Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Islam >> love http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225592196 Message started by freediver on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 12:16pm |
Title: love Post by freediver on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 12:16pm
Could you please lebaorate on this for us Abu:
abu_rashid wrote on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 12:07pm:
|
Title: Re: love Post by abu_rashid on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 2:32pm Quote:
|
Title: Re: love Post by freediver on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 2:34pm
Does this justify, even in modern times, the marriage of an old man to a prepubescent girl, or one who has just hit puberty, on the grounds that she will grow to love him?
|
Title: Re: love Post by sprintcyclist on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 2:53pm so islam controls people how they are to love each other ? love at first sight is not allowed under islam? |
Title: Re: love Post by freediver on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 3:14pm
Also, is this a cultural thing, or is it doctrinal? Is there something in the Koran that criticises the notion of two people falling in love and being mature enough to make their own decision about who to spend the rest of their life with?
Is this also a reason for making women wear tents? If marriages are arranged and not based on love, it would be inevitable for people to fall back to going for the best looking girl. If you rule that out as well, what do they fall back on? Wealth? Lottery? Prestige? Eugenics? |
Title: Re: love Post by mozzaok on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 3:22pm
Wow, it just gets worse, and worse doesn't it.
No wonder Islam chooses to promote isolationist enclaves, and shroud their beliefs and behaviours in secrecy. Islam does not believe in love, well paint me pink and call me molly, what the heck is that about. This is possibly the "offest" thing I have heard yet. |
Title: Re: love Post by freediver on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 3:41pm
It believes in love. Women grow to love the men who were chosen for them. Maybe it's like a coping mechanism.
Are there any Muslim wives who don't grow to love their husbands? Can the jibbed husbands get a refund? |
Title: Re: love Post by helian on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 3:50pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 2:53pm:
Hardly restricted to Islam, but. Hindus do the same, usually after consulting the astrological chart that is written for them when they are born. Ever read Holy Cow by Sarah Macdonald? About her time in India. Particularly poignant is the story of the young Indian woman who married outside her caste to an Indian doctor living in Thailand. Her mother committed suicide to restore the family honour. The young woman was considered dead and not permitted to attend the funeral. Orthodox Jews practice it too, I believe. I wonder how a Catholic would have been treated in Northern Ireland during the troubles if he/she married a Protestant? |
Title: Re: love Post by freediver on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 4:03pm
I wonder how a Catholic would have been treated in Northern Ireland during the troubles if he/she married a Protestant?
They would have kicked her out of the IRA. |
Title: Re: love Post by mozzaok on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 5:11pm Quote:
Who said mods can't have a sense of humour? |
Title: Re: love Post by helian on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 5:54pm freediver wrote on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 4:03pm:
They might have beaten her to a pulp. |
Title: Re: love Post by abu_rashid on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 6:00pm
helian,
Quote:
No, it's Islam only. Only Islam has these kinds of things, all other religions are moderate and peace-loving and don't have any negative aspects according to freediver and his groupies. It's only Islam that has this kind of stuff that freediver detests. Both he and sprintcyclist have already made posts that clearly state this fact, that Islam is completely different from all other religions. |
Title: Re: love Post by sprintcyclist on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 6:04pm Abu - I have often stated openly where I feel christians have it "wrong". yes, I feel islam is entirely different from other beliefs. Want me to list why ? |
Title: Re: love Post by freediver on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 9:29pm Quote:
Strawman. All we want is a straight answer Abu. I am asking questions, that's all. I am happy to let Islam be judged by it's answers. You, apparently, are not. |
Title: Re: love Post by freediver on Nov 7th, 2008 at 11:55am
Are there any other views on human relationships or emotions that are different from western views? For example, is fun or friendship viewed differently? Are Muslims allowed to have fun? Can they be friends with whoever they want?
|
Title: Re: love Post by freediver on Jan 26th, 2009 at 12:28pm |
Title: Re: love Post by Calanen on Jan 27th, 2009 at 12:54pm freediver wrote on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 4:03pm:
It wasnt that bad. But it would have been difficult to live in some places, and both sides would think of you as a possible spy. If you lived right downtown in Belfast worked in a big offices or something, it would be ok. The problem is that in Northern Ireland, everyone knows everyone, your relatives know the other sides relatives, and so on and so forth. So its not just about you and your relationship, but goes much deeper. You would be better getting married and moving to England. All families would be better able to cope. I am talking about during the Troubles. Now it honestly wouldn't matter (since the good friday accords) |
Title: Re: love Post by freediver on Jan 27th, 2009 at 2:39pm
Yeah I'd forgotten how 'inbred' some of those European towns and villages are.
|
Title: Re: love Post by Gaybriel on Jan 28th, 2009 at 5:12pm
gees you guys really like to take something and stretch it to breaking point don't you
I don't see anything wrong with abu's description of love. having a deep and spiritual connection sounds more lasting to me than whirlwind romance. having said that- I don't think that the two are necessarily mutually exclusive, you can have romance and giddyness and all that stuff and still have a deep and lasting connection |
Title: Re: love Post by freediver on Jan 28th, 2009 at 5:28pm
We weren't criticising Abu's description for what it included, but for what it excluded, and for what it facilitates.
|
Title: Re: love Post by Gaybriel on Jan 28th, 2009 at 5:30pm freediver wrote on Jan 28th, 2009 at 5:28pm:
what do you feel it excludes? I don't see how it facilitates child marriage- if you think a child can develo a deep and spiritual connection easier than it can become infatuated with someone then you're kidding yourself |
Title: Re: love Post by abu_rashid on Jan 29th, 2009 at 4:42am Quote:
Please do excuse me freediver. I was giving you a description within my capacity only. It is by no means exhaustive, and I do apologise to you for any shortcomings in my description. I wasn't aware that when I describe something, I was obligated to include every single detail... You're really not an easy man to please are you fd? Perhaps I'll refrain from going into any detail in future, so as not to give the impression that what I've stated is all-encompassing. |
Title: Re: love Post by freediver on Jan 29th, 2009 at 9:38am Quote:
For starters, it excludes the idea that you fall in love before getting married? Quote:
It facilitates child marriage by permitting child marriage. That's how. Quote:
Not sure where you got the rest of that from. I don't think a young girl can do that. That's the whole point. They should be protected, not married off to some old man in the hope that she will grow to love him through domestic and sexual servitude. |
Title: Re: love Post by freediver on Feb 12th, 2009 at 5:10pm freediver wrote on Nov 7th, 2008 at 11:55am:
"Allah did not create man so that he could have fun. The aim of creation was for mankind to be put to the test through hardship and prayer. An Islamic regime must be serious in every field. There are no jokes in Islam. There is no humor in Islam. There is no fun in Islam. There can be no fun and joy in whatever is serious." -- The Ayatollah Khomeini How accurate is Khomeini's representation of Islam's approach to fun? good vs bad http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1231925038 Dancing, partying 'banned' in holy city of Karbala http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225017788 |
Title: Re: love Post by freediver on Sep 14th, 2013 at 10:22am
Two very different views on love and marriage within Islam. If you follow the link to Gandalf's post, you can see him go on to discover, apparently for the first time, that Muhammed had sex with his slaves, as well as the dozen or so wives he collected along the way (often after chopping their husband's head off).
True Colours wrote on Sep 13th, 2013 at 10:57am:
True Colours wrote on Sep 3rd, 2013 at 12:34pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 3rd, 2013 at 8:35am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 3rd, 2013 at 1:11pm:
I don't think Gandalf managed to dig up a single example of Muhammed using the word love in the context of sex or marriage, or attempting to change the Arabic culture of treating women as property. It must be another example of Islam's "phased" approach to cultural change. |
Title: Re: love Post by freediver on Sep 17th, 2013 at 8:22pm polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 8:18pm:
So what is the appropriate length of time Gandalf? |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |