of that they engage in idle chit chat.

Also, After 20 yrs I would at least know where my hairdresser is from. The customer in this case was an ignorant fool.


edit: I'll also note that if this particular muslim lived up to her customers expectations, those scissors would have been used for something other than cutting hair.




We're in heated agreement.

I would never have embarrassed the lady with a rant like that.

But interestingly, John, do you know what my ethnic workmates used to call  me for hiding my 'true' feelings for not speaking up? "Typical British hypocrisy".

Blurting out what you really think, no matter how offensive or inappropriate the circumstance, was thought to be a case of you 'talking straight' - 'Not being deceitful' - 'Being commendably honest' - and to hell with you keeping a civilised and respectful tongue in your head.

I doubt they were calling you a hypocrite for not abusing anyone. I suspect it was cause you bitch about them cause they're tinted behind their back, then pretend to be their best buddy in front of them.

besides, 50 yrs ago it was a different era. Were women even allowed out of the kitchen back then?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 10th, 2017 at 11:45am

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 8:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 5:52pm:
Now we just need to figure out why he keeps you here?

Any ideas, Herr Bert?



Do YOU, John Smith, and the Tea Lady know why he keeps me here?  8-)


you're an Islamaphobe.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 10th, 2017 at 11:47am

Valkie wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 3:44am:
Its amazing how the sycophant, sympathiser, apologists throw the words islamaphobe and homophobe around as if its something to be ashamed of.

The simple fact is that being a brutal, primitive retarded muzzo gains you no consideration other than contempt and disgust.

The same for being one of the alphabet mob LGBTIQSP
There is nothing positive about being one of these mentally ill creatures who see the sewer as a playground.

The truth is that these creatures who throw these words homophobe and islamaphobe are in fact
Christophobes and Hetrophobes.

And the stupidity of their alliance becomes clear when one examines the doctrines of the two groups

The LGBTIQSP mob profess to hate homophobes
The feminists hate men who take them for granted or dont consider them equal

And yet the muzzos hate homosexual, with such fervour that they murder them.
The muzzos treat women with contempt and consider them far less than equal.

These two groups are mutually exclusive and yet are championed by the left wing idiooots.

It just shows you how stoooopid they are.




Just how do you manage to fit so much stupidity in so few words?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 10th, 2017 at 11:50am

John Smith wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 11:47am:

Valkie wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 3:44am:
Its amazing how the sycophant, sympathiser, apologists throw the words islamaphobe and homophobe around as if its something to be ashamed of.

The simple fact is that being a brutal, primitive retarded muzzo gains you no consideration other than contempt and disgust.

The same for being one of the alphabet mob LGBTIQSP
There is nothing positive about being one of these mentally ill creatures who see the sewer as a playground.

The truth is that these creatures who throw these words homophobe and islamaphobe are in fact
Christophobes and Hetrophobes.

And the stupidity of their alliance becomes clear when one examines the doctrines of the two groups

The LGBTIQSP mob profess to hate homophobes
The feminists hate men who take them for granted or dont consider them equal

And yet the muzzos hate homosexual, with such fervour that they murder them.
The muzzos treat women with contempt and consider them far less than equal.

These two groups are mutually exclusive and yet are championed by the left wing idiooots.

It just shows you how stoooopid they are.




Just how do you manage to fit so much stupidity in so few words?


He did well in that post.

If his aim was to prove to the world that he knows next to nothing about religion or homosexuality, he nailed it.



Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lord Herbert on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:12pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 11:47am:

Valkie wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 3:44am:
Its amazing how the sycophant, sympathiser, apologists throw the words islamaphobe and homophobe around as if its something to be ashamed of.

The simple fact is that being a brutal, primitive retarded muzzo gains you no consideration other than contempt and disgust.

The same for being one of the alphabet mob LGBTIQSP
There is nothing positive about being one of these mentally ill creatures who see the sewer as a playground.

The truth is that these creatures who throw these words homophobe and islamaphobe are in fact
Christophobes and Hetrophobes.

And the stupidity of their alliance becomes clear when one examines the doctrines of the two groups

The LGBTIQSP mob profess to hate homophobes
The feminists hate men who take them for granted or dont consider them equal

And yet the muzzos hate homosexual, with such fervour that they murder them.
The muzzos treat women with contempt and consider them far less than equal.

These two groups are mutually exclusive and yet are championed by the left wing idiooots.

It just shows you how stoooopid they are.




Just how do you manage to fit so much stupidity in so few words?


You see, you idiot, that's not an answer to the points that have been made in his post. You're not a little schoolboy in the playground ~ you're supposed to be a fully-fledged adult who has the intellect to respond to the points he's made.

It's this endless series of ad hominem childishness and laziness which is going to eventually kill this board of any worthy posters.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lord Herbert on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:14pm

mothra wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:55pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:54pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 2:24pm:
Well, bigotry can be discrete but tell me, Herbie? How can it be polite or appropriate?


Hush!

The men are talking.

I can hear the kettle boiling.


That's the best you could come up with?

How long did that take?


Until the whistle blew .....   ;D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:17pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:12pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 11:47am:

Valkie wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 3:44am:
Its amazing how the sycophant, sympathiser, apologists throw the words islamaphobe and homophobe around as if its something to be ashamed of.

The simple fact is that being a brutal, primitive retarded muzzo gains you no consideration other than contempt and disgust.

The same for being one of the alphabet mob LGBTIQSP
There is nothing positive about being one of these mentally ill creatures who see the sewer as a playground.

The truth is that these creatures who throw these words homophobe and islamaphobe are in fact
Christophobes and Hetrophobes.

And the stupidity of their alliance becomes clear when one examines the doctrines of the two groups

The LGBTIQSP mob profess to hate homophobes
The feminists hate men who take them for granted or dont consider them equal

And yet the muzzos hate homosexual, with such fervour that they murder them.
The muzzos treat women with contempt and consider them far less than equal.

These two groups are mutually exclusive and yet are championed by the left wing idiooots.

It just shows you how stoooopid they are.




Just how do you manage to fit so much stupidity in so few words?


You see, you idiot, that's not an answer to the points that have been made in his post.


The only point he's made, is the one we already knew: he has absolutely no idea what he's talking about.

There's nothing even close to a reasonable or rational argument in that post of his.

It's just the mindless ramblings of a senile old man, with way too much time on his hands, and way too much hatred in his heart.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:21pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:12pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 11:47am:

Valkie wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 3:44am:
Its amazing how the sycophant, sympathiser, apologists throw the words islamaphobe and homophobe around as if its something to be ashamed of.

The simple fact is that being a brutal, primitive retarded muzzo gains you no consideration other than contempt and disgust.

The same for being one of the alphabet mob LGBTIQSP
There is nothing positive about being one of these mentally ill creatures who see the sewer as a playground.

The truth is that these creatures who throw these words homophobe and islamaphobe are in fact
Christophobes and Hetrophobes.

And the stupidity of their alliance becomes clear when one examines the doctrines of the two groups

The LGBTIQSP mob profess to hate homophobes
The feminists hate men who take them for granted or dont consider them equal

And yet the muzzos hate homosexual, with such fervour that they murder them.
The muzzos treat women with contempt and consider them far less than equal.

These two groups are mutually exclusive and yet are championed by the left wing idiooots.

It just shows you how stoooopid they are.




Just how do you manage to fit so much stupidity in so few words?


You see, you idiot, that's not an answer to the points that have been made in his post. You're not a little schoolboy in the playground ~ you're supposed to be a fully-fledged adult who has the intellect to respond to the points he's made.

It's this endless series of ad hominem childishness and laziness which is going to eventually kill this board of any worthy posters.



he didn't make any points Herb. he went into a hysterical tantrum. When my kids do that I don't encourage them by trying to counter their arguments, that would only prolong the tantrum. Instead I send them to bed and let them sleep it off.

After their nap, the kids are always calm and more reasonable.  I'm not sure a nap would help calm valkie down.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lord Herbert on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:30pm
Quite seriously, you two buffoons should be told that it's fine to pop in a few ad hominems along the way, but also present your objections to some of the points made.


You two are bone-bloody-lazy, and that's why more than half your posts are just one-liner shithouse graffiti.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:31pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:30pm:
Quite seriously, you two buffoons should be told that it's fine to pop in a few ad hominems along the way, but also present your objections to some of the points made.


Quite seriously, none of his points are worthy of consideration.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lord Herbert on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:33pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:31pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:30pm:
Quite seriously, you two buffoons should be told that it's fine to pop in a few ad hominems along the way, but also present your objections to some of the points made.


Quite seriously, none of his points are worthy of consideration.


Then keep quiet.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:33pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:30pm:
Quite seriously, you two buffoons should be told that it's fine to pop in a few ad hominems along the way, but also present your objections to some of the points made.



newsflash Herb, I don't post for your entertainment. I post for my entertainment.




I know you're in shock to discover that, but that's the way it is.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:34pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:31pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:30pm:
Quite seriously, you two buffoons should be told that it's fine to pop in a few ad hominems along the way, but also present your objections to some of the points made.


Quite seriously, none of his points are worthy of consideration.


Then keep quiet.



Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:36pm

Here you go Herbie, let's look at this point:

"The same for being one of the alphabet mob LGBTIQSP

"There is nothing positive about being one of these mentally ill creatures who see the sewer as a playground."


Now, first of all, homosexuality isn't a mental illness.

Secondly, what does he mean about "the sewer as a playground"?

I'm going to take a guess, and assume that he's talking about anal sex.

The simple fact of the matter is, about the same amount of heterosexual couples enjoy anal sex as do homosexual couples.

So, is he saying that heterosexuals are suffering from a mental illness?

As I said, his points just aren't worthy of consideration.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Valkie on Oct 10th, 2017 at 7:43pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:30pm:
Quite seriously, you two buffoons should be told that it's fine to pop in a few ad hominems along the way, but also present your objections to some of the points made.


You two are bone-bloody-lazy, and that's why more than half your posts are just one-liner shithouse graffiti.


I generally ignore it, it has shown in the past that it is nothing but a troll and has no counter argument other than insults and abuse.

But you are correct in saying that I made some relevant points.
Points they cannot argue against.

Homosexuality is an abnormality.
Lets explore that
When something consists of a tiny percentage of a group, it is seen as an abnormality.
Now, humans are in fact animals
The primary drive of animals is propergation of the species.
Homosexuals cannot carry on the species, therfore they are abnormal to the primary drive of ALL animals.

Now if something is abnormal, by definition it is not representative of the species and must therfore be mentally deficient or mentally ill.

Finally
The fact that these individual have to associate with ever more abstract groups
Lesbians, Gays, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, Questioning, Sologomy and Pedophiles
LGBTIQSP

The more twisted and devided they become, the more letters are added
Is this the action of a sane mind?


Now the second argument I have
And onevwhic all the homosexual, lesbian, feminist sympathisers refuse to consider or answer.

Muzzos HATE pooftahs, they murder them daily
Muzzos BELIEVE tgat women are only worth half or less than a man and subjugate women, abuse them and beat them with the CULTs agreement

And yet the pooftahs, lesbians and feminists protect and support this CULT.

Do they believe that the muzzos will give them any leeway?
Are they stooopid enough to think the muzzos will allow them to continue their perverted practices if they get their way?

Now
Lets hear the arguments againt these truths?

Or will I simply be called a homophobe and islamaphobe by Christophobes and Hetrophobes?

I know what the answer will be.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Karnal on Oct 10th, 2017 at 7:49pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:31pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:30pm:
Quite seriously, you two buffoons should be told that it's fine to pop in a few ad hominems along the way, but also present your objections to some of the points made.


Quite seriously, none of his points are worthy of consideration.


Then keep quiet.


Exactly. It's talking back that gets these leftards banned.

They never learn.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Karnal on Oct 10th, 2017 at 7:52pm

Valkie wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 7:43pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:30pm:
Quite seriously, you two buffoons should be told that it's fine to pop in a few ad hominems along the way, but also present your objections to some of the points made.


You two are bone-bloody-lazy, and that's why more than half your posts are just one-liner shithouse graffiti.


I generally ignore it, it has shown in the past that it is nothing but a troll and has no counter argument other than insults and abuse.

But you are correct in saying that I made some relevant points.
Points they cannot argue against.

Homosexuality is an abnormality.
Lets explore that
When something consists of a tiny percentage of a group, it is seen as an abnormality.
Now, humans are in fact animals
The primary drive of animals is propergation of the species.
Homosexuals cannot carry on the species, therfore they are abnormal to the primary drive of ALL animals.

Now if something is abnormal, by definition it is not representative of the species and must therfore be mentally deficient or mentally ill.

Finally
The fact that these individual have to associate with ever more abstract groups
Lesbians, Gays, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, Questioning, Sologomy and Pedophiles
LGBTIQSP

The more twisted and devided they become, the more letters are added
Is this the action of a sane mind?


Now the second argument I have
And onevwhic all the homosexual, lesbian, feminist sympathisers refuse to consider or answer.

Muzzos HATE pooftahs, they murder them daily
Muzzos BELIEVE tgat women are only worth half or less than a man and subjugate women, abuse them and beat them with the CULTs agreement

And yet the pooftahs, lesbians and feminists protect and support this CULT.

Do they believe that the muzzos will give them any leeway?
Are they stooopid enough to think the muzzos will allow them to continue their perverted practices if they get their way?

Now
Lets hear the arguments againt these truths?

Or will I simply be called a homophobe and islamaphobe by Christophobes and Hetrophobes?

I know what the answer will be.


Who's Matty?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 10th, 2017 at 8:45pm

Valkie wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 7:43pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:30pm:
Quite seriously, you two buffoons should be told that it's fine to pop in a few ad hominems along the way, but also present your objections to some of the points made.


You two are bone-bloody-lazy, and that's why more than half your posts are just one-liner shithouse graffiti.


I generally ignore it, it has shown in the past that it is nothing but a troll and has no counter argument other than insults and abuse.

But you are correct in saying that I made some relevant points.
Points they cannot argue against.

Homosexuality is an abnormality.
Lets explore that
When something consists of a tiny percentage of a group, it is seen as an abnormality.
Now, humans are in fact animals
The primary drive of animals is propergation of the species.
Homosexuals cannot carry on the species, therfore they are abnormal to the primary drive of ALL animals.

Now if something is abnormal, by definition it is not representative of the species and must therfore be mentally deficient or mentally ill.

Finally
The fact that these individual have to associate with ever more abstract groups
Lesbians, Gays, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, Questioning, Sologomy and Pedophiles
LGBTIQSP

The more twisted and devided they become, the more letters are added
Is this the action of a sane mind?


Now the second argument I have
And onevwhic all the homosexual, lesbian, feminist sympathisers refuse to consider or answer.

Muzzos HATE pooftahs, they murder them daily
Muzzos BELIEVE tgat women are only worth half or less than a man and subjugate women, abuse them and beat them with the CULTs agreement

And yet the pooftahs, lesbians and feminists protect and support this CULT.

Do they believe that the muzzos will give them any leeway?
Are they stooopid enough to think the muzzos will allow them to continue their perverted practices if they get their way?

Now
Lets hear the arguments againt these truths?

Or will I simply be called a homophobe and islamaphobe by Christophobes and Hetrophobes?

I know what the answer will be.


That's was the biggest load of crap I've ever seen.

Next!

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lisa Jones on Oct 10th, 2017 at 9:21pm

Valkie wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 7:43pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:30pm:
Quite seriously, you two buffoons should be told that it's fine to pop in a few ad hominems along the way, but also present your objections to some of the points made.


You two are bone-bloody-lazy, and that's why more than half your posts are just one-liner shithouse graffiti.


I generally ignore it, it has shown in the past that it is nothing but a troll and has no counter argument other than insults and abuse.

But you are correct in saying that I made some relevant points.
Points they cannot argue against.

Homosexuality is an abnormality.
Lets explore that
When something consists of a tiny percentage of a group, it is seen as an abnormality.
Now, humans are in fact animals
The primary drive of animals is propergation of the species.
Homosexuals cannot carry on the species, therfore they are abnormal to the primary drive of ALL animals.

Now if something is abnormal, by definition it is not representative of the species and must therfore be mentally deficient or mentally ill.

Finally
The fact that these individual have to associate with ever more abstract groups
Lesbians, Gays, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, Questioning, Sologomy and Pedophiles
LGBTIQSP

The more twisted and devided they become, the more letters are added
Is this the action of a sane mind?


Now the second argument I have
And onevwhic all the homosexual, lesbian, feminist sympathisers refuse to consider or answer.

Muzzos HATE pooftahs, they murder them daily
Muzzos BELIEVE tgat women are only worth half or less than a man and subjugate women, abuse them and beat them with the CULTs agreement

And yet the pooftahs, lesbians and feminists protect and support this CULT.

Do they believe that the muzzos will give them any leeway?
Are they stooopid enough to think the muzzos will allow them to continue their perverted practices if they get their way?

Now
Lets hear the arguments againt these truths?

Or will I simply be called a homophobe and islamaphobe by Christophobes and Hetrophobes?

I know what the answer will be.


Well summed up.

Unfortunately you're surrounded by unemployed and unhinged cyber trolls who log into this site to graffiti everything they read!

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 10th, 2017 at 9:25pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 9:21pm:
Well summed up.

Unfortunately you're surrounded by unemployed and unhinged cyber trolls who log into this site to graffiti everything they read!


:-/

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 10th, 2017 at 9:37pm
I think that's Valkie's first 'atta boy in all his time on here.

He's too batshit crazy for even the most bigoted usually.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lisa Jones on Oct 10th, 2017 at 9:42pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 9:21pm:

Valkie wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 7:43pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:30pm:
Quite seriously, you two buffoons should be told that it's fine to pop in a few ad hominems along the way, but also present your objections to some of the points made.


You two are bone-bloody-lazy, and that's why more than half your posts are just one-liner shithouse graffiti.


I generally ignore it, it has shown in the past that it is nothing but a troll and has no counter argument other than insults and abuse.

But you are correct in saying that I made some relevant points.
Points they cannot argue against.

Homosexuality is an abnormality.
Lets explore that
When something consists of a tiny percentage of a group, it is seen as an abnormality.
Now, humans are in fact animals
The primary drive of animals is propergation of the species.
Homosexuals cannot carry on the species, therfore they are abnormal to the primary drive of ALL animals.

Now if something is abnormal, by definition it is not representative of the species and must therfore be mentally deficient or mentally ill.

Finally
The fact that these individual have to associate with ever more abstract groups
Lesbians, Gays, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, Questioning, Sologomy and Pedophiles
LGBTIQSP

The more twisted and devided they become, the more letters are added
Is this the action of a sane mind?


Now the second argument I have
And onevwhic all the homosexual, lesbian, feminist sympathisers refuse to consider or answer.

Muzzos HATE pooftahs, they murder them daily
Muzzos BELIEVE tgat women are only worth half or less than a man and subjugate women, abuse them and beat them with the CULTs agreement

And yet the pooftahs, lesbians and feminists protect and support this CULT.

Do they believe that the muzzos will give them any leeway?
Are they stooopid enough to think the muzzos will allow them to continue their perverted practices if they get their way?

Now
Lets hear the arguments againt these truths?

Or will I simply be called a homophobe and islamaphobe by Christophobes and Hetrophobes?

I know what the answer will be.


Well summed up.

Unfortunately you're surrounded by unemployed and unhinged cyber trolls who log into this site to graffiti everything they read!


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Brian Ross on Oct 10th, 2017 at 10:11pm

Valkie wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 7:43pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:30pm:
Quite seriously, you two buffoons should be told that it's fine to pop in a few ad hominems along the way, but also present your objections to some of the points made.


You two are bone-bloody-lazy, and that's why more than half your posts are just one-liner shithouse graffiti.


I generally ignore it, it has shown in the past that it is nothing but a troll and has no counter argument other than insults and abuse.

But you are correct in saying that I made some relevant points.
Points they cannot argue against.

Homosexuality is an abnormality.
Lets explore that
When something consists of a tiny percentage of a group, it is seen as an abnormality.
Now, humans are in fact animals
The primary drive of animals is propergation of the species.
Homosexuals cannot carry on the species, therfore they are abnormal to the primary drive of ALL animals.

Now if something is abnormal, by definition it is not representative of the species and must therfore be mentally deficient or mentally ill.

Finally
The fact that these individual have to associate with ever more abstract groups
Lesbians, Gays, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, Questioning, Sologomy and Pedophiles
LGBTIQSP

The more twisted and devided they become, the more letters are added
Is this the action of a sane mind?


Now the second argument I have
And onevwhic all the homosexual, lesbian, feminist sympathisers refuse to consider or answer.

Muzzos HATE pooftahs, they murder them daily
Muzzos BELIEVE tgat women are only worth half or less than a man and subjugate women, abuse them and beat them with the CULTs agreement

And yet the pooftahs, lesbians and feminists protect and support this CULT.

Do they believe that the muzzos will give them any leeway?
Are they stooopid enough to think the muzzos will allow them to continue their perverted practices if they get their way?

Now
Lets hear the arguments againt these truths?

Or will I simply be called a homophobe and islamaphobe by Christophobes and Hetrophobes?

I know what the answer will be.




Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Move along folks, move along.  Nothing new here, just Valkie displaying his usual Islamophobia and ad hominem insults.  Tsk, tsk, what is the point of you coming here except to provide you with a means of outletting your anger?   Nothing you say is constructive.  Muslims are here and they aren't going anywhere, despite your attempts at persecuting them.    ::) ::)

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Ye Grappler on Oct 10th, 2017 at 10:27pm
I've seen no racial hatred from mainstream Australia at any time since I've been alive..... and that's getting long in the tooth...

What I see is a bunch of self-interested minorities claiming they are hated, and then ensuring by their behaviour that they will indeed receive some response to their often vicious ideas and actions, thus making of their proclaimed victim status a reality - in their own minds.

We've been seeing this kind of rubbish from the feminists since the late 1960's - surely this nation has to ourgrow it some time and just tell these farken minorities to shut up and let everyone else go about their business in peace.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lisa Jones on Oct 10th, 2017 at 10:31pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 11:26am:
A good article.


A suburban hair salon, an anti-Muslim tirade and what it says about hate speech in Australia

Such hair as I have is cut from time to time by Mrs E, who runs a one-chair salon in my neighbourhood.

She has been in business there for 40 years. She knows all about the history of the street and many of her clients have been coming to her for half a lifetime.

The salon is shut on Mondays, when she cuts the hair of the elderly and disabled in various local institutions.

Mrs E is a petite woman with a cloud of brown hair, a bright smile and that empathetic personality that fits so many hairdressers for their parallel occupation of informal counsellor.

Under her hairdresser's smock she wears a dress or a blouse and trousers.

She came to Australia as a child from the Balkans, grew up, married, had two sons.

Australia is home and a place where she says she has always felt welcome, until the other day.

A client whose hair she had been cutting for 20 years came in as usual, and then, without any prompting or preamble, launched into a tirade against Muslims.

Mrs E heard her out. As a rule, like most sensible businesspeople, she resists being drawn into conversations about sex, religion or politics.

But eventually it became too much. "I'm a Muslim," she told the client, "and I very much regret that after 20 years I must tell you I will no longer cut your hair".
The salon contains no outward sign of her faith: nothing in her appearance or in the room itself gives it away. For her, it is something private; nothing to do with her professional life.

It happened that I came in about a week later. Mrs E and I often talk in general terms about what's going on in the world.

She knows I am a journalist and academic and I think she feels safe pushing her conversational boundaries slightly.

She told me this story and as she did so, the hurt was written all over her face.

And after nearly a lifetime in Australia, she said she felt just that little bit less welcome.

Hate speech seeping into Australian society

So this is how it goes.

Hate speech becomes part of the currency of national debate and is exploited for political purposes.

In 1996, Pauline Hanson delivers her notorious maiden speech in which she says Australia is being "swamped by Asians".

John Howard, as prime minister, dog-whistles that this is all about free speech.

In 2001, the so-called Tampa election occurs.

Boat people — overwhelmingly Muslim — become the butt of Howard's assertion of national sovereignty: "We will decide who comes to this country and the circumstances in which they come."

There are votes in this and both sides of politics pile on.

In the midst of the 2013 election, Labor's Kevin Rudd — the same man who claims Dietrich Bonhoeffer as an inspiration — slams the door on asylum seekers by striking deals, with Nauru and Papua New Guinea, that Australia is still living with.

In 2014, the Federal Government tries to weaken the Racial Discrimination Act in what is said to be in the interests of free speech.

Attorney-General George Brandis asserts that "people have a right to be bigots".
In 2015, research conducted for the Melbourne Social Equity Institute finds that the single most important driver of negative attitudes toward asylum seekers is religious prejudice, sometimes expressed as concern about the "Islamisation" of Australia.

In August 2017, Senator Hanson wears a burqa into Senate Question Time.

Senator Brandis discovers where bigotry can lead and assails her for an "appalling stunt" disrespectful of the Muslim faith.

Eventually, the political licensing of racism and religious intolerance seeps into the fabric of society. It might take a generation or it might take longer.

But when it does it stains and rots that fabric, eating away at people's sense of belonging, undermining the Australian multicultural project, and in a small suburban hair salon, a middle-aged woman feels emboldened to vent her prejudice, doing harm and hurt to someone who has been tending her person for 20 years.

Dennis Muller is a senior research fellow at the University of Melbourne's Centre for Advancing Journalism.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-09/anti-muslim-tirade-hairdresser-and-hate-speech-in-australia/9029746






the politics of division is alive and well in this country.



Good article????


All I can see is an article about what happened in a small hair dressing salon that had NOTHING to do with racial hatred at all.  ::)


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Valkie on Oct 11th, 2017 at 4:20am

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 9:21pm:

Valkie wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 7:43pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 12:30pm:
Quite seriously, you two buffoons should be told that it's fine to pop in a few ad hominems along the way, but also present your objections to some of the points made.


You two are bone-bloody-lazy, and that's why more than half your posts are just one-liner shithouse graffiti.


I generally ignore it, it has shown in the past that it is nothing but a troll and has no counter argument other than insults and abuse.

But you are correct in saying that I made some relevant points.
Points they cannot argue against.

Homosexuality is an abnormality.
Lets explore that
When something consists of a tiny percentage of a group, it is seen as an abnormality.
Now, humans are in fact animals
The primary drive of animals is propergation of the species.
Homosexuals cannot carry on the species, therfore they are abnormal to the primary drive of ALL animals.

Now if something is abnormal, by definition it is not representative of the species and must therfore be mentally deficient or mentally ill.

Finally
The fact that these individual have to associate with ever more abstract groups
Lesbians, Gays, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, Questioning, Sologomy and Pedophiles
LGBTIQSP

The more twisted and devided they become, the more letters are added
Is this the action of a sane mind?


Now the second argument I have
And onevwhic all the homosexual, lesbian, feminist sympathisers refuse to consider or answer.

Muzzos HATE pooftahs, they murder them daily
Muzzos BELIEVE tgat women are only worth half or less than a man and subjugate women, abuse them and beat them with the CULTs agreement

And yet the pooftahs, lesbians and feminists protect and support this CULT.

Do they believe that the muzzos will give them any leeway?
Are they stooopid enough to think the muzzos will allow them to continue their perverted practices if they get their way?

Now
Lets hear the arguments againt these truths?

Or will I simply be called a homophobe and islamaphobe by Christophobes and Hetrophobes?

I know what the answer will be.


Well summed up.

Unfortunately you're surrounded by unemployed and unhinged cyber trolls who log into this site to graffiti everything they read!



They have no counter argument.

So they insult, denegrate and shout over any comments they see as against them

No matter how logical,

But what can one expect from the mentally ill?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Valkie on Oct 11th, 2017 at 4:26am

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 10:27pm:
I've seen no racial hatred from mainstream Australia at any time since I've been alive..... and that's getting long in the tooth...

What I see is a bunch of self-interested minorities claiming they are hated, and then ensuring by their behaviour that they will indeed receive some response to their often vicious ideas and actions, thus making of their proclaimed victim status a reality - in their own minds.

We've been seeing this kind of rubbish from the feminists since the late 1960's - surely this nation has to ourgrow it some time and just tell these farken minorities to shut up and let everyone else go about their business in peace.


The only hate speech I see is
Muzzos demanding murder and beheading of infidels and any who they see as enemies  (which is everyone)

Or the LGBTIQSP mob barging in and insulting, destroying and shouting over normals.

Or the abbos screaming about their land being stolen, all the while sitting on a lifetime of pensions and free run.

Where is the hate speach demanding immigrants being beheaded.......there is none
Where is the hate speach demanding genocide of abbos........there is none
Where is the hate speach demanding pooftahs be shoved off buildings....... there us none

But in the tiny minds of these minority groups, everyone is agains them.

Probably all the drugs they take making them paranoid

If islam is so great, why do the muzzos all run from countries in which it rules?
True persicution, true hate speach comes from the mouths of babes in this CULT

If homosexuality is so normal, so wonderful, why are they always so unhappy and angry?
GAY  is a joke, they are not gay, thay are just always angry.
Even met an old pooftah? Sad and lonely personified.

And then we have the likes of bwyannnnnnnnnn
Desperatly looking for a cause to hang his hat on.
Unfortunately,  his limited cerebral capacity precludes him from putting forward any counter argument.
He simply falls back on thevsame old tired, oft repeated and boring statements.
I feel embarrassed for him, it must be sad living life like that.

Then we have other trolls and apologists who think insults and quips are somehow counter arguments.
They are not.
Like a child sticking their fingers in theirvears screaming "na na na na na" they seek to ignore the facts they cannot argue against and silence the ever growing tide of facts and truth that show their false faith in these  sick minority abnormals.

Yes bwyannnnnnnnnn
The muzzos are here to stay.
Like ticks, they bury their heads into their host and suck the welfare system dry.
This is the case in Every country they infect.

But in time, they will realise the stooopidity of their CULT.
By observing how civilization lives, no matter how hard their twisted imrans fight.
Eventually they will succumb to civilization and disregard the insane CULT.
Then what are you apologists going to do?

Hetrophobes, Christaphobes, these are the true phobias
Because the gays and muzzos realize that they are doomed in the long run.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by issuevoter on Oct 11th, 2017 at 7:10am
I have seen a number of racist statements on these forums. They usually come in the form of insulting terminology, but then there have been spurious claims of superiority or inferiority in one form or another. They are all varying forms of ignorance, and I don't mean that in the often used insulting way. I mean lack of knowledge or familiarity.

I cannot see any validity in the claims of superiority, or accertions of inforiority. And further, it is hard to be so uncharitable to other races if you have actually received hospitality when you have been among them. I think of all the kindness I have been shown from black Africans and white Afrikaaners, from Chinese, Polynesians, and Indians, and I clearly remember growing up in an Australia that was far too insular, but it was insular because of isolation; the unfamiliarity with other ways of life and peoples. I welcome a multicultural Australia.

But don't bother reading any further if you suffer from a misguided and self-destructive compassion  that you use to justify open boarders and somekind of obligation to take care of the rest of humanity.

If we have any obligation, it is to create a fairer civilisation here, out of what we have, and that will not be helped by lying to ourselves about the value of beliefs, philosophies, or religions. Likewise, blindly adhering to party platforms will not guarantee trustworthy reform. There is no value in racism, but I will not mince words; Islam is not a Race, it is a mind-set, and we have seen that those of this mind-set are prone to unusual bursts of violence and hatred, and as such, are a danger to us and themselves.

Are there other dangerous elements in society? Of course, but they are not afforded the respectability given freely to Islam under our principles of plurality and tolerance. The fact is that Islam is far more intolerant and insular than the our Commonwealth ever was, and they have no intention to change. Those who hold that only they know the true God will always be prone to fanaticism.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:25am


Typical LW Prog mentality... whether in the US or anywhere in the world.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:26am


Islam and homosexuals...

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:28am


Homosexuals/LW Progs/socialists and social activists.... all shallow thinkers...  right bwian... :D :D :D :D :D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:34am

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:35am

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:37am
In case you are slow...

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:12am

Goose Boy has quite a collection of ISIS photos.

He must be a big fan.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lisa Jones on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:14am

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:37am:
In case you are slow...


Islam is abhorrent!

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lisa Jones on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:14am

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:35am:


Islam is disgusting!

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lisa Jones on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:15am

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:34am:


Islam is vile!

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:16am

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:14am:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:37am:
In case you are slow...


Islam is abhorrent!


That's ISIS, dear.

Don't you know the difference?

Calling ISIS 'Islam', is like calling the KKK 'Christianity'.




Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:17am

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:15am:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:34am:


Islam is vile!


Again: that's ISIS, dear.

Don't you know the difference?

Calling ISIS 'Islam', is like calling the KKK 'Christianity'.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lisa Jones on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:24am
Every Christian denomination has officially denounced the KKK.

Now back to Islam....

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lisa Jones on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:27am

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:34am:




Ohhhh I remember this.


Poor bugger.

Imagine if this victim was your son or brother..... :'( :'( :'(


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lisa Jones on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29am

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:35am:




NO PERSON DESERVES THIS!

Islam has a lot to answer for!

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:32am

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29am:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:35am:




NO PERSON DESERVES THIS!


Agreed.

ISIS has a lot to answer for.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:32am

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:24am:
Every Christian denomination has officially denounced the KKK.

Now back to Islam....


Has every Christian, dear?

I'm curious.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lisa Jones on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:39am

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:32am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:24am:
Every Christian denomination has officially denounced the KKK.

Now back to Islam....


Has every Christian, dear?

I'm curious.


Yep....EVERY Christian denomination.

Now back to that vile and sorry excuse of a religion ISLAM.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lisa Jones on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:40am

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29am:
NO PERSON DESERVES THIS!

Islam has a lot to answer for!


The basis/reasoning behind the perpetrating of such a barbaric and cruel act against another person today?

The Koran!




Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:49am

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:39am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:32am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:24am:
Every Christian denomination has officially denounced the KKK.

Now back to Islam....


Has every Christian, dear?

I'm curious.


Yep....EVERY Christian denomination.


Has every Christian, dear?

Every individual Christian?

Are you a KKK fan?

I'm curious.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:50am

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:40am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29am:
NO PERSON DESERVES THIS!

Islam has a lot to answer for!


The basis/reasoning behind the perpetrating of such a barbaric and cruel act against another person today?


Ignorance.

You of all people should know that.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Dr Mengele on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:51am

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29am:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:35am:




NO PERSON DESERVES THIS!

Islam has a lot to answer for!


Have to disagree with you there, throwing homos off buildings should be a national sport.  :)

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Karnal on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:58am

Dr Mengele wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:51am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29am:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:35am:




NO PERSON DESERVES THIS!

Islam has a lot to answer for!


Have to disagree with you there, throwing homos off buildings should be a national sport.  :)


As long as we do this scientifically, Doctor, there should be no problem.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lisa Jones on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:02am

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:58am:

Dr Mengele wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:51am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29am:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:35am:




NO PERSON DESERVES THIS!

Islam has a lot to answer for!


Have to disagree with you there, throwing homos off buildings should be a national sport.  :)


As long as we do this scientifically, Doctor, there should be no problem.


:o :-? ::) >:( :-/ :-X

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:12am

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:58am:

Dr Mengele wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:51am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29am:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:35am:




NO PERSON DESERVES THIS!

Islam has a lot to answer for!


Have to disagree with you there, throwing homos off buildings should be a national sport.  :)


As long as we do this scientifically, Doctor, there should be no problem.


And homos aren't a race, so the good Doctor can't be accused of racism.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Karnal on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:27am

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 10:12am:

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:58am:

Dr Mengele wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:51am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29am:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:35am:




NO PERSON DESERVES THIS!

Islam has a lot to answer for!


Have to disagree with you there, throwing homos off buildings should be a national sport.  :)


As long as we do this scientifically, Doctor, there should be no problem.


And homos aren't a race, so the good Doctor can't be accused of racism.


Exactly. Hommers, Moslems, subhumans. Not a race, leftards, and not racist.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by UnSubRocky on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:20pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:24am:
Every Christian denomination has officially denounced the KKK.

Now back to Islam....


Westboro Baptist Church have not. And whatever Protestant churches that align themselves with the KKK, even secretly, have not denounced the KKK.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Gnads on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:35pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 10:27pm:
I've seen no racial hatred from mainstream Australia at any time since I've been alive..... and that's getting long in the tooth...

What I see is a bunch of self-interested minorities claiming they are hated, and then ensuring by their behaviour that they will indeed receive some response to their often vicious ideas and actions, thus making of their proclaimed victim status a reality - in their own minds.

We've been seeing this kind of rubbish from the feminists since the late 1960's - surely this nation has to ourgrow it some time and just tell these farken minorities to shut up and let everyone else go about their business in peace.



Going by what I see here Grap ... that's wishful thinking.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:40pm

UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:20pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:24am:
Every Christian denomination has officially denounced the KKK.

Now back to Islam....


Westboro Baptist Church have not. And whatever Protestant churches that align themselves with the KKK, even secretly, have not denounced the KKK.



Up! for Lisa.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:40pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 10:31pm:
All I can see is an article about what happened in a small hair dressing salon that had NOTHING to do with racial hatred at all.  ::)


that's cause you're an idiot

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Caesar Augustus on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:46pm

Dr Mengele wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:51am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29am:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:35am:




NO PERSON DESERVES THIS!

Islam has a lot to answer for!


Have to disagree with you there, throwing homos off buildings should be a national sport.  :)


KCUF you, you piece of shite.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Karnal on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:50pm

Auggie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:46pm:

Dr Mengele wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:51am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29am:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:35am:




NO PERSON DESERVES THIS!

Islam has a lot to answer for!


Have to disagree with you there, throwing homos off buildings should be a national sport.  :)


bugger you, you piece of shite.


Now now, we must respect the Doctor's courage to stand up, be counted, and throw these people off buildings.

Most brave of him.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Karnal on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:51pm

Auggie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:46pm:

Dr Mengele wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:51am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29am:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:35am:




NO PERSON DESERVES THIS!

Islam has a lot to answer for!


Have to disagree with you there, throwing homos off buildings should be a national sport.  :)


KCUF you, you piece of shite.


You can't say that, Caesar, that's rude.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by issuevoter on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:54pm
There are many fanatical and violent groups contending for the worst atrocities, but ISIS is Islam to the letter. Islam has internal divisions like Sunni and Shia, but they are quite irrelevant to we infidels. The weirdest thing about Muzlims is why they are so sadistic.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Gnads on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:59pm

UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:20pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:24am:
Every Christian denomination has officially denounced the KKK.

Now back to Islam....


Westboro Baptist Church have not. And whatever Protestant churches that align themselves with the KKK, even secretly, have not denounced the KKK.


A congregation with 70 members tops?

There are 1.8 billion Muslims ...

with an estimated fundamentalist/extremist/radical percentage of between 15% & 20%.

So that's between 270 to 360 million people who hate the west & all it stands for.

A percentage calculator doesn't even go low enough to to give a percentage number of 70 WestBro members as against 2.3 billion Christians.

Try another example.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Gnads on Oct 11th, 2017 at 2:04pm

Auggie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:46pm:

Dr Mengele wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:51am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29am:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:35am:




NO PERSON DESERVES THIS!

Islam has a lot to answer for!


Have to disagree with you there, throwing homos off buildings should be a national sport.  :)


KCUF you, you piece of shite.


Here's a piece of shyte ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRUJmGzV9Ko

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 11th, 2017 at 2:29pm

Gnads wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:59pm:
There are 1.8 billion Muslims ...

with an estimated fundamentalist/extremist/radical percentage of between 15% & 20%.


Estimated by whom?


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Caesar Augustus on Oct 11th, 2017 at 2:45pm

Gnads wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 2:04pm:

Auggie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:46pm:

Dr Mengele wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:51am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29am:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:35am:




NO PERSON DESERVES THIS!

Islam has a lot to answer for!


Have to disagree with you there, throwing homos off buildings should be a national sport.  :)


KCUF you, you piece of shite.


Here's a piece of shyte ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRUJmGzV9Ko


There's quite a difference between a person swearing at someone and killing someone.

Also, Dr Mengele is a neo-Nazi.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Karnal on Oct 11th, 2017 at 2:46pm

Auggie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 2:45pm:

Gnads wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 2:04pm:

Auggie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:46pm:

Dr Mengele wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:51am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29am:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:35am:




NO PERSON DESERVES THIS!

Islam has a lot to answer for!


Have to disagree with you there, throwing homos off buildings should be a national sport.  :)


KCUF you, you piece of shite.


Here's a piece of shyte ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRUJmGzV9Ko


There's quite a difference between a person swearing at someone and killing someone.

Also, Dr Mengele is a neo-Nazi.


We all are, Caesar, we all are. In our own way.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Caesar Augustus on Oct 11th, 2017 at 2:47pm

Gnads wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:59pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:20pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:24am:
Every Christian denomination has officially denounced the KKK.

Now back to Islam....


Westboro Baptist Church have not. And whatever Protestant churches that align themselves with the KKK, even secretly, have not denounced the KKK.


A congregation with 70 members tops?

There are 1.8 billion Muslims ...

with an estimated fundamentalist/extremist/radical percentage of between 15% & 20%.

So that's between 270 to 360 million people who hate the west & all it stands for.

A percentage calculator doesn't even go low enough to to give a percentage number of 70 WestBro members as against 2.3 billion Christians.

Try another example.


But those 15 - 20% you are talking about aren't jihadis, they're people who won't commit violence directly, but will support terrorist organisation; and also hold beliefs which we wouldn't expect.

Sam Harris made a good example of this on the Bill Maher show.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lord Herbert on Oct 11th, 2017 at 3:48pm

Auggie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 2:47pm:
But those 15 - 20% you are talking about aren't jihadis, they're people who won't commit violence directly, but will support terrorist organisation; and also hold beliefs which we wouldn't expect.


Correct.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry3NzkAOo3s


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Dr Mengele on Oct 11th, 2017 at 4:56pm

Auggie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:46pm:

Dr Mengele wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:51am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:29am:

Grendel wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 8:35am:




NO PERSON DESERVES THIS!

Islam has a lot to answer for!


Have to disagree with you there, throwing homos off buildings should be a national sport.  :)


KCUF you, you piece of shite.


No need to get mad. I haven't thrown any homos off a roof personally but I did find the videos on liveleak great to fap to. :D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Ye Grappler on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:26pm

Gnads wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:35pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 10:27pm:
I've seen no racial hatred from mainstream Australia at any time since I've been alive..... and that's getting long in the tooth...

What I see is a bunch of self-interested minorities claiming they are hated, and then ensuring by their behaviour that they will indeed receive some response to their often vicious ideas and actions, thus making of their proclaimed victim status a reality - in their own minds.

We've been seeing this kind of rubbish from the feminists since the late 1960's - surely this nation has to ourgrow it some time and just tell these farken minorities to shut up and let everyone else go about their business in peace.



Going by what I see here Grap ... that's wishful thinking.


Yeah - just trying to make the point that as a general rule we Aussies don't do racial hatred... but we can give it back when it's handed to us.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:27pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:26pm:
Yeah - just trying to make the point that as a general rule we Aussies don't do racial hatred.



you're kidding right?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:34pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:27pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:26pm:
Yeah - just trying to make the point that as a general rule we Aussies don't do racial hatred.



you're kidding right?



the last thing I go by is whats said by twats on here...

but on the whole..

what I do kn ow is WORDS are justthat WORDS>..

when I see things like young women being gang raped because they come from a different culture...

yes I use the word HATRED  attached to that crime...

when I read about gays being murdered  because they are gay... yep add HATRED to that as well..

when I see Mosques burnt down... in this country   yep I am getting very concerned...

and when I read of groups being sent to jail because they are planning to bomb building or bridges or army barracks....yep add it there as well..

define HATRED....

Definition of hatred

1 :extreme dislike or disgust :hate
2 :ill will or resentment that is usually mutual :prejudiced hostility or animosity
old racial prejudices and national hatreds



it seriously depends   and I for one do not agree with this WHOLE COUNTRY  being accused of RACIAL HATRED.....in fact it pings me right off.. >:( >:( >:( >:(

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Ye Grappler on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:38pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:27pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:26pm:
Yeah - just trying to make the point that as a general rule we Aussies don't do racial hatred.



you're kidding right?


Wops and wogs aren't a race.......... gypos, dinks, Snickers sand and banana etc... all are not races... and we as a nation have even accepted the Wogs and Poms, so don't whine....  Dirty Harry hates 'em all - especially Wogs....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnRkCemeV7k

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lisa Jones on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:52pm

issuevoter wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:54pm:
There are many fanatical and violent groups contending for the worst atrocities, but ISIS is Islam to the letter. Islam has internal divisions like Sunni and Shia, but they are quite irrelevant to we infidels. The weirdest thing about Muzlims is why they are so sadistic.


Thank you for pointing that out.

Many here conveniently forget that!

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:55pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:38pm:
Wops and wogs aren't a race.......... gypos, dinks, Snickers sand and banana etc... all are not races... and we as a nation have even accepted the Wogs and Poms, so don't whine.


ahhh  :D :D :D :D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:56pm

cods wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:34pm:
and I for one do not agree with this WHOLE COUNTRY  being accused of RACIAL HATRED


no one accused the whole country of racial hatred Cods.  Did you even read the OP?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Valkie on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:57pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:39am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:32am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:24am:
Every Christian denomination has officially denounced the KKK.

Now back to Islam....


Has every Christian, dear?

I'm curious.


Yep....EVERY Christian denomination.

Now back to that vile and sorry excuse of a religion ISLAM.



Please don't legitimize the islamic CULT.

It is a CULT in every aspect of the word.

And if you look at any legal or psychological assessment of a CULT it fits islam to the "T"

It is nothing more than a brutal, primitive, barbaric, misogynistic, pedophile infested homophobic CULT.

And yet the trolls seek to protect this CULT even though, god forbid, the CULT ever gets its way and takes over Australia, they will be sacrificed to their evil pig sired, self confessed pedophile prophet.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:59pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:55pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:38pm:
Wops and wogs aren't a race.......... gypos, dinks, Snickers sand and banana etc... all are not races... and we as a nation have even accepted the Wogs and Poms, so don't whine.


ahhh  :D :D :D :D



its true.. you can dish out the language js... dont pretend  and yes it all stings   for a moment  but no life is lost....hate is fear in disguise....we have to use words  because   it stops us using our hands or weapon s...I dont mind being called a POM  when they accuse me of all the wrongs in the world...and killing all the aborigines  I get a bit hot un der the collar.....

is that HATRED.?????   I will have to work on that!

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Valkie on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:02pm

Auggie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 2:47pm:

Gnads wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:59pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:20pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:24am:
Every Christian denomination has officially denounced the KKK.

Now back to Islam....


Westboro Baptist Church have not. And whatever Protestant churches that align themselves with the KKK, even secretly, have not denounced the KKK.


A congregation with 70 members tops?

There are 1.8 billion Muslims ...

with an estimated fundamentalist/extremist/radical percentage of between 15% & 20%.

So that's between 270 to 360 million people who hate the west & all it stands for.

A percentage calculator doesn't even go low enough to to give a percentage number of 70 WestBro members as against 2.3 billion Christians.

Try another example.


But those 15 - 20% you are talking about aren't jihadis, they're people who won't commit violence directly, but will support terrorist organisation; and also hold beliefs which we wouldn't expect.

Sam Harris made a good example of this on the Bill Maher show.


That is total and utter tripe.

Muzzos, even the so called moderate ones, do not hesitate in protesting should anyone dare to step on their precious toes.
The Moderate muzzos call for beheading, murder and destruction of anyone who they feel is against their brutal barbaric CULT.

Its not only the cowardly isis (so named because they cant spell something any more difficult).
Its every single muzzo anywhere in the world.

No one EVER flees to a muzzo country, they all flee from muzzo countries.
That is because once the CULT takes over LIFE IS DEATH, DESTRUCTION AND HELL.

And the apologists want this??????????
Go figure??????

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:06pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:56pm:

cods wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:34pm:
and I for one do not agree with this WHOLE COUNTRY  being accused of RACIAL HATRED


no one accused the whole country of racial hatred Cods.  Did you even read the OP?



its the general consensus here dont pretend..
I referred to all lefties once.. [meaning those on here] and got clobbered the same with referring to Qlders..

I did read the OP  and no I didnt think that was RACIAL HATRED.. it was WORDS...just a womens opinion she was talking to a women she thought she knew thats all  ...god knows what people talk about to their hairdresser...dont tell be men dont talk about the daily news?????.....

do we have to ask.. oh whats your religion so we all know not to tread on toes.??..


I would imagine a lot of Germans had their toes stepped on after the second world war... ::) ::)

they got over it..  well I hope they have.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Letitia Kemister on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:10pm
My family did.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:13pm

Letitia Kemister wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:10pm:
My family did.



oh  anew member... welcome... is that in reply to me ?

its a bit brief  so not sure....

but welcome to ozpol all the same..

hope you are tough

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:16pm

cods wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:06pm:
its the general consensus here dont pretend..



ok, but only if you stop pretending with me.

The article is about the rise of racism and how it's more mainstream than what it once was. And words are racism. Or will you only accept racism that involves physical attacks before you condemn it?
No one said all of Australia is racist. I know many Aussies who aren't racist. The salt of the earth. Also, no one is arguing Australia is the most racist, or worse than any of the other countries. It's not. We do far better than many other countries.


But that doesn't make the racism that is here any better. That doesn't excuse the comments that some people make.
I happen to agree that Racism is getting worse in this country. It's now become embedded in our politics. We have political parties that exist purely because they pander to racists. Divide and conquer. It's worked for centuries, and will continue to work for centuries more


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:18pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:26pm:

Gnads wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:35pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 10:27pm:
I've seen no racial hatred from mainstream Australia at any time since I've been alive..... and that's getting long in the tooth...

What I see is a bunch of self-interested minorities claiming they are hated, and then ensuring by their behaviour that they will indeed receive some response to their often vicious ideas and actions, thus making of their proclaimed victim status a reality - in their own minds.

We've been seeing this kind of rubbish from the feminists since the late 1960's - surely this nation has to ourgrow it some time and just tell these farken minorities to shut up and let everyone else go about their business in peace.



Going by what I see here Grap ... that's wishful thinking.


Yeah - just trying to make the point that as a general rule we Aussies don't do racial hatred... but we can give it back when it's handed to us.



Oh good. Just when i thought you couldn't top "Aussie men don't rape Muslim women".

Fabulous.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:19pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:16pm:

cods wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:06pm:
its the general consensus here dont pretend..



ok, but only if you stop pretending with me.

The article is about the rise of racism and how it's more mainstream than what it once was. And words are racism. Or will you only accept racism that involves physical attacks before you condemn it?
No one said all of Australia is racist. I know many Aussies who aren't racist. The salt of the earth. Also, no one is arguing Australia is the most racist, or worse than any of the other countries. It's not. We do far better than many other countries.


But that doesn't make the racism that is here any better. That doesn't excuse the comments that some people make.
I happen to agree that Racism is getting worse in this country. It's now become embedded in our politics. We have political parties that exist purely because they pander to racists. Divide and conquer. It's worked for centuries, and will continue to work for centuries more


That be a nutshell with it in it.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:42pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:26pm:
- just trying to make the point that as a general rule we Aussies don't do racial hatred...




Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Gnads on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:47pm

Auggie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 2:47pm:

Gnads wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:59pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:20pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 9:24am:
Every Christian denomination has officially denounced the KKK.

Now back to Islam....


Westboro Baptist Church have not. And whatever Protestant churches that align themselves with the KKK, even secretly, have not denounced the KKK.


A congregation with 70 members tops?

There are 1.8 billion Muslims ...

with an estimated fundamentalist/extremist/radical percentage of between 15% & 20%.

So that's between 270 to 360 million people who hate the west & all it stands for.

A percentage calculator doesn't even go low enough to to give a percentage number of 70 WestBro members as against 2.3 billion Christians.

Try another example.


But those 15 - 20% you are talking about aren't jihadis, they're people who won't commit violence directly, but will support terrorist organisation; and also hold beliefs which we wouldn't expect.

Sam Harris made a good example of this on the Bill Maher show.


So that makes them a safe option does it?

Bill Maher or Jimmy Kimmel .... perrrrlease  ::)

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Gnads on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:52pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:27pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:26pm:
Yeah - just trying to make the point that as a general rule we Aussies don't do racial hatred.



you're kidding right?


Why would he be?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:55pm

Gnads wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:52pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:27pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:26pm:
Yeah - just trying to make the point that as a general rule we Aussies don't do racial hatred.



you're kidding right?


Why would he be?




Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Gnads on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:56pm

cods wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:34pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:27pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:26pm:
Yeah - just trying to make the point that as a general rule we Aussies don't do racial hatred.



you're kidding right?



the last thing I go by is whats said by twats on here...

but on the whole..

what I do kn ow is WORDS are justthat WORDS>..

when I see things like young women being gang raped because they come from a different culture...

yes I use the word HATRED  attached to that crime...

when I read about gays being murdered  because they are gay... yep add HATRED to that as well..

when I see Mosques burnt down... in this country   yep I am getting very concerned...

and when I read of groups being sent to jail because they are planning to bomb building or bridges or army barracks....yep add it there as well..

define HATRED....

Definition of hatred

1 :extreme dislike or disgust :hate
2 :ill will or resentment that is usually mutual :prejudiced hostility or animosity
old racial prejudices and national hatreds



it seriously depends   and I for one do not agree with this WHOLE COUNTRY  being accused of RACIAL HATRED.....in fact it pings me right off.. >:( >:( >:( >:(


And who are the "Twats" here?

Not a term expected of an old biddy I'm sure.  ;D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Gnads on Oct 11th, 2017 at 7:03pm

cods wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:06pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:56pm:

cods wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:34pm:
and I for one do not agree with this WHOLE COUNTRY  being accused of RACIAL HATRED


no one accused the whole country of racial hatred Cods.  Did you even read the OP?



its the general consensus here dont pretend..
I referred to all lefties once.. [meaning those on here] and got clobbered the same with referring to Qlders..

I did read the OP  and no I didnt think that was RACIAL HATRED.. it was WORDS...just a womens opinion she was talking to a women she thought she knew thats all  ...god knows what people talk about to their hairdresser...dont tell be men dont talk about the daily news?????.....

do we have to ask.. oh whats your religion so we all know not to tread on toes.??..


I would imagine a lot of Germans had their toes stepped on after the second world war... ::) ::)

they got over it..  well I hope they have.


Don_T_mention_the_War.jpg (4 KB | 12 )

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Gnads on Oct 11th, 2017 at 7:12pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:42pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:26pm:
- just trying to make the point that as a general rule we Aussies don't do racial hatred...





Yes he's a very funny guy ol Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

But he wasn't an Ayatollah.

He's been given the flick for an Aytollah/Islamic Cleric Hassan Rouhani

that should go well .....

Oh yeah & he was University educated in Scotland.

No wonder he hates the West.




Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 11th, 2017 at 7:47pm

Gnads wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:52pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:27pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:26pm:
Yeah - just trying to make the point that as a general rule we Aussies don't do racial hatred.



you're kidding right?


Why would he be?



cause he's not normally that dumb.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Ye Grappler on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:11pm

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:18pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:26pm:

Gnads wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:35pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 10:27pm:
I've seen no racial hatred from mainstream Australia at any time since I've been alive..... and that's getting long in the tooth...

What I see is a bunch of self-interested minorities claiming they are hated, and then ensuring by their behaviour that they will indeed receive some response to their often vicious ideas and actions, thus making of their proclaimed victim status a reality - in their own minds.

We've been seeing this kind of rubbish from the feminists since the late 1960's - surely this nation has to ourgrow it some time and just tell these farken minorities to shut up and let everyone else go about their business in peace.



Going by what I see here Grap ... that's wishful thinking.


Yeah - just trying to make the point that as a general rule we Aussies don't do racial hatred... but we can give it back when it's handed to us.



Oh good. Just when i thought you couldn't top "Aussie men don't rape Muslim women".

Fabulous.


You have yet to show me where Aussie men (not immigrant Muslims) go about raping Muslim women.

No such thing exists.

There is something definitely wrong with some of you here.  You can have gang rapes of non-Muslim women by Muslim gangs, and abuse and threats to non-Muslims on a daily basis, and demands that all be converted to Islam etc - and yet you will not accept the undeniable fact that non-Muslim Australian men do not, as a rule or as part of a hate campaign, rape Muslim women.

Quite frankly - some of you are insane.

SHOW me then figures of Muslim women raped by Australians - by which I mean non-Muslim immigrants, but what are NORMAL Australians.

You, Mothra - show me the figures of Muslim women raped by Aboriginal men, who are Australian to the core..... THERE ARE NONE!  Same applies to your average Ocker... now try to grow up for once in your  life.   ::)

Now SHOW me where Australians of this nation, as a group, have not accepted any and all kinds of immigrants and given them a fair go far from the guns that were killing them, and show me where their life is not measurably better here than it was in the sh1t-hoels they came from.

And then tell me about all those Australians who go around attacking and insulting and abusing and threatening Muslims etc, who are supposedly deprived of rights etc, and yet have the same rights as everyone else here, even to sit in our Parliaments without even having been born here.

I'll say it again - some of you people are insane, and it is you who are the problem with all your endless paranoia and whining about your 'rights' and the 'rights' of minorities, not the ordinary Australian.

That includes you, Smith.  You and your family have prospered well here - better than being an Italian olive farm labourer - and yet you sh1t on this nation at times while enjoying your nice car, home and decent life.



Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:16pm
Speechless. Just speechless.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Ye Grappler on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:19pm

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:16pm:
Speechless. Just speechless.



Now THAT is the smartest thing you've said on this forum.  About time!

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:24pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:19pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:16pm:
Speechless. Just speechless.



Now THAT is the smartest thing you've said on this forum.  About time!


Ah yes. Sooooo clever. I would pitch it as being demonstrative of your general intellectual age.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Caesar Augustus on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:25pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:11pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 6:18pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 5:26pm:

Gnads wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 1:35pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 10th, 2017 at 10:27pm:
I've seen no racial hatred from mainstream Australia at any time since I've been alive..... and that's getting long in the tooth...

What I see is a bunch of self-interested minorities claiming they are hated, and then ensuring by their behaviour that they will indeed receive some response to their often vicious ideas and actions, thus making of their proclaimed victim status a reality - in their own minds.

We've been seeing this kind of rubbish from the feminists since the late 1960's - surely this nation has to ourgrow it some time and just tell these farken minorities to shut up and let everyone else go about their business in peace.



Going by what I see here Grap ... that's wishful thinking.


Yeah - just trying to make the point that as a general rule we Aussies don't do racial hatred... but we can give it back when it's handed to us.



Oh good. Just when i thought you couldn't top "Aussie men don't rape Muslim women".

Fabulous.


You have yet to show me where Aussie men (not immigrant Muslims) go about raping Muslim women.

No such thing exists.

There is something definitely wrong with some of you here.  You can have gang rapes of non-Muslim women by Muslim gangs, and abuse and threats to non-Muslims on a daily basis, and demands that all be converted to Islam etc - and yet you will not accept the undeniable fact that non-Muslim Australian men do not, as a rule or as part of a hate campaign, rape Muslim women.

Quite frankly - some of you are insane.

SHOW me then figures of Muslim women raped by Australians - by which I mean non-Muslim immigrants, but what are NORMAL Australians.

You, Mothra - show me the figures of Muslim women raped by Aboriginal men, who are Australian to the core..... THERE ARE NONE!  Same applies to your average Ocker... now try to grow up for once in your  life.   ::)

Now SHOW me where Australians of this nation, as a group, have not accepted any and all kinds of immigrants and given them a fair go far from the guns that were killing them, and show me where their life is not measurably better here than it was in the sh1t-hoels they came from.

And then tell me about all those Australians who go around attacking and insulting and abusing and threatening Muslims etc, who are supposedly deprived of rights etc, and yet have the same rights as everyone else here, even to sit in our Parliaments without even having been born here.

I'll say it again - some of you people are insane, and it is you who are the problem with all your endless paranoia and whining about your 'rights' and the 'rights' of minorities, not the ordinary Australian.

That includes you, Smith.  You and your family have prospered well here - better than being an Italian olive farm labourer - and yet you sh1t on this nation at times while enjoying your nice car, home and decent life.


If only you were that passionate about gay marriage, Grap...

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:29pm
Every little bit of Grap's advocacy is for white men, Caesar.

That's it. There is nobody else except the enemy or the servant.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Ye Grappler on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:30pm

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:24pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:19pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:16pm:
Speechless. Just speechless.



Now THAT is the smartest thing you've said on this forum.  About time!


Ah yes. Sooooo clever. I would pitch it as being demonstrative of your general intellectual age.



Accept reality - it doesn't hurt really.  My intellectual age far out-distances yours since I have provided factual support - all you are doing is inferring something negative about me, rather than disputing the facts provided.

Now - kid - the aged pension is not welfare, and nor is any other form of social security, and the only racial hatred in this nation is coming from very specific minority groups who are self-locked into ghettoes and into centuries outdated ideologies that have no place in a modern nation... and there is not one iota of proof to show that any segment of this society is actively persecuting such groups.  Some individuals may have a harsh word or two against them - but there is NO organised oppression of hatred against them.

Stop insulting Australians, who have proven themselves over and over to be the most kind and accepting lot in the world.  We take in all kinds, even wops and poms.... and everyone gets a fair go based on their input to this society.  Sitting back and whining and demanding and claiming oppression will gain you nothing - nobody has the time, energy or money to bother (apart from the government when it's courting votes....  ::) )

Proven, fact, and finished.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Caesar Augustus on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:33pm

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:29pm:
Every little bit of Grap's advocacy is for white men, Caesar.

That's it. There is nobody else except the enemy or the servant.


Can you provide evidence of institutionalised or otherwise form of racism in Australia?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:34pm
Factual support? (btw, that's as far as i got into your rant.)

What was this factual support that shows that no "Aussie" male has ever raped a Muslim woman.

That was what you are continuing to argue, after-all.

Factual evidence please.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Ye Grappler on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:36pm

Auggie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:25pm:
If only you were that passionate about gay marriage, Grap...


Why should I be?  Gay marriage doesn't exist and is currently under consideration as an amendment to the concept of marriage.....

I've said before that if the ex's nephew and his man wanted to get married, I'd be happy to attend and such and happy for them, but gay marriage simply is not real marriage.  Sorry 'bout that.  I don't mind people making a commitment to each other, but I draw the line at abuse and emotional blackmail as the means to get it.

I don't negotiate with terrorists, but I will listen to reason.

I'm still waiting for that list of traditional Australian men including Aboriginals who go around raping Muslim women, bashing Musos and Blacks, and all that..... as a matter of oppressing those groups.

It doesn't happen, and all this emotional nonsense thrown around without offering a valid response is just squid's ink.

Children, children.... get with the program.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:37pm

Auggie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:33pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:29pm:
Every little bit of Grap's advocacy is for white men, Caesar.

That's it. There is nobody else except the enemy or the servant.


Can you provide evidence of institutionalised or otherwise form of racism in Australia?


I would say there is tremendous amounts of institutionalised racism in the police force, the legal system, real estate, and other such sectors.

I think we have racism in our politics.

People of colour report that they have been, throughout their lives, overwhelming the recipients of racial prejudice.

I like to listen to people when they tell me how things are for them. Considering they live it and all.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Ye Grappler on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:44pm

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:37pm:

Auggie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:33pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:29pm:
Every little bit of Grap's advocacy is for white men, Caesar.

That's it. There is nobody else except the enemy or the servant.


Can you provide evidence of institutionalised or otherwise form of racism in Australia?


I would say there is tremendous amounts of institutionalised racism in the police force, the legal system, real estate, and other such sectors.

I think we have racism in our politics.

People of colour report that they have been, throughout their lives, overwhelming the recipients of racial prejudice.

I like to listen to people when they tell me how things are for them. Considering they live it and all.


Of course they do - but what are the facts?

"People report that they have been, throughout their lives, overwhelmingLY (fixed)** the recipients of racial prejudice."

That's more the reality.  I've never called a Black C*nt a Black C*nt - but I've been called a White C*nt by Black C*nts... for no reason other than that I am not tanned etc....  (though I tan very well and have olive skin - gotta be some wop in there somewhere - goin' git me a DNA test).  I've never called a Muslim a "Cun", as one did to me at a place of work after asking if he could screw my sister.... and I politely said no.

Everyone can claim prejudice or racism or whatever - but the realities need to be clear.

Racism is as racism does, as they say down in Green Bow - and what I've seen doesn't come from MY side of the tracks.... or if it does, it is only in response to prejudice and racism from the 'other' side, who, as I've pointed out before, go about alienating and angering people with their antics, and then claim victimhood.  They learned that from the 'feminists'.


** rising tide of illiteracy in alleged educated people

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Caesar Augustus on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:49pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:36pm:
but gay marriage simply is not real marriage.


Why is it not real marriage? Because it doesn't lead to the birth of children?

If you're going to play the 'traditional marriage' card, then let's look at what traditional marriage actually is. First, you only get one shot at it (unless your wife/husband dies); second, you can only have sex to get knocked up; and third, you have to have children.

That was what marriage has been defined as and was practised that way for centuries. If we're willing to allow adulterers to marry, to let second, third, or the tenth marriage be valid - picking and choosing what marriage is, then why can't we pick and choose that two same-sex couples can't get married?

What we have is modern marriage, not traditional marriage. Modern marriage is a legal institution recognising a union between two consenting adults. The principal of 'equality under the law' necessitates that same-sex marriage should be legal.

In fact, marriage is the one example where religion and the state have intersected. I agree that marriage is rooted in religion, but as I said above, there's a very strict criteria.

Second, by not letting same-sex couples marry, and having same-sex civil unions, we're essentially having a situation of 'separate but equal' (which was in place for over 60 years in America, known as the Jim Crow laws). We wouldn't (nor should we) except a separate but equal doctrine for racial segregation (even if the facilities were exactly equal in quality), no less than we should accept a separate but equal doctrine for the commitment between two consenting adults.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Ye Grappler on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:53pm

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:34pm:
Factual support? (btw, that's as far as i got into your rant.)

What was this factual support that shows that no "Aussie" male has ever raped a Muslim woman.

That was what you are continuing to argue, after-all.

Factual evidence please.


I thought you were speechless, yet here you are with your usual prejudices.

You provide some support for the contrary view that you espouse... there is none.  I would find it hard to imagine that, given the restrictions that Muslim women operate under, any of them was ever raped HERE by an Aussie.

In contrast, at least one Muslim gang went around targeting Australian non-Muslim women to 'teach them a lesson'..... and there are Muslim gangs terrorising and targeting  suburbs of Sydney and Melbourne.... but there are no non-Muslim gangs terrorising Muslim occupied areas of Sydney and Melbourne... and yet the screech is that 'Muslims are oppressed and under siege' - what a convenient and self-serving way to get things to go your way..... straight out of the feminist playbook.

None so blind as they who will not see.... except those who refuse to even look.   ::)  ::)  ::)

I cannot help you out of your own self-created trap.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:56pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:53pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:34pm:
Factual support? (btw, that's as far as i got into your rant.)

What was this factual support that shows that no "Aussie" male has ever raped a Muslim woman.

That was what you are continuing to argue, after-all.

Factual evidence please.


I thought you were speechless, yet here you are with your usual prejudices.

You provide some support for the contrary view that you espouse... there is none.  I would find it hard to imagine that, given the restrictions that Muslim women operate under, any of them was ever raped HERE by an Aussie.

In contrast, at least one Muslim gang went around targeting Australian non-Muslim women to 'teach them a lesson'..... and there are Muslim gangs terrorising and targeting  suburbs of Sydney and Melbourne.... but there are no non-Muslim gangs terrorising Muslim occupied areas of Sydney and Melbourne... and yet the screech is that 'Muslims are oppressed and under siege' - what a convenient and self-serving way to get things to go your way..... straight out of the feminist playbook.

None so blind as they who will not see.... except those who refuse to even look.   ::)  ::)  ::)

I cannot help you out of your own self-created trap.



You expectg me to trawl through every case of sexual assault to discern the religion of those involved to prove to you that "No Aussie has ever raped a Muslim"?

Like, do you actually hear yourself?

How many people do you need to tell you how ridiculous that is before you see it?

But you claimed factual evidence. Cough up.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Ye Grappler on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:56pm

Auggie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:49pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:36pm:
but gay marriage simply is not real marriage.


Why is it not real marriage? Because it doesn't lead to the birth of children?

If you're going to play the 'traditional marriage' card, then let's look at what traditional marriage actually is. First, you only get one shot at it (unless your wife/husband dies); second, you can only have sex to get knocked up; and third, you have to have children.

That was what marriage has been defined as and was practised that way for centuries. If we're willing to allow adulterers to marry, to let second, third, or the tenth marriage be valid - picking and choosing what marriage is, then why can't we pick and choose that two same-sex couples can't get married?

What we have is modern marriage, not traditional marriage. Modern marriage is a legal institution recognising a union between two consenting adults. The principal of 'equality under the law' necessitates that same-sex marriage should be legal.

In fact, marriage is the one example where religion and the state have intersected. I agree that marriage is rooted in religion, but as I said above, there's a very strict criteria.

Second, by not letting same-sex couples marry, and having same-sex civil unions, we're essentially having a situation of 'separate but equal' (which was in place for over 60 years in America, known as the Jim Crow laws). We wouldn't (nor should we) except a separate but equal doctrine for racial segregation (even if the facilities were exactly equal in quality), no less than we should accept a separate but equal doctrine for the commitment between two consenting adults.


Marriage is defined as between a man and a woman... now if you wish to have something else, you need to call it something other than 'marriage'...... 'bonding', 'committed' (the mind boggles at committal).. but let's cut to the chase.. marriage is between a man and a woman and gays are not man and woman.

"Dearly beloved, we are gathered here in the sight of God and this assembled company, to join in Gayriage this man and this man.... Bruce, do you take Cyril as your lawfully bonded partner?"

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:58pm
Grappler doesn't adapt, Caesar. He just garners more and more enemies.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Ye Grappler on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:00am

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:56pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:53pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:34pm:
Factual support? (btw, that's as far as i got into your rant.)

What was this factual support that shows that no "Aussie" male has ever raped a Muslim woman.

That was what you are continuing to argue, after-all.

Factual evidence please.


I thought you were speechless, yet here you are with your usual prejudices.

You provide some support for the contrary view that you espouse... there is none.  I would find it hard to imagine that, given the restrictions that Muslim women operate under, any of them was ever raped HERE by an Aussie.

In contrast, at least one Muslim gang went around targeting Australian non-Muslim women to 'teach them a lesson'..... and there are Muslim gangs terrorising and targeting  suburbs of Sydney and Melbourne.... but there are no non-Muslim gangs terrorising Muslim occupied areas of Sydney and Melbourne... and yet the screech is that 'Muslims are oppressed and under siege' - what a convenient and self-serving way to get things to go your way..... straight out of the feminist playbook.

None so blind as they who will not see.... except those who refuse to even look.   ::)  ::)  ::)

I cannot help you out of your own self-created trap.



You expectg me to trawl through every case of sexual assault to discern the religion of those involved to prove to you that "No Aussie has ever raped a Muslim"?

Like, do you actually hear yourself?

How many people do you need to tell you how ridiculous that is before you see it?

But you claimed factual evidence. Cough up.


Then dispute not that which you do not support when you are not prepared to provide support for an alternative view.

When did I claim 'factual evidence'?  There is NO program of rape of Muslim women and no program of oppression of Muslims here...

HERE!  You find the contrary... google rape of muslim women in australia and all you get is rape of Australian women by Muslims....

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=rape+of+muslim+women+in+australia&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b&gfe_rd=cr&dcr=0&ei=xSPeWf28MM_N8geK0oigDA

That tells it all... now, I'm reading a Jack Reacher novel and have to be up early.  Accept reality and move on.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:02am
Are you not aware of how preposterous the comment "No Aussie man has ever raped a Muslim" is?

Like, you're utterly oblivious?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Agnes on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:06am

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:02am:
Are you not aware of how preposterous the comment "No Aussie man has ever raped a Muslim" is?

Like, you're utterly oblivious?

all you ever talk about is rape man balls- its a sign of your inner mental health- get a man ffs

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Caesar Augustus on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:10pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:56pm:

Auggie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:49pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:36pm:
but gay marriage simply is not real marriage.


Why is it not real marriage? Because it doesn't lead to the birth of children?

If you're going to play the 'traditional marriage' card, then let's look at what traditional marriage actually is. First, you only get one shot at it (unless your wife/husband dies); second, you can only have sex to get knocked up; and third, you have to have children.

That was what marriage has been defined as and was practised that way for centuries. If we're willing to allow adulterers to marry, to let second, third, or the tenth marriage be valid - picking and choosing what marriage is, then why can't we pick and choose that two same-sex couples can't get married?

What we have is modern marriage, not traditional marriage. Modern marriage is a legal institution recognising a union between two consenting adults. The principal of 'equality under the law' necessitates that same-sex marriage should be legal.

In fact, marriage is the one example where religion and the state have intersected. I agree that marriage is rooted in religion, but as I said above, there's a very strict criteria.

Second, by not letting same-sex couples marry, and having same-sex civil unions, we're essentially having a situation of 'separate but equal' (which was in place for over 60 years in America, known as the Jim Crow laws). We wouldn't (nor should we) except a separate but equal doctrine for racial segregation (even if the facilities were exactly equal in quality), no less than we should accept a separate but equal doctrine for the commitment between two consenting adults.


Marriage is defined as between a man and a woman... now if you wish to have something else, you need to call it something other than 'marriage'...... 'bonding', 'committed' (the mind boggles at committal).. but let's cut to the chase.. marriage is between a man and a woman and gays are not man and woman.

"Dearly beloved, we are gathered here in the sight of God and this assembled company, to join in Gayriage this man and this man.... Bruce, do you take Cyril as your lawfully bonded partner?"


Why?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:17pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:56pm:

Auggie wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:49pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 11th, 2017 at 11:36pm:
but gay marriage simply is not real marriage.


Why is it not real marriage? Because it doesn't lead to the birth of children?

If you're going to play the 'traditional marriage' card, then let's look at what traditional marriage actually is. First, you only get one shot at it (unless your wife/husband dies); second, you can only have sex to get knocked up; and third, you have to have children.

That was what marriage has been defined as and was practised that way for centuries. If we're willing to allow adulterers to marry, to let second, third, or the tenth marriage be valid - picking and choosing what marriage is, then why can't we pick and choose that two same-sex couples can't get married?

What we have is modern marriage, not traditional marriage. Modern marriage is a legal institution recognising a union between two consenting adults. The principal of 'equality under the law' necessitates that same-sex marriage should be legal.

In fact, marriage is the one example where religion and the state have intersected. I agree that marriage is rooted in religion, but as I said above, there's a very strict criteria.

Second, by not letting same-sex couples marry, and having same-sex civil unions, we're essentially having a situation of 'separate but equal' (which was in place for over 60 years in America, known as the Jim Crow laws). We wouldn't (nor should we) except a separate but equal doctrine for racial segregation (even if the facilities were exactly equal in quality), no less than we should accept a separate but equal doctrine for the commitment between two consenting adults.


Marriage is defined as between a man and a woman... now if you wish to have something else, you need to call it something other than 'marriage'......


Why is that?


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:25pm

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus... 


Incorrect.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:26pm
Ah no it is not gweggy

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:37pm

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:26pm:
Ah no it is not gweggy


Oh, it most certainly is.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:44pm

Agnes wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:06am:

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:02am:
Are you not aware of how preposterous the comment "No Aussie man has ever raped a Muslim" is?

Like, you're utterly oblivious?

all you ever talk about is rape man balls- its a sign of your inner mental health- get a man ffs



speaking of mental health ....................... ::) ::) ::) ::)

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:44pm
Got nothing eh gweggy... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:10pm

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:44pm:
Got nothing eh gweggy...


Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?


That's correct - you have nothing.

It has not been that way for thousands of years.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:33pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:10pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:44pm:
Got nothing eh gweggy...


Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?


That's correct - you have nothing.

It has not been that way for thousands of years.




so how many years then pet.... you never said...


dont tell the aboriginals   your findings will you?..shhhhh



Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:36pm

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:10pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:44pm:
Got nothing eh gweggy...


Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?


That's correct - you have nothing.

It has not been that way for thousands of years.




so how many years then pet.... you never said...


Zero.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:38pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:36pm:

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:10pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:44pm:
Got nothing eh gweggy...


Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?


That's correct - you have nothing.

It has not been that way for thousands of years.




so how many years then pet.... you never said...


Zero.



so if man and women havnt been making babies..

who has..???..  :o :o :o :o

what do you know the rest of us dont????.. WOW...

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:40pm

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:38pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:36pm:

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:10pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:44pm:
Got nothing eh gweggy...


Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?


That's correct - you have nothing.

It has not been that way for thousands of years.




so how many years then pet.... you never said...


Zero.



so if man and women havnt been making babies..

who has..???..  :o :o :o :o

what do you know the rest of us dont????.. WOW...


Nobody said that, cods.

I suggest you scroll back and see what's being discussed.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Caesar Augustus on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:03pm

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?


Ok, so for the umpteenth time, what if they don't create families, is it still marriage?

Also, people can have children without getting married, can't they?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:24pm

Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:03pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?


Ok, so for the umpteenth time, what if they don't create families, is it still marriage?

Also, people can have children without getting married, can't they?

YOU are an idiot....  can't refute what I said...  go away and take your ludicrous strawmen with you.

Gweggy is busy shooting himself in the foot and avoiding reality.  Soon he'll be just like you. :D :D :D :D :D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Caesar Augustus on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:25pm
Here's an interesting article from ABC. It states that childless families will be the norm in the future. So, if the majority of marriages aren't producing children then what's the actually purpose of marriage?

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-05-15/childless-households-on-the-rise/8528546

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Caesar Augustus on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:26pm

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:24pm:

Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:03pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?


Ok, so for the umpteenth time, what if they don't create families, is it still marriage?

Also, people can have children without getting married, can't they?

YOU are an idiot....  can't refute what I said...  go away and take your ludicrous strawmen with you.

Gweggy is busy shooting himself in the foot and avoiding reality.  Soon he'll be just like you. :D :D :D :D :D


G, you say that marriage is about multiplying and having children, therefore if the couple don't have children, is that considered still a marriage? Should we annul a marriage that doesn't produce children?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:28pm
I suggest you read The HISTORY of MARRIAGE and you may (but I doubt it) just learn something.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:29pm

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:28pm:
I suggest you read The HISTORY of MARRIAGE and you may (but I doubt it) just learn something.


Yes.

He'll learn that marriage has not always been only between a man and a woman.

And, that it's not only for having children.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:33pm

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:28pm:
I suggest you read The HISTORY of MARRIAGE and you may (but I doubt it) just learn something.


the history of marriage even has brothers marrying their sisters

is that what you are advocating goose? you got a thing for your sister?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Aussie on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:33pm

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:28pm:
I suggest you read The HISTORY of MARRIAGE and you may (but I doubt it) just learn something.


Why....s/he is here just dealing with disposing of your arguments and do a great job as well.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Caesar Augustus on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:33pm

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:28pm:
I suggest you read The HISTORY of MARRIAGE and you may (but I doubt it) just learn something.


The history of marriage for over 1000 years has been:

1) you only get one bit of the cherry

2) sex that doesn't resulted in being knocked up is no t appropriate

3) marriage must produce children

4) divorce is not permissible.

Marry cannot be separated from from the Judeo-Christian tradition, if you want to take it to its full logic. You're just picking and choosing what you think marriage is.

We haven't had traditional marriage for over 50 years. Less and less married couples are having children.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:35pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:33pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:28pm:
I suggest you read The HISTORY of MARRIAGE and you may (but I doubt it) just learn something.


the history of marriage even has brothers marrying their sisters

is that what you are advocating goose? you got a thing for your sister?


Sounds relatively boring.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Karnal on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:37pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:33pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:28pm:
I suggest you read The HISTORY of MARRIAGE and you may (but I doubt it) just learn something.


the history of marriage even has brothers marrying their sisters

is that what you are advocating goose? you got a thing for your sister?


And why not? Marriage hasn't changed for thousands of years. Why should we change it now?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Neferti on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:29pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:28pm:
I suggest you read The HISTORY of MARRIAGE and you may (but I doubt it) just learn something.


Yes.

He'll learn that marriage has not always been only between a man and a woman.

And, that it's not only for having children.


Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.

Marriage was to "legalise" a relationship and to protect the children from being "bastards" ... in God's eyes.

Sex has always been sex! You don't need to be married to do it.  ;)

"Marriage" has never, ever been between anybody BUT a MAN and a WOMAN.

Undoubtedly, there has always been men who preferred men to have sex with, or even a bit "both ways",  as much as there has always been men who prefer children to have sex with. There has probably been men who prefer to have sex with their pet goat, sheep, dog or whatever, as well.

Regardless, I wish the Homosexuals a Great Wedding (and a Divorce when they want to call it quits). They will get what they asked for!  ;D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:48pm

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
"Marriage" has never, ever been between anybody BUT a MAN and a WOMAN.


Incorrect.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:50pm

Here you go:

The claim: Tony Abbott says marriage, or marriage-like relationships, have always been between a man and a woman.

The verdict: A significant body of academic work shows that marriage and "other solemnised relationships" have not always been between "a man and a woman".

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Caesar Augustus on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:54pm

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:29pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:28pm:
I suggest you read The HISTORY of MARRIAGE and you may (but I doubt it) just learn something.


Yes.

He'll learn that marriage has not always been only between a man and a woman.

And, that it's not only for having children.


Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.

Marriage was to "legalise" a relationship and to protect the children from being "bastards" ... in God's eyes.

Sex has always been sex! You don't need to be married to do it.  ;)

"Marriage" has never, ever been between anybody BUT a MAN and a WOMAN.

Undoubtedly, there has always been men who preferred men to have sex with, or even a bit "both ways",  as much as there has always been men who prefer children to have sex with. There has probably been men who prefer to have sex with their pet goat, sheep, dog or whatever, as well.

Regardless, I wish the Homosexuals a Great Wedding (and a Divorce when they want to call it quits). They will get what they asked for!  ;D


'In God's eyes'?

That then means that you only get one bite at the cherry; sex for pleasure is a sin; and you can't divorce.

I will support this restrictive interpretation of marriage if you will?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Karnal on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:55pm

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Well yes, Mr Howard might have changed that, but it was supported by the leftards, you know.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:57pm

"Roman Emperor Nero was married to not one man, but two. His nuptials were recorded and discussed at the time between subjects - friendly and hostile.

"The detail is recorded in the 1999 book Roman Homosexuality (updated in 2012) by Craig Williams, a classics professor of Brooklyn College, New York.

"The book includes a chapter on marriage between men, practiced throughout the empire, all the way to the top."

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:58pm

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:55pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Well yes, Mr Howard might have changed that, but it was supported by the leftards, you know.



It's probably all part of the Marxist plot. Division  of the people so as to ultimately blame on the bourgeoisie. With the help of the universities, the ABC and fake news.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Karnal on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:59pm

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:58pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:55pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Well yes, Mr Howard might have changed that, but it was supported by the leftards, you know.



It's probably all part of the Marxist plot. Division  of the people so as to ultimately blame on the bourgeoisie. With the help of the ABC and fake news.


"Progressives". Typical.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Neferti on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:00pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
"Marriage" has never, ever been between anybody BUT a MAN and a WOMAN.


Incorrect.


OK, I shall give you that BUT it always WAS between a man and a woman UNTIL the Homosexuals and their tag team (you & Co) started carrying on about it.

I don't care. NOBODY cares. Don't you get it?

Now Britain is starting to worry about "property" and so forth with their new Marriage Law.  At least Australia did it first ... change the "spouse" laws to apply to ALL couples, married or otherwise.  Y.A.W.N.

I can't wait for the Fat Lady to Sing!

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Neferti on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:01pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



Where?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:02pm

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
"Marriage" has never, ever been between anybody BUT a MAN and a WOMAN.


Incorrect.


OK, I shall give you that BUT it always WAS between a man and a woman UNTIL the Homosexuals and their tag team (you & Co) started carrying on about it.

I don't care. NOBODY cares. Don't you get it?

Now Britain is starting to worry about "property" and so forth with their new Marriage Law.  At least Australia did it first ... change the "spouse" laws to apply to ALL couples, married or otherwise.  Y.A.W.N.

I can't wait for the Fat Lady to Sing!


Yes, it's only a recent thing   ;D

"Roman Emperor Nero was married to not one man, but two. His nuptials were recorded and discussed at the time between subjects - friendly and hostile. The detail is recorded in the 1999 book Roman Homosexuality (updated in 2012) by Craig Williams, a classics professor of Brooklyn College, New York. The book includes a chapter on marriage between men, practiced throughout the empire, all the way to the top."

http://www.abc.net.au/news/factcheck/2013-11-01/tony-abbott-incorrect-history-marriage/5053844

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Neferti on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:05pm

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


A significant body of academic work shows that marriage and "other solemnised relationships" have not always been between "a man and a woman".

A Link.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:06pm

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


How many times do you people need it typed out?

Seriously?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Neferti on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:16pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:02pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
"Marriage" has never, ever been between anybody BUT a MAN and a WOMAN.


Incorrect.


OK, I shall give you that BUT it always WAS between a man and a woman UNTIL the Homosexuals and their tag team (you & Co) started carrying on about it.

I don't care. NOBODY cares. Don't you get it?

Now Britain is starting to worry about "property" and so forth with their new Marriage Law.  At least Australia did it first ... change the "spouse" laws to apply to ALL couples, married or otherwise.  Y.A.W.N.

I can't wait for the Fat Lady to Sing!


Yes, it's only a recent thing   ;D

"Roman Emperor Nero was married to not one man, but two. His nuptials were recorded and discussed at the time between subjects - friendly and hostile. The detail is recorded in the 1999 book Roman Homosexuality (updated in 2012) by Craig Williams, a classics professor of Brooklyn College, New York. The book includes a chapter on marriage between men, practiced throughout the empire, all the way to the top."


Wikipedia ....  ;D ;D ;D ;D Anybody can post there and change posts.

Since Nero was  born around AD 37, those tablets by various in the MI when Jesus was born as a Jew .......  it all sounds like bullshit to me, to me ....

It is obvious that some rampant homosexual is trying the change HISTORY .... how the hell would Craig Williams KNOW what was going on in AD67 or whatever  ... s.p.e.c.u.l.a.t.i.o.n.

NOBODY knows. Get it?

Besides when the Homosexuals can get married in Australia, they will have to fork out the exorbitant Legal fees that Divorce Lawyers ...

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Neferti on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:19pm

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:06pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


How many times do you people need it typed out?

Seriously?


;)

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:19pm

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:02pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
"Marriage" has never, ever been between anybody BUT a MAN and a WOMAN.


Incorrect.


OK, I shall give you that BUT it always WAS between a man and a woman UNTIL the Homosexuals and their tag team (you & Co) started carrying on about it.

I don't care. NOBODY cares. Don't you get it?

Now Britain is starting to worry about "property" and so forth with their new Marriage Law.  At least Australia did it first ... change the "spouse" laws to apply to ALL couples, married or otherwise.  Y.A.W.N.

I can't wait for the Fat Lady to Sing!


Yes, it's only a recent thing   ;D

"Roman Emperor Nero was married to not one man, but two. His nuptials were recorded and discussed at the time between subjects - friendly and hostile. The detail is recorded in the 1999 book Roman Homosexuality (updated in 2012) by Craig Williams, a classics professor of Brooklyn College, New York. The book includes a chapter on marriage between men, practiced throughout the empire, all the way to the top."


Wikipedia .... 


No. Not Wikipedia.

Do you have a problem with your eyes?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:21pm

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:16pm:
.......  it all sounds like bullshit to me, to me ....


Of course it does - you're an uneducated fool.

Unlike the person who wrote the book, who is a classics professor at Brooklyn College, New York.

Who to believe: classic professor, or internet troll?   :-/

Tough decision.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by mothra on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:24pm

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:19pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:06pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


How many times do you people need it typed out?

Seriously?


;)


Oh. You're just trolling. You have already read the countless examples of the diversity in marriage over the ages.

Or do you still think it's just for nice white people from proper churches?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Neferti on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:24pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:19pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:02pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
"Marriage" has never, ever been between anybody BUT a MAN and a WOMAN.


Incorrect.


OK, I shall give you that BUT it always WAS between a man and a woman UNTIL the Homosexuals and their tag team (you & Co) started carrying on about it.

I don't care. NOBODY cares. Don't you get it?

Now Britain is starting to worry about "property" and so forth with their new Marriage Law.  At least Australia did it first ... change the "spouse" laws to apply to ALL couples, married or otherwise.  Y.A.W.N.

I can't wait for the Fat Lady to Sing!


Yes, it's only a recent thing   ;D

"Roman Emperor Nero was married to not one man, but two. His nuptials were recorded and discussed at the time between subjects - friendly and hostile. The detail is recorded in the 1999 book Roman Homosexuality (updated in 2012) by Craig Williams, a classics professor of Brooklyn College, New York. The book includes a chapter on marriage between men, practiced throughout the empire, all the way to the top."


Wikipedia .... 


No. Not Wikipedia.

Do you have a problem with your eyes?


No, do you?

I think you have a problem with your sexual feelings ... go on, TRY it.

you might even like "BEING IN SEX" WITH A MAN .....

Just leave the children and the animals alone ... that is very, very GROSS .... and illegal. ;)


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:24pm

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:19pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:02pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
"Marriage" has never, ever been between anybody BUT a MAN and a WOMAN.


Incorrect.


OK, I shall give you that BUT it always WAS between a man and a woman UNTIL the Homosexuals and their tag team (you & Co) started carrying on about it.

I don't care. NOBODY cares. Don't you get it?

Now Britain is starting to worry about "property" and so forth with their new Marriage Law.  At least Australia did it first ... change the "spouse" laws to apply to ALL couples, married or otherwise.  Y.A.W.N.

I can't wait for the Fat Lady to Sing!


Yes, it's only a recent thing   ;D

"Roman Emperor Nero was married to not one man, but two. His nuptials were recorded and discussed at the time between subjects - friendly and hostile. The detail is recorded in the 1999 book Roman Homosexuality (updated in 2012) by Craig Williams, a classics professor of Brooklyn College, New York. The book includes a chapter on marriage between men, practiced throughout the empire, all the way to the top."


Wikipedia .... 


No. Not Wikipedia.

Do you have a problem with your eyes?


No,


Then why did you mention Wikipedia?


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:26pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:40pm:

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:38pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:36pm:

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:10pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:44pm:
Got nothing eh gweggy...


Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?


That's correct - you have nothing.

It has not been that way for thousands of years.




so how many years then pet.... you never said...


Zero.



so if man and women havnt been making babies..

who has..???..  :o :o :o :o

what do you know the rest of us dont????.. WOW...


Nobody said that, cods.

I suggest you scroll back and see what's being discussed.



I suggest you read the bit above which is what you replied too.. >:( in red.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:29pm

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:26pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:40pm:

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:38pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:36pm:

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:10pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:44pm:
Got nothing eh gweggy...


Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?


That's correct - you have nothing.

It has not been that way for thousands of years.




so how many years then pet.... you never said...


Zero.



so if man and women havnt been making babies..

who has..???..  :o :o :o :o

what do you know the rest of us dont????.. WOW...


Nobody said that, cods.

I suggest you scroll back and see what's being discussed.



I suggest you read the bit above which is what you replied too.. >:( in red.


No.

Scroll back further.

I'm not replying to that.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:47pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:05pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


A significant body of academic work shows that marriage and "other solemnised relationships" have not always been between "a man and a woman".

A Link.



omg... well you do read some weird stuff..

as we are talking about marriage   as we know it.. or thought we did.. ::)

can we see some of the registrations of these homosexual marriages that took place hundreds of years ago... I am not disputing homosexuality in Roman times ..but we all know Nero was depraved  as many of them were...and mock ceremonies do not make a marriage..

unless you are gweg that is.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:48pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:29pm:

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:26pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:40pm:

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:38pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:36pm:

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:10pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:44pm:
Got nothing eh gweggy...


Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?


That's correct - you have nothing.

It has not been that way for thousands of years.




so how many years then pet.... you never said...


Zero.



so if man and women havnt been making babies..

who has..???..  :o :o :o :o

what do you know the rest of us dont????.. WOW...


Nobody said that, cods.

I suggest you scroll back and see what's being discussed.



I suggest you read the bit above which is what you replied too.. >:( in red.


No.

Scroll back further.

I'm not replying to that.



well I did.. and as far as I am concerned so did you?..


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Ye Grappler on Oct 12th, 2017 at 6:13pm

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:05pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


A significant body of academic work shows that marriage and "other solemnised relationships" have not always been between "a man and a woman".

A Link.


omg... well you do read some weird stuff..

as we are talking about marriage   as we know it.. or thought we did.. ::)

can we see some of the registrations of these homosexual marriages that took place hundreds of years ago... I am not disputing homosexuality in Roman times ..but we all know Nero was depraved  as many of them were...and mock ceremonies do not make a marriage..

unless you are gweg that is.



Aye - and that's always been oddities and transgressions and has subsequently been stamped out... thank you for coming.  I read the links thanks, and it clearly shows that 'some' homosexual priests etc carried out homosexual marriages, but that practice was outlawed fifteen or sixteen hundred years ago... you are not permitted to cite illegal acts by some rogue priests that may have occurred subsequently.  Part of the reason for the attacks on the Templars, centuries later, was that they were cited as being homosexuals.... and thus agin the nature of Man and of God!!!

This kind of nonsense is like arguing with the 'feminist' minded about the suffragettes - who, by their violent and illegal and irresponsible actions, actually delayed the vote for women in Britain for twenty years after it was granted by majority vote under the first vote employing universal male suffrage in 1900 in Australia.

MEN gave women the vote in this nation at the first possible opportunity - MEN delayed it for twenty years in Britain due to the activities of suffragettes.

There is a lesson there for those who wish to learn properly and stop listening to the voices they think are from the Oracles.

Round 2:-  "actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church "

Indeed - but it was always solemnised by priests or heads of tribes or whatever.... just because one specific brand of religion adopted it and applied their own rules to it makes not one jot of difference.  Attacking some amorphous 'church' has no meaning whatsoever in the discussion of marriage.

Now - when you talk about 'the church' - what exactly 'church' do you mean?



Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 12th, 2017 at 6:27pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 6:13pm:

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:05pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


A significant body of academic work shows that marriage and "other solemnised relationships" have not always been between "a man and a woman".

A Link.


omg... well you do read some weird stuff..

as we are talking about marriage   as we know it.. or thought we did.. ::)

can we see some of the registrations of these homosexual marriages that took place hundreds of years ago... I am not disputing homosexuality in Roman times ..but we all know Nero was depraved  as many of them were...and mock ceremonies do not make a marriage..

unless you are gweg that is.



Aye - and that's always been oddities and transgressions and has subsequently been stamped out... thank you for coming.  I read the links thanks, and it clearly shows that 'some' homosexual priests etc carried out homosexual marriages, but that practice was outlawed fifteen or sixteen hundred years ago... you are not permitted to cite illegal acts by some rogue priests that may have occurred subsequently.  Part of the reason for the attacks on the Templars, centuries later, was that they were cited as being homosexuals.... and thus agin the nature of Man and of God!!!

This kind of nonsense is like arguing with the 'feminist' minded about the suffragettes - who, by their violent and illegal and irresponsible actions, actually delayed the vote for women in Britain for twenty years after it was granted by majority vote under the first vote employing universal male suffrage in 1900 in Australia.

MEN gave women the vote in this nation at the first possible opportunity - MEN delayed it for twenty years in Britain due to the activities of suffragettes.

There is a lesson there for those who wish to learn properly and stop listening to the voices they think are from the Oracles.

Round 2:-  "actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church "

Indeed - but it was always solemnised by priests or heads of tribes or whatever.... just because one specific brand of religion adopted it and applied their own rules to it makes not one jot of difference.  Attacking some amorphous 'church' has no meaning whatsoever in the discussion of marriage.

Now - when you talk about 'the church' - what exactly 'church' do you mean?



I prefer to go by the recorded register of marriages....

to me thats when it all became legitimised....

until then anyone could say or write anything  none could dispute it could they?

Nero has been given credit for lots of things even burning Rome.. however its all based on rumours...

and seriously thats almost all they had in those times..

very few were privy to, the happenings  in the courts..

but the stories would have been scandalous...

worse than today when everything is on video.. ;D ;D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 12th, 2017 at 7:30pm

Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:26pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:24pm:

Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:03pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?


Ok, so for the umpteenth time, what if they don't create families, is it still marriage?

Also, people can have children without getting married, can't they?

YOU are an idiot....  can't refute what I said...  go away and take your ludicrous strawmen with you.

Gweggy is busy shooting himself in the foot and avoiding reality.  Soon he'll be just like you. :D :D :D :D :D


G, you say that marriage is about multiplying and having children, therefore if the couple don't have children, is that considered still a marriage? Should we annul a marriage that doesn't produce children?

Actually I've said  marriage is about many things Auggie...  no need to create more lies about what I say.
You'll be taking gweggy's place doing that sort of thing. :D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 12th, 2017 at 7:35pm
Don't worry about gweggy he's wrong and a liar and being disingenous as usual.
he created another strawman which doesn't address what I actually said.
Don't waste your time with him he's as stupid as Auggie.
Aren't ya gweggy.
Nero married a man...  ta da...  well there you have it, 1 exception to the rule negates the billions that don't.

Pull the other one gweggy. :D :D :D :D :D :D

Thousands of years and billions of people gweggy...  the trend and norm has been set...  you lose. :D :D :D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Aussie on Oct 12th, 2017 at 7:38pm

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 7:30pm:

Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:26pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:24pm:

Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:03pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?


Ok, so for the umpteenth time, what if they don't create families, is it still marriage?

Also, people can have children without getting married, can't they?

YOU are an idiot....  can't refute what I said...  go away and take your ludicrous strawmen with you.

Gweggy is busy shooting himself in the foot and avoiding reality.  Soon he'll be just like you. :D :D :D :D :D


G, you say that marriage is about multiplying and having children, therefore if the couple don't have children, is that considered still a marriage? Should we annul a marriage that doesn't produce children?

Actually I've said  marriage is about many things Auggie...  no need to create more lies about what I say.
You'll be taking gweggy's place doing that sort of thing. :D


Yes you have said marriage is about many things, Grendel. 

Caesar has not lied at all.  S/he is, one by one, tearing your 'many things' apart.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 12th, 2017 at 7:39pm

A significant body of academic work shows that marriage and "other solemnised relationships" have not always been between "a man and a woman".


Or, you can believe the Goose     ;D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Caesar Augustus on Oct 12th, 2017 at 7:59pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:57pm:
"Roman Emperor Nero was married to not one man, but two. His nuptials were recorded and discussed at the time between subjects - friendly and hostile.

"The detail is recorded in the 1999 book Roman Homosexuality (updated in 2012) by Craig Williams, a classics professor of Brooklyn College, New York.

"The book includes a chapter on marriage between men, practiced throughout the empire, all the way to the top."


Wow great bit of info.

Cheers for that.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Caesar Augustus on Oct 12th, 2017 at 8:08pm

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:05pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


A significant body of academic work shows that marriage and "other solemnised relationships" have not always been between "a man and a woman".

A Link.



omg... well you do read some weird stuff..

as we are talking about marriage   as we know it.. or thought we did.. ::)

can we see some of the registrations of these homosexual marriages that took place hundreds of years ago... I am not disputing homosexuality in Roman times ..but we all know Nero was depraved  as many of them were...and mock ceremonies do not make a marriage..

unless you are gweg that is.


Perhaps you can answer this question: if a marriage does not result in children, is the marriage valid?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Caesar Augustus on Oct 12th, 2017 at 8:11pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 6:13pm:

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:05pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


A significant body of academic work shows that marriage and "other solemnised relationships" have not always been between "a man and a woman".

A Link.


omg... well you do read some weird stuff..

as we are talking about marriage   as we know it.. or thought we did.. ::)

can we see some of the registrations of these homosexual marriages that took place hundreds of years ago... I am not disputing homosexuality in Roman times ..but we all know Nero was depraved  as many of them were...and mock ceremonies do not make a marriage..

unless you are gweg that is.



Aye - and that's always been oddities and transgressions and has subsequently been stamped out... thank you for coming.  I read the links thanks, and it clearly shows that 'some' homosexual priests etc carried out homosexual marriages, but that practice was outlawed fifteen or sixteen hundred years ago... you are not permitted to cite illegal acts by some rogue priests that may have occurred subsequently.  Part of the reason for the attacks on the Templars, centuries later, was that they were cited as being homosexuals.... and thus agin the nature of Man and of God!!!

This kind of nonsense is like arguing with the 'feminist' minded about the suffragettes - who, by their violent and illegal and irresponsible actions, actually delayed the vote for women in Britain for twenty years after it was granted by majority vote under the first vote employing universal male suffrage in 1900 in Australia.

MEN gave women the vote in this nation at the first possible opportunity - MEN delayed it for twenty years in Britain due to the activities of suffragettes.

There is a lesson there for those who wish to learn properly and stop listening to the voices they think are from the Oracles.

Round 2:-  "actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church "

Indeed - but it was always solemnised by priests or heads of tribes or whatever.... just because one specific brand of religion adopted it and applied their own rules to it makes not one jot of difference.  Attacking some amorphous 'church' has no meaning whatsoever in the discussion of marriage.

Now - when you talk about 'the church' - what exactly 'church' do you mean?


So you concede that marriage is rooted in religion? If so, we should also outlaw divorce? Frankly I don't think people should be married for a second time just because of 'irreconcilable differences'. Marriage is sacred. You only get one bite at the cherry.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Karnal on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:03pm
We know now that marriages were originally between a man and his men or livestock. His shrews came later.

Why did Mr Howard change this?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:08pm
The union between men and women has been around for thousands of years and by billions of people...


Wassup...  can't deny it...  of course you cant.

What is the trend?
What is the norm?
Where did all those people come from all those years ago?
Where are they coming from now?

You people and especially gweggy and Auggie are a joke. :D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:10pm

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:03pm:
We know now that marriages were originally between a man and his men or livestock. His shrews came later.

Why did Mr Howard change this?



what did Mr Howard change karmel?....

had he  known what your mum and dad produced  he would have said.. marriage is between man and man only...

men produce the sex gene...

ye gods and they cant get that right...they have had enough chances...now they deserve each other.....

lets see what mess that can make of that arrangement.. :) :)... and it will keep the left male population down...no more brutal CFMEU nazis..

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Karnal on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:12pm
Greggery has just comprehensively proven that gay marriage and beastiality preceded the marriage of breeders.

Looks like gay marriage is just turning back the cock after all.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:13pm

Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 8:08pm:

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:05pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


A significant body of academic work shows that marriage and "other solemnised relationships" have not always been between "a man and a woman".

A Link.



omg... well you do read some weird stuff..

as we are talking about marriage   as we know it.. or thought we did.. ::)

can we see some of the registrations of these homosexual marriages that took place hundreds of years ago... I am not disputing homosexuality in Roman times ..but we all know Nero was depraved  as many of them were...and mock ceremonies do not make a marriage..

unless you are gweg that is.


Perhaps you can answer this question: if a marriage does not result in children, is the marriage valid?



if its registered ... yes indeedy...it isnt compulsory to produce children....but it is/was   the plan...

I know a few people who have never been able to conceive and  its broken their hearts.....so to steal their marriage for what ever purpose you have in mind.....

is pathetic..

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:16pm

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:12pm:
Greggery has just comprehensively proven that gay marriage and beastiality preceded the marriage of breeders.

Looks like gay marriage is just turning back the cock after all.




gweg is an authority  on everything anal... defy him at your peril..one clap and you go   poof!!!!!!!!!!!

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Karnal on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:18pm

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:13pm:

Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 8:08pm:

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:05pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


A significant body of academic work shows that marriage and "other solemnised relationships" have not always been between "a man and a woman".

A Link.



omg... well you do read some weird stuff..

as we are talking about marriage   as we know it.. or thought we did.. ::)

can we see some of the registrations of these homosexual marriages that took place hundreds of years ago... I am not disputing homosexuality in Roman times ..but we all know Nero was depraved  as many of them were...and mock ceremonies do not make a marriage..

unless you are gweg that is.


Perhaps you can answer this question: if a marriage does not result in children, is the marriage valid?



if its registered ... yes indeedy...it isnt compulsory to produce children....but it is/was   the plan...

I know a few people who have never been able to conceive and  its broken their hearts.....so to steal their marriage for what ever purpose you have in mind.....

is pathetic..


I say, dear, were they gay?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Caesar Augustus on Oct 12th, 2017 at 10:34pm

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:13pm:

Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 8:08pm:

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:05pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


A significant body of academic work shows that marriage and "other solemnised relationships" have not always been between "a man and a woman".

A Link.



omg... well you do read some weird stuff..

as we are talking about marriage   as we know it.. or thought we did.. ::)

can we see some of the registrations of these homosexual marriages that took place hundreds of years ago... I am not disputing homosexuality in Roman times ..but we all know Nero was depraved  as many of them were...and mock ceremonies do not make a marriage..

unless you are gweg that is.


Perhaps you can answer this question: if a marriage does not result in children, is the marriage valid?



if its registered ... yes indeedy...it isnt compulsory to produce children....but it is/was   the plan...

I know a few people who have never been able to conceive and  its broken their hearts.....so to steal their marriage for what ever purpose you have in mind.....

is pathetic..


Not being able to have children and choosing not to have them is completely different.

I was referring to the latter

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Caesar Augustus on Oct 12th, 2017 at 10:37pm

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:08pm:
The union between men and women has been around for thousands of years and by billions of people...


Wassup...  can't deny it...  of course you cant.

What is the trend?
What is the norm?
Where did all those people come from all those years ago?
Where are they coming from now?

You people and especially gweggy and Auggie are a joke. :D


Slavery had been practised for thousands of years and by billions of people...

Wassup... can't deny it.... of course you can't.

What is the trend?
What is the norm?
Where did all those slaves come from all those years ago?
Why aren't they there now?

Because society changes....

You people and Soren have no idea.  :D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Frank on Oct 12th, 2017 at 10:42pm

Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 10:37pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:08pm:
The union between men and women has been around for thousands of years and by billions of people...


Wassup...  can't deny it...  of course you cant.

What is the trend?
What is the norm?
Where did all those people come from all those years ago?
Where are they coming from now?

You people and especially gweggy and Auggie are a joke. :D


Slavery had been practised for thousands of years and by billions of people...

Wassup... can't deny it.... of course you can't.

What is the trend?
What is the norm?
Where did all those slaves come from all those years ago?
Why aren't they there now?

Because society changes....

You people and Soren have no idea.  :D

:D


So if two blokes can't marry then it's  like slavery!!

You are all out of your minds - assuming you had any to be out of. I doubt it. 


Not very change is good, not every diversity is positive, not every fashion is to be embraced. Progress is not in itself a good. Bad things progress.

You have to be discerning. Jumping on bandwagon is stupid.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 12th, 2017 at 11:14pm

Frank wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 10:42pm:
So if two blokes can't marry then it's  like slavery!!


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Caesar Augustus on Oct 12th, 2017 at 11:22pm

Frank wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 10:42pm:

Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 10:37pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:08pm:
The union between men and women has been around for thousands of years and by billions of people...


Wassup...  can't deny it...  of course you cant.

What is the trend?
What is the norm?
Where did all those people come from all those years ago?
Where are they coming from now?

You people and especially gweggy and Auggie are a joke. :D


Slavery had been practised for thousands of years and by billions of people...

Wassup... can't deny it.... of course you can't.

What is the trend?
What is the norm?
Where did all those slaves come from all those years ago?
Why aren't they there now?

Because society changes....

You people and Soren have no idea.  :D

:D


So if two blokes can't marry then it's  like slavery!!

You are all out of your minds - assuming you had any to be out of. I doubt it. 


Not very change is good, not every diversity is positive, not every fashion is to be embraced. Progress is not in itself a good. Bad things progress.

You have to be discerning. Jumping on bandwagon is stupid.


So, when we actually practised traditional marriage for over 1000 years as you claim, society was really great, wasn't it!? Traditional marriage didn't stop 2 world wars, did it?

I can thankfully say that our society has progressed very well compared with 100 years ago.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Valkie on Oct 13th, 2017 at 4:58pm

Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 11:22pm:

Frank wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 10:42pm:

Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 10:37pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:08pm:
The union between men and women has been around for thousands of years and by billions of people...


Wassup...  can't deny it...  of course you cant.

What is the trend?
What is the norm?
Where did all those people come from all those years ago?
Where are they coming from now?

You people and especially gweggy and Auggie are a joke. :D


Slavery had been practised for thousands of years and by billions of people...

Wassup... can't deny it.... of course you can't.

What is the trend?
What is the norm?
Where did all those slaves come from all those years ago?
Why aren't they there now?

Because society changes....

You people and Soren have no idea.  :D

:D


So if two blokes can't marry then it's  like slavery!!

You are all out of your minds - assuming you had any to be out of. I doubt it. 


Not very change is good, not every diversity is positive, not every fashion is to be embraced. Progress is not in itself a good. Bad things progress.

You have to be discerning. Jumping on bandwagon is stupid.


So, when we actually practised traditional marriage for over 1000 years as you claim, society was really great, wasn't it!? Traditional marriage didn't stop 2 world wars, did it?

I can thankfully say that our society has progressed very well compared with 100 years ago.


Yeah
We are just soooooooo much better off
Less tha 0.001% of the population own 99% of the money.

Institutions rob the poor to pay tge rich

Sick mentally ill sexual deviates try to make the other 97% of the population think that they have to accept this deviation as normal
It is not.

Aids was rampant, and what section of society was the primary offender.
Now its all sorts of other STDs being spread by the deviates.

People are less secure than they were 100 years ago
People have less control and are more controlled by the grubberment than EVER.

SOCIETY IS GETTING SICKER
THIS SSM RUBBISH IS ONLY MAKING IT WORSE

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Brian Ross on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:04pm


Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Move along folks, nothing of interest here, just Valkie drinking too much and displaying his crass ignorance.  Tsk, tsk.   ::)

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:04pm

Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 10:34pm:

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 9:13pm:

Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 8:08pm:

cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:05pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


A significant body of academic work shows that marriage and "other solemnised relationships" have not always been between "a man and a woman".

A Link.



omg... well you do read some weird stuff..

as we are talking about marriage   as we know it.. or thought we did.. ::)

can we see some of the registrations of these homosexual marriages that took place hundreds of years ago... I am not disputing homosexuality in Roman times ..but we all know Nero was depraved  as many of them were...and mock ceremonies do not make a marriage..

unless you are gweg that is.


Perhaps you can answer this question: if a marriage does not result in children, is the marriage valid?



if its registered ... yes indeedy...it isnt compulsory to produce children....but it is/was   the plan...

I know a few people who have never been able to conceive and  its broken their hearts.....so to steal their marriage for what ever purpose you have in mind.....

is pathetic..


Not being able to have children and choosing not to have them is completely different.

I was referring to the latter



the end is the same ..

legal marriage is just a piece of paper   has no bearing on what you produce....even if its a divorce....

in 2017    I think we have  well most of us   have grown up...and realise that piece of paper does not make a union perfect...

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:06pm

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:04pm:


Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Move along folks, nothing of interest here, just Valkie drinking too much and displaying his crass ignorance.  Tsk, tsk.   ::)



dearie dearie me.. why does this crass boring twat keep popping in.


  has fd got a malfunction in the website?????

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Brian Ross on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:12pm

cods wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:06pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:04pm:


Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Move along folks, nothing of interest here, just Valkie drinking too much and displaying his crass ignorance.  Tsk, tsk.   ::)


dearie dearie me.. why does this crass boring twat keep popping in.

  has fd got a malfunction in the website?????


Valkie has a right to speak, Cods.  Just like you.  However, he appears far less intelligent than you.   Keep the good work up, start thinking about what you're saying and keep off the booze, is what I recommend.    ::)

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:30pm

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:12pm:

cods wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:06pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:04pm:


Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Move along folks, nothing of interest here, just Valkie drinking too much and displaying his crass ignorance.  Tsk, tsk.   ::)


dearie dearie me.. why does this crass boring twat keep popping in.

  has fd got a malfunction in the website?????


Valkie has a right to speak, Cods.  Just like you.  However, he appears far less intelligent than you.   Keep the good work up, start thinking about what you're saying and keep off the booze, is what I recommend.    ::)



well I know you only honor us with a visit in between playing with yourself...

but seriously dont let us interrupt your other life....run along now pet.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Valkie on Oct 13th, 2017 at 6:26pm

cods wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:30pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:12pm:

cods wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:06pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:04pm:


Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Move along folks, nothing of interest here, just Valkie drinking too much and displaying his crass ignorance.  Tsk, tsk.   ::)


dearie dearie me.. why does this crass boring twat keep popping in.

  has fd got a malfunction in the website?????


Valkie has a right to speak, Cods.  Just like you.  However, he appears far less intelligent than you.   Keep the good work up, start thinking about what you're saying and keep off the booze, is what I recommend.    ::)



well I know you only honor us with a visit in between playing with yourself...

but seriously dont let us interrupt your other life....run along now pet.


Its his therapy

Remember, muzzos have limited IQs because of all the inbreeding.

Muzzos are frugal, if not smart
With their parents being their cousins, uncles, brothers and sisters
Possibly even their own kids as well
They only have to buy few presents to cover the lot.

Perhaps thats why bwyannnnnn is so taken with them???????

Or then again, maybe its simply because he is an uneducated troll
Who only has one sentence written down, by someone, and he hasnt the cerebral capacity to think of anything else?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by John Smith on Oct 13th, 2017 at 6:38pm

Valkie wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 6:26pm:
Remember, muzzos have limited IQs because of all the inbreeding.


and what's your excuse?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 13th, 2017 at 7:51pm

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:04pm:


Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Move along folks, nothing of interest here, just Valkie drinking too much and displaying his crass ignorance.  Tsk, tsk.   ::)

no no no bwian...  Auggie is confused did you read his last post? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Do you too think SSM will prevent wars bwian? :D :D :D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 13th, 2017 at 7:52pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 6:38pm:

Valkie wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 6:26pm:
Remember, muzzos have limited IQs because of all the inbreeding.


and what's your excuse?


;D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Brian Ross on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:28pm

cods wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:30pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:12pm:

cods wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:06pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:04pm:


Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Move along folks, nothing of interest here, just Valkie drinking too much and displaying his crass ignorance.  Tsk, tsk.   ::)


dearie dearie me.. why does this crass boring twat keep popping in.

  has fd got a malfunction in the website?????


Valkie has a right to speak, Cods.  Just like you.  However, he appears far less intelligent than you.   Keep the good work up, start thinking about what you're saying and keep off the booze, is what I recommend.    ::)



well I know you only honor us with a visit in between playing with yourself...

but seriously dont let us interrupt your other life....run along now pet.




Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Tsk, tsk, just move along folks, nothing of interest here, just Cods displaying her usual ad hominem insults.   ::)

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Brian Ross on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:30pm

Valkie wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 6:26pm:

cods wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:30pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:12pm:

cods wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:06pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:04pm:


Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Move along folks, nothing of interest here, just Valkie drinking too much and displaying his crass ignorance.  Tsk, tsk.   ::)


dearie dearie me.. why does this crass boring twat keep popping in.

  has fd got a malfunction in the website?????


Valkie has a right to speak, Cods.  Just like you.  However, he appears far less intelligent than you.   Keep the good work up, start thinking about what you're saying and keep off the booze, is what I recommend.    ::)



well I know you only honor us with a visit in between playing with yourself...

but seriously dont let us interrupt your other life....run along now pet.


Its his therapy

Remember, muzzos have limited IQs because of all the inbreeding.

Muzzos are frugal, if not smart
With their parents being their cousins, uncles, brothers and sisters
Possibly even their own kids as well
They only have to buy few presents to cover the lot.

Perhaps thats why bwyannnnnn is so taken with them???????

Or then again, maybe its simply because he is an uneducated troll
Who only has one sentence written down, by someone, and he hasnt the cerebral capacity to think of anything else?




Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Tsk, tsk, just move along folks, nothing of interest here, just Valkie displaying his usual Islamophobia   ::)

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Lionel Edriess on Oct 13th, 2017 at 10:04pm

I had hoped to see some relevant discussion and/or debate on the subject of racial hatred in Australia when I opened this thread.

What did I find?

The usual subjects involved in a meaningless, derogatory, offensive, ongoing tirade against opposing opinion. Par for the course, these days, and typical of the 'old days' before certain sanctions became into play. Antifa has become a power player without the wit to discover the roots of its own philosophy.

It must be the view count, there is no other reason for allowing such tag-team trolling on a debate site.

Other than certain posters taking the time to frame their replies in response to continual baiting by others, this site has become a waste of time. It would appear that there is a cadre here that cannot resist playing the old game of 'soggy biscuit'.

Small wonder that the world has degraded into what it has become.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Karnal on Oct 14th, 2017 at 10:17am

Lionel Edriess wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 10:04pm:
I had hoped to see some relevant discussion and/or debate on the subject of racial hatred in Australia when I opened this thread.

What did I find?

The usual subjects involved in a meaningless, derogatory, offensive, ongoing tirade against opposing opinion. Par for the course, these days, and typical of the 'old days' before certain sanctions became into play. Antifa has become a power player without the wit to discover the roots of its own philosophy.

It must be the view count, there is no other reason for allowing such tag-team trolling on a debate site.

Other than certain posters taking the time to frame their replies in response to continual baiting by others, this site has become a waste of time. It would appear that there is a cadre here that cannot resist playing the old game of 'soggy biscuit'.

Small wonder that the world has degraded into what it has become.


I could not agree more.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Ye Grappler on Oct 14th, 2017 at 10:22am
Simple solution - get rid of the self-styled races that make themselves worthy of hatred...... I'm sure they would be much happier back in the Old Country where they can scratch a living out of a dry and dusty patch of soil instead of copping affirmative action and all the other rorts..... give the Kangaroo Kaffirs who feel hated a reservation out back and let them chase kangaroos to their heart's content....

Oh - and re the comment below - I wouldn't say Valkie is 'less intelligent' - perhaps he has a different style and a different 'cultural' approach to issues, but that does not necessarily translate into 'less' or 'more' intelligent.

Many a politician comes across as intelligent in their well-versed way, but when you look at the results they are obviously not of a high grade of intelligence in the main... just because Valkie speaks like a 'Westie' doesn't mean he is not as intelligent.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 14th, 2017 at 10:57am
Amen to that... :)

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 14th, 2017 at 10:59am

cods wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:06pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 5:04pm:


Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Move along folks, nothing of interest here, just Valkie drinking too much and displaying his crass ignorance.  Tsk, tsk.   ::)



dearie dearie me.. why does this crass boring twat keep popping in.


  has fd got a malfunction in the website?????

yes cods...  and its called bwian...  mind you there are quite a few other sub-malfunctions trolling around too. ::)

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:00am

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 10:22am:
Simple solution -


Indeed.

Get rid of all the bigots, racists, Islamophobes, and homophobes.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:02am
Bye then gweggy...  ya bigot. :D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:09am

Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:02am:
Bye then gweggy... 


Seeya!

Don't let the door hit your fat arse on the way out.

[smiley=vrolijk_26.gif]

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Yadda on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:13am

John Smith wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 11:26am:

Mrs E is a petite woman with a cloud of brown hair, a bright smile and that empathetic personality that fits so many hairdressers for their parallel occupation of informal counsellor.

.....A client whose hair she had been cutting for 20 years came in as usual, and then, without any prompting or preamble, launched into a tirade against Muslims.

....."I'm a Muslim," she told the client




QUESTION;
Why does 'Mrs E' think and believe that it should be lawful, for her, as a moslem, to murder someone who is not a moslem ?


QUESTION;
Under those circumstances, why does 'Mrs E' think that it is OK [and not immoral] to be a moslem ?


Why does 'Mrs E' think that it is OK to be a moslem,
when mainstream ISLAMIC law teaches the moslem,
EVERY MOSLEM,
that it is lawful, to rob, rape and murder 'other persons',
.....so long as those other persons are not moslems ?

I'm not suggesting that 'Mrs E' has ever murdered anyone, nor that she 'immediately' has such an inclination in mind.

But how could any moral person, choose to belong, and to remain and belong, to a society of men, who teach, AS A FIRST PRINCIPLE, that it is lawful to rob, rape and murder 'other persons' who do not belong to your group ?



QUESTION;
Why does 'Mrs E', and other moslems, think that it is UNREASONABLE, for another Australian to DESPISE THEM, AND FEAR THEM,
when they are happy to be members of a community which is full of latent, wanna-be homicidal maniacs ?



.



ISLAMIC LAW TEXT....

"Ibn 'Umar related that the Messenger of Allah, upon whom be peace, said, "I have been ordered to kill the people until they testify that there is no god except Allah, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer and pay the zakah. If they do that, their blood and wealth are protected from me save by the rights of Islam. Their reckoning will be with Allah." (Related by al-Bukhari and Muslim.) "
fiqhussunnah/fus1_06


ISLAMIC LAW TEXT....

"Ibn 'Abbas reported that the Prophet said: "The bare essence of Islam and the basics of the religion are three [acts], upon which Islam has been established. Whoever leaves one of them becomes an unbeliever and his blood may legally be spilled. [The acts are:] Testifying that there is no God except Allah, the obligatory prayers, and the fast of Ramadan."...."
fiqhussunnah/#3.110

n.b.
"Whoever......becomes an unbeliever.....his blood may legally be spilled."



THE HADITH....

"...the Prophet said, 'If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him." - DEAD.
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #004.052.260




.




Yadda said....
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1431117115/1#1

Quote:

"every moslem in Australia is a latent, wanna-be homicidal maniac"

- Yadda



QUESTION;
What about the innocent moslems ?

IMO, [logically] there are no innocent moslems [among persons who have come to the age of consent], and yet still declare themselves to be moslems.

How so [logically] ?

QUESTION;
How credible is it that a person who is devout enough to insist that he is a moslem, is unaware of what ISLAM promotes, and is unaware of what the principle tenets of ISLAM are ?


QUESTION;
How 'innocent' is a person who agrees to give aid and comfort [and to give their own 'power'],      ...to a philosophy which transforms human beings, into homicidal maniacs ?


QUESTION;
How 'innocent' is a person who agrees to give aid and comfort [and to give their own 'power'],     ...to a philosophy which claims that murdering, in the cause of religious bigotry, is a religious virtue ?





.




Watch good 'Aussie' moslems,      practicing ISLAM      behind closed doors.....

------------- >

Muslims brainwash children in Australia  -------- >   goto 43 sec
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krk5piUzp1E


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krk5piUzp1E




.




CRIMINAL INTENT, IN THE MOSLEM HEART
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1252898491/0#0

Quote:

Every moslem in Australia [and indeed, every moslem on the planet], by self declaring as a moslem, is self declaring a criminal intent [by our laws] against local non-moslems.


ISLAM is a criminal compact among moslems, to wage a violent 'religious' war against non-moslems ['disbelievers'].


.....Basically, fundamentally, all ISLAMIC doctrine translates as enmity, and encourages [criminal] violence, towards ALL non-moslems.






Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Yadda on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:22am


"racial hatred in Australia"




p.s.
ISLAM is not a racial group.

And 'moslems' are not a racial group.


ISLAM is a murderous death cult.

And 'moslems' are the willing members of a murderous death cult.

If they were not,    then moslems [living within Australia] would renounce ISLAM, and leave its ranks.






Every moslem in Australia, is a moslem.


A moslem, is a follower of ISLAM.       < -------- dictionary definition.


Every moslem has chosen, and continues to choose, to give his allegiance to ISLAM.

THAT, is what a moslem is.  !!!!



.



Google;
Shahada, confession of faith, of a muslim

"There is no god except for Allah alone; and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah."


By definition,       every moslem is a follower of ISLAM.

And every moslem is a supporter of what ISLAMIC law
endorses,
promotes, and
encourages.



Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 14th, 2017 at 1:53pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:09am:

Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:02am:
Bye then gweggy... 


Seeya!

Don't let the door hit your fat arse on the way out.

[smiley=vrolijk_26.gif]

Oh poor gweggy...  you lose...
No prizes for 2nd gweggy
no prizes for editing my post... :D :D :D

BTW my arse isn't fat...  you must have been looking at yours in a mirror ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 14th, 2017 at 3:48pm

Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 1:53pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:09am:

Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:02am:
Bye then gweggy... 


Seeya!

Don't let the door hit your fat arse on the way out.

[smiley=vrolijk_26.gif]



BTW my arse isn't fat... 


My mistake.

That was your head I was looking at.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 14th, 2017 at 3:53pm
Really?
That's all you've got?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 14th, 2017 at 3:54pm

Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 3:53pm:
Really?
That's all you've got?


It's all I need.

That, and to sit back and watch you make a fool of yourself.

Tell us again how SSM will result in straight couples turning gay, resulting in the end of the human race.

;D

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Mr Hammer on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:05pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 9th, 2017 at 11:26am:
A good article.


A suburban hair salon, an anti-Muslim tirade and what it says about hate speech in Australia

Such hair as I have is cut from time to time by Mrs E, who runs a one-chair salon in my neighbourhood.

She has been in business there for 40 years. She knows all about the history of the street and many of her clients have been coming to her for half a lifetime.

The salon is shut on Mondays, when she cuts the hair of the elderly and disabled in various local institutions.

Mrs E is a petite woman with a cloud of brown hair, a bright smile and that empathetic personality that fits so many hairdressers for their parallel occupation of informal counsellor.

Under her hairdresser's smock she wears a dress or a blouse and trousers.

She came to Australia as a child from the Balkans, grew up, married, had two sons.

Australia is home and a place where she says she has always felt welcome, until the other day.

A client whose hair she had been cutting for 20 years came in as usual, and then, without any prompting or preamble, launched into a tirade against Muslims.

Mrs E heard her out. As a rule, like most sensible businesspeople, she resists being drawn into conversations about sex, religion or politics.

But eventually it became too much. "I'm a Muslim," she told the client, "and I very much regret that after 20 years I must tell you I will no longer cut your hair".
The salon contains no outward sign of her faith: nothing in her appearance or in the room itself gives it away. For her, it is something private; nothing to do with her professional life.

It happened that I came in about a week later. Mrs E and I often talk in general terms about what's going on in the world.

She knows I am a journalist and academic and I think she feels safe pushing her conversational boundaries slightly.

She told me this story and as she did so, the hurt was written all over her face.

And after nearly a lifetime in Australia, she said she felt just that little bit less welcome.

Hate speech seeping into Australian society

So this is how it goes.

Hate speech becomes part of the currency of national debate and is exploited for political purposes.

In 1996, Pauline Hanson delivers her notorious maiden speech in which she says Australia is being "swamped by Asians".

John Howard, as prime minister, dog-whistles that this is all about free speech.

In 2001, the so-called Tampa election occurs.

Boat people — overwhelmingly Muslim — become the butt of Howard's assertion of national sovereignty: "We will decide who comes to this country and the circumstances in which they come."

There are votes in this and both sides of politics pile on.

In the midst of the 2013 election, Labor's Kevin Rudd — the same man who claims Dietrich Bonhoeffer as an inspiration — slams the door on asylum seekers by striking deals, with Nauru and Papua New Guinea, that Australia is still living with.

In 2014, the Federal Government tries to weaken the Racial Discrimination Act in what is said to be in the interests of free speech.

Attorney-General George Brandis asserts that "people have a right to be bigots".
In 2015, research conducted for the Melbourne Social Equity Institute finds that the single most important driver of negative attitudes toward asylum seekers is religious prejudice, sometimes expressed as concern about the "Islamisation" of Australia.

In August 2017, Senator Hanson wears a burqa into Senate Question Time.

Senator Brandis discovers where bigotry can lead and assails her for an "appalling stunt" disrespectful of the Muslim faith.

Eventually, the political licensing of racism and religious intolerance seeps into the fabric of society. It might take a generation or it might take longer.

But when it does it stains and rots that fabric, eating away at people's sense of belonging, undermining the Australian multicultural project, and in a small suburban hair salon, a middle-aged woman feels emboldened to vent her prejudice, doing harm and hurt to someone who has been tending her person for 20 years.

Dennis Muller is a senior research fellow at the University of Melbourne's Centre for Advancing Journalism.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-09/anti-muslim-tirade-hairdresser-and-hate-speech-in-australia/9029746






the politics of division is alive and well in this country.

So somebody knocked her faith. Woopi du. Muslims kill people for  belonging to other religions. All religions should be criticised.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:07pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:05pm:
[All religions should be criticised.


Yes they should, Homo.

But should we discriminate against people because of their religion?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Mr Hammer on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:10pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:07pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:05pm:
[All religions should be criticised.


Yes they should, Homo.

But should we discriminate against people because of their religion?
The person talking to the hairdresser  obviously didn't know she was Muslim so it wasn't personal discrimination.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:12pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:07pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:05pm:
[All religions should be criticised.


Yes they should, Homo.

But should we discriminate against people because of their religion?
The person talking to the hairdresser  obviously didn't know she was Muslim so it wasn't personal discrimination.


I don't recall using the word 'personal'.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:12pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:07pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:05pm:
[All religions should be criticised.


Yes they should, Homo.

But should we discriminate against people because of their religion?



only the members of the cult Islamphobes...they deserve everything.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Mr Hammer on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:15pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:12pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:07pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:05pm:
[All religions should be criticised.


Yes they should, Homo.

But should we discriminate against people because of their religion?
The person talking to the hairdresser  obviously didn't know she was Muslim so it wasn't personal discrimination.


I don't recall using the word 'personal'.
Well if it isn't personally aimed and was talking generally about Islam it falls under the banner of religious criticism.  I don't see that as discrimination at all.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:17pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:00am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 10:22am:
Simple solution -


Indeed.

Get rid of all the bigots, racists, Islamophobes, and homophobes.

and big FAT LIARS.... you gweggy being the biggest..

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Mr Hammer on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:19pm

cods wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:00am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 10:22am:
Simple solution -


Indeed.

Get rid of all the bigots, racists, Islamophobes, and homophobes.

and big FAT LIARS.... you gweggy being the biggest..
Doesn't Pecca criticise people by calling them gay on here Cods?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:23pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:19pm:

cods wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:00am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 10:22am:
Simple solution -


Indeed.

Get rid of all the bigots, racists, Islamophobes, and homophobes.

and big FAT LIARS.... you gweggy being the biggest..
Doesn't Pecca criticise people by calling them gay on here Cods?


How?

There's nothing wrong with being gay.

How on Earth could it be a criticism?

The only people who would consider it criticism, are homophobes.

Are you a homophobe, Homo?

I'm curious.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:23pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:19pm:

cods wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:00am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 10:22am:
Simple solution -


Indeed.

Get rid of all the bigots, racists, Islamophobes, and homophobes.

and big FAT LIARS.... you gweggy being the biggest..
Doesn't Pecca criticise people by calling them gay on here Cods?



"homo"   more like  gay sounds too polite for our gweg...

and he has been banned for a loooooooooooong time for far worse....

you would never catch him if its a name calling comp... ;D ;D ;D...

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:24pm
btw he secretly loves bobby...he delights in playing with him... :)

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:24pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:12pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:07pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:05pm:
[All religions should be criticised.


Yes they should, Homo.

But should we discriminate against people because of their religion?
The person talking to the hairdresser  obviously didn't know she was Muslim so it wasn't personal discrimination.


I don't recall using the word 'personal'.
Well if it isn't personally aimed and was talking generally about Islam it falls under the banner of religious criticism.  I don't see that as discrimination at all.


You might want to go back to the OP, put down your robe and cross, and read the story.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:26pm

cods wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:23pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:19pm:

cods wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:00am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 10:22am:
Simple solution -


Indeed.

Get rid of all the bigots, racists, Islamophobes, and homophobes.

and big FAT LIARS.... you gweggy being the biggest..
Doesn't Pecca criticise people by calling them gay on here Cods?



"homo"   more like  gay sounds too polite for our gweg...

..



No dear.

Mr Hammer has several socks.

One of them is Jocko Homo.

We call him 'Homo' for short.

Ask him yourself.  Go on ...

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by cods on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:26pm
well that looks like another 3 threads trashed by trash talk.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Mr Hammer on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:29pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:23pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:19pm:

cods wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:00am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 10:22am:
Simple solution -


Indeed.

Get rid of all the bigots, racists, Islamophobes, and homophobes.

and big FAT LIARS.... you gweggy being the biggest..
Doesn't Pecca criticise people by calling them gay on here Cods?


How?

There's nothing wrong with being gay.

How on Earth could it be a criticism?

The only people who would consider it criticism, are homophobes.

Are you a homophobe, Homo?

I'm curious.

If you support gay people why do you use their lifestyle as a criticism? You do it all of the time. You'd never say those things to a gay person, would you?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Mr Hammer on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:30pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:24pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:12pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:07pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:05pm:
[All religions should be criticised.


Yes they should, Homo.

But should we discriminate against people because of their religion?
The person talking to the hairdresser  obviously didn't know she was Muslim so it wasn't personal discrimination.


I don't recall using the word 'personal'.
Well if it isn't personally aimed and was talking generally about Islam it falls under the banner of religious criticism.  I don't see that as discrimination at all.


You might want to go back to the OP, put down your robe and cross, and read the story.
I read it. If somebody knocked Christianity I wouldn't refuse to cut their hair. In fact I wouldn't give a crap. That's the difference.

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Mr Hammer on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:31pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:26pm:

cods wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:23pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:19pm:

cods wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:00am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 10:22am:
Simple solution -


Indeed.

Get rid of all the bigots, racists, Islamophobes, and homophobes.

and big FAT LIARS.... you gweggy being the biggest..
Doesn't Pecca criticise people by calling them gay on here Cods?



"homo"   more like  gay sounds too polite for our gweg...

..



No dear.

Mr Hammer has several socks.

One of them is Jocko Homo.

We call him 'Homo' for short.

Ask him yourself.  Go on ...
Homo for short??  ;D ;D Go and say that to a gay person and see how they feel you homophobe?

Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by greggerypeccary on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:32pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:29pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:23pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:19pm:

cods wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:00am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 10:22am:
Simple solution -


Indeed.

Get rid of all the bigots, racists, Islamophobes, and homophobes.

and big FAT LIARS.... you gweggy being the biggest..
Doesn't Pecca criticise people by calling them gay on here Cods?


How?

There's nothing wrong with being gay.

How on Earth could it be a criticism?

The only people who would consider it criticism, are homophobes.

Are you a homophobe, Homo?

I'm curious.

If you support gay people why do you use their lifestyle as a criticism?


I don't.

It's impossible to use it as a criticism, as there's nothing wrong with being gay.


Title: Re: racial hatred in Australia
Post by Grendel on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:32pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 3:54pm:

Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 3:53pm:
Really?
That's all you've got?


It's all I need.

That, and to sit back and watch you make a fool of yourself.

Tell us again how SSM will result in straight couples turning gay, resulting in the end of the human race.

;D

Liar liar pants on fire again gweggy.
Are you a compulsive liar?

You seem to do it so often... :D :D :D :D :D

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.