Quote:

.....   The Insecurity That Drives Misogynists.  ........ Key points Two types of sexism are hostile sexism (antagonism toward women) and benevolent sexism (seeing women as fragile and in need of protection). Men who feel they do not make good romantic mates are less likely to offset their hostile sexism with benevolent sexism. Understanding subjective perceptions of mate value may help identify men who hold misogynistic views or may be prone to violence against women.  ...........              ....  The present study found the association between hostile and benevolent sexism is related to perceived mate value. Hostile sexist men balance their antagonism and hostility toward women with acts of chivalry (e.g., cherishing and protecting women) only if they perceive themselves to have high mate value. Knowing the different faces of sexism is important, as research on sexism indicates patriarchal order is maintained through a mix of both hostile and benevolent sexism. Behaviors associated with benevolent sexism (i.e. cherishing and protecting women) counterbalance the costs of hostile sexism (i.e. hostility and aggression). Yet, regardless of the positive intentions or behaviors of benevolently sexist men, benevolent sexism is a form of gender-based prejudice. It maintains male dominance and a patriarchal order that oppresses women, who are viewed as weak, incompetent, and dependent on men.        .........

https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/finding-new-home/202108/the-insecurity-drives-misogynists

Bad spellers of the world - untie!!




psychology of misognyists (sic)


There are two types of misognyists, as "there are only two things that can destroy a healthy man: love trouble, ambition, and financial catastrophe. And that’s already three things, and there are a lot more."

;D ;D ;D

Frank is exposed.

mothra wrote on Oct 7^th, 2026 at 9:58am:

Frank is exposed.

:D :D


"Why has psychology—meaning thereby not knowledge of men and experience of life but scientific psychology—always been the shallowest and most worthless of the disciplines of philosophy, a field so empty that it has been left entirely to mediocre minds and barren systematists? The reason is not far to seek. It is the misfortune of “experimental” psychology that it does not even possess an object as the word is understood in any and every scientific technique. Its searches and solutions are fights with shadows and ghosts."


( Not Arash Emamzadeh of Psychology Today, naturally)

mothra wrote on Oct 7^th, 2026 at 9:58am:

Frank is exposed.

anything of depth, understanding or compassion triggers some people

Sprintcyclist wrote on Oct 7^th, 2026 at 12:26pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 7th, 2026 at 9:58am: Frank is exposed. anything of depth, understanding or compassion triggers some people

;D ;D


What do you, or Psychology Today, know about depth and understanding?


You are the one who starts numerous threads triggered by your unmedicated TDS and pronounced self-loathing as a man.

“Women are made to fly and soar,” she wrote, “not to creep and crawl, as the haters of our sex want us to.”

Sprintcyclist wrote on Oct 8^th, 2026 at 12:48pm:

“Women are made to fly and soar,” she wrote, “not to creep and crawl, as the haters of our sex want us to.”

"Women need men to anchor them, lest they float away to oblivion."

"psychology of misognyists"


Sprintcyclist wrote on Oct 8^th, 2026 at 12:48pm:

“Women are made to fly and soar,” she wrote, “not to creep and crawl, as the haters of our sex want us to.”

1/
A 'misogynist'.

Coz.......that descriptor......has to be speaking of some male/masculine entity,
who is invariably, engaged in some grave error of judgement.

Right ?

Well.....in this PC world.......aren't   they   always !!!
/sarc off


2/
And IMO, the title of this thread is a misnomer.

misnomer = = a wrong or inaccurate name or term.           the wrong use of a name or term.

Coz.......all women are 90% of the time, the innocent victims of 'bad actors' [in their space] ?

I don't think so.

Empowerment from the...... Zeitgeist of PC 'Entitlement'.



CONTRA-WISE;
If anyone [i.e. another woman, or, a man]......chooses to pander to 'a female voice' who has no common sense......
then any good outcome will rarely result.

e.g.
Like pandering to the whims of any child [an immature psyche].......a good outcome can rarely result.


ANALOGY.....
And......in a sane world......shouldn't we all.....choose to be critical [hold a critical opinion of, and about, AND NOT FOLLOW]......an individual who chooses to recklessly run close to the edge of an obvious precipice ?

precipice = = a tall and very steep rock face or cliff.


ARGUMENT;
The opinion of any woman cannot be assumed to be a correct opinion [or an optimum opinion].......just because the opinion in question, emerges from a feminine psyche.



Angela Merkel

:P

An Australian judge gave a Bhutanese teen 18 months for raping a girl at a Canberra party, then suspended it on the spot because he had only been in Australia six months and had “limited insight into societal norms.”
Justice Andrew Muller sentenced him in the ACT Supreme Court. The boy was 16 at the time. He had arrived from Bhutan about six months earlier. He met the girl at a house party in Holt in August 2025, walked her to a green belt, and raped her. He pleaded guilty to sexual intercourse without consent. Reports of the hearing say he used considerable force.
Muller said the lack of sexual experience and the short time in the country reduced his moral culpability. He said the teen now understands consent needs clear agreement, not just the absence of a no. Prosecutors asked for jail. The judge said rehabilitation was better served in the community. The 18 months is a good-behaviour order until April 2028.
He knew enough to plead guilty. The girl still got no jail time out of it.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Oct 11^th, 2026 at 7:14am:

An Australian judge gave a Bhutanese teen 18 months for raping a girl at a Canberra party, then suspended it on the spot because he had only been in Australia six months and had “limited insight into societal norms.” Justice Andrew Muller sentenced him in the ACT Supreme Court. The boy was 16 at the time. He had arrived from Bhutan about six months earlier. He met the girl at a house party in Holt in August 2025, walked her to a green belt, and raped her. He pleaded guilty to sexual intercourse without consent. Reports of the hearing say he used considerable force. Muller said the lack of sexual experience and the short time in the country reduced his moral culpability. He said the teen now understands consent needs clear agreement, not just the absence of a no. Prosecutors asked for jail. The judge said rehabilitation was better served in the community. The 18 months is a good-behaviour order until April 2028. He knew enough to plead guilty. The girl still got no jail time out of it.

Diversity of societal norms is our strength, innit!

Frank wrote on Oct 11^th, 2026 at 7:19am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Oct 11th, 2026 at 7:14am: An Australian judge gave a Bhutanese teen 18 months for raping a girl at a Canberra party, then suspended it on the spot because he had only been in Australia six months and had “limited insight into societal norms.” Justice Andrew Muller sentenced him in the ACT Supreme Court. The boy was 16 at the time. He had arrived from Bhutan about six months earlier. He met the girl at a house party in Holt in August 2025, walked her to a green belt, and raped her. He pleaded guilty to sexual intercourse without consent. Reports of the hearing say he used considerable force. Muller said the lack of sexual experience and the short time in the country reduced his moral culpability. He said the teen now understands consent needs clear agreement, not just the absence of a no. Prosecutors asked for jail. The judge said rehabilitation was better served in the community. The 18 months is a good-behaviour order until April 2028. He knew enough to plead guilty. The girl still got no jail time out of it. Diversity of societal norms is our strength, innit!

Why do you only condemn sexual assault when it's a brown or black person doing it?

When it's a white guy, you're in there swinging for him.

mothra wrote on Oct 11^th, 2026 at 7:47am:

Frank wrote on Oct 11th, 2026 at 7:19am: Sprintcyclist wrote on Oct 11th, 2026 at 7:14am: An Australian judge gave a Bhutanese teen 18 months for raping a girl at a Canberra party, then suspended it on the spot because he had only been in Australia six months and had “limited insight into societal norms.” Justice Andrew Muller sentenced him in the ACT Supreme Court. The boy was 16 at the time. He had arrived from Bhutan about six months earlier. He met the girl at a house party in Holt in August 2025, walked her to a green belt, and raped her. He pleaded guilty to sexual intercourse without consent. Reports of the hearing say he used considerable force. Muller said the lack of sexual experience and the short time in the country reduced his moral culpability. He said the teen now understands consent needs clear agreement, not just the absence of a no. Prosecutors asked for jail. The judge said rehabilitation was better served in the community. The 18 months is a good-behaviour order until April 2028. He knew enough to plead guilty. The girl still got no jail time out of it. Diversity of societal norms is our strength, innit! Why do you only condemn sexual assault when it's a brown or black person doing it? When it's a white guy, you're in there swinging for him.

That's enough lying, sladereuse.


Tinted rapist are excused, white ones arent. Neither should be excused. But shrieks of wacism and islamophobia from you goes a long way and gives them a pass.

Frank wrote on Oct 11^th, 2026 at 9:00am:

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2026 at 7:47am: Frank wrote on Oct 11th, 2026 at 7:19am: Sprintcyclist wrote on Oct 11th, 2026 at 7:14am: An Australian judge gave a Bhutanese teen 18 months for raping a girl at a Canberra party, then suspended it on the spot because he had only been in Australia six months and had “limited insight into societal norms.” Justice Andrew Muller sentenced him in the ACT Supreme Court. The boy was 16 at the time. He had arrived from Bhutan about six months earlier. He met the girl at a house party in Holt in August 2025, walked her to a green belt, and raped her. He pleaded guilty to sexual intercourse without consent. Reports of the hearing say he used considerable force. Muller said the lack of sexual experience and the short time in the country reduced his moral culpability. He said the teen now understands consent needs clear agreement, not just the absence of a no. Prosecutors asked for jail. The judge said rehabilitation was better served in the community. The 18 months is a good-behaviour order until April 2028. He knew enough to plead guilty. The girl still got no jail time out of it. Diversity of societal norms is our strength, innit! Why do you only condemn sexual assault when it's a brown or black person doing it? When it's a white guy, you're in there swinging for him. That's enough lying, sladereuse. Tinted rapist are excused, white ones arent. Neither should be excused. But shrieks of wacism and islamophobia from you goes a long way and gives them a pass.

Yet you fall over yourself to defend white rapists ... you always blame the woman ... and you need absolutely no convincing to accept that a brown or black person is guilty.


See, to some of us, that would be considered a character flaw.

mothra wrote on Oct 11^th, 2026 at 9:07am:

Frank wrote on Oct 11th, 2026 at 9:00am: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2026 at 7:47am: Frank wrote on Oct 11th, 2026 at 7:19am: Sprintcyclist wrote on Oct 11th, 2026 at 7:14am: An Australian judge gave a Bhutanese teen 18 months for raping a girl at a Canberra party, then suspended it on the spot because he had only been in Australia six months and had “limited insight into societal norms.” Justice Andrew Muller sentenced him in the ACT Supreme Court. The boy was 16 at the time. He had arrived from Bhutan about six months earlier. He met the girl at a house party in Holt in August 2025, walked her to a green belt, and raped her. He pleaded guilty to sexual intercourse without consent. Reports of the hearing say he used considerable force. Muller said the lack of sexual experience and the short time in the country reduced his moral culpability. He said the teen now understands consent needs clear agreement, not just the absence of a no. Prosecutors asked for jail. The judge said rehabilitation was better served in the community. The 18 months is a good-behaviour order until April 2028. He knew enough to plead guilty. The girl still got no jail time out of it. Diversity of societal norms is our strength, innit! Why do you only condemn sexual assault when it's a brown or black person doing it? When it's a white guy, you're in there swinging for him. That's enough lying, sladereuse. Tinted rapist are excused, white ones arent. Neither should be excused. But shrieks of wacism and islamophobia from you goes a long way and gives them a pass. Yet you fall over yourself to defend white rapists ... you always blame the woman ... and you need absolutely no convincing to accept that a brown or black person is guilty. See, to some of us, that would be considered a character flaw.

Like I said, enough stupid, malicious lying from you.

Frank wrote on Oct 11^th, 2026 at 9:12am:

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2026 at 9:07am: Frank wrote on Oct 11th, 2026 at 9:00am: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2026 at 7:47am: Frank wrote on Oct 11th, 2026 at 7:19am: Sprintcyclist wrote on Oct 11th, 2026 at 7:14am: An Australian judge gave a Bhutanese teen 18 months for raping a girl at a Canberra party, then suspended it on the spot because he had only been in Australia six months and had “limited insight into societal norms.” Justice Andrew Muller sentenced him in the ACT Supreme Court. The boy was 16 at the time. He had arrived from Bhutan about six months earlier. He met the girl at a house party in Holt in August 2025, walked her to a green belt, and raped her. He pleaded guilty to sexual intercourse without consent. Reports of the hearing say he used considerable force. Muller said the lack of sexual experience and the short time in the country reduced his moral culpability. He said the teen now understands consent needs clear agreement, not just the absence of a no. Prosecutors asked for jail. The judge said rehabilitation was better served in the community. The 18 months is a good-behaviour order until April 2028. He knew enough to plead guilty. The girl still got no jail time out of it. Diversity of societal norms is our strength, innit! Why do you only condemn sexual assault when it's a brown or black person doing it? When it's a white guy, you're in there swinging for him. That's enough lying, sladereuse. Tinted rapist are excused, white ones arent. Neither should be excused. But shrieks of wacism and islamophobia from you goes a long way and gives them a pass. Yet you fall over yourself to defend white rapists ... you always blame the woman ... and you need absolutely no convincing to accept that a brown or black person is guilty. See, to some of us, that would be considered a character flaw. Like I said, enough stupid, malicious lying from you.

Not a word of a lie. One only needs to read through this thread to see that.

You don't give a crap about the rights of girls and women ...  i mean, just look at how you talk about us. You only care that nobody gets to reduce us but you.

mothra wrote on Oct 11^th, 2026 at 9:14am:

Not a word of a lie. One only needs to read through this thread to see that. You don't give a crap about the rights of girls and women ...  i mean, just look at how you talk about us. You only care that nobody gets to reduce us but you.

Are you describing Albo?

He wants to bonk Kylie Minogue and
he thinks the Japanese PM has nice melons.   ::)

mothra wrote on Oct 11^th, 2026 at 9:14am:

...........  You don't give a crap about the rights of girls and women ...  i mean, just look at how you talk about us. You only care that nobody gets to reduce us but you.

yes, toxic man there

Sprintcyclist wrote on Oct 11^th, 2026 at 10:29am:

mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2026 at 9:14am: ...........  You don't give a crap about the rights of girls and women ...  i mean, just look at how you talk about us. You only care that nobody gets to reduce us but you. yes, toxic man there

Wife Explains Her Love Language Is For Husband To Go Out And Earn All The Money And Then Come Home And Do All The Chores
Family


ONTARIO, CA — In a revelation intended to lay a foundation for a better marital relationship, a local wife explained to her husband that her love language is for him to go out and earn all the money and then come home and do all the chores.

The deep moment of vulnerability came one evening this week, as Cheryl Crentist sat her husband, Rob, down to let him know what he could do to help her feel most loved, appreciated, and cared for, which turned out to be all of the work both inside and outside the home.

"It's how I feel loved," she told him. "When I see you getting up early every morning and going in to work all day to earn an income to provide for the kids and us, and then coming home at the end of the day and starting to cook, clean, fold laundry, and put the kids to bed… that's when I feel like you care about me. Make me feel special. It's my love language. So, the more you do that, the more I'll really appreciate it. Thanks, honey."

Husband Rob Crentist agreed that he needed to step up his efforts to express his love for her in the way she best receives it. "I guess it makes sense," he said. "Whenever I take a quick glance over at her on the couch while I'm vacuuming the floors after doing the dishes at the end of a long day at work, I can see her smile of appreciation."

At publishing time, Cheryl had informed Rob that her second love language was Amazon gift cards

mothra wrote on Oct 11^th, 2026 at 9:14am:

Frank wrote on Oct 11th, 2026 at 9:12am: mothra wrote on Oct 11th, 2026 at 9:07am: Tinted rapist are excused, white ones arent. Neither should be excused. But shrieks of wacism and islamophobia from you goes a long way and gives them a pass. Yet you fall over yourself to defend white rapists ... you always blame the woman ... and you need absolutely no convincing to accept that a brown or black person is guilty. See, to some of us, that would be considered a character flaw. Like I said, enough stupid, malicious lying from you.

Not a word of a lie. One only needs to read through this thread to see that.

You don't give a crap about the rights of girls and women ...  i mean, just look at how you talk about us. You only care that nobody gets to reduce us but you.[/quote]


he voted for a raper.
he probably bought the rapers stupid hat