Her statement hits Blanche hard…

https://youtu.be/puwq4b4_sH4?si=2F1WSzOkMMFNtOI7

Blanche will be dead one day (and not a day too soon).

There'll be a queue of people to piss on his grave.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 18^th, 2026 at 8:08pm:

Blanche will be dead one day (and not a day too soon). There'll be a queue of people to piss on his grave.

… and most of the Trump cabinet, including their Dear Leader.

She does videos online highlighting the corruption in the current DOJ, and they're very, very good videos. Well worth watching.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jul 19^th, 2026 at 1:11pm:

She does videos online highlighting the corruption in the current DOJ, and they're very, very good videos. Well worth watching.

Did she do the same for the previous administration, or is she partisan? ::)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JGEXteJ_JA

lee wrote on Jul 19^th, 2026 at 1:47pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jul 19th, 2026 at 1:11pm: She does videos online highlighting the corruption in the current DOJ, and they're very, very good videos. Well worth watching. Did she do the same for the previous administration, or is she partisan? ::)

The previous administration wasn’t corrupt like this one and didn’t misuse the DOJ to go after political opponents, unlike the current administration. Hence, there was no need for her to do this.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jul 19^th, 2026 at 7:34pm:

The previous administration wasn’t corrupt like this one and didn’t misuse the DOJ to go after political opponents, unlike the current administration.

Perhaps you should use google.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/justice-department-report-face-act-biden-era-doj-enforcement/

https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/3264261-the-disturbing-misuse-of-doj-by-the-biden-white-house-continues/

https://time.com/article/2026/05/27/why-biden-is-suing-the-department-of-justice-trump-response-lawsuit/

lee wrote on Jul 20^th, 2026 at 1:26pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jul 19th, 2026 at 7:34pm: The previous administration wasn’t corrupt like this one and didn’t misuse the DOJ to go after political opponents, unlike the current administration. Perhaps you should use google. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/justice-department-report-face-act-biden-era-doj-enforcement/ https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/3264261-the-disturbing-misuse-of-doj-by-the-biden-white-house-continues/ https://time.com/article/2026/05/27/why-biden-is-suing-the-department-of-justice-trump-response-lawsuit/

Thanks, Lee. Now, would you like to summarize what Google says?

Kindly tell us why Sleepy Joe was far worse than DL and used the DOJ to go after his political opponents, unlike the current administration.

Please explain when Sleepy Joe told the DOJ what to do, who to go after and how much moolah he demanded.

Do tell us all how Sleepy fired DOJ lawyers for refusing to say it was okay to pardon violent DV perps and rapists.

Once you've done that, we'll do a compare and contrast with your DL and form an opinion.

Cheers.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 20^th, 2026 at 1:37pm:

Now, would you like to summarize what Google says?

Do your own homework, I am not here for you. 8-)

lee wrote on Jul 20^th, 2026 at 1:57pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 20th, 2026 at 1:37pm: Now, would you like to summarize what Google says? Do your own homework, I am not here for you. 8-)

No worries. We'll do it for you, shall we?

According to your Googling:

1. Sleepy Joe's DOJ prosecuted anti-abortion activists under the 1994 FACE Act.

2. Sleepy Joe's press secretary warned states to pass laws that complied with the Constitution or face legal challenges from the DOJ.

3. Sleepy Joe, retired prez, filed a lawsuit to prevent the current DOJ from releasing transcripts of his private conversations with a biographer.

You're using these three points to defend your DL. That's nice, Lee. Here's what you're defending him for:

1. Ordering Attorney Generals to prosecute political enemies. His directive to Pam Bondi could not have been more specific: What about Comey, Adam "Shifty" Schiff, Leticia??? They're all guilty as hell, but nothing is going to be done...We can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility. They impeached me twice, and indicted me (5 times!), OVER NOTHING. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!

2. Directing the DOJ to personally pay him $230 mil in damages for prosecuting him. The DOJ acknowledged the request, but refuses to comment on victim settlements.

3. Having his old friend Ghislaine Maxwell, a convicted sex trafficker, transferred to a minimum security security work farm where she has a service dog, massage therapist, her own private area in the prison with snacks to receive visitors and the use of the warden's office to make calls and use computers.

4. Starting up a pay-to-play pardon business, wiping out nearly $2 bil in fines and restitution payments, commuting the sentences of fraudsters, drug traffickers and violent felons, in return for cash transfers and political donations. Of the pardoned Jan 6 rioters alone, 97 have gone on to reoffend: DV, violence, sex crimes, gun crimes, drugs, DUI, the lot.

5. Suing the DOJ, then ordering them to "settle", demanding a $1.8 bil compensation fund for his political loyalists and lifetime immunity from all IRS tax audits. A recent court ruling described the deal as an unparalleled exercise in self-dealing.

6. Covering up over 50% of the Epstein files in direct violation of
the Epstein Files Transparency Act (ETFA). The legislation was passed because he refused to release them in the first place. Those who have accessed the files report his name mentioned over a million times, in connection with multiple reported sexual crimes, some against children.

7. Suing the media, a direct affront to the First Amendment, is something no prez has even dreamed of doing. He's even gone after his political enemies legal firms, targeting lawyers who've defended or prosecuted cases against himself.

8. Firing a pardon attorney for refusing to politicize the pardon process. Liz Oyer, an apolitical federal employee, merely did her job. She carried out a risk assessment and, based on the evidence, found giving Mel his guns back was likely to present a danger to the public. Liz is only one lawyer fired. The DOJ and FBI have been purged.

9. Appointing his own personal lawyer as Attorney General. When asked during the hearing, Todd let this one slip. What was their relationship like? Did he consider himself as friend of DL?

Why no, Todd said, he was merely there as his lawyer.

Out of all of these facts, this one gets to the heart. The lawfare, the pardons, the payouts, the legal and procedural violations - all of it unprecedented, all of it illegal. They are all being carried out by the president's personal lawyer, who now gets to decide which federal crimes get prosecuted.

None of these acts are remotely comparable to Sleepy Joe, just as they're not comparable to any other prez. The closest you'll find is Nixon, forced to resign for covering up a burglary, a crime that seems tame by comparison. JD, of course, said just that.

During Joe's administration, the DOJ was hands off. The law was blind and applied equally to all. Sleepy never even stood in the way of the prosecution of his own son. Your DL, by comparison, has turned the DOJ into his private law firm, according to his very own AG.

You might not be here for us, Lee, but do you know?

We'll always be here for you

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 20^th, 2026 at 4:53pm:

You're using these three points to defend your DL.

Nope. That's where you are wrong. Both sides do it. It doesn't make it right. It is wrong.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

How convenient of me that I didn't include Hunter's pardon. ::)

lee wrote on Jul 20^th, 2026 at 5:53pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 20th, 2026 at 4:53pm: You're using these three points to defend your DL. Nope. That's where you are wrong. Both sides do it. It doesn't make it right. It is wrong.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D How convenient of me that I didn't include Hunter's pardon. ::)

So just to clarify, you condemn your DL turning the DOJ into his own private legal firm and personal bank account, do you?

We'll need an answer to this one thanks, dear.

You may not be able to do homework, but I'm sure you can give a simple yes or no.

Cheers.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 20^th, 2026 at 8:05pm:

So just to clarify, you condemn your DL turning the DOJ into his own private legal firm and personal bank account, do you?

His own private legal firm? You mean the same as Biden? Oh noes, the irony it burns. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

BTW - Calling Biden "Sleepy Joe" is just your way of defending YOUR DL. "it wasn't his fault, he was sleepy" And of course that was backed up by his party, and they took advantage.

So sleeping on the job is good government, Got it. ;D ;D ;D ;D

lee wrote on Jul 21^st, 2026 at 12:33pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 20th, 2026 at 8:05pm: So just to clarify, you condemn your DL turning the DOJ into his own private legal firm and personal bank account, do you? His own private legal firm? You mean the same as Biden? Oh noes, the irony it burns. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D BTW - Calling Biden "Sleepy Joe" is just your way of defending YOUR DL. "it wasn't his fault, he was sleepy" And of course that was backed up by his party, and they took advantage. So sleeping on the job is good government, Got it. ;D ;D ;D ;D

You may have misread the question, but that's okay, we'll ask it again.

Do you condemn your DL turning the DOJ into his own private legal firm and personal bank account?

We'll need an answer to this one thanks, dear.

Cheers.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 21^st, 2026 at 1:13pm:

You may have misread the question,

Nope. I was responding to its intent. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

lee wrote on Jul 21^st, 2026 at 2:36pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 21st, 2026 at 1:13pm: You may have misread the question, Nope. I was responding to its intent. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Right, so you deliberately answered the wrong question.

Cunning, no?

You just said this kind of corruption is wrong. Can you tell us why that is?

Cheers.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 21^st, 2026 at 5:13pm:

You just said this kind of corruption is wrong. Can you tell us why that is?

\
Bloody hell  you are thick. All corruption is wrong.  Don't limit yourself to Republicans. ::)

lee wrote on Jul 21^st, 2026 at 6:18pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 21st, 2026 at 5:13pm: You just said this kind of corruption is wrong. Can you tell us why that is? \ Bloody hell  you are thick. All corruption is wrong.  Don't limit yourself to Republicans. ::)

Right, so what do you have to say to your DL about that?

You got shirty about Sleepy Joe filing a lawsuit to prevent the current DOJ from releasing transcripts of his private conversations with a biographer.

But you're okay with your DL helping himself to $1.8 bil in government funds and demanding tax exemptions for life?

You'll need to explain yourself, Lee.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 21^st, 2026 at 6:26pm:

You'll need to explain yourself, Lee.

You are still as thick as a brick. There is no such thing as "noble cause corruption" it is simply corruption. Now what was it I said about corruption - remind me. ::)

BTW - AI says -"There’s no clear finding that Donald Trump “helped himself” to government funds in the sense of being ruled criminally liable for stealing taxpayer money for personal use."

So that is false. ;)

lee wrote on Jul 21^st, 2026 at 8:38pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 21st, 2026 at 6:26pm: You'll need to explain yourself, Lee. You are still as thick as a brick. There is no such thing as "noble cause corruption" it is simply corruption. Now what was it I said about corruption - remind me. ::) BTW - AI says -"There’s no clear finding that Donald Trump “helped himself” to government funds in the sense of being ruled criminally liable for stealing taxpayer money for personal use." So that is false. ;)

Can you post that for us, Lee?

With the source, please.

Cheers.

Search duck.ai for "There's no clear finding that Donald Trump "helped himself" to government funds in the sense of being ruled criminally liable for stealing taxpayer money for personal use."

You get yourself so tied up in your lies you have to doubt everyone else. ::)

BTW- Do you know how Presidents separate their own holdings whilst holding office? ::)

OR try Google Ai -

"There's no clear finding that Donald Trump "helped himself" to government funds in the sense of being ruled criminally liable for stealing taxpayer money for personal useThat is correct. No court or official investigation has ever found Donald Trump criminally liable for stealing or directly misappropriating taxpayer money for personal use."

https://www.google.com/search?q=There%27s+no+clear+finding+that+Donald+Trump+%22helped+himself%22+to+government+funds+in+the+sense+of+being+ruled+criminally+liable+for+stealing+taxpayer+money+for+personal+use&client=firefox-b-lm&hs=1Ay&sca_esv=856d4ba1f97ab2d0&sxsrf=APpeQnvnsNiGPJbvVfYwIiMYKyqm0WtZ4w%3A1784694654945&udm=50&fbs=ABfTbFVyMZGZf1hfvX9uKjN_-G8cY2oODYyTyZk24Xz37_7FQ0lVXiTzJxYqWN1RsBG-9fwO8FdOs0x3JcWne-X98mCRSaeuTXAHso71zbNznSEOZDVQcUX15QHVRXb69Pr5OKWsikA0nDgJFZGXPXBcoEo5X3Rzeb4PSe0dR9zXjfJQs1w9hUuhB8C6v8iM6kHap5ncKcJfNql6TtFx7hSKGeVAeeX1fw&aep=1&ntc=1&cs=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjQ-8HXueWVAxWMi2MGHfwRKV8Q2J8OegQIDxAD&biw=1138&bih=498&dpr=1.2&mstk=AUtExfDLSTrotrGPAPk9NlbFzBjrSo119M2DBbxE4u9foZVzojq8hrhICEMsPUnhCLRAxQlf71cQbmLCO9Ov-nkGdsG86z5aiyNtWftc9lfWqgwjtnSc59wEYWg7C7tlnRZhfHzHjcND3WVxey1CiJIRXh19z1me0FAfNlCUB1xPXJvvaL_-b9WHuN2TTEXOLVeXN9BnTUahSZmezOSTpJ3zICGeYIqcm889gZJxYgM6WHIXkMCu3fqWrqJib05rPDCezKQ7ly4MaOjbqVK-TWPXnM1GJBrCmh0zB05_RM40B7Y6P68gCfLsObSEPlbud8CLqTt2-3wpGswAUg&csuir=1&mtid=j0dgaqiCN4bf4-EP79LhuQo

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:32pm:

OR try Google Ai - "There's no clear finding that Donald Trump "helped himself" to government funds in the sense of being ruled criminally liable for stealing taxpayer money for personal useThat is correct. No court or official investigation has ever found Donald Trump criminally liable for stealing or directly misappropriating taxpayer money for personal use."

What about money donated to charities?

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 1:41pm:

Search duck.ai for "There's no clear finding that Donald Trump "helped himself" to government funds in the sense of being ruled criminally liable for stealing taxpayer money for personal use." You get yourself so tied up in your lies you have to doubt everyone else. ::) BTW- Do you know how Presidents separate their own holdings whilst holding office? ::)

Criminality and civil liability are two different legal criteria, Lee. Duck AI said no such thing, but I'm curious.

Are you now raising the corruption bar to include acts only with criminal or civil rulings?

All good. Cite your criminal/civil rulings against Sleepy Joe, please.

Cheers.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:35pm:

lee wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 2:32pm: OR try Google Ai - "There's no clear finding that Donald Trump "helped himself" to government funds in the sense of being ruled criminally liable for stealing taxpayer money for personal useThat is correct. No court or official investigation has ever found Donald Trump criminally liable for stealing or directly misappropriating taxpayer money for personal use." What about money donated to charities?

Strange. DL was ruled civilly liable.

Trump university - civilly liable.

E Jean defamation - civilly liable. Sexual assault - civilly liable.

Theft of government records - criminally indicted. Conspiracy to overturn an election - criminally indicted. Georgia election interference - criminally arrested.

34 counts of fraudulently falsifying business records, raised to felony status due to proven election interference - criminally convicted.

We've omitted all the other civil counts where he settled. These are just the indictments, arrests, civil rulings and criminal convictions.

So, we'll await Lee's AI response on Sleepy Joe, shall we?

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:39pm:

Criminality and civil liability are two different legal criteria, Lee. Duck AI said no such thing, but I'm curious.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 21^st, 2026 at 6:26pm:

But you're okay with your DL helping himself to $1.8 bil in government funds and demanding tax exemptions for life?

Your words.

Duck AI - "There isn’t evidence (in the reporting I found) that Trump personally “took” government money for himself in the way you might mean it—but there was a proposed DOJ-created settlement structure using taxpayer money that critics said could benefit Trump’s allies."

Google AI - "No, Donald Trump has not been legally found to have stolen or directly embezzled government funds."

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-lm&q=did+trmp+help+himself+to+governemtn+funds&udm=50&fbs=ABfTbFVyMZGZf1hfvX9uKjN_-G8cY2oODYyTyZk24Xz37_7FQ0Kuh3jfnRqiKzI7KrGsO-bHLKGXxP60AsAIKmX_LR6dbn90_Li4knBLWsQBiN9sOY_E-bnvXJkcu0TCeAK8uzlofR3jNCBvy2obvpSiDXb-eVKP7YCI9LPF1ylVVBLJq-qsoHHTpCrKBHTXejYGWfj533obFcycDDC3y_e03ti4FUB4tw&aep=10&ntc=1&mstk=AUtExfAisxJXFzqCUi4N8Ir27dE70fKym9NVv1gcH6P3OIK9gx7YAHedj11kYmuUkrC5h4kIQyTrculT-9xUZJuk-gtMmRo_O-tLg4RGwJlYZQz1fFG9prIb8sSsvZiBggxaahCHB4eQJkKAeD9DRuaeRoXxPgW7RujbaGBBM4XwbPNJzQEaY5V8tDR19nrEN3-HDKEWijvREMw2qRJwfXW3x_bfkK2aV1pBHxss511iT6X0IW5cA3M9BiTQQzIFnr4PGbAJAgbZ4yuPDI9vo4kwwN0twB1TXgRukE33KZTErdr9b1l-yuen65gKEQhDw94AoCcYa84x5OZk1w&aioh=3&csuir=1&mtid=AVVgavySC9WI4-EPlvPC2AY

Once I got it to answer the querstion.


Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:39pm:

Are you now raising the corruption bar to include acts only with criminal or civil rulings?

Nope. Help himself has its own connotattions of legality., ::)

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:35pm:

lee wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 2:32pm: OR try Google Ai - "There's no clear finding that Donald Trump "helped himself" to government funds in the sense of being ruled criminally liable for stealing taxpayer money for personal useThat is correct. No court or official investigation has ever found Donald Trump criminally liable for stealing or directly misappropriating taxpayer money for personal use." What about money donated to charities?

Did he donate money to charities?

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 2:35pm: lee wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 2:32pm: OR try Google Ai - "There's no clear finding that Donald Trump "helped himself" to government funds in the sense of being ruled criminally liable for stealing taxpayer money for personal useThat is correct. No court or official investigation has ever found Donald Trump criminally liable for stealing or directly misappropriating taxpayer money for personal use." What about money donated to charities? Did he donate money to charities?

;D

There's more chance of you and FD answering a question than there is of the rapist donating to a charity.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:40pm:

There's more chance of you and FD answering a question than there is of the rapist donating to a charity.

So he never donated to charities? Then  why the questiion? :o

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 3:40pm: There's more chance of you and FD answering a question than there is of the rapist donating to a charity. So he never donated to charities? Then  why the questiion? :o

Concentrate.  I know you can do it.

Has Donald Trump ever helped himself to funds that were donated to charities by other people?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:44pm:

Has Donald Trump ever helped himself to funds that were donated to charities by other people?

Thank you for clarifying your question. it wasn't that hard was it?

Yes and repaid it. next? ::)

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 3:44pm: Has Donald Trump ever helped himself to funds that were donated to charities by other people? Thank you for clarifying your question. it wasn't that hard was it? Yes ...

Ah.

It wasn't that hard, was it?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:51pm:

It wasn't that hard, was it?

What wasn't dummy. I already said corruption goes both ways. ::)

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:32pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 2:39pm: Are you now raising the corruption bar to include acts only with criminal or civil rulings? Nope.

Great. So we can finally receive your answer.


Quote:

No, Donald Trump has not directly taken government funds for himself, but his administration’s attempt to settle a lawsuit using taxpayer money was blocked by courts and dropped following intense bipartisan backlash.

Why did you omit this one, Lee? The deal was so corrupt, the judge referred DL's lawyers to their respective bar associations for immediate disbarment.

Your DL has indeed taken direct government funds for himself. $1.6 bil in government funds were paid out directly to fund his own Kazakstani mining venture. 

$230 mil from the DOJ for his pain and suffering - something even DL says looks bad.

No need for court rulings here, dear. DL declared it.

Can you show Sleepy Joe doing any such thing?

We'll broaden it out to make it easy for you - can you show any other prez?

Cheers.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:51pm:

lee wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 3:47pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 3:44pm: Has Donald Trump ever helped himself to funds that were donated to charities by other people? Thank you for clarifying your question. it wasn't that hard was it? Yes ... Ah. It wasn't that hard, was it?

Hang on, did Lee just say he supports a DL who's been found liable for charity fraud?

I'm confused. He keeps adding all these addendums and footnotes.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:38pm:

but his administration’s attempt to settle a lawsuit using taxpayer money was blocked by courts and dropped following intense bipartisan backlash.

So his administration not Trump himself. You really are clutching at straws as well as your pearls.
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:38pm:

Your DL has indeed taken direct government funds for himself. $1.6 bil in government funds were paid out directly to fund his own Kazakstani mining venture.

You haven't shown that either. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

According to duck.ai - "No clear evidence shows that Donald Trump himself “took” or personally received direct U.S. government funds for his own Kazakh mining venture."

Try again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:46pm:

I'm confused.

poor petal. the perpetually confused. ;D ;D ;D ;D

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:50pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 4:46pm: I'm confused. poor petal. the perpetually confused. ;D ;D ;D ;D

Great. Feel free to enlighten us with an answer. Can you show Sleepy Joe doing any such thing?

We'll broaden it out to make it easy for you - can you show any other prez?

Cheers.

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:49pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 4:38pm: but his administration’s attempt to settle a lawsuit using taxpayer money was blocked by courts and dropped following intense bipartisan backlash. So his administration not Trump himself. Try again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Oh, I see. So you think his personal attorney Todd Blanche did this on his own, do you?

So why did you DL push for it? He originally wanted the money to be paid to himself. He switched it to a LAWFARE victim's fund when the judge knocked it back.

We'd like just one question answered here, please. Don't you think asking for that is corrupt?

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:53pm:

lee wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 4:50pm: Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 4:46pm: I'm confused. poor petal. the perpetually confused. ;D ;D ;D ;D Great. Feel free to enlighten us with an answer. Can you show Sleepy Joe doing any such thing? We'll broaden it out to make it easy for you - can you show any other prez? Cheers.

lee?

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:49pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 4:38pm: but his administration’s attempt to settle a lawsuit using taxpayer money was blocked by courts and dropped following intense bipartisan backlash. So his administration not Trump himself. You really are clutching at straws as well as your pearls. Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 4:38pm: Your DL has indeed taken direct government funds for himself. $1.6 bil in government funds were paid out directly to fund his own Kazakstani mining venture. You haven't shown that either. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D According to duck.ai - "No clear evidence shows that Donald Trump himself “took” or personally received direct U.S. government funds for his own Kazakh mining venture." Try again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Looks like Lee's gone, Greggery. Hard day at the office, eh?

He's countered evidence from the New York Times, supported by government funding submissions, licensing agreements with the government of Kazakhstan and confessions from his own two sons, with a heavily redacted AI quote, which reads:


Quote:

"There isn’t evidence (in the reporting I found) that Trump personally “took” government money for himself in the way you might mean it—but there was a proposed DOJ-created settlement structure using taxpayer money that critics said could benefit Trump’s allies."

They're all as bad as each other, no?

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:53pm:

Can you show Sleepy Joe doing any such thing?

Oh you mean Sleepy Joe is more slippery than that? I agree. ;)

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 5:28pm:

lee wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 4:49pm: Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 4:38pm: but his administration’s attempt to settle a lawsuit using taxpayer money was blocked by courts and dropped following intense bipartisan backlash. So his administration not Trump himself. You really are clutching at straws as well as your pearls. Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 4:38pm: Your DL has indeed taken direct government funds for himself. $1.6 bil in government funds were paid out directly to fund his own Kazakstani mining venture. You haven't shown that either. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D According to duck.ai - "No clear evidence shows that Donald Trump himself “took” or personally received direct U.S. government funds for his own Kazakh mining venture." Try again. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Looks like Lee's gone, Greggery. Hard day at the office, eh?

Looks that way.

Or, as Bobby likes to say, a hard day at the orifice.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 5:28pm:

He's countered evidence from the New York Times, supported by government funding submissions, licensing agreements with the government of Kazakhstan and confessions from his own two sons, with a heavily redacted AI quote, which reads: Quote: "There isn’t evidence (in the reporting I found) that Trump personally “took” government money for himself in the way you might mean it—but there was a proposed DOJ-created settlement structure using taxpayer money that critics said could benefit Trump’s allies."

Oh only "critics said could". That seems ominous. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 5:22pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 4:53pm: lee wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 4:50pm: Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 4:46pm: I'm confused. poor petal. the perpetually confused. ;D ;D ;D ;D Great. Feel free to enlighten us with an answer. Can you show Sleepy Joe doing any such thing? We'll broaden it out to make it easy for you - can you show any other prez? Cheers. lee?

Lee's evidence to date:


lee wrote on Jul 20^th, 2026 at 1:26pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jul 19th, 2026 at 7:34pm: The previous administration wasn’t corrupt like this one and didn’t misuse the DOJ to go after political opponents, unlike the current administration. Perhaps you should use google. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/justice-department-report-face-act-biden-era-doj-enforcement/ https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/3264261-the-disturbing-misuse-of-doj-by-the-biden-white-house-continues/ https://time.com/article/2026/05/27/why-biden-is-suing-the-department-of-justice-trump-response-lawsuit/

When we asked what it said, Lee told us to do our own homework, as you do.

The poor dear hadn't even bothered to read it.

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 5:32pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 5:28pm: He's countered evidence from the New York Times, supported by government funding submissions, licensing agreements with the government of Kazakhstan and confessions from his own two sons, with a heavily redacted AI quote, which reads: Quote: "There isn’t evidence (in the reporting I found) that Trump personally “took” government money for himself in the way you might mean it—but there was a proposed DOJ-created settlement structure using taxpayer money that critics said could benefit Trump’s allies." Oh only "critics said could". That seems ominous. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Oh?

You haven't posted any. Why's that, Lee?

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 5:36pm:

You haven't posted any.

Any what? Your response doesn't even address the post. "critics said could" doesn't mean it was anything. Your critics think you are dumb. Does it make you so? Judging by your response yes, but it is not proof. ::)

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 5:50pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 5:36pm: You haven't posted any. Any what? Your response doesn't even address the post. "critics said could" doesn't mean it was anything. Your critics think you are dumb. Does it make you so? Judging by your response yes, but it is not proof. ::)

So where's your evidence? We've shown you billions, evidenced from multiple sources, including your DL himself. Even your silly old AI search says it.

You've posted three links you didn't even read, so we'll ask you again.

Can you show Sleepy Joe doing any such thing?

We'll make it even easier for you - can you show any other prez?

If you refuse to say, just tell us why.

We're here for you, dear.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 7:23pm:

So where's your evidence?

Evidence? You think sleepy joe was in a coma? ;D ;D ;D ;D

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 8:42pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 7:23pm: So where's your evidence? Evidence? You think sleepy joe was in a coma? ;D ;D ;D ;D

Right, so you're done.

Thanks, Lee. We'll need to hear you say it, dear.

Tell us all why.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 11:40pm:

Right, so you're done.

So says poor karny. Whenever he gets shot down on this bogus claims he reverts to "Saint Joe". ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

lee wrote on Jul 23^rd, 2026 at 3:55pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 11:40pm: Right, so you're done. So says poor karny. Whenever he gets shot down on this bogus claims he reverts to "Saint Joe". ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

No no, if you refuse to say, you need to tell us why.

We're fine to give you options. We do like a decent multiple choice, dear.

You, Lee, refuse to say because:

a) You're a little bit butthurt. Bobby was in the other bed when the leftards and modern classics popped round.

b) The cat has your tongue.

c) You can't bear to say a bad thing about DL - ever.

d) Yes, Master.

Kindly select a response. If you refuse again, one will be selected for you.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 23^rd, 2026 at 4:36pm:

Kindly select a response. If you refuse again, one will be selected for you.

Ok go for it. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 23^rd, 2026 at 4:36pm:

lee wrote on Jul 23rd, 2026 at 3:55pm: Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 11:40pm: Right, so you're done. So says poor karny. Whenever he gets shot down on this bogus claims he reverts to "Saint Joe". ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D No no, if you refuse to say, you need to tell us why. We're fine to give you options. We do like a decent multiple choice, dear. You, Lee, refuse to say because: a) You're a little bit butthurt. Bobby was in the other bed when the leftards and modern classics popped round. b) The cat has your tongue. c) You can't bear to say a bad thing about DL - ever. d) Yes, Master. Kindly select a response. If you refuse again, one will be selected for you.

https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/multiple-choice-all-above-options-test-quiz-uncertainty-gues-words-touch-screen-wall-man-selecting-option-47965130.jpg

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 23^rd, 2026 at 4:36pm:

lee wrote on Jul 23rd, 2026 at 3:55pm: Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 11:40pm: Right, so you're done. So says poor karny. Whenever he gets shot down on this bogus claims he reverts to "Saint Joe". ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D No no, if you refuse to say, you need to tell us why. We're fine to give you options. We do like a decent multiple choice, dear. You, Lee, refuse to say because: a) You're a little bit butthurt. Bobby was in the other bed when the leftards and modern classics popped round. b) The cat has your tongue. c) You can't bear to say a bad thing about DL - ever. d) Yes, Master. Kindly select a response. If you refuse again, one will be selected for you.

It was a close call between A and D, Lee, but let's get real.

You're not butthurt, dear, you're totally under his command.

You don't even feel it going in. No one with any neurological functioning would regurgitate the kind of responses you have in this thread. Your only articulate responses have been your giggles.

The rewritten AI feeds, the irrelevant propaganda, the absurd hits on Sleepy Joe. The excuses, the shifting goalposts, the invention of legal terms like "criminal liability", your own lies betraying your lack of understanding of even basic terms of reference.

It's almost hard to believe you come from a prosperous, developed and free country. Good education, a free media, one of the most representative democracies in the world.

But this is willful ignorance, doublethink, the ability as Orwell put it, to say that two plus two equals five. Typically, that happens in authoritarian regimes like Russia and Chi-na. What you've shown is that even so-called free people long, as Goebbels put it, to submit, to give into their overwhelming desire to obey.

Now, we know you'll claim the exact opposite - that everybody else is deluded. But, here in this thread, you've had the opportunity to prove your case. We've been most patient, following up on your propositions, reading your links, clarifying your AI searches. We've done, as you say, your homework for you, summarizing your sources, clarifying and giving you the opportunity to respond at every turn.

Your responses have been abrupt, to say the least. It's as if you didn't want to prove your case, offering up giggles and smug one-liners rather than any actual facts. Your argument itself, of course, is your go-to standby; they're all as bad as each other.

As we've seen in this thread, of course, is that nothing could be further from the truth. When asked to show who's as bad as each other, you got all tongue-tied. You won't even say why you refuse to say it.

Now, you've asked us to select the answer for you, but we're not done yet. We have one short answer question left. The question is why.

Why would you try to excuse and cover up the most blatant corruption we've ever seen by a US prez? You spent four years ranting about Bengazi and Burisma and laptops from hell. Why are you now turning the other cheek to the most brazen acts of theft by a US prez in US history?

In one of your responses, you tried telling us DL wasn't responsible for his DOJ lawsuit, his "administration" was. So, the last question left, and the most telling, is why.

Please explain?

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:49pm:

According to duck.ai - "No clear evidence shows that Donald Trump himself “took” or personally received direct U.S. government funds for his own Kazakh mining venture."

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:32pm:

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jul 21st, 2026 at 4:26pm: But you're okay with your DL helping himself to $1.8 bil in government funds and demanding tax exemptions for life? Your words. Duck AI - "There isn’t evidence (in the reporting I found) that Trump personally “took” government money for himself in the way you might mean it—but there was a proposed DOJ-created settlement structure using taxpayer money that critics said could benefit Trump’s allies."

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

lee wrote on Jul 23^rd, 2026 at 7:02pm:

lee wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 4:49pm: According to duck.ai - "No clear evidence shows that Donald Trump himself “took” or personally received direct U.S. government funds for his own Kazakh mining venture." lee wrote on Jul 22nd, 2026 at 3:32pm: Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jul 21st, 2026 at 4:26pm: But you're okay with your DL helping himself to $1.8 bil in government funds and demanding tax exemptions for life? Your words. Duck AI - "There isn’t evidence (in the reporting I found) that Trump personally “took” government money for himself in the way you might mean it—but there was a proposed DOJ-created settlement structure using taxpayer money that critics said could benefit Trump’s allies." ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Sorry, Lee, this is just you repeating words you put into AI and giggling.

You've been asked why you're carrying on like this. Like, what's in it for you?

This question involves a little self reflection. Can you do that?

Can you provide an answer?

Because you were the one claimed "Your DL has indeed taken direct government funds for himself. $1.6 bil in government funds were paid out directly to fund his own Kazakstani mining venture. " Amongst other things. It juyst shows you for the liar you are.

We once had a poster called Laugh.
I believe he drowned in the bath.
He hated old Joe - over Gaza, you know.
So he switched to DL for a laugh.

Now Joe got the flick, then Karmala came quick
But Laugh couldn't handle the change.
They're as bad as each other, he said feeling sick,
On Israel, they're fuckin' deranged.

Oh? We asked Laugh,
There's only one other path.
You know who'll get in if not she.
I don't care, said our friend,
These leftards must end,
So he went for DL and JD.

We warned him, of course.
He'd feel endless remorse
If DL got in and began.
You'll get more endless war,
Gazan kiddies galore
Will get fingered and killed and what for?

That's only the start, he'll tear the US apart
And put tariffs on the rest of the world.
If he's not invading, he'll be busily stealing
And endlessly clutching his pearls.

Don't worry, Laugh said,
You'll have a stroke, end up dead,
It's only a barrel of fun.
Let DL get in, wreck the joint, do us in.
Let him kill it and let's start again.

DL got erected, Laugh left all corrected,
Off with a puff and a poof!
Now DL is in, Laugh has gone with a grin,
Laughing his affro away.

The moral is this: take care what you wish,
The alternative may be worse than you thought.
Karmala might be a bore, but look what you've wrought
Not just on the Yanks, but us all.

The stock market's been bashed, our economy will crash,
The price of oil's gone through the roof.
He's tariffed the farm, he's invaded Iran,
Now he's looking for more wars to send troops.

He sent DOGE to save bucks, they got rather stuck
They could only find two hundred mil.
They cut food stamps and meds, they cut foreign aid
A million Sudan kiddies died.
But DL's kids thrived, they did deals on the side,
Their dad pulled in four bil in bribes.

Now Lee, he felt hurt. So unfair he did blurt,
They're all as bad as the last.
How so? We asked Lee. He refused to concede.
He posted us giggles and fleed.

They all go in the end - Laugh, Lee and their friends,
The leftards, the retards, the lot.
Laugh went off in a fright, like a thief in the night,
Lee may well do the same in the end.

DL will leave too, just as you do,
Off in a huff with a hiss
When the next one's sworn in,
Lee will sing a new tune, his DL he will sorely miss.
Corruption! He'll shriek, so mean and unfair!
Why can't DL stay on? It's too hard to bear!

That's okay, we'll explain, DL's happy and gay.
He's at least ten bil up from before.
He's pardoned the kids, they've moved to new digs,
They're all currently counting the score.

Late in the night, if you wake in a fright,
Wondering how your super's performing,
There's not much to do, DL's off with the loot,
The broligarchs stealing the rest.

It could well be worse, we're not in Iran,
Greenland or Cuba or Venezuela.
Until Pauline gets in, we're still happy and free
Down here in lucky Australia.

Nice doggerel. Any truth in it? ;)

lee wrote on Jul 25^th, 2026 at 1:41pm:

Nice doggerel. Any truth in it? ;)

A question, is it? You couldn't even answer a multiple, you poor old thing.

You're pretty much on autobot now, Lee, but do you know?

Once you push that switch, there's no coming back. Bobby and Aquascoot, I'm afraid, will never be themselves again.

Before this administration's done, you'll be posting giggles only, we guarantee that.

No more words for you, dear. You'll be gone.

How does it feeeeeel?

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 25^th, 2026 at 9:23pm:

Before this administration's done, you'll be posting giggles only, we guarantee that.

Ah. And what happens if I don't post giggles only? Just what is your "guarantee" worth? ;)


Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 25^th, 2026 at 9:23pm:

How does it feeeeeel?

it feels like yout on the back foot already. ::)

https://i.postimg.cc/YCCR9qnY/Screenshot-2026-07-26-073400.png

lee wrote on Jul 26^th, 2026 at 12:47pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 25th, 2026 at 9:23pm: Before this administration's done, you'll be posting giggles only, we guarantee that. Ah. And what happens if I don't post giggles only? Just what is your "guarantee" worth? ;) Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 25th, 2026 at 9:23pm: How does it feeeeeel? it feels like yout on the back foot already. ::)

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

lee wrote on Jul 26^th, 2026 at 12:59pm:

https://i.postimg.cc/YCCR9qnY/Screenshot-2026-07-26-073400.png

That’s precisely what Trump and his administration is doing…

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jul 26^th, 2026 at 3:02pm:

That’s precisely what Trump and his administration is doing…

Oh noes. Now Trump is a "liberal" aka Democrat. ::)

Todd Blanche Confirmed as U.S. Attorney General

The next step on his road to disbarment  :)

So much so for those meaningless little torchings, when the end result ultimately failed to stop his confirmation. Todd wins and Trump wins the big prize :)

LearJett wrote on Aug 9^th, 2026 at 3:24pm:

So much so for those meaningless little torchings, when the end result ultimately failed to stop his confirmation. Todd wins and Trump wins the big prize :)

Torchings? DL's a war president, Lear. You'd hardly suggest an AG approval's a big prize when DL's fighting for his life over in Iran, now would you?

Do you have any opinion on DL's progress?

Cheers.