Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Political Parties >> Liberal Party >> low blow from Bill Heffernan http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1178063021 Message started by freediver on May 2nd, 2007 at 9:43am |
Title: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by freediver on May 2nd, 2007 at 9:43am
http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Heffernan-still-insulting-women-Macklin/2007/05/02/1177788182844.html
Labor frontbencher Jenny Macklin has demanded Liberal Senator Bill Heffernan apologise for declaring Labor deputy leader Julia Gillard unqualified to lead the country on grounds she's deliberately chosen not to have children. Senator Heffernan raised eyebrows last year when he described the childless Ms Gillard - who could become deputy PM in a Labor government - as unqualified to lead the nation because she was barren. In an interview published in Wednesday's Bulletin magazine he stood by that observation. But he conceded he was uncouth when he said Ms Gillard had no idea what life was about because she had no children. "I won't walk away from that," he told the magazine. |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by mantra on May 2nd, 2007 at 5:50pm
I'm glad he said what he did. It can only enhance the ALP's chances at the next election. After the negativity surrounding the past few days over Julia Gillard's relationship with business leaders, Heffernan's uncouth and redneck comments will hopefully have a negative effect on the Liberals anti-union campaign.
|
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by IQSRLOW(Guest) on May 2nd, 2007 at 6:13pm
Heffernan's an idiot and will be seen as such but the voting public has a right to be made aware of the ALP handing over power to appease defunct unions at the expense of those who actually contribute something to society (employers)
The days of union strongholds is done and dusted and should be buried under a steaming pile of faeces so that the smell matches the content. |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by mantra on May 3rd, 2007 at 7:40am Quote:
Oh - and the employees don't contribute anything to society? Would businesses survive without workers? Record profits are being reaped, while the workers are going backwards. Do you think that mining companies will cease trading if some benefits are restored to the workers? While the average Australian foregoes penalty rates, overtime, leave loading, sick leave and holiday pay - corporations and CEO's are in receipt of obscene profits and they are increasing quarterly as most of us are aware. Unions brought fair working conditions into the 20th century. Workchoices has taken them back to the 19th century. If the unions and Gillard can restore some fairness back into the workplace - good on them. Heffernan's regressive thinking is on par with his leader. |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by sprintcyclist on May 3rd, 2007 at 8:38am
Yes, Heffernans comments were just a personal attack.
Wether anyone has kids or not has very little bearing if any on their political career. Ecologically, Julia gillard has probably done a good thing by having no kids. Stupid heffernen, labour were taking some real stick from the media, he gave them a complete let off. I like country folk |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by maille on May 4th, 2007 at 10:32am mantra wrote on May 2nd, 2007 at 5:50pm:
One would have hoped anyway mantra-this morning on 'Today' news a poll suggested that 70% of voters thought she could not lead properly if she were not a parent.This is of course rediculous. Bill Heffernen is a troublemaker. |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by sprintcyclist on May 4th, 2007 at 10:46am
There was one thing he said that I agreed with.
Words to the effect , "Someone with no kids do not know the relationship between the father, the mother and the nappy bucket." Had he phrased his earlier comment less as a personal attack and more thoughtfully/positively, would have been ok. |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by freediver on May 4th, 2007 at 10:53am
I wonder how often Bill Heffernan employs his intricate knowledge of nappy buckets in managing the country.
|
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by sprintcyclist on May 4th, 2007 at 11:17am
Bill Heffernan proposed "The Nappy Bucket Recovery" policy of 2004.
It was proposed to cart water from NT to lake Eyre using a human chain of nappy buckets. A forrward thinking politician if ever there was one. ( Paul Keating was another) (Wherever do I come up with this stuff from ??) |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by oceans_blue on May 5th, 2007 at 11:46am Sprintcyclist wrote on May 4th, 2007 at 11:17am:
Paul Keating was indeed a forward thinking politician-and he has been very vocal of late re-IR etc. Good to see- I love Keating to have another crack at the PM ship. He would fix whatever ails us in no time. |
Title: PM unmoved by proposal to drug test MPs Post by freediver on Jun 24th, 2007 at 3:22pm
Perhaps a bit of a gimmick, but still an interesting proposal. Only problem is, if politicians are tested, they will probably start passing laws to test everyone else. Bill also mentioned lawyers and judges in his rant and the comments are attributed by many to his obsession with the judiciary.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/PM-unmoved-by-proposal-to-drug-test-MPs/2007/06/24/1182623707339.html Prime Minister John Howard has declined to endorse or criticise a proposal by Liberal senator Bill Heffernan for MPs to be subjected to random drug testing. Senator Heffernan said politicians should be subjected to the same testing regime for illicit drugs as football players to send a message "that we are fair dinkum about stamping out drug use", Fairfax reported on Sunday. Salvation Army spokesman Pat Daley said that because of the importance of their decision-making, politicians should undergo drug tests. "Do you think that there are politicians using drugs? Let's find out," Mr Daley told AAP. "Given that there's drug testing of airline pilots and police and sportsmen and many other people in the community, it's only appropriate that politicians be drug tested given that they're making very serious decisions for the community. |
Title: Heffernan wins most sexist remark Post by freediver on Nov 13th, 2007 at 10:39am
http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Heffernan-wins-most-sexist-remark/2007/11/12/1194766594243.html
Controversial Liberal senator Bill Heffernan has won the 15th annual Ernie award for sexist remarks. The award was given to Senator Heffernan for comments earlier this year about ALP deputy leader Julia Gillard. Senator Heffernan said Ms Gillard was unfit for leadership because she was "deliberately barren". The award ceremony at NSW parliament house in Sydney also saw the launch of The Ernies Book, 1,000 terrible things Australian men have said about women. The "anthology of misogyny" or "portfolio of piggery" chronicles the past 15 years of sexist quotes from politicians to priests, celebrities, sports stars, judges and even prime ministers. It included comments by former prime minister Paul Keating, union leader Martin Ferguson, and retired judge Roddy Meagher. The room of women decided who should receive this year's Ernie by a traditional "boo-off". While Senator Heffernan was the winner, or loser, saw a top field full of what feminist's would call faux pas. Workplace and employment minister Joe Hockey was booed for his comments that it was hard work for him during his wife's pregnancy. Hockey upset about pregnancy joke focus http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Hockey-upset-about-pregnancy-joke-focus/2007/11/13/1194766630302.html Workplace Relations Minister Joe Hockey says he's upset about the attention given to a joke he made about his wife's pregnancy. Mr Hockey was on Monday night named as a contender at the annual Ernie awards for sexist remarks. A "boo-off" by women at NSW parliament decided the annual Ernie award should go to one of Mr Hockey's Liberal colleagues, Senator Bill Heffernan, for saying the childless deputy Labor leader Julia Gillard was unfit for leadership because she was "deliberately barren". |
Title: another low act, family first Post by freediver on Nov 21st, 2007 at 6:16pm
Family First 'abusing abortion clients'
http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Family-First-abusing-abortion-clients/2007/11/21/1195321843982.html Family First members have been harassing women attending a Victorian abortion clinic, Australian Democrats leader Lyn Allison says. "Family First has taken its anti-choice stance too far," Senator Allison said in a statement. "Prominent members of the extreme right-wing party have been harassing and abusing women who terminate their pregnancies," she said. "Security guards have told me that the protesters often yell at women entering the clinic and follow them down the street as they leave. "They accuse the women of being murderers. "These certainly aren't the kinds of people we want represented in our parliament." Family First did not immediately respond to the allegations. |
Title: Re: another low act, family first Post by deepthought on Nov 21st, 2007 at 6:44pm freediver wrote on Nov 21st, 2007 at 6:16pm:
According to who? A Democrat? Ha ha ha ha. What a load of old cobblers. I wouldn't trust a Democrat to push my supermarket trolley for me. |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by freediver on Nov 21st, 2007 at 6:55pm
This says it all: Family First did not immediately respond to the allegations.
|
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by sprintcyclist on Nov 21st, 2007 at 7:11pm
I'ld be surprised if FF have been harassing women visiting an abortion clinic.
Sure, they prob don't agree with abortions, but harassing women at an abortion clinic is a different thing altogether. Their site does not suggest this sort of thing. no response means nothing |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by IQSRLOW on Nov 21st, 2007 at 7:13pm
no response means nothing
Except to someone with an obvious bias |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by freediver on Nov 21st, 2007 at 7:29pm
Why didn't they deny it up front? Something ringing bells in the back of their mind perhaps?
Still no word from family first as far as I can tell. |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by deepthought on Nov 21st, 2007 at 7:41pm freediver wrote on Nov 21st, 2007 at 7:29pm:
Perhaps you could check the news then Quote:
|
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by freediver on Nov 21st, 2007 at 7:46pm
Maybe I misread it - is he saying they have been out the front of the abortion clinic for 15 years? What do they do? Sit out the front and drink tea and chat quietly amongst themselves? Though I do congratulate them from avoiding having charges laid against them. I guess they have some self control.
This Dave bloke must think he's real tough sitting out the front of an abortion clinic having a go at women when they are at their most vulnerable. Maybe he'll graduate to harassing school kids next for holding hands with people of the same sex. |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by deepthought on Nov 21st, 2007 at 9:13pm freediver wrote on Nov 21st, 2007 at 7:46pm:
I expect he cares to speak out for those even more vulnerable. Those without a voice at all. I expect that makes him a very principled man. But you don't care for that obviously. |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by sprintcyclist on Nov 22nd, 2007 at 8:52am
hear hear deepy.
If they have been there for 15 years without a charge laid, pretty ok really. I'ld presume they are for the unborn baby, not against the troubled mum to be. |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by freediver on Nov 22nd, 2007 at 9:40am
I can respect people who oppose abortion and who campaign against it, but to start harassing women when they are at their most vulnerable and forcing doctors to hire security guards is just wrong. Half the women they harass are probably just there for advice anyway.
|
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by deepthought on Nov 22nd, 2007 at 6:03pm freediver wrote on Nov 22nd, 2007 at 9:40am:
At an abortion clinic? What kind of advice do they give? |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by freediver on Nov 22nd, 2007 at 8:09pm
What the health implications of the various oiptions are - the sort of advice doctors are trained to give.
|
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by deepthought on Nov 22nd, 2007 at 10:51pm freediver wrote on Nov 22nd, 2007 at 8:09pm:
So let me get this straight - you believe that doctors in abortion clinics urge women not to abort their unborn? Why are they called abortion clinics do you think? Why not medical centres? And why would women seeking advice go to an abortion clinic? I don't know of any woman who just wants pre-natal advice utilising the services of an abortion clinic. Do you? |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by freediver on Nov 23rd, 2007 at 7:28am
So let me get this straight - you believe that doctors in abortion clinics urge women not to abort their unborn?
No Deepthought, they inform them of what their options are and what the implications of each option are. They do not try to steer patients in any one direction. Why are they called abortion clinics do you think? They are called plenty of things - family planning centres. If you were totally against abortion and wanted to jsutify harassing every single woman that walked through the door, you would call them abortion clinics. |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by deepthought on Nov 23rd, 2007 at 4:41pm freediver wrote on Nov 23rd, 2007 at 7:28am:
So that bloody Democrat Lyn Allison is a hypocrite hey? It was him that called it an abortion clinic when he told the news media "Family First members have been harassing women attending a Victorian abortion clinic". Hypocritical bastard. Tell me freediver - why don't women get advice from their own doctor then? What purpose do 'abortion clinics' serve? |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by freediver on Nov 23rd, 2007 at 4:43pm
I think that family planning clinics give free consultation on pregnancy, STD's etc, or something like that. GP's refer people to them.
|
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by deepthought on Nov 23rd, 2007 at 5:00pm freediver wrote on Nov 23rd, 2007 at 4:43pm:
WHAT??????????? I know of only one woman who ever went to an abortion clinic and I have known heaps of pregnant women. That one woman went for an abortion, not advice. |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by freediver on Nov 23rd, 2007 at 5:03pm
I doubt many women make up their mind without medical advice. But if you want to try to draw trends based on one incident, go ahead.
|
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by deepthought on Nov 23rd, 2007 at 5:05pm freediver wrote on Nov 23rd, 2007 at 5:03pm:
How many women do you know who have gone to an abortion clinic for pre-natal care then - why not tell me why you think I'm wrong? |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by freediver on Nov 23rd, 2007 at 5:16pm
Unlike Family First, I don't tend to ask women about their reproductive history.
Nor have I knocked any up accidentally then blamed them for the choice they made. |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by deepthought on Nov 23rd, 2007 at 5:30pm freediver wrote on Nov 23rd, 2007 at 5:16pm:
You claimed to know quite a bit about them before. You reckoned GP's referred people to them. How did you know that then? Guess? You appear to have developed amnesia. |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by freediver on Nov 23rd, 2007 at 5:36pm
No. There was a bi hoo-ha about it in the media a while back. Some Family First nutters were trying to worm their way into a medical advice hotline and give biased advice based on personal judgement of certain women rather than medical advice.
I admit that's a bit sketchy, but it's a lot better than trying to count the number of women I know who have been to a family planning centre. Do you really think women go and tell everyone about it afterwards? |
Title: Re: low blow from Bill Heffernan Post by deepthought on Nov 23rd, 2007 at 7:08pm freediver wrote on Nov 23rd, 2007 at 5:36pm:
I think you are quite confused. Either that or I am. You refer to abortion clinics as Family Planning Centres. Here's the web address for Queensland's Family Planning Clinic Services http://www.fpq.com.au/clinic_services.stm Can you point out on there the bit that says they offer abortions please? |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |