Supreme Court again rejects Trump's bid to overturn E Jean Carroll sex abuse case

https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg

For a second time, the US Supreme Court has declined President Donald Trump's bid to overturn a federal civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll.

In June, the top court had already denied a prior attempt by Trump to review the civil case.

So much winning!  ;D

LAWFARE !!!

They declined to look at the case.  The did NOT uphold anything, nor struck down anything.

There is NO SCOTUS ruling. there is only 'dont ask us'.


Let creeps, pakis, and assorted TDS kids ululate to that.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18^th, 2026 at 10:54am:

Supreme Court again rejects Trump's bid to overturn E Jean Carroll sex abuse case https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg For a second time, the US Supreme Court has declined President Donald Trump's bid to overturn a federal civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll. In June, the top court had already denied a prior attempt by Trump to review the civil case.

You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife.

Frank wrote on Aug 18^th, 2026 at 7:42pm:

They declined to look at the case.

Exactly.

That's what's stated in the OP, and nobody has said anything to the contrary.

The rapist loses again - it's a lovely day   :)






*On a side note, who's surprised to see Frank here defending a violent rapist?  Anyone?  Anyone?

Blood on Peccary's hands.

Frank wrote on Aug 18^th, 2026 at 7:45pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:54am: Supreme Court again rejects Trump's bid to overturn E Jean Carroll sex abuse case https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg For a second time, the US Supreme Court has declined President Donald Trump's bid to overturn a federal civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll. In June, the top court had already denied a prior attempt by Trump to review the civil case. You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife.

Dishonest?

The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023?

"A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it."

The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women?

Is there something you're not telling us?

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18^th, 2026 at 7:53pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:54am: Supreme Court again rejects Trump's bid to overturn E Jean Carroll sex abuse case https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg For a second time, the US Supreme Court has declined President Donald Trump's bid to overturn a federal civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll. In June, the top court had already denied a prior attempt by Trump to review the civil case. You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. Dishonest? The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us?

Slowly, dimwitted village creep, slowly. Sound it out if it help:

You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife.

The SCOTUS news item is not a confirmation of your dishonest splicing in of a 2023 front page, despicable, repulsive liar.

Peccary is a fraud, liar, troll and immoral creep from the Media world.

Frank wrote on Aug 18^th, 2026 at 8:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:54am: Supreme Court again rejects Trump's bid to overturn E Jean Carroll sex abuse case https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg For a second time, the US Supreme Court has declined President Donald Trump's bid to overturn a federal civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll. In June, the top court had already denied a prior attempt by Trump to review the civil case. You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. Dishonest? The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? Slowly, dimwitted village creep, slowly. Sound it out if it help: You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. The SCOTUS news item is not a confirmation of your dishonest splicing in of a 2023 front page, despicable, repulsive liar.

https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg

The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023?

"A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it."

The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women?

Is there something you're not telling us?

https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg

Tall poppy syndrome.
Peccary trying to bring Trump down to his perverted level.
Leftism: accusation is admission

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18^th, 2026 at 8:17pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:54am: Supreme Court again rejects Trump's bid to overturn E Jean Carroll sex abuse case https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg For a second time, the US Supreme Court has declined President Donald Trump's bid to overturn a federal civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll. In June, the top court had already denied a prior attempt by Trump to review the civil case. You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. Dishonest? The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? Slowly, dimwitted village creep, slowly. Sound it out if it help: You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. The SCOTUS news item is not a confirmation of your dishonest splicing in of a 2023 front page, despicable, repulsive liar. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg

The real question is, why are you such a congenitally dishonest, lying creep.

And when your lies and dishonesty are pointed out, why do you bleat about ' defending' what you lied about. Showing that you are a dishonest lying creep is not 'defending' what you lied about, despicable creep. It is not going along with your dishonesty and lies, skin-crawlingly repulsive, slanderous liar.

Frank wrote on Aug 18^th, 2026 at 10:43pm:

The real question is, why are you such a congenitally dishonest, lying creep. And when your lies and dishonesty are pointed out, why do you bleat about ' defending' what you lied about. Showing that you are a dishonest lying creep is not 'defending' what you lied about, despicable creep. It is not going along with your dishonesty and lies, skin-crawlingly repulsive, slanderous liar.

Oh, Frank - you're just so hilariously entertaining.

I'm almost dying laughing here.  ;D

I have to admire your persistence. But, you really need to trade in your tired, repetitive insults for some new ones.

I think the E Jean  saga is a blight on trumps past.

Like when Hugh Grant was caught in a car with a fat ugly sex worker.

We expect these high value men to have standards and boundaries .

Trump and Hugh have a duty to only engage in intimacy with hot women.

Trump is a fairytale figure .

As a 10 , he should accept nothing less than an 8

;D

Frank wrote on Aug 18^th, 2026 at 10:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:17pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:54am: Supreme Court again rejects Trump's bid to overturn E Jean Carroll sex abuse case https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg For a second time, the US Supreme Court has declined President Donald Trump's bid to overturn a federal civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll. In June, the top court had already denied a prior attempt by Trump to review the civil case. You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. Dishonest? The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? Slowly, dimwitted village creep, slowly. Sound it out if it help: You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. The SCOTUS news item is not a confirmation of your dishonest splicing in of a 2023 front page, despicable, repulsive liar. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The real question is, why are you such a congenitally dishonest, lying creep. And when your lies and dishonesty are pointed out, why do you bleat about ' defending' what you lied about. Showing that you are a dishonest lying creep is not 'defending' what you lied about, despicable creep. It is not going along with your dishonesty and lies, skin-crawlingly repulsive, slanderous liar.

Slander, is it?

Strange. Here's your DL, found liable for slander. There's a pic of the perp on the front page.

And you feel butthurt and aggrieved?

There there, old boy, we're here for you. You have every right to feel offended, and should too.

We mean this in the nicest possible way, no?

aquascoot wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 6:57am:

I think the E Jean  saga is a blight on trumps past. Like when Hugh Grant was caught in a car with a fat ugly sex worker. We expect these high value men to have standards and boundaries . Trump and Hugh have a duty to only engage in intimacy with hot women. Trump is a fairytale figure . As a 10 , he should accept nothing less than an 8

What, you mean going sloppy seconds with Jeff Epstein and ending up with a clapped out Slovenian hooker?

Come come. Even Melania won't go near him. He's stuck with Natalie Harp emptying his nappies and leaving him love letter post-it notes.

Even she won't give him a kiss.

You?

Frank wrote on Aug 18^th, 2026 at 10:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:17pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:54am: Supreme Court again rejects Trump's bid to overturn E Jean Carroll sex abuse case https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg For a second time, the US Supreme Court has declined President Donald Trump's bid to overturn a federal civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll. In June, the top court had already denied a prior attempt by Trump to review the civil case. You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. Dishonest? The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? Slowly, dimwitted village creep, slowly. Sound it out if it help: You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. The SCOTUS news item is not a confirmation of your dishonest splicing in of a 2023 front page, despicable, repulsive liar. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The real question is, why are you such a congenitally dishonest, lying creep. And when your lies and dishonesty are pointed out, why do you bleat about ' defending' what you lied about. Showing that you are a dishonest lying creep is not 'defending' what you lied about, despicable creep. It is not going along with your dishonesty and lies, skin-crawlingly repulsive, slanderous liar.

There's no dishonesty and no lies.

Thread Title: Trump is an adjudicated rapist and he has lost again.

Newspaper: A jury did find that Trump is a sex abuser.

https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:31am:

Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:43pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:17pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:54am: Supreme Court again rejects Trump's bid to overturn E Jean Carroll sex abuse case https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg For a second time, the US Supreme Court has declined President Donald Trump's bid to overturn a federal civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll. In June, the top court had already denied a prior attempt by Trump to review the civil case. You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. Dishonest? The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? Slowly, dimwitted village creep, slowly. Sound it out if it help: You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. The SCOTUS news item is not a confirmation of your dishonest splicing in of a 2023 front page, despicable, repulsive liar. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The real question is, why are you such a congenitally dishonest, lying creep. And when your lies and dishonesty are pointed out, why do you bleat about ' defending' what you lied about. Showing that you are a dishonest lying creep is not 'defending' what you lied about, despicable creep. It is not going along with your dishonesty and lies, skin-crawlingly repulsive, slanderous liar. There's no dishonesty and no lies. Thread Title: Trump is an adjudicated rapist and he has lost again. Newspaper: A jury did find that Trump is a sex abuser. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg

Absence of photo/video evidence makes it bs.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 8:51am:

Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:43pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:17pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:54am: Supreme Court again rejects Trump's bid to overturn E Jean Carroll sex abuse case https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg For a second time, the US Supreme Court has declined President Donald Trump's bid to overturn a federal civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll. In June, the top court had already denied a prior attempt by Trump to review the civil case. You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. Dishonest? The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? Slowly, dimwitted village creep, slowly. Sound it out if it help: You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. The SCOTUS news item is not a confirmation of your dishonest splicing in of a 2023 front page, despicable, repulsive liar. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The real question is, why are you such a congenitally dishonest, lying creep. And when your lies and dishonesty are pointed out, why do you bleat about ' defending' what you lied about. Showing that you are a dishonest lying creep is not 'defending' what you lied about, despicable creep. It is not going along with your dishonesty and lies, skin-crawlingly repulsive, slanderous liar. Slander, is it?

The old boy's a bit confused.

There's no slander - it's a fact.

"A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it."

https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg

Jasin wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 8:18am:

;D

;D ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:31am:

Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:43pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:17pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:54am: Supreme Court again rejects Trump's bid to overturn E Jean Carroll sex abuse case https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg For a second time, the US Supreme Court has declined President Donald Trump's bid to overturn a federal civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll. In June, the top court had already denied a prior attempt by Trump to review the civil case. You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. Dishonest? The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? Slowly, dimwitted village creep, slowly. Sound it out if it help: You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. The SCOTUS news item is not a confirmation of your dishonest splicing in of a 2023 front page, despicable, repulsive liar. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The real question is, why are you such a congenitally dishonest, lying creep. And when your lies and dishonesty are pointed out, why do you bleat about ' defending' what you lied about. Showing that you are a dishonest lying creep is not 'defending' what you lied about, despicable creep. It is not going along with your dishonesty and lies, skin-crawlingly repulsive, slanderous liar. There's no dishonesty and no lies. Thread Title: Trump is an adjudicated rapist and he has lost again. Newspaper: A jury did find that Trump is a sex abuser. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg

No no, I think the old boy's offended with your BREAKING NEWS, Greggery. It's the verdict from 2023, after all.

I'll have you know the old boy prefers his BREAKING NEWS on UK child sex grooming gangs from 2002.

Much more up to date and pertinent, no?

SLANDER !!!

tallowood wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 11:07am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 10:31am: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:43pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:17pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:54am: Supreme Court again rejects Trump's bid to overturn E Jean Carroll sex abuse case https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg For a second time, the US Supreme Court has declined President Donald Trump's bid to overturn a federal civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll. In June, the top court had already denied a prior attempt by Trump to review the civil case. You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. Dishonest? The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? Slowly, dimwitted village creep, slowly. Sound it out if it help: You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. The SCOTUS news item is not a confirmation of your dishonest splicing in of a 2023 front page, despicable, repulsive liar. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The real question is, why are you such a congenitally dishonest, lying creep. And when your lies and dishonesty are pointed out, why do you bleat about ' defending' what you lied about. Showing that you are a dishonest lying creep is not 'defending' what you lied about, despicable creep. It is not going along with your dishonesty and lies, skin-crawlingly repulsive, slanderous liar. There's no dishonesty and no lies. Thread Title: Trump is an adjudicated rapist and he has lost again. Newspaper: A jury did find that Trump is a sex abuser. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg Absence of photo/video evidence makes it bs.

He's right, Greggery. It would appear you've committed the cardinal sin of not reposting the E Jean verdict, the jury findings, the case files, the appeals and the appeals of the appeals.

I'm sorry, dear, that's despicable.

tallowood wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 11:24am:

Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 8:18am: ;D ;D ;D

;D ;D ;D

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 11:44am:

tallowood wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 11:07am: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 10:31am: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:43pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:17pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:54am: Supreme Court again rejects Trump's bid to overturn E Jean Carroll sex abuse case https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg For a second time, the US Supreme Court has declined President Donald Trump's bid to overturn a federal civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll. In June, the top court had already denied a prior attempt by Trump to review the civil case. You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. Dishonest? The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? Slowly, dimwitted village creep, slowly. Sound it out if it help: You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. The SCOTUS news item is not a confirmation of your dishonest splicing in of a 2023 front page, despicable, repulsive liar. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The real question is, why are you such a congenitally dishonest, lying creep. And when your lies and dishonesty are pointed out, why do you bleat about ' defending' what you lied about. Showing that you are a dishonest lying creep is not 'defending' what you lied about, despicable creep. It is not going along with your dishonesty and lies, skin-crawlingly repulsive, slanderous liar. There's no dishonesty and no lies. Thread Title: Trump is an adjudicated rapist and he has lost again. Newspaper: A jury did find that Trump is a sex abuser. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg Absence of photo/video evidence makes it bs. He's right, Greggery. It would appear you've committed the cardinal sin of not reposting the E Jean verdict, the jury findings, the case files, the appeals and the appeals of the appeals. I'm sorry, dear, that's despicable.

Indeed.

And now he wants to see a video of her being raped.

Would authorities be interested in his hard drive?

tallowood wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 11:46am:

tallowood wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 11:24am: Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 8:18am: ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

;D ;D ;D ;D

aquascoot wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 6:57am:

I think the E Jean  saga is a blight on trumps past. Like when Hugh Grant was caught in a car with a fat ugly sex worker. We expect these high value men to have standards and boundaries . Trump and Hugh have a duty to only engage in intimacy with hot women. Trump is a fairytale figure . As a 10 , he should accept nothing less than an 8

And when you're a star they let you do it -

you can do anything -

grab them ...

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 11:50am:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 11:44am: tallowood wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 11:07am: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 10:31am: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:43pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:17pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:54am: Supreme Court again rejects Trump's bid to overturn E Jean Carroll sex abuse case https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg For a second time, the US Supreme Court has declined President Donald Trump's bid to overturn a federal civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll. In June, the top court had already denied a prior attempt by Trump to review the civil case. You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. Dishonest? The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? Slowly, dimwitted village creep, slowly. Sound it out if it help: You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. The SCOTUS news item is not a confirmation of your dishonest splicing in of a 2023 front page, despicable, repulsive liar. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The real question is, why are you such a congenitally dishonest, lying creep. And when your lies and dishonesty are pointed out, why do you bleat about ' defending' what you lied about. Showing that you are a dishonest lying creep is not 'defending' what you lied about, despicable creep. It is not going along with your dishonesty and lies, skin-crawlingly repulsive, slanderous liar. There's no dishonesty and no lies. Thread Title: Trump is an adjudicated rapist and he has lost again. Newspaper: A jury did find that Trump is a sex abuser. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg Absence of photo/video evidence makes it bs. He's right, Greggery. It would appear you've committed the cardinal sin of not reposting the E Jean verdict, the jury findings, the case files, the appeals and the appeals of the appeals. I'm sorry, dear, that's despicable. Indeed. And now he wants to see a video of her being raped. Would authorities be interested in his hard drive?

Not really. They tried all that with Hunter, remember?

When it turned out it was just a USB stick full of downloaded emails and a few phished dick pics, they went all shy. The LAPTOP FROM HELL went from the CRIME OF THE CENTURY on Tucker to, er, we'll have to wait and see what happens.

Of course, they forgot all that after DL lost his erection and it was suddenly BREAKING again, blaming the fake news for not blowing the scoop.

ELECTION INTERFERENCE !!!

Tucker, who'd blathered away for a week on Fox primetime, refused to talk. Miranda Devine, who'd hit the front page of the New York Post, didn't want to say. When Fox got done for the biggest libel settlement in history, we all found out why.

So now we know. The only ones found civilly liable for SLANDER were Fox, Tucker, Rudy and then, in the E Jean trial, DL himself.

Rudy and DL were arrested for conspiracy to rig an election, banged to rights. If DL hadn't ordered the charges dropped, they'd be doing twenty years in Fort Buttner FCC.

Dishonesty, lies, skin-crawlingly repulsive slanderous LIAR !!!

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 11:50am:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 11:44am: tallowood wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 11:07am: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 10:31am: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:43pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:17pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:54am: Supreme Court again rejects Trump's bid to overturn E Jean Carroll sex abuse case https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg For a second time, the US Supreme Court has declined President Donald Trump's bid to overturn a federal civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll. In June, the top court had already denied a prior attempt by Trump to review the civil case. You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. Dishonest? The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? Slowly, dimwitted village creep, slowly. Sound it out if it help: You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. The SCOTUS news item is not a confirmation of your dishonest splicing in of a 2023 front page, despicable, repulsive liar. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The real question is, why are you such a congenitally dishonest, lying creep. And when your lies and dishonesty are pointed out, why do you bleat about ' defending' what you lied about. Showing that you are a dishonest lying creep is not 'defending' what you lied about, despicable creep. It is not going along with your dishonesty and lies, skin-crawlingly repulsive, slanderous liar. There's no dishonesty and no lies. Thread Title: Trump is an adjudicated rapist and he has lost again. Newspaper: A jury did find that Trump is a sex abuser. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg Absence of photo/video evidence makes it bs. He's right, Greggery. It would appear you've committed the cardinal sin of not reposting the E Jean verdict, the jury findings, the case files, the appeals and the appeals of the appeals. I'm sorry, dear, that's despicable. Indeed. And now he wants to see a video of her being raped. Would authorities be interested in his hard drive?

So pecca, are you going to call authorities or are you afraid to attract attention to yourself and end in jail?  ;D

Frank wrote on Aug 18^th, 2026 at 10:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:17pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:54am: Supreme Court again rejects Trump's bid to overturn E Jean Carroll sex abuse case https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg For a second time, the US Supreme Court has declined President Donald Trump's bid to overturn a federal civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll. In June, the top court had already denied a prior attempt by Trump to review the civil case. You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. Dishonest? The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? Slowly, dimwitted village creep, slowly. Sound it out if it help: You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. The SCOTUS news item is not a confirmation of your dishonest splicing in of a 2023 front page, despicable, repulsive liar. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The real question is, why are you such a congenitally dishonest, lying creep. And when your lies and dishonesty are pointed out, why do you bleat about ' defending' what you lied about. Showing that you are a dishonest lying creep is not 'defending' what you lied about, despicable creep. It is not going along with your dishonesty and lies, skin-crawlingly repulsive, slanderous liar.

This is, word-for-word, what we all want to ask you when you continue to defend the indefensible Donald Trump. He is a colossal liar, a cheat, corrupt to the core and basically the worst President in US history. Why do you continue to defend such a horrible person? He cheated on his wife while she was pregnant, for crying out loud, and has even paid hookers hush money!

Totally false.
Ever since America rejected the British political system in its War of Independence in favour (and supported by) mainland European powers that adhered to the archaic Westernism of Rome and Athens. It has been a corrupt rogue entity whose only connection created Communism, Terrorism & implementation of Dictators   Even its Civil War was an act of failure with the fall of its Confederacy aspect (like Germany failed in Europe). Now the Gay Blue North is failing by suicide, for lack of its justification of the Redneck Grey south being around to prop it up. The Civil war was clearly a case of two wrongs not making a right. As the Blue Democrats now fail, France fails in Europe.
Clearly the USA backed the wrong horse in the mainland European powers over the British Holy Grail.
This is why Trump is President.  Your gay Lefty Courts of corruption were failures of lies and fabrications, following a Media narrative of Music and Entertainment.  ;D

You lose
  ;)

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 2:02pm:

This is, word-for-word, what we all want to ask you when you continue to defend the indefensible Donald Trump. He is a colossal liar, a cheat, corrupt to the core and basically the worst President in US history. Why do you continue to defend such a horrible person? He cheated on his wife while she was pregnant, for crying out loud, and has even paid hookers hush money!

And when you're a star they let you do it -

you can do anything -

grab them ...

Bobby. wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 3:50pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 2:02pm: This is, word-for-word, what we all want to ask you when you continue to defend the indefensible Donald Trump. He is a colossal liar, a cheat, corrupt to the core and basically the worst President in US history. Why do you continue to defend such a horrible person? He cheated on his wife while she was pregnant, for crying out loud, and has even paid hookers hush money! And when you're a star they let you do it - you can do anything - grab them ...

No, you can't.

That's why Trump - a convicted felon - is an adjudicated rapist.

Carroll didn't let him do anything - he violently violated her body against her will.

https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg

Peccary loses big time.
His parents worked for the Soviets and his propaganda is Soviet.

Jasin wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 4:18pm:

Peccary loses big time. His parents worked for the Soviets and his propaganda is Soviet.

So you’re okay with Trump raping a woman?

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 2:02pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:43pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:17pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:54am: Supreme Court again rejects Trump's bid to overturn E Jean Carroll sex abuse case https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg For a second time, the US Supreme Court has declined President Donald Trump's bid to overturn a federal civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll. In June, the top court had already denied a prior attempt by Trump to review the civil case. You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. Dishonest? The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? Slowly, dimwitted village creep, slowly. Sound it out if it help: You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. The SCOTUS news item is not a confirmation of your dishonest splicing in of a 2023 front page, despicable, repulsive liar. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The real question is, why are you such a congenitally dishonest, lying creep. And when your lies and dishonesty are pointed out, why do you bleat about ' defending' what you lied about. Showing that you are a dishonest lying creep is not 'defending' what you lied about, despicable creep. It is not going along with your dishonesty and lies, skin-crawlingly repulsive, slanderous liar. This is, word-for-word, what we all want to ask you when you continue to defend the indefensible Donald Trump. He is a colossal liar, a cheat, corrupt to the core and basically the worst President in US history. Why do you continue to defend such a horrible person? He cheated on his wife while she was pregnant, for crying out loud, and has even paid hookers hush money!

If your life was as scrutinised as Trump's you wouldn't escape a goodish whipping. Or as Hamlet put it,
"Use every man after his desert, and who should 'scape whipping?"

You TDS kids are emotionally incontinent zealots about Trump - just as you were about Dubya, the 'BushHitler', and Reagan before him; about Howard, Abbott, etc here - anyone you perceive as your political enemy is always your 'Antichrist du jour. Not going along with your mental and emotional diarrhoea and rityal daily stonings is not 'defending' anyone. It's simply not joining you in your recurrent derangement.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 4:24pm:

Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:18pm: Peccary loses big time. His parents worked for the Soviets and his propaganda is Soviet. So you’re okay with Trump raping a woman?

But he didn't.  That's where you're wrong.
If he did, he would be in gaol, not in the oval office

You seem OK to peddle lies for your tds.

Jasin wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 4:42pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:24pm: Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:18pm: Peccary loses big time. His parents worked for the Soviets and his propaganda is Soviet. So you’re okay with Trump raping a woman? But he didn't.

Oh, he most certainly did.

That's done and dusted.

What we haven't got to the bottom of is why you and Frank  continually go out of your way to defend white men who sexually abuse females.

We all have our suspicions as to why that is though.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 4:45pm:

Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:42pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:24pm: Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:18pm: Peccary loses big time. His parents worked for the Soviets and his propaganda is Soviet. So you’re okay with Trump raping a woman? But he didn't.  Oh, he most certainly did. That's done and dusted. What we haven't got to the bottom of is why you and Frank  continually go out of your way to defend white men who sexually abuse females. We all have our suspicions as to why that is though.

No he did not.
1 there is no evidence
2 your insistence that he did proves that he did not because you are proven liar and cheat.

Proof that greggerypeccary is cheat and liar

Frank wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 4:28pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 2:02pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:43pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:17pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 8:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18th, 2026 at 10:54am: Supreme Court again rejects Trump's bid to overturn E Jean Carroll sex abuse case https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg For a second time, the US Supreme Court has declined President Donald Trump's bid to overturn a federal civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E Jean Carroll. In June, the top court had already denied a prior attempt by Trump to review the civil case. You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. Dishonest? The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? Slowly, dimwitted village creep, slowly. Sound it out if it help: You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. The SCOTUS news item is not a confirmation of your dishonest splicing in of a 2023 front page, despicable, repulsive liar. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The real question is, why are you such a congenitally dishonest, lying creep. And when your lies and dishonesty are pointed out, why do you bleat about ' defending' what you lied about. Showing that you are a dishonest lying creep is not 'defending' what you lied about, despicable creep. It is not going along with your dishonesty and lies, skin-crawlingly repulsive, slanderous liar. This is, word-for-word, what we all want to ask you when you continue to defend the indefensible Donald Trump. He is a colossal liar, a cheat, corrupt to the core and basically the worst President in US history. Why do you continue to defend such a horrible person? He cheated on his wife while she was pregnant, for crying out loud, and has even paid hookers hush money! If your life was as scrutinised as Trump's you wouldn't escape a goodish whipping. Or as Hamlet put it, "Use every man after his desert, and who should 'scape whipping?" You TDS kids are emotionally incontinent zealots about Trump - just as you were about Dubya, the 'BushHitler', and Reagan before him; about Howard, Abbott, etc here - anyone you perceive as your political enemy is always your 'Antichrist du jour. Not going along with your mental and emotional diarrhoea and rityal daily stonings is not 'defending' anyone. It's simply not joining you in your recurrent derangement.

No one has the right not to be not offended, innit.

Except the poor old boy.

tallowood wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 5:03pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:45pm: Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:42pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:24pm: Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:18pm: Peccary loses big time. His parents worked for the Soviets and his propaganda is Soviet. So you’re okay with Trump raping a woman? But he didn't.  Oh, he most certainly did. That's done and dusted. What we haven't got to the bottom of is why you and Frank  continually go out of your way to defend white men who sexually abuse females. We all have our suspicions as to why that is though. No he did not.

Oh, he most certainly did.

That's done and dusted.

What we haven't got to the bottom of is why you, Jasin, and Frank continually go out of your way to defend white men who sexually abuse females.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 4:45pm:

Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:42pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:24pm: Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:18pm: Peccary loses big time. His parents worked for the Soviets and his propaganda is Soviet. So you’re okay with Trump raping a woman? But he didn't.  Oh, he most certainly did. That's done and dusted. What we haven't got to the bottom of is why you and Frank  continually go out of your way to defend white men who sexually abuse females. We all have our suspicions as to why that is though.

They're a little bit sore, Greggery, that's all.

Good grief, the old boy hasn't passed stool since 2008.

2023 must feel like years ago.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 4:45pm:

Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:42pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:24pm: Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:18pm: Peccary loses big time. His parents worked for the Soviets and his propaganda is Soviet. So you’re okay with Trump raping a woman? But he didn't.  Oh, he most certainly did. That's done and dusted. What we haven't got to the bottom of is why you and Frank  continually go out of your way to defend white men who sexually abuse females. We all have our suspicions as to why that is though.

No he didn't.
There is no proof. If there was, he would be in gaol, not the oval office.
You've been proven before on this as a liar with fraudulent info.
You peddle fabrications and false accusations like all Lefties do because accusation is admission with Leftism and that's proven.
Are you a Rapist?
We know you anal tap women to prove to yourself that you're not gay.
Explains your faecal output of TDS.
You really need to seek mental health advice.

The rapist gets handsy with the kids.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzvLPb3dAoM

Who'll be the first to defend the adjudicated rapist for continually touching little kids - Jasin, Frank, or tallowood?

Pecca posts lies.

Proof that greggerypeccary is cheat and liar

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 5:31pm:

The rapist gets handsy with the kids. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzvLPb3dAoM Who'll be the first to defend the adjudicated rapist for continually touching little kids - Jasin, Frank, or tallowood?

Most are saying Jasin   :-/

Jasin wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 5:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:45pm: Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:42pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:24pm: Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:18pm: Peccary loses big time. His parents worked for the Soviets and his propaganda is Soviet. So you’re okay with Trump raping a woman? But he didn't.  Oh, he most certainly did. That's done and dusted. What we haven't got to the bottom of is why you and Frank  continually go out of your way to defend white men who sexually abuse females. We all have our suspicions as to why that is though. No he didn't. There is no proof. If there was, he would be in gaol, not the oval office. You've been proven before on this as a liar with fraudulent info. You peddle fabrications and false accusations like all Lefties do because accusation is admission with Leftism and that's proven. Are you a Rapist? We know you anal tap women to prove to yourself that you're not gay. Explains your faecal output of TDS. You really need to seek mental health advice.

There you go, Greggery. No, three courts didn't find DL a naughty old sex abuser. JaSin simply can't bear it.

Seek mental health treatment - in a country of your choice. E Jean must have raped him!

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 5:31pm:

The rapist gets handsy with the kids. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzvLPb3dAoM Who'll be the first to defend the adjudicated rapist for continually touching little kids - Jasin, Frank, or tallowood?

Oh, I think Bobby would like to have a say, Greggery

Bobby?

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 5:48pm:

Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 5:30pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:45pm: Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:42pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:24pm: Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:18pm: Peccary loses big time. His parents worked for the Soviets and his propaganda is Soviet. So you’re okay with Trump raping a woman? But he didn't.  Oh, he most certainly did. That's done and dusted. What we haven't got to the bottom of is why you and Frank  continually go out of your way to defend white men who sexually abuse females. We all have our suspicions as to why that is though. No he didn't. There is no proof. If there was, he would be in gaol, not the oval office. You've been proven before on this as a liar with fraudulent info. You peddle fabrications and false accusations like all Lefties do because accusation is admission with Leftism and that's proven. Are you a Rapist? We know you anal tap women to prove to yourself that you're not gay. Explains your faecal output of TDS. You really need to seek mental health advice. There you go, Greggery. No, three courts didn't find DL a naughty old sex abuser. JaSin simply can't bear it.

I wonder what colour the sky is in Jasin's world   :-/

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 5:52pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 5:48pm: Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 5:30pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:45pm: Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:42pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:24pm: Jasin wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 4:18pm: Peccary loses big time. His parents worked for the Soviets and his propaganda is Soviet. So you’re okay with Trump raping a woman? But he didn't.  Oh, he most certainly did. That's done and dusted. What we haven't got to the bottom of is why you and Frank  continually go out of your way to defend white men who sexually abuse females. We all have our suspicions as to why that is though. No he didn't. There is no proof. If there was, he would be in gaol, not the oval office. You've been proven before on this as a liar with fraudulent info. You peddle fabrications and false accusations like all Lefties do because accusation is admission with Leftism and that's proven. Are you a Rapist? We know you anal tap women to prove to yourself that you're not gay. Explains your faecal output of TDS. You really need to seek mental health advice. There you go, Greggery. No, three courts didn't find DL a naughty old sex abuser. JaSin simply can't bear it. I wonder what colour the sky is in Jasin's world   :-/

That's a tough one. JaSin won't even reveal which timezone he's posting from.

Proof that greggerypeccary is cheat and liar

tallowood wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 5:56pm:

Proof that greggerypeccary is cheat and liar

Absence of photo/video evidence makes it bs.

For Frank, Jasin, and tallowood.

This instinct to defend men accused of sexual abuse stems from a desire to protect oneself and maintain power by association.

Why Men Still Defend Sexual Predators And Fight The #MeToo Movement

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 6:27pm:

For Frank, Jasin, and tallowood. This instinct to defend men accused of sexual abuse stems from a desire to protect oneself and maintain power by association. Why Men Still Defend Sexual Predators And Fight The #MeToo Movement

All starting to make sense now?

“Men may not have done anything on the level of the offender they support, but they perhaps have committed some smaller version of the same offense and fear that they will be stigmatized or brought to task in the same way,” explains Brooke Sprowl, a family therapist.

Proof that greggerypeccary is cheat and liar

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 6:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 6:27pm: For Frank, Jasin, and tallowood. This instinct to defend men accused of sexual abuse stems from a desire to protect oneself and maintain power by association. Why Men Still Defend Sexual Predators And Fight The #MeToo Movement All starting to make sense now? “Men may not have done anything on the level of the offender they support, but they perhaps have committed some smaller version of the same offense and fear that they will be stigmatized or brought to task in the same way,” explains Brooke Sprowl, a family therapist.

The answer was right there in front of us all the time?

The notion that support for sexual offenders, in particular, comes from a paranoid place of seeking justification or absolution for past behaviors is not unique to Sprowl. It’s a common understanding that basically posits men are often unclear on whether or not they have perpetrated offenses against others in the past.

Proof that greggerypeccary is cheat and liar

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 6:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 6:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 6:27pm: For Frank, Jasin, and tallowood. This instinct to defend men accused of sexual abuse stems from a desire to protect oneself and maintain power by association. Why Men Still Defend Sexual Predators And Fight The #MeToo Movement All starting to make sense now? “Men may not have done anything on the level of the offender they support, but they perhaps have committed some smaller version of the same offense and fear that they will be stigmatized or brought to task in the same way,” explains Brooke Sprowl, a family therapist. The answer was right there in front of us all the time? The notion that support for sexual offenders, in particular, comes from a paranoid place of seeking justification or absolution for past behaviors is not unique to Sprowl. It’s a common understanding that basically posits men are often unclear on whether or not they have perpetrated offenses against others in the past.

Now we know why they keep defending an adjudicated rapist.

Not that we didn't really already know.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 6:51pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 6:33pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 6:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 6:27pm: For Frank, Jasin, and tallowood. This instinct to defend men accused of sexual abuse stems from a desire to protect oneself and maintain power by association. Why Men Still Defend Sexual Predators And Fight The #MeToo Movement All starting to make sense now? “Men may not have done anything on the level of the offender they support, but they perhaps have committed some smaller version of the same offense and fear that they will be stigmatized or brought to task in the same way,” explains Brooke Sprowl, a family therapist. The answer was right there in front of us all the time? The notion that support for sexual offenders, in particular, comes from a paranoid place of seeking justification or absolution for past behaviors is not unique to Sprowl. It’s a common understanding that basically posits men are often unclear on whether or not they have perpetrated offenses against others in the past. Now we know why they keep defending an adjudicated rapist. Not that we didn't really already know.

Stop lying and cheating

Proof that greggerypeccary is cheat and liar

Desperate lunatics like Peccary and corrupt Democrat biased Courts, fabricating lies and false propaganda like the BBC did with the Capitol Hill protest.
The irresponsibility of Media splicing & editing, making lies of Russian collisions and more. Even the Australian ABC just falsely showed 120 Palestinian burials it said wete women and children mostly. When in truth, they were 90 official Hamas personnel and where the rest came were claimed to be vapourised by Israel attacks, hence no proof of bodies.
I mean, the bulls#t Lefty propaganda just shoots itself in the foot every time.
The Democrats & France are failing to deal with the present problems but like cowards in denial like Peccary - too afraid to admit it.

Peccay's claims are nothing but a snake in the grass.
Of course, Peccary will flee to the shadows as usual when the going gets tough.
Only mentally ill people can't admit that they're wrong. Evil even, when they know they are and they still think they can get away with it.

Man up Peccary and make yourself public in a clip to stand by in your false accusations.
But you're a coward and liar and you won't.  ;D

A Manhattan federal jury found Donald Trump liable in a civil suit for the sexual abuse and defamation of writer E. Jean Carroll, awarding millions in damages. While the specific jury verdict did not find him liable for rape under New York's narrow penal definition at the time, the presiding judge later clarified that the jury's finding of sexual assault met common, modern definitions of rape.

https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg

Peccary desperately just trolling now.
Liar with blood on his hands.
He's the bad guy folks.
Flushed out like the Democrats and Media by Trump the Lightning Rod, for all the world to see.
Peccary's corrupt American Courts. Just ask the Negroes.

Legal and Court Context

Civil Verdicts: A 2023 jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding $5 million, and a 2024 jury awarded an additional $83.3 million for related defamation.

Judge's Clarification: U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan stated that the jury's finding of forcible digital penetration matched the common understanding of rape, and noted that E. Jean Carroll’s assertion that she was raped was "substantially true" in the context of legal dismissals.

Appeals Status: The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Trump’s final appeals regarding the initial $5 million judgment, allowing the verdict and payout to stand, while additional appeals regarding subsequent judgments have continued.

https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg

Tell the truth, Greggery, don't lie.

What was the final amount DL was ordered to pay for raping and defaming E Jean? 

Now now, Greggery, tell the truth, please. Don't lie.

What was the final amount DL was ordered to pay E Jean?

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 7:38pm:

Tell the truth, Greggery, don't lie. What was the final amount DL was ordered to pay for raping and defaming E Jean?

DL was ordered to pay writer E. Jean Carroll a total of $5 million (plus post-judgment interest, totaling about $5.6 million to $5.8 million) in the finalized 2023 sexual abuse and defamation case.

He faces a separate, distinct defamation judgment of $83.3 million that remains under ongoing appeal, bringing the combined total of the two civil verdicts to over $88 million.

https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg

Peccary the Forum Troll.
Trump is painful for Peccary. But Suicide is painless and that's the path Leftism is on.
Shame for him and the Left. we won't be going down with them.
Our hands are clean. :)

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 7:47pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 7:38pm: Tell the truth, Greggery, don't lie. What was the final amount DL was ordered to pay for raping and defaming E Jean?  DL was ordered to pay writer E. Jean Carroll a total of $5 million (plus post-judgment interest, totaling about $5.6 million to $5.8 million) in the finalized 2023 sexual abuse and defamation case. He faces a separate, distinct defamation judgment of $83.3 million that remains under ongoing appeal, bringing the combined total of the two civil verdicts to over $88 million. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg

$88 mil, eh?

Oo-er, two fat ladies, innit.

Do they have these in your little country JaSin?

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 7:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 7:47pm: Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 7:38pm: Tell the truth, Greggery, don't lie. What was the final amount DL was ordered to pay for raping and defaming E Jean?  DL was ordered to pay writer E. Jean Carroll a total of $5 million (plus post-judgment interest, totaling about $5.6 million to $5.8 million) in the finalized 2023 sexual abuse and defamation case. He faces a separate, distinct defamation judgment of $83.3 million that remains under ongoing appeal, bringing the combined total of the two civil verdicts to over $88 million. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg $88 mil, eh? Oo-er, two fat ladies, innit. Do they have these in your little country JaSin?

What little country is that?   :-/

Proof that greggerypeccary is cheat and liar

You lose again.  ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 8:09pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 7:58pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 7:47pm: Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 19th, 2026 at 7:38pm: Tell the truth, Greggery, don't lie. What was the final amount DL was ordered to pay for raping and defaming E Jean?  DL was ordered to pay writer E. Jean Carroll a total of $5 million (plus post-judgment interest, totaling about $5.6 million to $5.8 million) in the finalized 2023 sexual abuse and defamation case. He faces a separate, distinct defamation judgment of $83.3 million that remains under ongoing appeal, bringing the combined total of the two civil verdicts to over $88 million. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg $88 mil, eh? Oo-er, two fat ladies, innit. Do they have these in your little country JaSin? What little country is that?   :-/

JaSin?

Over to you.

Apologies, corect me if i'm wrong, but Tallowood seems to be arguing that unless there is video or eye-witness evidence, you cannot prove that sexual assault occurred?

Have i misread this?

Because the Taliban have similar requirements.

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 8:31am:

Apologies, corect me if i'm wrong, but Tallowood seems to be arguing that unless there is video or eye-witness evidence, you cannot prove that sexual assault occurred? Have i misread this? Because the Taliban have similar requirements.

Did Taliban refused to pay you 5million dollars?  :o

tallowood wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 9:20am:

mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 8:31am: Apologies, corect me if i'm wrong, but Tallowood seems to be arguing that unless there is video or eye-witness evidence, you cannot prove that sexual assault occurred? Have i misread this? Because the Taliban have similar requirements. Did Taliban refused to pay you 5million dollars?  :o

The Taliban require male witnesses to a sexual assault to come forward and testify that it did indeed occur.

You require video footage.

All in all, odds against the victim, no?

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 9:24am:

tallowood wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 9:20am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 8:31am: Apologies, corect me if i'm wrong, but Tallowood seems to be arguing that unless there is video or eye-witness evidence, you cannot prove that sexual assault occurred? Have i misread this? Because the Taliban have similar requirements. Did Taliban refused to pay you 5million dollars?  :o The Taliban require male witnesses to a sexual assault to come forward and testify that it did indeed occur. You require video footage. All in all, odds against the victim, no?

So are you Taliban victim or not?

Interesting ... Taliban "victim".

No video means no case against Trump.


Why Tallow, are women accused by the Taliban automatically victims while women accusing Trump don't have the evidence to justify themselves?

You're not .... prejudiced, are you?

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 9:32am:

Interesting ... Taliban "victim". No video means no case against Trump. Why Tallow, are women accused by the Taliban automatically victims while women accusing Trump don't have the evidence to justify themselves? You're not .... prejudiced, are you?

Why mothra, does Trump accused by the whore automatically have to pay 5 million dollars while there is no evidence?

You're not .... prejudiced against Trump, are you?

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 8:31am:

Apologies, correct me if i'm wrong, but Tallowood seems to be arguing that unless there is video or eye-witness evidence, you cannot prove that sexual assault occurred?

He demands video or photographic evidence.

But only - and this is the important part - if the alleged rapist is a rich white man.

All others are immediately guilty even if there's no evidence whatsoever.

tallowood wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 9:46am:

mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 9:32am: Interesting ... Taliban "victim". No video means no case against Trump. Why Tallow, are women accused by the Taliban automatically victims while women accusing Trump don't have the evidence to justify themselves? You're not .... prejudiced, are you? Why mothra, does Trump accused by the whore automatically have to pay 5 million dollars while there is no evidence? You're not .... prejudiced against Trump, are you?

There was, judiciarily found, sufficient evidence to find Trump guilty of sexual assault.

This is not in question.

What is in question is what you personally consider evidence. You will only accept video evidence. Or maybe eye-witness?

Do the eye-witnesses need to be male?

Because if so, it is yet another thing you have in common with the Taliban.

tallowood wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 9:46am:

mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 9:32am: Interesting ... Taliban "victim". No video means no case against Trump. Why Tallow, are women accused by the Taliban automatically victims while women accusing Trump don't have the evidence to justify themselves? You're not .... prejudiced, are you? Why mothra, does Trump accused by the whore automatically have to pay 5 million dollars while there is no evidence?

au contraire

I. The Evidence Presented at Trial

We summarize the evidence presented to the jury regarding the charged 1996 assault and 2022 defamation of Ms. Carroll.  

Habitual liar pecca writes that Trump is guilty without evidence

Proof that greggerypeccary is cheat and liar

Therefore Trump is not guilty.
Q.E.D.

Just gonna say, i spent a decade or two being pretty optimistic ... but things are looking grim for women and girls.

One hell of a backlash.

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 9:57am:

Just gonna say, i spent a decade or two being pretty optimistic ... but things are looking grim for women and girls. One hell of a backlash.

Conservative "men" - such as tallowood, Frank, and JaSin - always take the side of the alleged rapist if they are white westerners.

It really is quite alarming.

tallowood wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 9:56am:

Habitual liar pecca writes that Trump is guilty without evidence Proof that greggerypeccary is cheat and liar Therefore Trump is not guilty. Q.E.D.

Yeah but you think like the Taliban ... so imma gonna stter clear of your recommendations.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 9:59am:

mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 9:57am: Just gonna say, i spent a decade or two being pretty optimistic ... but things are looking grim for women and girls. One hell of a backlash. Conservative "men" - such as tallowood, Frank, and JaSin - always take the side of the alleged rapist if they are white westerners. It really is quite alarming.

My sincere hope that the relegation of women to second class citizens, still being withing living memory, will inspire resistance.

I'm seeing enormous hurdles.

The manosphere scares the absolute poo out of me. Seriously toxic stuff.

And the leader of the free world is a pervy old rapist who has millions defending him on social media.

Just marvy.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 9:52am:

tallowood wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 9:46am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 9:32am: Interesting ... Taliban "victim". No video means no case against Trump. Why Tallow, are women accused by the Taliban automatically victims while women accusing Trump don't have the evidence to justify themselves? You're not .... prejudiced, are you? Why mothra, does Trump accused by the whore automatically have to pay 5 million dollars while there is no evidence? au contraire I. The Evidence Presented at Trial We summarize the evidence presented to the jury regarding the charged 1996 assault and 2022 defamation of Ms. Carroll.

From pecca link:


Quote:

Justia Opinion Summary

Opinion of politically motivated court is not proof therefore Trump is not guilty especially in the light of insistence of his guilt by habitual liar.
Proof that greggerypeccary is cheat and liar

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 9:59am:

tallowood wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 9:56am: Habitual liar pecca writes that Trump is guilty without evidence Proof that greggerypeccary is cheat and liar Therefore Trump is not guilty. Q.E.D. Yeah but you think like the Taliban ... so imma gonna stter clear of your recommendations.

Did Taliban refused to pay you 5million dollars? 

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:04am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 9:59am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 9:57am: Just gonna say, i spent a decade or two being pretty optimistic ... but things are looking grim for women and girls. One hell of a backlash. Conservative "men" - such as tallowood, Frank, and JaSin - always take the side of the alleged rapist if they are white westerners. It really is quite alarming. My sincere hope that the relegation of women to second class citizens, still being withing living memory, will inspire resistance. I'm seeing enormous hurdles. The manosphere scares the absolute poo out of me. Seriously toxic stuff. And the leader of the free world is a pervy old rapist who has millions defending him on social media. Just marvy.

None more so that tallowood, Frank, JaSin, and Bobby.

I'm guessing they're all Sydney Swans fans too.

tallowood wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:10am:

mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 9:59am: tallowood wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 9:56am: Habitual liar pecca writes that Trump is guilty without evidence Proof that greggerypeccary is cheat and liar Therefore Trump is not guilty. Q.E.D. Yeah but you think like the Taliban ... so imma gonna stter clear of your recommendations. Did Taliban refused to pay you 5million dollars?

Are you Fleadriver?

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:11am:

mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:04am: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 9:59am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 9:57am: Just gonna say, i spent a decade or two being pretty optimistic ... but things are looking grim for women and girls. One hell of a backlash. Conservative "men" - such as tallowood, Frank, and JaSin - always take the side of the alleged rapist if they are white westerners. It really is quite alarming. My sincere hope that the relegation of women to second class citizens, still being withing living memory, will inspire resistance. I'm seeing enormous hurdles. The manosphere scares the absolute poo out of me. Seriously toxic stuff. And the leader of the free world is a pervy old rapist who has millions defending him on social media. Just marvy. None more so that tallowood, Frank, JaSin, and Bobby. I'm guessing they're all Sydney Swans fans too.

Proof that greggerypeccary is cheat and liar

Hey Greg! Would you rather be a cheat and a liar on an anonymous message board or hold similar ethics towards the sexual assault of women as the Taliban?

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:17am:

Hey Greg! Would you rather be a cheat and a liar on an anonymous message board or hold similar ethics towards the sexual assault of women as the Taliban?

Lock in 'A', please Eddie.

I like how all of sudden lefties became Islamophobic to suit their political agenda  ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:20am:

mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:17am: Hey Greg! Would you rather be a cheat and a liar on an anonymous message board or hold similar ethics towards the sexual assault of women as the Taliban? Lock in 'A', please Eddie.

Gotcha.

Hey, do you think Tallow is Fleeadriver of Gordy?

tallowood wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:26am:

I like how all of sudden lefties became Islamophobic to suit their political agenda  ;D

Que?

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:27am:

tallowood wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:26am: I like how all of sudden lefties became Islamophobic to suit their political agenda  ;D Que?

5 million dollars lefty hunters ;D

tallowood wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:29am:

mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:27am: tallowood wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:26am: I like how all of sudden lefties became Islamophobic to suit their political agenda  ;D Que? 5 million dollars lefty hunters ;D

I know you think you are making sense ....

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:31am:

tallowood wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:29am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:27am: tallowood wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:26am: I like how all of sudden lefties became Islamophobic to suit their political agenda  ;D Que? 5 million dollars lefty hunters ;D I know you think you are making sense ....

I know you want 5 million dollars  ;D

And this is the standard for debate Fleadriver strives tto keep his forum at.

Not much life left in the old girl now.

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:37am:

And this is the standard for debate Fleadriver strives tto keep his forum at. Not much life left in the old girl now.

This is your life  ;D ;D ;D

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:26am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:20am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:17am: Hey Greg! Would you rather be a cheat and a liar on an anonymous message board or hold similar ethics towards the sexual assault of women as the Taliban? Lock in 'A', please Eddie. Gotcha. Hey, do you think Tallow is Fleeadriver of Gordy?

I think shallowood is in a world of his own   :-/

tallowood wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:40am:

mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:37am: And this is the standard for debate Fleadriver strives tto keep his forum at. Not much life left in the old girl now. This is your life  ;D ;D ;D

No. I only pop in occasionally to hand you your arses.


For example, today, you have been found very wanting.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:41am:

mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:26am: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:20am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:17am: Hey Greg! Would you rather be a cheat and a liar on an anonymous message board or hold similar ethics towards the sexual assault of women as the Taliban? Lock in 'A', please Eddie. Gotcha. Hey, do you think Tallow is Fleeadriver of Gordy? I think shallowood is in a world of his own   :-/

Cheating, lying and masturbating is pecca's world.  ;D

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:43am:

tallowood wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:40am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:37am: And this is the standard for debate Fleadriver strives tto keep his forum at. Not much life left in the old girl now. This is your life  ;D ;D ;D No. I only pop in occasionally to hand you your arses. For example, today, you have been found very wanting.

5 dollars is all you worth not 5 million  ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:41am:

mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:26am: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:20am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:17am: Hey Greg! Would you rather be a cheat and a liar on an anonymous message board or hold similar ethics towards the sexual assault of women as the Taliban? Lock in 'A', please Eddie. Gotcha. Hey, do you think Tallow is Fleeadriver of Gordy? I think shallowood is in a world of his own   :-/

Hmmm .. unconvinced. Still, i'm not here much.

God knows why they're pretending to be Russian. Games aplenty!

tallowood wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:44am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:41am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:26am: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:20am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:17am: Hey Greg! Would you rather be a cheat and a liar on an anonymous message board or hold similar ethics towards the sexual assault of women as the Taliban? Lock in 'A', please Eddie. Gotcha. Hey, do you think Tallow is Fleeadriver of Gordy? I think shallowood is in a world of his own   :-/ Cheating, lying and masturbating is pecca's world.  ;D

Demanding video evidence of sexual assault is Tallowood's.

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:47am:

tallowood wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:44am: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:41am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:26am: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:20am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:17am: Hey Greg! Would you rather be a cheat and a liar on an anonymous message board or hold similar ethics towards the sexual assault of women as the Taliban? Lock in 'A', please Eddie. Gotcha. Hey, do you think Tallow is Fleeadriver of Gordy? I think shallowood is in a world of his own   :-/ Cheating, lying and masturbating is pecca's world.  ;D Demanding video evidence of sexual assault is Tallowood's.

Did Taliban sexually assault you, are they that desperate?  :o

tallowood wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:54am:

mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:47am: tallowood wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:44am: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:41am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:26am: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:20am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:17am: Hey Greg! Would you rather be a cheat and a liar on an anonymous message board or hold similar ethics towards the sexual assault of women as the Taliban? Lock in 'A', please Eddie. Gotcha. Hey, do you think Tallow is Fleeadriver of Gordy? I think shallowood is in a world of his own   :-/ Cheating, lying and masturbating is pecca's world.  ;D Demanding video evidence of sexual assault is Tallowood's. Did Taliban sexually assault you, are they that desperate?  :o

Sexual assault is hilarious, isn't is Tallowood?

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:57am:

tallowood wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:54am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:47am: tallowood wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:44am: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:41am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:26am: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:20am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:17am: Hey Greg! Would you rather be a cheat and a liar on an anonymous message board or hold similar ethics towards the sexual assault of women as the Taliban? Lock in 'A', please Eddie. Gotcha. Hey, do you think Tallow is Fleeadriver of Gordy? I think shallowood is in a world of his own   :-/ Cheating, lying and masturbating is pecca's world.  ;D Demanding video evidence of sexual assault is Tallowood's. Did Taliban sexually assault you, are they that desperate?  :o Sexual assault is hilarious, isn't is Tallowood?

mothra and Talliban  ;D ;D ;D

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:46am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:41am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:26am: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:20am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:17am: Hey Greg! Would you rather be a cheat and a liar on an anonymous message board or hold similar ethics towards the sexual assault of women as the Taliban? Lock in 'A', please Eddie. Gotcha. Hey, do you think Tallow is Fleeadriver of Gordy? I think shallowood is in a world of his own   :-/ Hmmm .. unconvinced. Still, i'm not here much. God knows why they're pretending to be Russian. Games aplenty!

He's a bit of a bot, Mother. You've gotta admit, it beats Bobby's greatest hits.

It trump's the old boy's regurgitated tanties. Tallow's a gen-u-wine Russian-backed bot.

The "noble Alpha", he upon the "narrow road to success". Not so much a man as an algorithm.

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 10:57am:

tallowood wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:54am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:47am: tallowood wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:44am: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:41am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:26am: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:20am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:17am: Hey Greg! Would you rather be a cheat and a liar on an anonymous message board or hold similar ethics towards the sexual assault of women as the Taliban? Lock in 'A', please Eddie. Gotcha. Hey, do you think Tallow is Fleeadriver of Gordy? I think shallowood is in a world of his own   :-/ Cheating, lying and masturbating is pecca's world.  ;D Demanding video evidence of sexual assault is Tallowood's. Did Taliban sexually assault you, are they that desperate?  :o Sexual assault is hilarious, isn't is Tallowood?

It's a little bit naughty, Mother. It's like the Benny Hill Show, but with real life celebs like the Don.

It's a pity they didn't keep the surveillance footage. The court would have got to see DL chasing E Jean around Bergdorff's in fast-forward, pulling out sexy lingerie, entering changing rooms, young lasses running out covering their bosoms, manikins being disrobed, matronly store managers fainting in horror, security guards blowing whistles and chasing DL down the escalators, etc, etc, etc.

The jury would have had a right old chuckle. Remember, Donny's an entertainer, not a politician.

The Real Americans vibe with that, no?

Peccary & Mothra are Master Baiters.  ;D

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 11:44am:

mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:46am: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:41am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:26am: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:20am: mothra wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 10:17am: Hey Greg! Would you rather be a cheat and a liar on an anonymous message board or hold similar ethics towards the sexual assault of women as the Taliban? Lock in 'A', please Eddie. Gotcha. Hey, do you think Tallow is Fleeadriver of Gordy? I think shallowood is in a world of his own   :-/ Hmmm .. unconvinced. Still, i'm not here much. God knows why they're pretending to be Russian. Games aplenty! He's a bit of a bot, Mother. You've gotta admit, it beats Bobby's greatest hits. It trump's the old boy's regurgitated tanties. Tallow's a gen-u-wine Russian-backed bot. The "noble Alpha", he upon the "narrow road to success". Not so much a man as an algorithm.

talipaki durka, burqa, banana, jihad, deep stick, durka, etc., etc,. etc.. ;)

 

Oh look - Vlad's got them doing Haikus - in Urdu.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 5:03pm:

Oh look - Vlad's got them doing Haikus - in Urdu.

steal banana seat on stick  ;D

tallowood wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 5:09pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 5:03pm: Oh look - Vlad's got them doing Haikus - in Urdu. steal banana seat on stick  ;D

Oh, Mattywisk, you are naughty. To think Mother thought you were Freediver.

And Russian!

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 5:15pm:

tallowood wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 5:09pm: Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 5:03pm: Oh look - Vlad's got them doing Haikus - in Urdu. steal banana seat on stick  ;D Oh, Mattywisk, you are naughty. To think Mother thought you were Freediver. And Russian!

Karnal durka, burqa, jihad banana, deep stick, durka, etc., etc,. etc..  ;D

You're no Ruski, dear. You're Matty!

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 5:22pm:

You're no Ruski, dear. You're Matty!

You are monkey on the stick  ;D

tallowood wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 5:25pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 20th, 2026 at 5:22pm: You're no Ruski, dear. You're Matty! You are monkey on the stick  ;D

I do feel Mother raised a pertinent point, Matty.

Why would some Aussie disability pensioner champion the policies of one V.Putin?

Like, what could possibly be in it for you?

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 5:22pm:

You're no Ruski, dear. You're Matty!

Pidorosticheskaya makaka, sidi na kolu i ne rypajsya, chtob ne bolelo  ;D

I know, Matty, you said that. I asked you why you'd be into it all.

If you had your way, we'd be in an endless war of attrition with New Zealand. We'd be importing North Koreans to replace the million or so deaths of our own boys. The ruling regime's political opponents would be given eleven year sentences for even mentioning the war. Our economy would be teetering on collapse, we'd be under constant drone attack, we'd be sanctioned global pariahs and for what?

To make some silly would-be tsar the richest leader in the world? To own the leftards?

It doesn't make sense. People like you would be living on the streets eating cat food - if you're not already.

Why would you want all this for your once-proud country?

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 6:18pm:

I know, Matty, you said that. I asked you why you'd be into it all. If you had your way, we'd be in an endless war of attrition with New Zealand. We'd be importing North Koreans to replace the million or so deaths of our own boys. The ruling regime's political opponents would be given eleven year sentences for even mentioning the war. Our economy would be teetering on collapse, we'd be under constant drone attack, we'd be sanctioned global pariahs and for what? To make some silly would-be tsar the richest leader in the world? To own the leftards? It doesn't make sense. People like you would be living on the streets eating cat food - if you're not already. Why would you want all this for your once-proud country?

Idi na huj  ;)

There you go, Bobby.

Why bother cutting and pasting the same three posts when you can produce utterances like Matty's?

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 2:02pm:

This is, word-for-word, what we all want to ask you when you continue to defend the indefensible Donald Trump. He is a colossal liar, a cheat, corrupt to the core and basically the worst President in US history. Why do you continue to defend such a horrible person? He cheated on his wife while she was pregnant, for crying out loud, and has even paid hookers hush money!

And when you're a star they let you do it -

you can do anything -

grab them ...

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 20^th, 2026 at 7:04pm:

There you go, Bobby. Why bother cutting and pasting the same three posts when you can produce utterances like Matty's?

You think about 10 different people are Matty -

whoever that was?