Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Finance and Economics >> House with a problem http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1459686656 Message started by Sir Bobby on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 10:30pm |
Title: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 10:30pm
Any building experts online here at Ozpolitic?
I want to buy a house & it has a problem. See the picture. There is no mortar left in some of the bricks & it is quite bad in the area shown. How can mortar wash away? The house was built in the late 80s & maybe not enough cement was used in the mortar? ( My place now has such hard mortar that it turns a masonry bit red hot if you try to drill it.) Is this problem in the photo serious? It's all around the house but the worst spot is in the photo. What is holding the building up? Would it fall down if there was an earthquake? What would it cost to fix it? cheers sir Bobby |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 10:55pm
Doesn't anyone know?
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sprintcyclist on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 10:59pm I am not a building expert. If it is not a load bearing wall, not as big a problem. A building inspection by a qualified person might help. Certainly it is a bargaining area. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 10:59pm
I knew a couple who bought a house where very large cracks had been plastered & painted over by the seller.
3 months later a whole wall collapsed & the the place was condemned by the local council & had to be bulldozed down. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:02pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 10:59pm:
I could get an Archicentre report but it seems that it's so bleeding obvious that it's serious - I'd be wasting my money on the report. Yes - it's a bargaining chip. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir lastnail on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:05pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 10:59pm:
This all wouldn't be an issue if by law the seller had to provide a report but of course this would cause the whole housing market to collapse overnight because there are so many dumps that need major work. The most expensive purchase you make in a lifetime and safety issues fly right out the door in favour of turning over a quick buck :( |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:14pm Sir lastnail wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:05pm:
That's right sir Nail. You need a road worthy certificate to sell a car but nothing to sell a house. Here's a picture from another place. the wood is rotten under the shower. the question is how bad is it? It could be just one board but it might be the whole floor! |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir lastnail on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:18pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:14pm:
I reckon if you bought that for the stupid prices they are asking now a few hours later you would have buyers remorse and you'd need a large dose of Valium just to get to sleep :( |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:20pm Sir lastnail wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:05pm:
why? bobby is aware of the problem and still looking at buying it. When is your brain going to connect with reality? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sprintcyclist on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:25pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:02pm:
I think a carpenter from a local paper would be a good first step. His comments won't be binding. At this stage, you want someone qualified onsite to say if the damage is structural or not. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:25pm John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:20pm:
Dear John, It depends how serious the problem is. The rotting wood in that bathroom - I could fix it myself but the house with the mortar out of the bricks - that's another story. How serious is it Einstein? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:25pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 10:30pm:
Hi Bobby I'm not expert, but I have seen this before. As far as I'm aware, there are two possible causes. One is not enough cement used when mixing the mortar. The other is a missing damp coursing. Moisture rising causes the mortar to wash out. It's not hard to fix, but it is tedious. You have to scrape out the mortar a few bricks at a time, take out the bricks and then relay them with new mortar (install damp coursing on the bottom as you go). Be careful not to take out to many bricks at a time or you'll cause the wall above to collapse. For safety sake, I'd do no more than 3 bricks at a time. It's fairly easy to do yourself. Otherwise hire someone to do it for you. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir lastnail on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:26pm John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:20pm:
It's potentially dangerous and not fit to live in. If the wall collapses on someone then of course the real estate scumbag who sold it is indemnified and gets to keep his ill gotten gains :( |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:27pm
As for the shower, assume it's all rotten.
Work out what it will cost you to repair all this stuff then get the seller to knock that of the price. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:28pm Sir lastnail wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:26pm:
you're potentially dangerous. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:29pm John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:25pm:
OK thanks - so you're saying you don't need any form of jack to hold the weight of the wall while the bricks are taken out? Some bricks are just loose & come out by hand. It's almost like there is nothing there at all to hold the weight of the wall. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:30pm John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:27pm:
idiotic advice. why not just buy a house that doesnt need repairing. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:32pm ian wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:30pm:
that takes the fun out of it. It all depends on the price, no? :D :D :D |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:32pm John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:27pm:
Yes - these things can be used as bargaining chips. the seller of that place with a bad shower wouldn't admit there was a serious problem - he said it was easy to fix - just a few rotten boards & the rest of it was OK. - he couldn't be bothered tearing the tiles up to do it. Of course - he would downplay it! |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir lastnail on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:33pm John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:28pm:
Hey smithy isn't it funny how a real estate agent does not need to have a financial advisors license ? funny about that considering they are offering financial advice on million dollar assets compared with someone with a financial advisors license who offers advice on 5K parcel of shares :(. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:33pm ian wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:30pm:
Because you'll pay a lot more. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:34pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:29pm:
if you're worried, crawl underneath and build a temporary pier. If it hasn't collapsed yet, I don't see why it would suddenly. As long as you only do a few bricks at a time. Having said that, I haven't got the full picture. if you're not sure, get a building report. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:35pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:33pm:
Come of it Bobby, Ian and common sense are miles apart |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:35pm Sir lastnail wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:33pm:
why would an agent need financial advisors license? They sell houses, not give finance advice. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:35pm
Bobby, your issue with the bricks is incorrectly mixed mortar, just because this is the part of the brickwork you can see mortar missing does not mean there are not problems with the rest of the brickwork. Its likely that the mortar was incorrectly mixed for the whole job. Also, the fact that there are 2 apparent serious repair issues with this house means that there are probably a whole host of serious issues you cant see. Stay away. Do not buy this house unless you pay land value only with a discount for the price of demolishing this place.
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:37pm John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:34pm:
I am almost sure that if I showed the bank that picture of the bricks they would want a full report. It looks bad to me but I'm not a builder or any sort of expert. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:37pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:32pm:
tear up tiles? first you have to remove the shower base, then pull up tiles, waterproofing and then the floor boards. Then start again and rebuild the thing. It's not hard, but it's a little more complicated than changing a few boards. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:37pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:33pm:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:38pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:37pm:
you should ALWAYS get a building inspection BEFORE you buy. If this is what you can see, who knows what's there that you as a layman can't see. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:38pm ian wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:35pm:
The 2 pictures I showed everyone are from TWO different houses that I looked at. My untrained eye has probably missed much more. Its likely that the mortar was incorrectly mixed for the whole job. Yes - the whole place would have sandy mortar - some halfwit mixed the mortar in the wrong amounts - not enough cement. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:39pm John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:38pm:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:39pm ian wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:35pm:
this is the sort of house I love to buy ... most idiots stay away, they get scared. A little elbow grease and it'll most likely shine up nicely, then he can sell it to some idiot looking for no issues. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:40pm John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:39pm:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:41pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:38pm:
ohh, I thought they were the same house. Pick your problem that you'd prefer to fix and run with that one. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir lastnail on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:41pm John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:35pm:
Sure they sell houses to investors as well. What a great investment it says in the ad :D LOL |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:42pm Sir lastnail wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:41pm:
so do adds for jewelry, paintings and collectables ... should they all have financial advisors licenses? :D :D |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:43pm
Ive changed my mind Bobby. Ignore my advice. John Smith is the expert here, listen to him. A bit of elbow grease will transform those structural problems and white anted flooring no end. Then after that you can offload it to some idiot who doesnt know anything, like John suggests.
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir lastnail on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:44pm John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:41pm:
and don't expect a warranty on termite damage. You find that out the hard way after you have signed over your life over to a bank :( |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Wolseley on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:45pm John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:35pm:
Of course. Only a person of remarkably low intelligence would think that a real estate agent would need such a licence. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:45pm ian wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:43pm:
But: Its likely that the mortar was incorrectly mixed for the whole job. That means the whole house is a right off. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:45pm Sir lastnail wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:44pm:
do you live in Narnia? SO if you find termite damage in 12 months time, how can you tell when the termites ate the wood? was it before or after purchase? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:46pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:45pm:
unlikely .... if it was the whole house you'd have evidence of it everywhere. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sprintcyclist on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:46pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:37pm:
It looks bad to me too . |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir lastnail on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:47pm Wolseley wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:45pm:
why don't you go and buy another self help book you moreon. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:48pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:46pm:
it looks worse than it actually is. Especially if it's isolated to that area. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:48pm John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:46pm:
It's only down low on the bricks that are near the ground - all around the house. The roof tiles & guttering are brand new. Maybe the old guttering was sending water down across the brickwork ? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir lastnail on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:49pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:46pm:
it's a renovators delight says the ad from Liare and DeShonky realtors :D LOL |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:50pm John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:48pm:
it looks worse than it actually is. Especially if it's isolated to that area. It's not isolated to that area.. It's all around the house but I showed a pic of the worst part. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:50pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:45pm:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:52pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:48pm:
Correct again. The mortar is likely inferior in all areas, but only completely missing in areas where the water run off has concentrated or the damp course is missing. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:53pm ian wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:50pm:
So - it's a bulldozer job? What a pity - it's a large area of land. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:54pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:53pm:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir lastnail on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:56pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:53pm:
It should be classified like some cars that have been in a bad accident as an un-repairable write-off and ready for demolition !! |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:56pm ian wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:54pm:
Yep - John would fix it with a $50 bag of cement & sand from Bunnings. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 4th, 2016 at 12:07am
The thing is that Roman mortar is still ok after 2000 years.
This place was only built at the end of 80's. It's only 28 year old mortar. Some Aussie halfwit mixed the mortar in the wrong ratio. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir lastnail on Apr 4th, 2016 at 12:09am Bobby. wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 12:07am:
what the pricks do is they steal some of the cement and use it on another job and that's why you get a bad mix :( |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 4th, 2016 at 12:11am Sir lastnail wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 12:09am:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Wolseley on Apr 4th, 2016 at 12:13am
If it's on a large block of land, chances are that it will end up being bought by a developer who will knock it down and build townhouses on the site. That's probably the best thing that could happen to this house.
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 4th, 2016 at 12:15am ian wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 12:11am:
Yes - I've seen places like this before where you can get a screwdriver & just run it along the mortar & it falls out like sand. Other places like mine have rock hard mortar that you can't even drill with a masonry bit. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 4th, 2016 at 12:18am Wolseley wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 12:13am:
Yes - it looks like a developers dream - you could build 3 or maybe 4 townhouses on it. I don't have the money to develop it. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 4th, 2016 at 12:30am ian wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 12:11am:
Or they used old cement that had gone off. It has a short shelf life. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 4th, 2016 at 12:30am Wolseley wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 12:13am:
Yes - it looks like a developers dream - you could build 3 or maybe 4 townhouses on it. I don't have the money to develop it. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 4th, 2016 at 12:32am
Qui audet adipiscitur bobby. Borrow the money.
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 4th, 2016 at 12:36am ian wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 12:32am:
I just want to buy a house where I can pay off a small mortgage in 5 years. I have most of the capital I need already. I want to retire in 5 years without a mortgage hanging over my head. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 4th, 2016 at 7:31am
The bricks in that photo I posted are not load bearing -
that's why the building hasn't fallen down - maybe it would be easy to repair? perhaps it's not so serious? http://www.structuralengineerscivplex.com.au/brick-veneer-construction.html Quote:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 4th, 2016 at 7:42am |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 4th, 2016 at 8:56am Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:48pm:
then it's almost certainly due to failure of the damp coursing. An easy fix if you want to put the time into it. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 4th, 2016 at 8:57am Bobby. wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 7:42am:
to put the damp coursing in you'll need to take out the bricks, not just chip out an inch like this link tells you. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by greggerypeccary on Apr 4th, 2016 at 9:36am |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Wolseley on Apr 4th, 2016 at 9:53am John Smith wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 8:56am:
If you're a bricklayer, that is. I have never seen a house with a brickwork problem as bad as this. The only one I have seen that even approached this condition was almost 100 years old and had obvious dampness issues. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by greggerypeccary on Apr 4th, 2016 at 9:58am Wolseley wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 9:53am:
It's pretty common here in Perth. I've seen much worse. In fact, I was visiting a retirement village a few weeks ago and the damage I saw there was widespread and quite severe (caused by sprinklers). |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 4th, 2016 at 5:10pm John Smith wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 8:56am:
Yes the damp coursing is not something I knew about . http://www.handyman.net.au/how-get-rid-rising-damp Quote:
Moldy brick can be fixed by replacing the damp proof course - Quote:
It looks like it's not a DIY job & could be costly to repair. It looks like I'd have to get it checked for termites too! I need to find out what it would cost to repair. The deadbeat Estate agent claims he never even saw this problem! |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 4th, 2016 at 6:16pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 5:10pm:
he may not have. Besides, most agents walk around with their eyes closed. Bobby. wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 5:10pm:
like I said, get a quote and have it taken of the agreed price |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 4th, 2016 at 6:44pm John Smith wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 6:16pm:
Real estate agents never see any of the faults. The Real Estate agent never got back to me. I spoke to a builder just now. he said: you can't just fill the gaps with mortar - you have to replace the water proof "damp coursing" It's a big job & if the rest of the building has poor quality mortar then it may well be a bulldozer job. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 4th, 2016 at 6:47pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 6:44pm:
now how many times have I told you that? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 4th, 2016 at 6:47pm
John Smith reckons its an easy fix Bobby, dont trust the builder, what would he know. John loves properties like this, a bit of elbow grease and Bobs your uncle.
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 4th, 2016 at 6:49pm John Smith wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 6:47pm:
Alright - you were correct - I don't know - I'm not a builder. This time a real builder told me. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 4th, 2016 at 8:17pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 6:49pm:
ian wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 6:47pm:
it is ...it's not my fault common sense escapes you |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 4th, 2016 at 8:48pm John Smith wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 8:17pm:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 4th, 2016 at 9:07pm ian wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 8:48pm:
John is forgiven namaste |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 4th, 2016 at 9:18pm ian wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 8:48pm:
who condemned it? you? you didn't even know what damp coursing was ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 4th, 2016 at 11:17pm John Smith wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 9:18pm:
I didn't know what damp coursing was. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 4th, 2016 at 11:26pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 11:17pm:
neither did Ian. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 4th, 2016 at 11:29pm John Smith wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 11:26pm:
Well the builder did. I am now considering a place further out East which will be in good condition. I'll check it out tomorrow over the phone. I don't want to buy a bulldozer job |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 4th, 2016 at 11:31pm
good luck with the search
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 4th, 2016 at 11:33pm John Smith wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 11:31pm:
Thanks |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sprintcyclist on Apr 4th, 2016 at 11:46pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 6:44pm:
Good research Bobby. Well done. You did the work and got a sensible answer. Well worth paying for. Saved yourself a lot of bother there and gained some knowledge. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 12:34am John Smith wrote on Apr 4th, 2016 at 9:18pm:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 8:27am ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 12:34am:
The builder confirmed it? When did that happen? The builder said'IF' Ian. That means the builder didn't know, and in this day and age where he has to cover his arse or risk being sued, the tendency is to cover all over with as many 'if's' 'maybe's' and 'possibles' as possible.. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 8:29am ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 12:34am:
now you're just showing how truly stupid you are ...i told bobby several times to get a building inspection report done :D :D. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 5th, 2016 at 9:08pm John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 8:29am:
Most people would just do a temporary repair on those bricks & forget about the need for " damp coursing ". You could probably get away with it. The house seems to be built on sand which can subside under the foundations if water comes from a broken gutter or spout. Also the damp areas are breeding grounds for termites. No wonder I see many houses bulldozed & new ones built. If I could do a repair myself I'd probably buy that place. It's just in a perfect location for me & has a big backyard which I like. I am still tempted if I could get it at a price where the cost of fixing the brickwork is taken into account. Unfortunately it doesn't work like that. Someone will always pay the asking price because they don't realise what they are getting in to. The owner should have to supply an Archicentre & termite report by law. Real estate buying & selling is out of control. It is also tempting to go into heavier debt than is sensible. But then if you lose your job or get sick you're in real trouble with the bank. It's a stressful time when you look for a house. I wish I had a builder friend who could inspect with me. I would say that 99% of people at auctions are buying with no building report. People in this country are heavy gamblers & risk takers. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 9:10pm John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 8:27am:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 9:14pm John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 8:29am:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 9:15pm
And heres Johns post advising Bobby not to get a report done. What a prime d!ckhead.
John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:20pm:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 5th, 2016 at 9:22pm Quote:
The builder has to cover his arse with a repair. His repair would have to last at least 25 years so they do it properly. Dodgy house flippers would do a temporary repair with $200 of cement & sand from Bunnings & the buyer would not be aware. 2 years later the problem could come back & termites could riddle the house. I've watched the house flippers shows & "the Block" etc & I've never seen brick problems like this. ( it's all around the house on every wall but the picture is the worst spot ) Those TV shows are laughed at by real builders. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 9:45pm ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 9:14pm:
Yes and i still maintain it's an easy fix. I've done it before. It's tedious and time consuming, but not difficult. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 9:47pm ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 9:15pm:
I know you struggle with basics, but where have I advised Bobby NOT to get a report done? Do you even understand what's written in front of you/ |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 9:48pm ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 9:10pm:
no, the builder confirmed that there IS a probability. The building game is all about limiting your liability Ian. One day, when you grow up and buy your own house, you may realise that. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 9:49pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 9:22pm:
wrong ... 8 years |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:02pm John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 9:48pm:
Yes. eaxctly what i said. feel foolish now? You should. and you should just have shut up because you didnt know. Now you are reduced to echoing my comments and claiming them as your own. Very sad and pathetic. I feel sorry for you. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:04pm John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 9:45pm:
Lol. How on earth is "tedious and time consuming" easy John? have you ever done any manual work in your whole life?. At least your peasant forebears had that to their credit. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:04pm John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 9:47pm:
still waiting Ian ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:05pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 9:22pm:
Correct bobby. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:06pm ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:04pm:
I do manual work all the time Ian. Unlike you, a bit of hard work doesn't scare me. Tedious and time consuming is not hard. Especially if you're not in a rush. Now if you had to run those bricks up 20 flights of stairs, then you might say it's a hard. Although in your case you probably run out of puff just brushing your teeth |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:08pm John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:34pm:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:09pm ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:08pm:
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D are you trying to redefine stupid? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:10pm John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:39pm:
What a complete fool. As well as giving dangerous advice, johnthen pretends he is some sort of renovation expert and can easily fix houses with massive structural and white ant issues. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:11pm John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:06pm:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sprintcyclist on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:13pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 9:08pm:
Yes, very stressful. Did that carpenter seem ok ? Maybe hire him to inspect other houses? yes, it's very very stressful. Awfully so. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:14pm ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:11pm:
I'm fairly fit Ian. In fact, I spent most of today working outside. If you think I'm on here 24/7 the perhaps you should seek help? Your fascination with me is affecting your cognitive abilities |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:15pm John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:38pm:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:16pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:13pm:
You don't hire a carpenter, you hire an independent building inspector. Carpenters will talk down jobs they don't like, and talk up jobs that they think they can make a quid on. You have the inspector inspect (most of the ones I've come across are retired builders anyway) and then you get the carpenter to quote on the inspectors findings |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:17pm ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:15pm:
;D ;D ;D ;D that's the best you've got Ian? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D what a loser |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:17pm John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:14pm:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:18pm ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:10pm:
white ants? ;D ;D ;D are you drunk now? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:20pm ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:17pm:
Why? I don't know ...perhaps you're a closet fag. As for your feeling inferior, that's for you to sort out. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:25pm John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:20pm:
Calling me a homo doesnt insult me John. Im not homophobic. And you need to understand, I dont feel inferior to you in any way, I feel much superior to you. Unlike you Im not a desk jockey desperately hoping to impress people on the internet. Unlike you i dont feel the need to lie about anything. You are transparent to me John. Totally. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:27pm John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:17pm:
I like posters who use emoticons a lot, it means they feel inferior and the need to over compensate. see how I can read you John? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:32pm ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:25pm:
I wasn't calling you a homo Ian, I was suggesting a motive. As to it's accuracy, that's for you to figure out. I can tell you feel superior to me. That's why you're so determined to tell me so ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:33pm ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:27pm:
All I can see is how stupid you really are. A laughing emoticon means that I am laughing. Would you prefer I put 'lol' :D :D |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:35pm John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:04pm:
don't run away Ian ... stand by your comments. No need to be ashamed. (It's to late for that for you anyway) . Where did I tell him not to get a report? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:52pm ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:05pm:
Thanks Ian. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:55pm John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:20pm:
Every thread gets turned into something about poofters. God help us all. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir lastnail on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:59pm John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:14pm:
Work for dole ;) |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:01pm Sir lastnail wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 10:59pm:
sometimes it feels like it :D :D |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:07pm John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:01pm:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:12pm ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:07pm:
Wow Ian - you did OK. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:30pm ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:07pm:
so you bought it and sold it overnight Ian? I think you're full of sh1t. You haven't made anything. All you did was spend a few hundred thou. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:31pm John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:30pm:
John - you're jealous - we have a property mogul on Ozpolitic. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:39pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:31pm:
no Bobby, not jealous ... but you don't make money by buying property. No matter how it's re- zoned. The profit comes when you SELL it. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:44pm John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:30pm:
The resale was finalised this morning. I accepted the offer yesterday.The whole thing took 3 weeks. winner winner chicken dinner. Did it all on borrowed money and i have yet to step foot on the property.ii |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:45pm ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:44pm:
3 weeks? Ohh, I thought you said overnight. :D :D |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:47pm
yes the whole deal in which I made $150,000 took 3 weeks. What did you make the last 3 weeks John?
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:47pm ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:47pm:
;D ;D ;D good try Ian. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:49pm
emoticons again John. They only show your urge to try to appear less inferior.
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:55pm ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:49pm:
No, we've already covered that. A laughing emoticon shows that I am laughing at you. Ohh , and if you really felt superior, you wouldn't try astonishing me with your $150 000 profit (not quite ... but that's another story). You see, you wouldn't be trying to impress me (or anyone else) if you were so superior. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:56pm John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:45pm:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by ian on Apr 6th, 2016 at 12:00am John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:55pm:
An emoticon shows you have nothing to say John. And a series of them shows you are trying to over compensate. Dont squirm, it only makes the web tighter. We all have egos john. im no different. Just felt like telling someone, a nobody like you on the internet seemed appropriate. Nothing to do with trying to impress you. please, dont flatter yourself. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sprintcyclist on Apr 6th, 2016 at 12:51am Bobby. wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:12pm:
Wow, I have never had a windfall like that. Going to buy yourself a 'well done' gift ? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 6th, 2016 at 6:21am ian wrote on Apr 5th, 2016 at 11:44pm:
Will the mean you'll get hit with CGT? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 6th, 2016 at 7:21am
I just spoke to another builder:
He says the house might be able to be saved without too much cost. He would need to dig down to below the level of the bricks - even pull some bricks out & have a look to see what's going on. The most likely cause was stale cement - out of date - past it's expiry date - was used by a bodgy builder. He reckons I need to get a quote from a good bricky before considering to buy it. He would need to check for any rotten wood behind the bricks. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sprintcyclist on Apr 6th, 2016 at 7:33am Bobby. wrote on Apr 6th, 2016 at 7:21am:
Is it a supporting wall ? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 6th, 2016 at 7:48am Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 6th, 2016 at 7:33am:
No - it's brick veneer. The house loads are held up by a wooden frame. The only load bearing is holding the weight of the bricks above the wall. It's strange how the whole brick wall doesn't collapse under it's own weight. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 6th, 2016 at 9:03am ian wrote on Apr 6th, 2016 at 12:00am:
no IAN, a series of them means that I'm laughing and not just having a chuckle. you'd best stick to what you know best ... amateur psychology certainly doesn't appear to be your topic. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 6th, 2016 at 9:04am Bobby. wrote on Apr 6th, 2016 at 7:48am:
it's tied in to the wall .. and despite the mortar missing in many places, the bricks are still there to hold the weight from above. As long as you don't remove too many at once it won't fall down |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 6th, 2016 at 9:07am ian wrote on Apr 6th, 2016 at 12:00am:
you can't even be honest with yourself. If you weren't trying to impress, you wouldn't tell anyone, especially anonymous posters on the internet. Apart from Andrei, have you ever seen anyone else on heretalk about how much money they make? You think you're the only one to make money? ? Do you want to know why no one feels the need to discuss it? it's because they have no need to impress you. :D :D |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 6th, 2016 at 8:07pm John Smith wrote on Apr 6th, 2016 at 9:04am:
Some bricks are not holding any weight - they are just sitting there with a huge gap. It makes me wonder that if you did move 4 or 5 bricks whether the wall would start to crack & eventually come down. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 6th, 2016 at 9:12pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 6th, 2016 at 8:07pm:
eventually it would. Ever play Jenga Bobby? Much the same principle |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 6th, 2016 at 9:18pm John Smith wrote on Apr 6th, 2016 at 9:12pm:
No but it reminds me of why an archway in a tunnel doesn't fall down. Maybe this is the same principle? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 7th, 2016 at 9:17pm
I'm still getting quotes to fix the problem with those bricks.
So far $100 per square meter to repoint the bricks with new mortar but no mention of damp coursing so I just sent an email to a place that specialises in stopping rising damp. I spoke to the real estate agent & the owner is not willing to lower his price as the land is worth what he's asking for it - or so he says. This is getting interesting. I can't find a location & price that suits me more - even after looking at 100s of adverts. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 7th, 2016 at 9:29pm
Here's a picture of another part of a different wall:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 7th, 2016 at 9:29pm
I'm still getting quotes to fix the problem with those bricks.
So far $100 per square meter to repoint the bricks with new mortar but no mention of damp coursing so I just sent an email to a place that specialises in stopping rising damp. I spoke to the real estate agent & the owner is not willing to lower his price as the land is worth what he's asking for it - or so he says. This is getting interesting. I can't find a location & price that suits me more - even after looking at 100s of adverts. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by greggerypeccary on Apr 7th, 2016 at 9:58pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 7th, 2016 at 9:29pm:
Have you considered Newtown, in Sydney? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 7th, 2016 at 10:41pm greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 7th, 2016 at 9:58pm:
No - Bellevue Hill or Point Piper or Darling Point is more to my liking. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 7th, 2016 at 10:53pm
The Chinese keep pushing up the prices:
http://www.realestate.com.au/blog/australias-most-expensive-suburbs-in-2015/ Quote:
1. Darling Point, NSW – $5,651,000 |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sprintcyclist on Apr 7th, 2016 at 11:28pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 6th, 2016 at 7:48am:
aahh, that changes the scenario a bit I believe. So despite the looks (which are pretty awful), the brick wall could be totally removed with no adverse effects? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 8th, 2016 at 7:12am Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 7th, 2016 at 11:28pm:
The bricks are keeping the weather out. They act as the shell of the building. The building is repairable & I need to get a price to stop the problem returning. Still waiting on a reply. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 8th, 2016 at 7:16am
Where is Lisa when we need her?
She is supposed to be the moderator of the Real Estate section. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by cods on Apr 8th, 2016 at 8:59am Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2016 at 11:32pm:
bobs when we first moved to Canberra we rented ..one day the tiles in the shower actually moved...incredible..we found out the shower had no wet wall the tiles had been just laid on gyprock of course it had been patched up in the past ... but how useless was that... I would not trust your eyes alone.....that is a massive water problem.... I also knew someone who bought a house from the owner builder....when they removed the wallpaper from the main bedroom wall.. it was covering up a huge hole... he must have run out of noggins...lol... it cost me I think almost a $1000 for a building inspection before I could sell my house.... I think thats fair.. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 8th, 2016 at 10:35pm cods wrote on Apr 8th, 2016 at 8:59am:
Hi Cods, I haven't seen a single house ever offered with an independent building inspection report. It should be mandatory by law. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 8th, 2016 at 10:39pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 8th, 2016 at 10:35pm:
don't be daft Bobby. If the owner provides it, it's not independent. Do you know how many builders I know who would give me a positive report if I asked, sight unseen? The best way to be sure is to commission your own. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 8th, 2016 at 10:52pm John Smith wrote on Apr 8th, 2016 at 10:39pm:
Don't worry - I am going to get an independent report on any place I buy. In fact - my bank demanded one. Trouble is that a lot of reports are worthless. They can't pull away walls to check for rotting wood. They can't dig down under bad bricks to see if they have proper damp coursing fitted. If there is no manhole to go under the house how can they check the stumps? They can't remove a tile in the bathroom to check for rotting wood. A proper builder with permission to do a little damage would be the best but that is not going to happen. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir lastnail on Apr 8th, 2016 at 11:00pm John Smith wrote on Apr 8th, 2016 at 10:39pm:
then make it a jailable offense to falsify a report and the reporting standards would soon improve ;) Why should ten interested parties each fork out for a report ? That is totally retarded. The seller should provide a legitimate report as is done with road worthy certificates !! The problem is with this industry is that the rogues in the industry dictate the legislation to the piss-weak politicians who are willing accept their political donations :( |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 8th, 2016 at 11:07pm Sir lastnail wrote on Apr 8th, 2016 at 11:00pm:
Hi sir Nail, the politicians could easily make an inspection report mandatory from the seller with a simple act of parliament. They won't do it because they are all evil. I will never vote for any politician again. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir lastnail on Apr 8th, 2016 at 11:10pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 8th, 2016 at 11:07pm:
They would never do it because most houses would fail the test and could not be sold based on safety issues so the industry would collapse over night !! But never let safety get in the way of turning over a quick buck eh ;) |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 8th, 2016 at 11:15pm Sir lastnail wrote on Apr 8th, 2016 at 11:10pm:
Hi sir Nail, good houses would pass the test. Other houses are sold based just on the land value & are bulldozed anyway. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 8th, 2016 at 11:18pm Sir lastnail wrote on Apr 8th, 2016 at 11:00pm:
fraud is already a jailable offense. :D :D |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 8th, 2016 at 11:19pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 8th, 2016 at 11:07pm:
good idea . next election, you should vote for the checkout chick :D :D |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 8th, 2016 at 11:24pm John Smith wrote on Apr 8th, 2016 at 11:19pm:
I have seen a few hot looking ones. ;) |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by cods on Apr 9th, 2016 at 4:48pm John Smith wrote on Apr 8th, 2016 at 10:39pm:
IT IS LAW IN ACT.. and no pet you dont provide it.. YOU THE OWNER JUST PAYS FOR IT>> they the GOVT send round a team when your house goes on the market.. the agent gives you a rough idea of the cost... thats all I can tell you.. but you or the agent have no say in it whatever... the buyer would get a copy of their report as I did.. so if they make a mistake and the house is built on a rubbish tip....... they the building code body will be sued not the seller.. it is all proper and above board........ neither side can pick who does the survey. I thought it was the law all over..... I agree it should be... you need to think how much work are you prepared to do... as it looks like a lot of expensive works needs doing.....do your homework bobs.. it will be worth it...unless you are a sooper dooper tradie who can do everything.. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 9th, 2016 at 4:50pm cods wrote on Apr 9th, 2016 at 4:48pm:
No idea of the law in the ACT. Last time i went there was to go to the war memorial, not buy a house. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by greggerypeccary on Apr 9th, 2016 at 4:52pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 8th, 2016 at 11:24pm:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 9th, 2016 at 7:38pm cods wrote on Apr 9th, 2016 at 4:48pm:
Hi Cods, I just looked at a place further out east - it's all perfect - renovated - painted - it ticks every box & I can afford it with a tiny mortgage. The other place featured in the pictures - with the faulty bricks is really bad. I inspected it today & the only thing going for it is the land value. It would cost a lot of money to fix it up & I don't want to borrow so much money & have another mortgage over my head. the last mortgage drove me mad until I paid it off. I hate owing money. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 9th, 2016 at 7:54pm
Some more pictures of the house with the bad bricks & also under the house!
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 9th, 2016 at 7:56pm
Under the house - concrete stumps:
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 9th, 2016 at 7:56pm
Close up of one stump.
Notice the stump is cracked! |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 9th, 2016 at 10:37pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 9th, 2016 at 7:56pm:
great idea if you're worried about termites. Hadn't seen concrete ones like that used on houses before |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by greggerypeccary on Apr 9th, 2016 at 10:41pm John Smith wrote on Apr 9th, 2016 at 10:37pm:
Really? They're very common in WA. I had the first house I ever bought re-stumped with concrete. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 9th, 2016 at 10:46pm John Smith wrote on Apr 9th, 2016 at 10:37pm:
It's not supposed to be a termite area. Notice what appears to be salt at the bottom of the stump? That's typical of water damage. It must be very wet soil when it rains with poor drainage. It shows what can happen if people don't fix problems early. I will follow this house to see who buys it - for how much & what happens. The real estate agent said it would quite likely be bought by a developer & demolished to build a brand new house. Maybe it could be fixed up by a builder when he's not doing other jobs? It's too much for me to do as it needs a complete renovation inside as well. The asking price is too high. If they reduced the price by 100K I'd buy it but the owner wants his pound of flesh & he'll get it - the market is just so hot at the moment. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 9th, 2016 at 10:53pm greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 9th, 2016 at 10:41pm:
nope ... seen walls down to foundations, timber posts on pole homes and brick piers, but never concrete like that. I have seen it in commercail applications on an old shop / restaurant ... my first house's foundations were just common bricks laid down on their sides with the walls build on top of that. No mortar or concrete at all in the foundations. Damn thing was 80 yrs old, only two doors down from the rail line (so lots of vibrations) and hardy a crack anywhere. They certainly don't build them like that anymore. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by greggerypeccary on Apr 9th, 2016 at 10:55pm John Smith wrote on Apr 9th, 2016 at 10:53pm:
Well, there you go. Here in Perth, many (if not most) old homes have been re-stumped with concrete. Then again, we do things differently here: we build houses with double brick. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 9th, 2016 at 11:01pm greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 9th, 2016 at 10:55pm:
I have a German friend who says we build poor quality houses here in Australia. The one I have shown in these pics is only 28 years old! |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir lastnail on Apr 9th, 2016 at 11:08pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 9th, 2016 at 7:56pm:
The flipmen would buy this for 60K in the US and spend 20K fixing it up and then flip it for 110K. None of this $550K rubbish ripoff that we get here. We get totally ripped off on housing because the banks here are playing everyone for suckers :( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjK43B4CRb4 |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 9th, 2016 at 11:36pm Sir lastnail wrote on Apr 9th, 2016 at 11:08pm:
Yes sir Nail, in Melbourne you could quite easily pay $1 million for a dump that is ready to fall down. Today - I saw a modest place with no backyard get passed in at auction for 700K It's getting ridiculous. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sprintcyclist on Apr 9th, 2016 at 11:41pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 9th, 2016 at 7:56pm:
Hi Bobby, that does not appear to be a correctly made concrete stump. See how one side is all rough ? They are normally smooth and finished on all sides. I put some in once. this one appears to be a home made stump. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 10th, 2016 at 12:27am Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 9th, 2016 at 11:41pm:
A home made stump - wow! |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sprintcyclist on Apr 10th, 2016 at 12:45am A good house to not buy :-) |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 10th, 2016 at 6:35am Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 12:45am:
Hi Sprint, I think it would be alright for a builder who had all the money to buy it upfront - no mortgage - & he could fix it up when he didn't have other jobs to do. In a few years it would be worth 100K to 200K more if this real estate bubble keeps inflating. I prefer to buy a place that is all perfect to start off with. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:28am Bobby. wrote on Apr 9th, 2016 at 11:01pm:
we do. We build according to our environment. Every country does. We don't need our houses to withstand -30 degrees temps or hold up tons of snow. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 10th, 2016 at 11:49am John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:28am:
OK - I wonder why houses aren't built with reinforced concrete walls? Then you could put a flat roof on top & have the roof area as a garden or place to have deck chairs etc. You could double your usable space. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 10th, 2016 at 12:44pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 11:49am:
nothing stopping you ... .except that like everyone else, you want the smallest mortgage you can get. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 10th, 2016 at 1:21pm John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 12:44pm:
OK - so reinforced concrete costs a lot more than brick veneer? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 10th, 2016 at 1:22pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 1:21pm:
I imagine so otherwise everyone would do it. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Lionel Edriess on Apr 10th, 2016 at 1:43pm @ Bobby Having worked for a house-moving company in Queensland, I would suggest that you have a look at a smaller, low-set, timber house and consider raising it to gain the room underneath. You need to find something that is stumped to begin with. Add-ons to the structure like laundries, verandas, etc., can be separated from the main structure during the lift. Brick veneer construction is unlikely to able to be successfully raised. I don't know where you are considering buying, but the advantages of raising as opposed to extending are many. For one, you can double the usable area of the structure - even though the house might be small to begin with. With this method, you have time to plan your utilisation of such extra space while in residence. Again, it's a matter of factoring the extra expense. Here's an example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eV-mc7FprCw A house raised 8' can be enclosed underneath and be legally classified as living area. It's an option you may not have considered. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 10th, 2016 at 4:14pm Lionel Edriess wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 1:43pm:
Thanks Lionel, I am well aware of that. I am not buying weather board. Re-inforced concrete is not available anywhere. I only want to buy brick veneer with the bricks in good condition. I placed on offer on a house today with over 750 m2 of land. Wish me luck. cheers sir Bobby. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sprintcyclist on Apr 10th, 2016 at 5:08pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 6:35am:
A very good idea |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 10th, 2016 at 7:10pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 5:08pm:
Yes Sprint, when you see some of the actual places that look so good in the adverts it comes as a shock: |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 10th, 2016 at 7:12pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 7:10pm:
the only shock is that you seem to be genuinely shocked by it .... are you really that gullible as to believe photos designed to sell you a product are genuinely representative? Have you seen how big a Big Mac looks in all the promo photos? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 10th, 2016 at 7:35pm John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 7:12pm:
I am surprised by the dishonesty of the real estate agent adverts. People will find out the truth anyway - when they come to inspect the property. There is no point in hiding obvious faults - it just wastes everyone's time including the agents. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 10th, 2016 at 7:46pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 7:35pm:
but they're not being dishonest. They aren't builders so they're not qualified to comment about any issues, real or imagined. Their job is to sell. No salesman in the world sells anything by highlighting flaws in the product. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 10th, 2016 at 7:58pm John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 7:46pm:
What they do is use euphemisms e.g. a dump that needs bulldozing is called a renovators delight. :) |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Wolseley on Apr 10th, 2016 at 11:47pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 6:35am:
Or near perfect. The only way you can get exactly what you like is by building from scratch. If you are buying an existing house, don't worry too much about the bathrooms or kitchen or garden. Look rather at whether the building is in sound condition, where it is located and whether or not it has a floor plan that suits how you will live in it. We bought our present house almost three years ago. It was in pretty good condition (it was only 12 years old) and we could have moved straight in, but I chose to repaint it inside before we did and also replaced the carpet in the main bedroom. After we moved in, we had almost everything removed from the existing garden and I replanted it all (only two roses and the hedge at the front remain from the original garden) - thankfully none of the trees were large enough to be subject to tree preservation orders. Then we had the en-suite, main bathroom and toilet completely gutted and renovated - they were serviceable, but not what we wanted. The entrance doors and side lights have been changed - not because there was anything wrong with them but rather because we didn't really like what was there. The only unplanned expenditure was on the roof - it turned out that the cement on the ridge tiles was crumbling. The kitchen can wait - we will probably have it redone in a couple of years, but it is OK for now and, when we have it renovated, it will probably be more or less the same layout. All in all, it took us well over six months to find the house we wanted and, after a bit of work, we have more or less what we would have had if we had built from scratch - and in a position that is handy to almost everything. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 11th, 2016 at 6:15am Wolseley wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 11:47pm:
Hi Wolseley, You have done well. I was prepared to do some renovations in a more expensive area but my offer fell through - the owners wanted too much for a place that required 30K of work to finish off & also some clown had painted the bricks white many years ago & the paint was peeling off. Bricks need to breathe out the moisture to stop wood rotting behind them so paint is undesirable. The place shown in the pics on this thread required too much work or to be bulldozed. Once again the owner wanted far too much for it. By going a bit further East I was able to put in an offer for a place that is as you say - near perfect - & requires only a tiny mortgage after I sell my place. I am still waiting for a reply. cheers sir Bobby. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 11th, 2016 at 8:54am Bobby. wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 7:58pm:
how is that different from 'fresh food people' when the food has been sitting in cool rooms for 6 months? or 'the bank that cares' or any other of the millions of lines used in advertising? Renovators dreams do not need bulldozing, they just need a renovator who's not scared of some work. While it might not suit you, there are many that love em. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 11th, 2016 at 10:34pm John Smith wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 8:54am:
You have a point & as you said - those McDonald's hamburgers pictures look so wonderful until you get your hamburger & it looks nothing like the one in the picture. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrZFM2nvLXA Also - I've already said that a builder or bricky could take on that place with the stuffed bricks & make it nice without it costing too much for him. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 12th, 2016 at 8:46pm
Latest news,
My search is over - my offer for a house has been accepted. Once I sell my place I'll only have a tiny mortgage. I can't wait to move in in just over 30 days. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sprintcyclist on Apr 12th, 2016 at 8:56pm Congratulations |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 12th, 2016 at 9:01pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 12th, 2016 at 8:56pm:
Thanks Sprint, I expect to have to do some maintenance over the next 10 years but the house is in excellent condition. I can't find a crack in the brickwork or mortar & it's all straight. cheers sir Bobby. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by John Smith on Apr 12th, 2016 at 9:41pm
Congratulations Bobby. I'm glad you stopped waiting for the bubble to burst like nail is doing .... renting while retired or on a pension is difficult
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 12th, 2016 at 9:50pm John Smith wrote on Apr 12th, 2016 at 9:41pm:
Thanks John, The problem was that for every dollar I saved - the house prices would go up 2 or 3 dollars. It was costing me money to have money in the bank. The bubble just would not burst. The time to act was now & I'm left with only a tiny mortgage when I sell my place. I just hope I get a decent price for my place. cheers Bobby. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 12th, 2016 at 10:04pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 12th, 2016 at 9:50pm:
The trick I ended up using to get a house was to tell a real Estate agent exactly what I wanted & to make a good offer before the house was put on the market. Once they are on the market the Chinese always outbid you in any auction. Most of the other places were over priced & there were too many dumps for sale. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Wolseley on Apr 12th, 2016 at 10:10pm John Smith wrote on Apr 12th, 2016 at 9:41pm:
Exactly. The last thing you want is to still be renting after you retire. It's a recipe for disaster. Bobby. wrote on Apr 12th, 2016 at 9:50pm:
It might deflate a bit, but it's not going to burst. Bobby. wrote on Apr 12th, 2016 at 9:50pm:
I hope you do too but if you get an offer that's near what you want, you may as well take it rather than hanging around hoping for something better. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir Bobby on Apr 12th, 2016 at 10:16pm Wolseley wrote on Apr 12th, 2016 at 10:10pm:
Hi Wolseley, I agree with all your replies. As for those renovators delights - only builders should take them on. Some people spend 100K on renos & are still not happy. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Bobby on Jan 4th, 2019 at 9:36am
I was house hunting & found this.
It's a worry as it's not the only crack - just the worst one. It looks like I will have to get a quote from somewhere. There are many pitfalls when buying a house. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Gordon on Jan 4th, 2019 at 9:50am
If the house is worth spending money on, get the exterior finished in a good acrylic render which is often cheaper than brick pointing.
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Bobby on Jan 4th, 2019 at 9:56am Gordon wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 9:50am:
I would never paint bricks - bricks need to breathe to get the moisture out from the walls. In this case the foundation must have given way underneath - maybe because that drain next to it has over flowed with water? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Gordon on Jan 4th, 2019 at 10:10am Bobby. wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 9:56am:
That house looks like it will fall down while you're asleep and you will die. Let a Muslim or Sudanese buy it :) |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 4th, 2019 at 10:13am Bobby: how many other photos labelled 'Large crack' and 'Close up of 2nd crack' do you have on your computer? I'm curious. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Gordon on Jan 4th, 2019 at 10:16am
Another advantage of acrylic render is that it allows the material underneath to “breathe”, allowing for a drier and healthier home.
https://hipages.com.au/article/what_is_acrylic_rendering |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Bobby on Jan 4th, 2019 at 10:22am Gordon wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 10:10am:
Very funny. I think the drain next to it is blocked so that water has run out of it for years and undermined the foundation. In that case it could have encouraged termites. This could be the tip of an iceberg - the problems could be much greater. then again it might also be a relatively cheap repair compared to the cost of a house. I would need a quote to fix it & get a termite inspection certificate. That's expensive & the owner should provide that but they never do. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir lastnail on Jan 4th, 2019 at 10:27am
Why are real estate agents allowed to sell unsafe and potentially life threatening products to the general public without any due diligence ? I mean you can't sell a car without a road worthy unless it is a total bomb so why not a house ?
What sort of country is this ? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Bobby on Jan 4th, 2019 at 10:29am Sir lastnail wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 10:27am:
It's because they're scum who just want to take your money and have no comeback if you buy a faulty house. Buyer beware. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir lastnail on Jan 4th, 2019 at 10:33am
What sort of system is this ? And that Frydenturd dude wants the banks to start doling out money again to increase the price of all of these dumps. I just don't get it :(
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Bobby on Jan 4th, 2019 at 10:40am Sir lastnail wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 10:33am:
We need compulsory termite & building inspection certificates supplied by the owner by law. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Sir lastnail on Jan 4th, 2019 at 11:09am Bobby. wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 10:40am:
You won't get it because half the houses on the market would be condemned and real estate greed is much more important than consumer safety :( |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 4th, 2019 at 11:14am Bobby. wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 10:40am:
You just make the certificates a condition of sale. If the seller doesn't supply them, you tell them to stick their house up their arse. Simples. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Bobby on Jan 4th, 2019 at 11:51am greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 11:14am:
Yep - people need to be tough like Greggy. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Laugh till you cry on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:01pm
Epilog:
Bobby bought the house on the advice of three fingers Gordon and it later collapsed in a heap of rubble. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Bobby on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:04pm Laugh till you cry wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:01pm:
LOL. A house like that would need professionals to inspect it & quote before buying. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Laugh till you cry on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:05pm Bobby. wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:04pm:
Are you dumping feces on three fingers Gordon? |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Bobby on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:10pm
LTYC - no toilet humor allowed.
Such humor is the sign of a person who hasn't progressed past 4 years of age. forgiven namaste |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Captain Nemo on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:12pm
Looks like subsidence to me.
That could turn out to be a major problem. I would look for a different property to buy. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:13pm Bobby. wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 11:51am:
I've done it three times. If the offer comes back with "at seller's cost" crossed out, I tell the agent to withdraw the offer. Nek minnut, seller pays :) If someone wants to sell a house bad enough they aren't going to quibble over $400. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Bobby on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:18pm Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:12pm:
Yes - it looks like it would need to be jacked up on that area - some concrete put down under the foundation & then the bricks re-installed with new mortar. One problem with jacking up an area of a house is that the internal walls can start cracking. The more you think about it, the worse the problem becomes. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Bobby on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:29pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:13pm:
That's OK for a termite inspection but what about brickwork? You need a quote to fix it. Reminder from page 7 of this thread about a similar problem: http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1459686656/90 |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:33pm Bobby. wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:29pm:
You can get a building inspection and termite inspection combined for about $400 to $500. I don't think I'd be buying something with cracks like that, though. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Bobby on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:36pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:33pm:
Yes - like the last one shown above - someone actually bought it! |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:38pm Bobby. wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:36pm:
Some people like a challenge. It looks old, though. They might be considering demolition and rebuilding. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Bobby on Jan 4th, 2019 at 1:07pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 12:38pm:
I know one person who wanted a challenge - a house in a terrible state. He and his wife bought a house in 2007 and they have only renovated 2 bedrooms & a bit of the kitchen after over 11 years. They still have the lounge & another bedroom & the full kitchen to do. In that time they haven't received a cent of income from rent or anything. It's still worth nearly 3 times what they paid for it especially if they can finish the renovation. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Laugh till you cry on Jan 4th, 2019 at 1:11pm Bobby. wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 1:07pm:
Perhaps they could have made more by bulldozing it and selling the land for a quick buck. Flippers can make more than sitters. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Gordon on Jan 4th, 2019 at 1:18pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 11:14am:
People like to use their own independent building inspectors. I wouldn't trust one supplied by a vendor. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Bobby on Jan 4th, 2019 at 1:24pm Laugh till you cry wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 1:11pm:
They just used it as a nest egg. They still would have made a lot more on paper than if they would have put their money into super. They'll do OK. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Bobby on Jan 4th, 2019 at 1:26pm Gordon wrote on Jan 4th, 2019 at 1:18pm:
Not only that - all those inspections have an out clause for the inspector hidden in the fine print. If they fail to find something that costs you a fortune to fix you can't make a lawsuit against them. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Bobby on Jan 6th, 2019 at 6:35am
I just had another look at the picture.
I point out that the drain could have overflowed and the water may have undermined the foundations? Damp coursing should have stopped it - why not? Also - why are the bricks a different colour on the bottom layers? Has a previous owner had the whole house re-pointed using different color bricks because of a subsidence problem - or was it an original color scheme? It smells a bit fishy to me. |
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Laugh till you cry on Jan 6th, 2019 at 11:59am
Bobby, you should not have bought the BV banger with the screwed foundations.
|
Title: Re: House with a problem Post by Bobby on Jan 6th, 2019 at 12:14pm Laugh till you cry wrote on Jan 6th, 2019 at 11:59am:
dear beloved LTYC, I sold my house ages ago. I've been looking for another one ever since. I wouldn't buy a brick veneer banger. You can see how fussy I am. I was hoping to get advice from the people on Ozpolitic - many of whom have more experience in these important matters. forgiven namaste |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |