Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> General Board >> Amber Harrison still refuses to face reality http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1500298634 Message started by Sprintcyclist on Jul 17th, 2017 at 11:37pm |
Title: Amber Harrison still refuses to face reality Post by Sprintcyclist on Jul 17th, 2017 at 11:37pm Quote:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-17/amber-harrison-ordered-to-pay-legal-costs-for-seven/8716104 |
Title: Re: Amber Harrison still refuses to face reality Post by Ye Grappler on Jul 18th, 2017 at 2:48am
Confidentiality? Regarding what? She gets paid to keep quiet about shagging some idiot, but if she speaks out, that's a breach?
DID-UMS! What a 'legal' nonsense.... if you can't take it - don't go there in the first place, big boy.... legend in your own mind..... "Seven West Media".. So it's NOT Seven itself... just some other corporate dodge... so why is some idiot with a hard prick who is in SEVEN (not Seven West Media) getting this insider treatment? Did the 'judge' actually consider that? (NO). I mean - a company like Adani can borrow MEGA-cash from Adani West and cop it as a tax dodge as a 'repayment'.... so how does this d!ckhead get to hide behind another part of the 'corporate structure'? I say shoot the judge and get a new one... hang 'em and hang 'em high! Then start on the corporate lawyers..... |
Title: Re: Amber Harrison still refuses to face reality Post by Emma on Jul 18th, 2017 at 3:36am
I am not aware of the facts in this matter. I only actually heard about it today.
If she provided no substantive material to support her case in Court, I'm not sure there was anything else the Court could do.. |
Title: Re: Amber Harrison still refuses to face reality Post by The Mechanic on Jul 18th, 2017 at 6:37am
stupid cocaine using dirty slut...
what is it about these women who think that they can sleep with the boss... a married man.. and then somehow when the affair ends they think they are owed some sort of massive payout?? and then somehow "THEY" become the "VICTIM" ... ::) get back to your trailer you piece of trash... same goes with those dirty sluts who were sleeping with the AFL CEOs who they knew were married with kids... they were adults.. they knew what they were doing... try earning a living that doesn't involve opening your legs ya filthy whores... >:( |
Title: Re: Amber Harrison still refuses to face reality Post by chimera on Jul 18th, 2017 at 6:47am
gold-digger
noun: gold-digger; plural noun: gold-diggers; noun: golddigger; plural noun: golddiggers a woman who forms relationships with men purely to obtain money or gifts from them. "girls who go out with men your age are just gold-diggers!" |
Title: Re: Amber Harrison still refuses to face reality Post by cods on Jul 18th, 2017 at 7:19am
what most forget is .. she is just one women...who had an affair with one of the bosses but suddenly it isnt one on one its her against a corporation...
the bloke has gone completely under the radar as if he never existed.. Quote:
she is so correct on this.... David and Goliath you get crushed under the weight of it.. I honestly believe if 7 hadnt used their might and power this would have run its course and disappeared from the media....but they did because they could... >:( >:(.. why should anyone be forced to back down because they dont have the money??????.. bloody law there is not a thing fair about it. >:( |
Title: Re: Amber Harrison still refuses to face reality Post by Sprintcyclist on Jul 18th, 2017 at 7:39am Emma wrote on Jul 18th, 2017 at 3:36am:
I am a bit vague on it myself. I believe she has having an affair with a married man, one of the bosses. She was later offered a largish sum of money and been turned down for a promotion. Or basically fired and offered a large sum of cash. She turned the cash down and tried to sue her bosses for unfair dismissal. Going to court is a 'last resort' in my ideas. If someone has wronged you and wants to settle out of court, in most cases consider their offer carefully. |
Title: Re: Amber Harrison still refuses to face reality Post by Sprintcyclist on Jul 18th, 2017 at 7:40am cods wrote on Jul 18th, 2017 at 7:19am:
The law is not always just. Yes, if you will get outgunned in court, do not go there. |
Title: Re: Amber Harrison still refuses to face reality Post by cods on Jul 18th, 2017 at 7:47am Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 18th, 2017 at 7:40am:
so you agree the law is for the rich.. :( :( |
Title: Re: Amber Harrison still refuses to face reality Post by Gordon on Jul 18th, 2017 at 8:23am
Feel free to correct, but I think this is what happened.
During the affair Harrison was misusing her work credit card to the tune of more than $100k The affair ended and she was sacked for the funds misappropriation. Harrison engaged a workplace lawyer and 7 settled for $400k plus $50 legals and a gag order on the lot, which she immediately and repeatedly broke. In all the articles I've read on this, the ones with feminist leanings have all made vague comments about how the big boys club always wins and how the legal system is stacked up against a woman, but they refuse to dig into the actual details of the case because if they do, it all points to her being a gold digger. |
Title: Re: Amber Harrison still refuses to face reality Post by The Mechanic on Jul 18th, 2017 at 11:15am Gordon wrote on Jul 18th, 2017 at 8:23am:
Now we are getting closer to the truth.... ( unlike cods 🙄 ) She could have walked away with nearly half a million dollars.... ( I wouldn't have given the slut one cent ) and been done with it.... 4 times she could have walked away and with her pockets full of money.... but she wanted more AFTER taking the original money 💰..... Vindictive bitches never know when to stop.... she also wanted to destroy this guy as well... Then the stupid slut broke all agreements ... So the judge said... guess what... you broke a legally binding agreement so Pay Back the Money 💰... Freaking Hillarious I say ;D ... But now she crying .... I've got no money 😭 |
Title: Re: Amber Harrison still refuses to face reality Post by Alinta on Jul 18th, 2017 at 12:07pm Emma wrote on Jul 18th, 2017 at 3:36am:
Indeed yes........or should do... Defendant’s claim: each party bear the costs The losing party must point to and the Court must be satisfied of some “exceptional measure” to justify depriving a successful party of their costs; Smeaton Hanscomb & Co Ltd v Sassoon I Setty, Son & Co (No 2) [1953] 2 All ER 1588 at 1590 per Devlin J, see also Waterman v Gerling Australia Insurance Co Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] NSWSC 1111 at [10] per Brereton J; Dal Pont at [8.25]. Without any admissible evidence to rely on, the Defendant has not satisfied me of any grounds for why she should not pay the costs of the Plaintiffs, at least on an ordinary basis, as the unsuccessful party in these proceedings. The Defendant’s failure to provide the Court with any evidence of circumstances that may justify the Court taking the exceptional measure of ordering each party bear their own costs speaks to the weakness of her claim for such an order. Having retained experienced and reputable lawyers up until the very eve of this hearing, I can only assume the Defendant was given proper advice on the costs consequences of a belated capitulation in such hotly contested proceedings, and the need to devise a fall-back position regarding costs. I accept the plain reality is the parties did attempt to negotiate a settlement on multiple occasions to no avail. Nonetheless it must have been plainly apparent to those advising the Defendant that capitulation, in the event no agreement was reached, would result in adverse costs consequences. I can also therefore only assume her failure to provide any cogent explanation supported by evidence for why the ordinary rule for costs should not be ordered is because neither such evidence nor explanation exists. On these grounds I am not satisfied it is appropriate to order each party bear their own costs. Read more here... http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWSC/2017/952.html |
Title: Re: Amber Harrison still refuses to face reality Post by chimera on Jul 18th, 2017 at 2:46pm
In the circumstances of this vexatious litigation and lacking bona fides the said Defendant has the default option of applying executive facility to speculative croupier opportunities followed by re-investment of acquisitions in red-chip stock.
https://au.indeed.com/Casino-jobs-in-Sydney-NSW Jobs Casino Vacancies available in Sydney NSW . |
Title: Re: Amber Harrison still refuses to face reality Post by Honky on Jul 18th, 2017 at 2:54pm
On the one hand we have an opportunistic gold digger and on the other, a media giant.
Its just so sad that one of these ghoulish entities has to win. |
Title: Re: Amber Harrison still refuses to face reality Post by chimera on Jul 18th, 2017 at 3:50pm
The black-gowned wigged claws from the depths clutch double handfuls of lucre from both ghouls and subside into the bubbling morass.
|
Title: Re: Amber Harrison still refuses to face reality Post by Gnads on Jul 18th, 2017 at 7:02pm Gordon wrote on Jul 18th, 2017 at 8:23am:
Gold digger & thief. She deserved the decision against her .... and some. She f*#Ked her way up stole spilled her guts got a settlement & it wasn't enough. Now she has her just deserts. |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |