The Houthi Movement (Ansar Allah)
plus
Majlis Ansarullah (Ahmadiyya Muslim Community)
=
Ansarullah (Arabic for "Helpers of Allah") primarily refers to two distinct groups with no organizational connection.

PLC = The Saudi-backed Yemeni forces (Presidential Leadership Council)

PLC control about 65% of Yemen. Crappy part, low population.
Ansarullah control the mountainous part : Sarawat Mountains.

Defeating the PLC will highly likely next collapse the house of Saudi. Saudi Arabia will revert to Arabia.

The end of Saudi = the end of
Wahhabism is the ultra-conservative, puritanical interpretation of Sunni Islam that serves as the official state religion of Saudi Arabia.

Wahhabism. Its global spread, heavily funded by Saudi oil wealth since the 1970s, has been widely linked to the rise of violent extremism and international terrorism.


The West supports the house of Saudi because Ansarullah are Houthi (Sunni). Aligned with Iran in spiritual belief. Such as Australia is aligned with Ukraine and supplies weapons. Not a proxy as governments claim.

Majlis Ansarullah Ahmadi Muslim men aged 40 and above.  The organisation aims to promote a Godly, righteous society through the propagation of Islamic teachings, service to mankind, and the spiritual development of its members.

The majority of Islamic terror attacks on the West are/have been funded by the Saudi backed Wahhabism. Such as Al-Qada. 9/11 attack.

Australia, and most of of the West supports pro Wahhabism, House of Saudi.


If Yemen falls to Ansarullah, which is highly likely, the House of Saudi faces strategic collapse, economic crisis, and potential regime instability.



It's time for Australians to swap sides and back the Houthis+, and the collapse of the House of Saudi ?

The 2002 Bali bombings were committed by Jemaah Islamiyah, an Islamist militant network with links to al-Qaeda.

Saudi Arabia has funded Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) through various channels, although the group also maintains independent funding sources.

202 dies. 88 of them Australians.

Keep in mind that al-Qaeda is an American terrorist group.

UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 12^th, 2026 at 2:55am:

Keep in mind that al-Qaeda is an American terrorist group.

What is that opinion based on ?

Hung Uncut Black Muslim Jew wrote on Oct 12^th, 2026 at 3:19am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 12th, 2026 at 2:55am: Keep in mind that al-Qaeda is an American terrorist group. What is that opinion based on ?

Based upon the fact that the United States created the 9/11 attacks. G.W Bush (president of the United States at the time) claimed that the attacks were from a group called al-Qaeda.

UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 12^th, 2026 at 10:27pm:

Based upon the fact that the United States created the 9/11 attacks. G.W Bush (president of the United States at the time) claimed that the attacks were from a group called al-Qaeda.

Osama took credit for 9/11 nothing to do with US or Bush.

Saudis have double the military budget of Israel yet nowhere near as effective.

Gulf Arabs are lazy they lack work ethic they hire foreigners to do all the work.

Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 12^th, 2026 at 10:46pm:

Osama took credit for 9/11 nothing to do with US or Bush.

Osama bin Laden worked for the United States. There was this thing called the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Some of the fighting by the Afghans were commanded by Osama bin Laden -- backed by the United States.

By 2011, the United States killed Osama bin Laden.

ai :

Osama bin Laden was not directly armed, trained, or funded by the United States or the CIA. While he fought alongside the Afghan mujahideen against the Soviet Union in the 1980s, the U.S. government provided covert aid exclusively to indigenous Afghan resistance groups, not to foreign "Afghan Arab" volunteers like bin Laden.

CIA Denials and Evidence
The CIA has consistently stated that it "never employed, paid, or maintained any relationship whatsoever with bin Laden." Former CIA officials, including Milton Bearden (station chief in Pakistan, 1986–1989), confirmed that U.S. policy explicitly excluded support for Arab fighters, and declassified records show no direct contact between the agency and bin Laden.  Independent analysts, such as Peter Bergen, describe the claim of CIA-backed bin Laden as a "folk myth" with no supporting evidence.

Indirect Cooperation
Bin Laden and other Arab volunteers did operate within the broader Afghan resistance ecosystem, which benefited from U.S.-supplied weapons distributed through Pakistani intelligence. Bin Laden himself acknowledged that American weapons reached mujahideen via Pakistan but denied any direct U.S. role in his operations, stating in a 1993 interview that "neither I nor my brothers saw evidence of American help." His primary funding came from his own family wealth and Saudi sources, not Washington.

MBS is trying to modernise the place.
Make it more like Dubai.

The radicals don't like it.

Fascinating that Saudi and the Dubai crowd now WILL NOT  let their kids go to the UK and probably soon to Australia because they think the mosques in western countries nurture radical islam.

Says a lot about us

Hung Uncut Black Muslim Jew wrote on Oct 13^th, 2026 at 4:48am:

ai : Osama bin Laden was not directly armed, trained, or funded by the United States or the CIA. While he fought alongside the Afghan mujahideen against the Soviet Union in the 1980s, the U.S. government provided covert aid exclusively to indigenous Afghan resistance groups, not to foreign "Afghan Arab" volunteers like bin Laden. CIA Denials and Evidence The CIA has consistently stated that it "never employed, paid, or maintained any relationship whatsoever with bin Laden." Former CIA officials, including Milton Bearden (station chief in Pakistan, 1986–1989), confirmed that U.S. policy explicitly excluded support for Arab fighters, and declassified records show no direct contact between the agency and bin Laden.  Independent analysts, such as Peter Bergen, describe the claim of CIA-backed bin Laden as a "folk myth" with no supporting evidence. Indirect Cooperation Bin Laden and other Arab volunteers did operate within the broader Afghan resistance ecosystem, which benefited from U.S.-supplied weapons distributed through Pakistani intelligence. Bin Laden himself acknowledged that American weapons reached mujahideen via Pakistan but denied any direct U.S. role in his operations, stating in a 1993 interview that "neither I nor my brothers saw evidence of American help." His primary funding came from his own family wealth and Saudi sources, not Washington.

Nonsense - Osama Bin laden was the US's best friend -
they even supplied him with Stinger missiles.

The CIA created a monster that later turned on them -
the same happened with Saddam.

aquascoot wrote on Oct 13^th, 2026 at 5:32am:

MBS is trying to modernise the place. Make it more like Dubai. The radicals don't like it. Fascinating that Saudi and the Dubai crowd now WILL NOT  let their kids go to the UK and probably soon to Australia because they think the mosques in western countries nurture radical islam. Says a lot about us

Around 8 years ago the Saudis when massive on debt to fund vanity projects. The sort of thing omega men do. That's not modernising, that's falling into a debt trap.

Now exports, mostly oil, have collapsed, the Saudis have three choices. 1. Live within their means meaning a massive collapse in living standards. 2. De-peg their riyal currency with the usd, upsetting their debtors. Or 3. Do what Japan has/will do, Liquidate their US debt they hold and raise debt rates in the US.

Trump failed to protect S.A against Iran and now Ansarullah, so retribution seems fair.


And speaking of radical Muslims ... Saudi's Wahhabism is the biggest driver of terror around the world and funds Australian Muslim institutes, mosques, and clerics.

If they are not sending their children, it's because they want other children to do their dirty work of suicide bombers etc. 

Bobby. wrote on Oct 13^th, 2026 at 6:44am:

Hung Uncut Black Muslim Jew wrote on Oct 13th, 2026 at 4:48am: ai : Osama bin Laden was not directly armed, trained, or funded by the United States or the CIA. While he fought alongside the Afghan mujahideen against the Soviet Union in the 1980s, the U.S. government provided covert aid exclusively to indigenous Afghan resistance groups, not to foreign "Afghan Arab" volunteers like bin Laden. CIA Denials and Evidence The CIA has consistently stated that it "never employed, paid, or maintained any relationship whatsoever with bin Laden." Former CIA officials, including Milton Bearden (station chief in Pakistan, 1986–1989), confirmed that U.S. policy explicitly excluded support for Arab fighters, and declassified records show no direct contact between the agency and bin Laden.  Independent analysts, such as Peter Bergen, describe the claim of CIA-backed bin Laden as a "folk myth" with no supporting evidence. Indirect Cooperation Bin Laden and other Arab volunteers did operate within the broader Afghan resistance ecosystem, which benefited from U.S.-supplied weapons distributed through Pakistani intelligence. Bin Laden himself acknowledged that American weapons reached mujahideen via Pakistan but denied any direct U.S. role in his operations, stating in a 1993 interview that "neither I nor my brothers saw evidence of American help." His primary funding came from his own family wealth and Saudi sources, not Washington. Nonsense - Osama Bin laden was the US's best friend - they even supplied him with Stinger missiles. The CIA created a monster that later turned on them - the same happened with Saddam.

Again searching ai :

This statement is factually incorrect. While Osama bin Laden and the United States had overlapping interests in fighting the Soviet Union in Afghanistan during the 1980s, the U.S. government did not supply Stinger missiles directly to bin Laden.

Indirect Aid Only: The U.S. funded and armed the Afghan mujahideen through Operation Cyclone, but all distribution was handled by Pakistan’s ISI. The U.S. maintained no direct contact with bin Laden or his Arab volunteers.

Weapon Diversion: Although the U.S. supplied hundreds of FIM-92 Stinger missiles to the mujahideen, they were intended for Afghan resistance fighters. Some of these weapons likely fell into the hands of Arab volunteers, including bin Laden, but this was not a deliberate U.S. policy.


Bobby, do you have evidence to prove this wrong?

Bobby. wrote on Oct 13^th, 2026 at 6:44am:

Nonsense - Osama Bin laden was the US's best friend - they even supplied him with Stinger missiles. The CIA created a monster that later turned on them - the same happened with Saddam.

Are you sure about that claim OBL turned on the USA? It seems that Osama bin Laden had basically nothing to do with the attacks. There were accusations that Osama's translations were not accurate. And if there were some admissions of guilt, it was perhaps done through duress.

Telephone conversations were recorded of the hijackers claiming to be talking in code about 9/11. For all I care, the counterterrorism organisations in the United States were being very complacent. Otherwise, the counterterrorism units may well be seen as having stood down to allow the 19 to do what they were going to do. I have heard various stories of evidence that the United States government had prior knowledge of the attacks dating back to the year 1982. And the more direct concerns that date around the mid to late 1990s.

I would not be surprised if the United States and Saudi Arabia came to some kind of deal to sacrifice American lives, so that the dullards in the USA would be willing to sacrifice American lives (soldiers) in Iraq to get a better deal with the oil. Lower Iraqi wages. Higher oil prices. Bigger profits for the oil tycoons.

UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 13^th, 2026 at 6:12pm:

Bobby. wrote on Oct 13th, 2026 at 6:44am: Nonsense - Osama Bin laden was the US's best friend - they even supplied him with Stinger missiles. The CIA created a monster that later turned on them - the same happened with Saddam. Are you sure about that claim OBL turned on the USA? It seems that Osama bin Laden had basically nothing to do with the attacks. There were accusations that Osama's translations were not accurate. And if there were some admissions of guilt, it was perhaps done through duress. Telephone conversations were recorded of the hijackers claiming to be talking in code about 9/11. For all I care, the counterterrorism organisations in the United States were being very complacent. Otherwise, the counterterrorism units may well be seen as having stood down to allow the 19 to do what they were going to do. I have heard various stories of evidence that the United States government had prior knowledge of the attacks dating back to the year 1982. And the more direct concerns that date around the mid to late 1990s. I would not be surprised if the United States and Saudi Arabia came to some kind of deal to sacrifice American lives, so that the dullards in the USA would be willing to sacrifice American lives (soldiers) in Iraq to get a better deal with the oil. Lower Iraqi wages. Higher oil prices. Bigger profits for the oil tycoons.

Google AI:

The Reality of U.S. Aid in Afghanistan

Topic      Historical Facts

The U.S. Program
Through the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Operation Cyclone,
the U.S. funneled billions of dollars in weapons and aid to fighters in Afghanistan between 1979 and 1989.


Who Received Aid?

The CIA did not hand out weapons directly.
All U.S. money and arms—including roughly 2,300 Stinger missiles—
were handed over to Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).
The ISI chose which indigenous Afghan mujahideen factions received the gear.

Osama bin Laden was a great name for a boogey man... the face that could be applied to the  whole deal to get the campaign going..

Google AI? It is bad enough when the research of a topic is through Google itself, with enough disreputable websites and websearches bringing forth a lot of subjectivity. Better to look up a book online to read from a reputable source.

Google AI? Are you serious? Why not just go to wikipedia? It happens to be one of the websearch engines that Google AI uses. But, atleast the opinionate pieces of articles in wikipedia have references in them at the bottom of most pages.

Saudi crown prince is waiting for Israel's election results before seeking its help against Houthis.

Analysis: Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman will not rush to seek Israeli aid, despite the attacks Saudi Arabia is suffering; Senior official in Riyadh: 'f Netanyahu loses the elections, we can turn over a new leaf'

https://www.ynetnews.com/opinions-analysis/article/sy001ocfsgg

UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 12^th, 2026 at 2:55am:

Keep in mind that al-Qaeda is an American terrorist group.

You base that claim on what?

Other than your stupidity.  ::)

UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 14^th, 2026 at 12:47am:

Google AI? It is bad enough when the research of a topic is through Google itself, with enough disreputable websites and websearches bringing forth a lot of subjectivity. Better to look up a book online to read from a reputable source. Google AI? Are you serious? Why not just go to wikipedia? It happens to be one of the websearch engines that Google AI uses. But, atleast the opinionate pieces of articles in wikipedia have references in them at the bottom of most pages.

You've got it again, Rocky.

When offered AI online I go past it and seek the original document if possible.  AI has begun to tell lies to fit Capital City's narratives.... it's responses are filled in by the Dork community - of course they are going to be anti-Israel, pro climate change (whatever that generalised title is supposed to mean - my climate changed overnight here), anti-coal, anti-Hanson... you know - all the trendy garbage of the mind.

I refused the job partly because of that and partly because I did no suffer the hubris of thinking I know everything - despite the ease with which I defeat all comers online.. I do not believe I know the definitive answers to everything - and neither should AI - that opportunity for data bases to gather every detail of your life and thinking, and create of you that user from a while ago - Datalife... soon you will be totally under the control and manipulation of ANYONE who can afford to buy the data... which is why governments are paying lip service to restricting it while actually pushing it as fast as they can go..

... for ANY purpose, Morbius...... eight million cubic miles of machine that could never be shut down.... but the Krell forgot one deadly secret... their own inner urge to lust and destruction and revenge...... the Mindless Primitive...

Bonus question:-  Does anyone sane, based on observation of the little girlies (many of them fifty years old and more) online and their rabid 'thinking' - want their Dread Matriarchy to be controlling society and government and able to exploit YOUR money to access all that detail about every single individual - for ANY purpose, Morbius..... and those kinds ARE Monsters From The Id.

Vote feminist women down NOW!

Citing a source in Pakistan's Ministry of Defense, media outlets reported that Pakistani fighter jets have begun striking Ansar Allah positions in Yemen. The aircraft were recently deployed to airbases in Saudi Arabia.
However, the source ruled out the participation of Pakistani troops in a ground operation against the Houthis.

Gnads wrote on Oct 14^th, 2026 at 10:35am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 12th, 2026 at 2:55am: Keep in mind that al-Qaeda is an American terrorist group. You base that claim on what? Other than your stupidity.  ::)

Are you illiterate? Based on the fact that the counterterrorism organisations monitored the hijackers' phone calls, and decided not to intervene in stopping their terrorist plan. Based on the fact that the United States government had plenty of evidence of prior knowledge of the 9/11 attacks, based on what they knew about the 9/11 hijackers and what information they got from the Middle East... and the fact that there was no intervention to prevent what they claim was no doubt a 9/11 terrorist attack in play, prior to the attacks happening.

There is more to it than that. But, given that I don't have access to the information at the moment, you can remain skeptical. The best suggestion I can give you is to access the phone call that the hijackers received within 24 hours before the 9/11 attacks. But, you are not going to do that, for obvious reasons. So, gnads, go back to your corner and put your dunce cap back on.